Office 2010: RTM's getting closer

Summary: Yes, Microsoft officials have been saying Office 2010, the next version of the company's desktop productivity suite, will be available by June 2010. But you know those under-promise/over-deliver-focused Office guys always like to beat their own deadlines. I'm expecting they'll do it again this time around ... and by more than a few months.

Yes, Microsoft officials have been saying Office 2010, the next version of the company's desktop productivity suite, will be available by June 2010. But you know those under-promise/over-deliver-focused Office guys always like to beat their own deadlines. I'm expecting they'll do it again this time around ... and by more than a few months.

Microsoft is confirming this week that it has provided its Technology Adoption Program (TAP) members with the near-final Release Candidate of Office 2010. The company isn't planning to provide any more public test releases of Office 2010, however. A spokesperson sent the following update:

“Microsoft made a release candidate available to members in the technology adoption program (TAP). This is one of Microsoft’s planned milestones in the engineering process; however they do not have plans to make this new code set available broadly.”

Distributor Ingram Micro also has begun inviting select reseller partners to a March 1 "launch event" for Office 2010 at a Microsoft office in Canada. A "launch" can mean a lot of things in Microsoft's world. Sometimes the company launches products and later ships them; sometimes it uses "launch" to refer to the kick-off of marketing and training activities. But given various reports of possible Office 2010 escrow builds in the wild, I wouldn't be surprised to see Office 2010 be released to manufacturing sooner rather than later.

From the Ingram invitation (a copy of which one reader shared with me):

"Now easier to sell, Microsoft Office 2010 helps you grow your revenue, increase profitability, and meet evolving customer demands.  With a streamlined product line and easier sales process, Office 2010 helps save you time, effort, and money by reducing complexity and shortening sales cycles for the world’s most popular productivity suite."

I'd be interested to hear what tricks Microsoft has up its sleeve to shorten the Office 2010 sales cycles, at a time when competition is up, and economic pressures are preventing many businesses from upgrading... I'd expect Office Web Apps, the Webified versions of Word, Excel, PowerPoint and OneNote, to play a big part in the campaign. (Speaking of OWA, check out this nifty chart I found on one Microsoft blogger's site, which compares what Office 2010's locally installed Word, Excel, PowerPoint and OneNote will provide, feature-wise, vs. Office Web Apps.)

Microsoft officials aren't changing their public Office 2010 timing guidance. They are continuing to say that Office 2010 will be available by June 2010.

In related news, was I the only one who thought it odd that almost none of the recent reports about Google possibly launching an apps store for third-party products that will work with Google Apps mentioned Microsoft?

Microsoft already offers free add-ons and templates to Office from third-party vendors via the Office Online site. That same site also features a marketplace of paid third-party apps and services that complement Office. Microsoft and Intuit recently announced a deal via which users will be able to access hosted small-business productivity apps via Intuit's App Center marketplace.

Topics: Collaboration, Microsoft, Software

About

Mary Jo has covered the tech industry for more than 25 years for a variety of publications and Web sites, and is a frequent guest on radio, TV and podcasts, speaking about all things Microsoft-related. She is the author of Microsoft 2.0: How Microsoft plans to stay relevant in the post-Gates era (John Wiley & Sons, 2008).

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Talkback

27 comments
Log in or register to join the discussion
  • Waiting...

    I'm just waiting to read about various paper sizes, most likely using the term "baroque" somewhere in the comment.
    KTLA
    • Don't forget...

      1) Printing is dead, and office is bloated from all those formatting options!

      2) OO is far superior in all ways possible. It has way more features and it's free. (No, it's not, it doesn't, and you get what you pay for, but close enough)

      3) Activation, serial numbers, and genuine advantage (oh, the horror of having to use legitimate, paid-for software!)

      4) It has hundreds of bugs, is way too insecure, and never upgrades or installs right. (Except for the 99.99% of competent office users and admins)

      5) It doesn't run on linux and is not open source, therefore it is of no value.

      I thought maybe I can save the same redundant idiots some time by pre-emptively posting their drivel.
      crazydanr@...
      • LOL, #5 is my favorite :) nt

        nt
        SystemVoid
      • Haha... So if printing is dead...

        What separates it from OOo?

        I never understood that.
        The one and only, Cylon Centurion
        • OpenOffice is not much good either. For reading .doc and .docx attachments

          thouth, OpenOffice does work GREAT. There are fewer
          idiots every day attaching the garbage though . . .
          . .
          DonnieBoy
      • Pretty good list, except, OpenOffice is as bad a MS Office. It is just a

        good tool for reading attachments from idiots that
        use MS Office.

        Well, Google Docs works pretty good for reading MS
        Office attachments too - as long as they are not too
        complicated.
        DonnieBoy
        • So what you're saying is ...

          ... the GoogleDocs is only good for simple docs and that OO is crap.

          Thanks for clearing that up Donnie, and I am glad to see you've finally come to your senses on this matter after spending so many years trying to convince us all that OO is wonderful.

          http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-1009-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=22383&messageID=425662&tag=content;col1

          http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-9595-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=20709&messageID=396651&tag=content;col1

          Any half-decent developer can create a simple office app, but creating world-class products that meet the needs of 90% of the potential customer-base takes a whole heck of a lot of effort, skill and resources.
          de-void-21165590650301806002836337787023
      • That Was Good

        Nice pre-emptive strike. :)
        DarienHawk67
      • Number 1 is the best!

        [i]Printing is dead, and office is bloated from all those formatting options![/i]

        Now if only I could put a finger on who says that all the time....... :)
        John Zern
        • Open_Office does it all

          Without a LICENSE & LOSS of business revenue on
          bloated insecure software.
          linux_kernel
          • ^--- File this under #2, please (nt)

            nt
            crazydanr@...
          • Except for ...

            ... handling complex documents with lots of tables, multi-column layouts, embedded charts and spreadsheet data, embedded data pulled from live Databases, etc.

            OpenOffice is great as a free tool for simple scenarios, but it pales into insignificance compared to MS Office's level of sophistication and polish.

            Before you rush to condemn Office 2010, I strongly encourage you to download and try a copy - I have been more impressed with Office 2010 than any prior version of Office, and I've used every single edition ever released!
            de-void-21165590650301806002836337787023
          • No it doesn't

            Although Open Office may be fine for the average user. Open office is a poor substitute for Office for many of us. As far as bloat (you made a post further down the thread)...Open Office Calc runs slower than MS Office Excel in almost every category: http://blogs.zdnet.com/Ou/?p=480

            Here is a few things I can think of:

            Excel vs Calc

            1. Calc can only allