Microsoft's $300 million makeover

By | May 20, 2008, 7:00am PDT

Summary: Remember that $300 million consumer ad campaign that Microsoft awarded earlier this year? New specifics are emerging on how the ad agency that won the deal — Crispin Porter + Bogusky — is starting its task of rebranding Microsoft as a cool company.

Remember that $300 million consumer ad campaign that Microsoft awarded earlier this year?

New specifics are emerging on how the ad agency that won the deal — Crispin Porter + Bogusky — is starting its task of rebranding Microsoft as a cool company. Crispin Porter counts Burger King, Molson, Volkswagon and Virgin Atlantic among its high-flying clients.

The Crispin folks say they like a challenge. They have one on their hands with the Softies. From the Fast Company article on the ad agency:

“Microsoft’s already problematic reputation in some circles — as the soulless, power-hungry purveyor of lackluster products — has suffered a series of self-inflicted wounds. It spent two years and $500 million on the media blitz around the long-delayed Windows Vista launch, only to see the January 2007 ‘Wow’ campaign, which likened Microsoft’s new operating system to Woodstock and the fall of the Berlin Wall, derided as arrogant and creatively void.”

Can Microsoft ever be seen as hip as Apple? Seems like a tall order. The article continues:

Countering that (Microsoft) nebbishy, pocket-protected image now falls to Crispin. And Bogusky’s team is revved up at the prospect. ‘There was a time,’ says Jeff Hicks, Crispin’s CEO, ‘when it was Avis against Hertz, Coke against Pepsi, Visa against American Express. I think Microsoft is at the epicenter of the great brand challenge of the next decade — or millennium.’”

If you were helping Crispin spend that $300 million, what would you do to try to help Microsoft out of its Vista marketing morass? One blogger thinks Microsoft would be well-served to use Chairman Bill Gates, in spite of his imminent retirement from day-to-day duties at Microsoft, as the centerpiece of its campaign. Thoughts?

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Topics

Mary Jo has covered the tech industry for more than 25 years for a variety of publications and Web sites, and is a frequent guest on radio, TV and podcasts, speaking about all things Microsoft-related. She is the author of Microsoft 2.0: How Microsoft plans to stay relevant in the post-Gates era (John Wiley & Sons, 2008).

Disclosure

Mary-Jo Foley

Freelance journalist/blogger Mary Jo Foley has nothing to disclose. WYSIWYG (what you see is what you get). I do not own Microsoft stock or stock in any of its partners or competitors. I have no business ventures that are sponsored by/funded by Microsoft or any of its partners or competitors.

Biography

Mary-Jo Foley

Mary Jo Foley has covered the tech industry for 25 years for a variety of publications, including ZDNet, eWeek and Baseline. She has kept close tabs on Microsoft strategy, products and technologies for the past 10 years. In the late 1990s, she penned the award-winning "At The Evil Empire" column for ZDNet, and more recently the Microsoft Watch blog for Ziff Davis.

Got a tip? Send her an email with your rants, rumors, tips and tattles. Confidentiality guaranteed.

54
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

RE: Microsoft's $300 million makeover
makrejktt83-24353644081278398028281453544802 Updated - 11th Nov
Lovely nfl jersey online site. Quite a lot Detroit Lions Jerseys of very helpful fine points there. My corporation is e-mailing it then having a fgreen bay packers jerseys ellows!
0 Votes
+ -
I'm For Gates
brightstarbeing 20th May 2008
It works for Apple. why not turn Apple's lovable, but inept buisiness type into Bill and fight fire with fire?
0 Votes
+ -
Gates???
Userama 20th May 2008
And how would that help counter the "nebbishy, pocket-protected" image? Mega-bad idea.
They can't undo the damage they have done to the tech world, and to the image of the US.

A few million quid of stolen money at an ad agency isn't going to convince the people that are worth convincing.

Only global co-operation will do.
0 Votes
+ -
Yeah.
spookyone1 24th May 2008
Gates is not Jobs. Won't work. Gates is exactly what MS
doesn't want to portray themselves as.
0 Votes
+ -
sell the company...
Arnout Groen 20th May 2008
there's no way, that M$ is getting a better name because of this "stunt"..

They can take classes about ethics, morality etc.. all they like, but they're too far gone.
0 Votes
+ -
Read "The Power of Focus"
SwitchStories 20th May 2008
Steve Ballmer should read "The Power of Focus" so they improve their CORE products and services instead of trying to serve everything from consoles, through CRM systems, Surface to operating systems. Vista was the example of how you can spoil your best asset.
0 Votes
+ -
Amen, brother (or sister)...
jscarey 20th May 2008
The farther away from its core, the chances of any company faltering increase significantly.

Hold out a couple of grand to spend on Starbucks gift cards and t-shirts then take the rest to India, buy a city of programmers who don't think customers have endless resources (money and memory) to create a svelte and stable product(s), send copies to bloggers (along with the aforementioned GC's and T's), make a YouTube video or two and don't release 39 crippled sub-versions.

Oh, and I only want 10% to direct the campaign. It's not much I know, but I'll scrimp and use coupons; I think the sacrifice is worth preserving the proud legacy of customer service that is MS!

Has anybody bought a "big-ass" wall computer to go with their "big-ass" table computer, yet? How 'bout one of those sexy BROWN zunes? I don't think anyone loves their x-box toaster the way I do....

I'd switch to OSX, but I live in Florida and those black mock turtlenecks are just too warm.
upper management. It will take a long time to make MS look like a cool company, and they first have to BE a cool company before you start the ad campaign.
0 Votes
+ -
And Monkey Boy...
Dave32265 3rd Apr 2009
should be the first to go.

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=1274983729713522403

And this is the CEO of a major corporation. NOT COOL!
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Microsoft's $300 million makeover
Return_of_the_jedi 14th Oct
@DonnieBoy

Welcome back.
0 Votes
+ -
MS needs a sustained ad campaign ...
P. Douglas 20th May 2008
... for its overall and consumer products images. MS just can't do it for a while and then stop, and hope to counter Apple and its other competitors. Also MS' ads need to be very impactful. Apple's consumer ads are extremely impactful and has completely blunted Zune's uptake, and has propelled the iPhone to sales levels almost no one imagined possible. MS may be in for a sustained ad war against Apple in the consumer front - particularly when it releases Windows Mobile 7. If MS begins to win, it may throttle its ad campaign down a bit. Apple has shown however, that you boost your sales a lot in the consumer market using lots of ads - even when you don't have strong competitors around.
0 Votes
+ -
I don't envy the ad agency's job
j.m.galvin 20th May 2008
ALL marketing boils down to one
thing: Positively differentiating
yourself from competitors.

MS's only competition in the US is
Apple.

The difference is that Apple is a
computer that runs its own OS.
Windows is an OS that runs on
many different brands. If I want
a Mac, I buy an Apple machine.

If I buy a Windows machine, I get
a Dell, HP, Gateway, etc.
Windows is only the underlying
OS. That makes it hard for MS to
differentiate since there in no
Microsoft brand computer.

Apple has taken advantage of
this in its advertising. You never
hear the word Dell, or Gateway.
Apple simply refers to 'PC" -
differentiating itself from ALL
other computers.

MS's problem is exacerbated by
the very fact of its near monopoly
position. Vista would have to
contain something unbelievable
to get people to replace their
present Windows machine. Vista
does not offer that. It may or
may not be "better" than XP, but
it does not really have anything exceptionally new.

Lastly, Vista does suffer a
negative perception. The cause,
or correctness, of that perception
is irrelevant. Whether the
negative perception is MS's fault,
the fault of PC makers offering
underpowered machines,
peripheral makers making poor
drivers, or bloatware loaded on
OEM machines is irrelevant in the
consumers' eye. Overcoming
that perception will be very
difficult.
0 Votes
+ -
Vista
GTWilson 22nd May 2008
Vista looks to be Microsoft's Micro-Channel in a way.
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Microsoft's $300 million makeover
Digital_Dame 20th May 2008
I think Crispin is a great choice. They(MSFT)let the general perception of nerdy, uncool, and boring ridigity last way too long with the MAC verses PC ads that have been running...Look everyone wants to "date" the Mac Dude, but you don't marry him ..you marry the tried and true PC guy. He shows up, and represents decent security(okay maybe).
If they really want to change their image, they should stop letting their marketing department dictate their product strategy. There is no way in hell the Vista fiasco was a product of the desires of software engineers. Programmers would NOT create an OS and then take tons of extra time to cripple it intentionally by choice. The multiple crippled SKU crap was obviously forced down their throats by marketing-types. If the programmers were left alone to create a great product, I'm certain we'd have a better and more current OS than we do.

That's one BIG difference in consumer perception between Apple and Microsoft. Apple seems to let their smart people create the cool products they want to create. Microsoft seems to force their smart people to create whatever crap their marketers want to sell.
0 Votes
+ -
Baloney.
Userama 20th May 2008
Isn't it marketing's job know what the user wants, and provide inputs to the designers to come up with a user-pleasing product? That works just fine at Apple, where Steve Jobs, a first-class marketeer, influences the designs and ends up with first-class products.

It seems to me that at Microsoft, it's more the nerdy tech types that are steering the ship, and the result is nerdy, complicated, difficult-to-use products. Leaving software designers to magically create wonderfulness by themselves is a pipe dream. You need a strong, visionary leader who knows what people like, and steers the designers to implement it. That isn't happening at Microsoft.
0 Votes
+ -
Really?
techconc 21st May 2008
"It seems to me that at Microsoft, it's more the nerdy
tech types that are steering the ship, and the result is
nerdy, complicated, difficult-to-use products. "


Was it the nerdy tech types that decided Vista needed to
ship with 5 SKUs? I wouldn't think so.

"You need a strong, visionary leader who knows what
people like, and steers the designers to implement it. That
isn't happening at Microsoft."


Agreed. Gates, Ballmer, etc. may well be good at
negotiating deals, etc. but they are far from visionaries.
Microsoft products are designed by committees, etc. For
this reason, they're not particularly innovative. If Microsoft
wants to be cool like Apple, they need to innovate and
produce cool products like Apple. Microsoft needs to be
first to market or really pioneer new territory rather than
competing against last year's products. Microsoft needs a
corporate culture that not only supports but promotes this
behavior.

It's almost comical that Microsoft believes their image can
be changed by advertising alone. That's only part of the
equation. No matter how great the advertising is, if the
products (and company actions) are nothing to get excited
about, no amount of advertising is going to change that.
Throwing more money at their advertising budget alone
won't help.
0 Votes
+ -
Does having umpteen SKUs...
Userama 21st May 2008
...really affect the basic usability of each product? Doesn't seem like there's much of a connection there.

But I agree with you that the multiple SKU thing was a boneheaded marketing decision because of the customer confusion it caused.
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Microsoft's $300 million makeover
Loverock Davidson 20th May 2008
Microsoft doesn't need any help. They have been an industry leader for decades. The ad campaign will just help spread the word. They could advertise the Microsoft's products, the advantages of using them, the cost savings of using them, the security and stability of Microsoft products... there is no limit to what they can advertise. I just hope they don't get caught up in the mess of " and I'm a pc" and actually tell the truth instead of the lies we currently watch in those commercials.
"the security and stability of Microsoft products"

Absolutely hilarious !

.
0 Votes
+ -
now it's just getting tiresome.
0 Votes
+ -
Microsoft spent 100 million on the Zune launch (and god
knows how many millions on product development) and after
2 years the "iPod Killer" even with heavily subsidized and
discounted units has sold 2 million Zunes, in the same period
Apple sold 76 million ipods.
0 Votes
+ -
Then thats great news for MS
AllKnowingAllSeeing 21st May 2008
Considering Apple sold 100 million iPods (all models combined) since 2001 (7 years ago) and MS sold 2 million in 18 months.

Now, if your numbers are right and Apples old 76 millon iPods in that 18 month period, then it would mean that the other 5-1/2 years they sold roughly 480,000 iPods a year from 2001 to end of 2006

Seems like Microsoft is off to a much better start then Apple was.
0 Votes
+ -
How Many Macs in Africa?
public@... 20th May 2008
Or in South America...or the eastern Bloc?
While Macs are nice machines with great design cues and certainly do get the job done...the pc is still the machine that computes solutions to world hunger in Zagreb..that designs graphics in Buenos Aires, that browses the web in Soweto (I kid you not).

If market penetration means anything...Microsoft (via it's creation...the PC) is a great success on a golbal scale while Mac is an Boutique corperation catering to the wealthy fashionista types.

How many small businesses are built around the repackaging of old MAC components and software onto newish motherboards and processors? Not many...yet the PC and it's "rube goldgergian" ability to be snapped together from disparate parts have created many thousands of jobs around the world.

I have always said that as time goes on PC's will become Macish and Macs will be come PCish...and we are seeing that now...but in the end....the average (worldwide) user does not really care who makes the hammer...or even the nail. Brand loyalty...or even brand preference... is a rich man's game, like he stock market...in which I have profited from both companies evolutions.
0 Votes
+ -
How Tolkien-esque!
zkiwi 20th May 2008
Mac-ish and PC-ish... Sounds kind of like the Treebeard's view on the Ents over time.

However, I prefer to think of PC's as Orcs, a corruption of the Elves (the Macs). Mind you, some people think I'm overly fond of Macs, so go figure.
0 Votes
+ -
Good Point - Ironically
David Blomstrom 22nd May 2008
Microsoft and Apple have completely different business styles; Bill Gates excels at exploiting poor nations around the world, while Apple focuses more on innovation. What you describe as "market penetration" could more honestly be labeled monopolism.

Do some research on the Gates Foundation, Bill Gates' phony philanthropic racket. Not only is it an investment firm, it's eerily similar to Microsoft in its operating style and profit motive. In other words, it's little more than a Microsoft subsidiary.

Anywhere there are sick, starving or poor children to be exploited, you'll probably see Bill Gates and his father drop in for a photo op eventualy.

David Blomstrom
Anti-M$ Political Candidate
0 Votes
+ -
Are the really THAT evil?
public@... 23rd May 2008
While I understand the thrust of your point I think that it is a bit too err...one sided. I know that you know that Apple & Steve Jobs are as obsessed with profit and share value as is Microsoft & Bill G.. I believe that the head of any multinational corporation would love to find himself in the position of having such a ubiquitous presence that any attempt to improve it further is seen as monopolistic.

In the case of Microsoft I think that the government has done it's job. There are plenty of choices in all segments of the computing field and there are new startups all the time. Granted...they did assasinate that web browser company...but that was a long time ago and who cares anyway. The same thing will probably happen with virtualization...how horrible for all of us to find something that we once paid for suddenly built into something else that we pay for. Sort of like when the automobile companies decided to include bodies on the cars they were selling and suddenly all of these "coachworks" companies were forced out of business.

Re the charity...Im sure that like most charities it is born from the fact that you can give it to the government or you can give it away yourself. Like any large charitable org with a big endowment the old mantra "never touch the principle" is often in force. Thus, the more profit the charitable org can generate via its investments...the more money they can give away.

More money = good.... Bill and Steve nod their heads.
Right.... blood money, guts money, arm money, leg money, finger money, toe money, knee-cap money, elbow money, any kind of money, it don't matter. Maybe even a little honest money to hide the rest behind.

The end justifies the means. It's just business as usual. Nothing personal, y'understand? Don't worry if you see a gigantic barracuda coming at you. There's lots of other smaller fishies who would love to do the same business as usual.
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Microsoft's $300 million makeover
Return_of_the_jedi 14th Oct
@Ole Man

Welcome back.
0 Votes
+ -
Ans: approx .01% of the computers in Africa
myother Updated - 3rd Apr 2009
To answer your question from an informed perspective (IDC Reports) - Macs make up about .01% of the computers in Africa which by the way is about the same ratio of Linux to Windows installations worldwide. In Africa, we own what we have paid for in cash not credit so the utility value of any purchase is the determining factor - you are right, the Mac/PC War for most was over a long time ago. The last fires in Europe and America will be smothered out by the same downpour that is washing away credit and a lifestyle that is divorced from reality.
0 Votes
+ -
linux installations
peter@... 3rd Apr 2009
>which by the way is about the same ratio of Linux to Windows installations worldwide

You have ABSOLUTELY NO IDEA how many Linux installations there are worldwide. Nor does anyone else.
0 Votes
+ -
Wrong tack
johnfenjackson@... 20th May 2008
"I suspect what Microsoft would most like to instill in people's minds is they are innovators and leaders, and that's what they think of as being cool."

This is precisely the mistake M$ made with VISTA. Did we believe the BS?

Until M$ produce a genuine innovation JOBS will keep eating their lunch.

Make M$ appear cool? "Your mission Jim, should you decide to accept it ... should any of your team be caught or killed the secretary will disavow all knowledge of your actions."

Campaign start date July? Unless we see new product it will simply help write the next App??e sketch.

I think M$ should do the exact opposite ... I think they should start working WITH people.
0 Votes
+ -
Step 1:
Henry Miller 20th May 2008
Fire Ballmer and the rest of the senior executives. They're too closely associated with Microsoft's history of predation, dirty tricks, and seeking and abusing it's near monopoly.

Step 2: Stop the dirty tricks, et. al.

Unless MS fixes the foregoing, no ad agency on the plant will be able fix their image.
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Microsoft's $300 million makeover
davisnewman 20th May 2008
It's not what you say, It's what you do. Microsoft has to decide if they want to change or just change their story. Or as Dr. Phil would say, "If you don't own it, you can't change it."
0 Votes
+ -
Take the Dell Advice...
Jeremy W 20th May 2008
shut it down and return the money to the shareholders.

This is a company whose most important products
have all been failures: Vista, WinMobile, Zune, Spot,
Playsforsure, etc.

The management is obviously failing. Putting lipstick
on this pig will not do it, especially with an oaf like
Ballmer at the helm.
0 Votes
+ -
"Microsoft (via it's creation...the PC)"

Wow, Microsoft created the PC! Please update the Personal
Computer entries on Wikipedia. They are full erroneous facts.
0 Votes
+ -
MS needs more than just PR
TtfnJohn 21st May 2008
And having Bill Gates, as powerful an icon as he is at the centre of a rebranding campaign won't accomplish it.

For example, while Vista may not be a technical failure it certainly reminds one of a three-legged horse. Vista is, on the other hand, completely dead as a marketing success. And please don't bore me about licenses sold that data doesn't have a thing to do with how many Vista desktops are actually in use out there.

The smell around Vista, for better or worse, is close to a carnal house and no amount of rebranding will save it from the smell. Facts be damned.

(This is similar to the oft repeated lie that Linux is hard to install and doesn't support things like WiFi. Sadly that's distro specific though I can tell you that the major distros such as Fedora, Ubuntu, Mandriva, PCLinuxOS, SUSE etc are, in many ways far easier to install than Windows is from a clean start. And they do support most hardware and wifi now, too. Facts, again, be damned.)

If there is to be a real rebranding of Microsoft it has to be focused on being something less than the 20 year reputation as a rapacious predator. In other words, the ad agency has to convince MS to be a better partner with the rest of the IT world and not the constant aggressor.

Now, just how you convince a salesman like Ballmer to do that when all his sales instincts scream "Microsoft Uber Alles" (like any good salesman) is beyond me.

Microsoft doesn't need to be seen as cool. On one side Apple has that locked up and not even Bill Gates is a Steve Jobs. The other side of cool is the FLOSS world led by Linux where people basically get to tinker a whole bunch, play around and not worry about pappy MS whacking them. (Or mama Apple either, if to comes to that.) Microsoft needs to be rebranded as a stable and reliable partner of its business customers and of the IT world at large.

In short it needs to learn cooperation. A large dash of humility would help too.

Overcoming Microsoft's increasingly bad reputation for any number of things, including it's products and it's unfocused want (as opposed to need) for "world domination", its combative attitude about just about anything and it's complete failure to understand the "wired world" illustrated by the Internet and to actually compete there much less thrive is going to be a major challenge for anyone attempting to rebrand them.

It will be impossible if the attitude at the top of the House of Microsoft and the company as a whole doesn't change and soften.

It is possible, after all. It wasn't that long ago that IBM was the Goliath on the PC block until they badly misstepped and a younger, focused, nimbler Microsoft supplanted them. Their rebranding took more than a decade to accomplish and now they're one of the good guys.

I'll agree that casting Gates as a spokesman for Microsoft is a good idea once other things are accomplished. In the world of personal computing those who truly understand the power of these devices and can speak about them really come down to three, no matter what you (or I), think of them. Bill Gates, Steve Jobs, Linus Torvalds. They have different visions but all three do understand what the PC can do and can communicate it.

I'm not sure Microsoft has the luxury of the decade that IBM took to reinvent itself. Nor does it have the similar time frame for the Lazarus like rebirth of Apple. It will lose market share on all fronts in the meantime. Strangely, I think that more than anything will actually save Microsoft by focusing them again and teaching them, because the do need to remember it, that they are not the God of computing.

ttfn

John
0 Votes
+ -
Wasted money
nizuse 21st May 2008
Anyone who remotely thinks that MS can be seen as cool has his head stuck in the toilet.

Further, it's a waste of money: it could be put to better use somewhere else.

Finally, the mere fact that MS is able to spend 300m on this shows they've got too much money. But then again we knew already: BS upgrades, BS VISTA, BS rip off licensing models etc. I dare to say that MS has not benefited the world economy: by killing off innovation with illegal and predatory practices, MS alone is guilty of stagnation in innovation for decades. Time to break up the company and get some real competition back in the game.
0 Votes
+ -
Lost Cause (Blowback)
David Blomstrom 22nd May 2008
Microsoft will never have a good
public image. A global crime
spree spanning decades has
simply earned too many enemies.
Moreover, Microsoft can never be
separated from its worst enemy -
Bill Gates.

Let me give you an example of
Gates' clinical arrogance and
greed. As I write this, the world is
mourning for Burma and China,
where millions have been killed
or left homeless by natural
disasters. So how does Mr.
Philanthropist, who all but claims
to have a finger on the planet's
pulse 24/7 react?

He jumps in his private jet and
zips over to South Korea, where
he gives an Xbox inlaid with
mother-of-pearl to the
president, calling it a symbol of
"Peace."

The Xbox is widely criticized for
its often violent games; it has
even been associated with
murder. Not only is this one of
the tackiest sales pitches in
history, it makes one question
Bill Gates' sanity.

As I said, Bill Gates has hurt too
many people, earning a lot of
enemies. I predict growing global
blowback, likely centered in Latin
America. In the meantime, I'm
running for public office and
using my campaign to blast
Billysoft - right here in Seattle.

I've also launched a new anti-
Microsoft website at
www.billysoft.org.

It's about time someone held Bill
Gates and his crooked attorney
father accountable.

David Blomstrom
0 Votes
+ -
Your site is for me, Dave
Ole Man 22nd May 2008
Thanks!
0 Votes
+ -
This has been debated in other articles... How to regain the mindshare that Microsoft has lost?

Microsoft, for many years, didn't want to interoperate with anyone else. Now they have a problem with everyone picking on them - telling them what they may and may not do. (USA, EU, South Korea, Japan)

It must suck for them.

The smart move would be to build a shell on top of BSD. For backwards compatibility, contribute to the Wine project to ensure its success.

Being 'transparent' with the world is what the world is asking for. Nobody wants to be locked in to any software vendor.

I would rather develop my applications to be cross-platform. You see, just because I prefer to use a non-Microsoft OS, doesn't mean I should force my customers to do the same. Choice. I've made mine, but am willing to let others make theirs.

If Microsoft were to do this, and do it right, they would not have to deal with Monopoly restrictions AND their value, at least in the minds of the technical elite, would skyrocket. That would make them a cool company, then the PR firms job would be a cakewalk.

-Mike
0 Votes
+ -
More shareholder money wasted
Jeremy W 22nd May 2008
Companies that produce world class products do not
need to do top-to-bottom ad agency/marketing re-
dos.

They produce superb products. As P&G or Johnson &
Johnson.

This is yet another symptom of Bloat marketing: the
chronic and incessant over pushing of products that
can best be described as relentlessly mediocre.

If anyone asks what is the best mobile device, chances
are the answer will be iPhone rather than the seventh
evolution WinMobile. Why? It is simply because MSFT
produces junk, mediocre products motivated by a "to-
hell-with-'em" monopolist attitude.

The Bloatfarm always approaches its product development on the basis that it will tie whatever
product back to the mother ship of Win or Office. The
result is products (Vista, Xbox, Zune, WinMobile,
Playsforsure, Spot, etc.) that win no awards and mostly
frustrate the users. Has anyone ever found a
WinMobile user who is happy? I used almost a dozen
before I gave up on the WinCrapware in them. Sigh.

In the end, who really wants this junk?

Yesterday, MSFT took another step further down the road of mediocrity: paying the user to use its mediocre
search tools. Hello, paying the user? I thought this
was a service that people would be glad to use.

Immediately after the announcement, its stock price
dropped almost $4 billion.

Yup, this is another "innovation."
They said Podcasting was awesome but choose not to embrace it.

What so cool about this?
0 Votes
+ -
It's like...
gtdworak 23rd May 2008
Putting lipstick on a pig.
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Microsoft's $300 million makeover
jmqwerty 22nd Aug 2008
trying to make a silk purse out of a sow's ear?
300 million more poured on top of 500 million you say? 800 million to try and make over crappy software, money better spent giving stockholders something to apologize for wasting their money in the last years making vista
0 Votes
+ -
Why bother?
springerj Updated - 3rd Apr 2009
MS is an OS monopolist. People like you and me aren't their
customers; the likes of Dell and HP are. They could care less
what people think about them, since it has zero impact on
sales.

Of course they would like to get some other businesses and
they're having trouble leveraging their monopoly to do it, since
that's illegal. Unfortunately people's attitudes isn't the
problem. Products and behavior are the problem. All the
advertising in the world won't turn the frog into prince
charming. You can use advertising to educate and reinforce
who you are, but it can't change who you are.


0 Votes
+ -
VolkswagEn
Fixer77 3rd Apr 2009
...not VolkswagOn.
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Microsoft's $300 million makeover
robertmlsw@... 3rd Apr 2009
Maybe Gates could go on Dancing with the Stars? Seriously communication is the issue with Vista- you not only can't communicate with a Mac, you can't communicate with another Vista Box half of the time.
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Microsoft's $300 million makeover
Jackie150 14th Oct 2009
Microsoft has been testing FCI internally, said Ward Ralston, Windows Server Product Manager. sexy costumesAnother new capability Microsoft has added to the Windows Server 2008 R2 RC is support for 64 logical processors with Hyper-V.
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Microsoft's $300 million makeover
makrejktt83-24353644081278398028281453544802 Updated - 11th Nov
Lovely nfl jersey online site. Quite a lot Detroit Lions Jerseys of very helpful fine points there. My corporation is e-mailing it then having a fgreen bay packers jerseys ellows!

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix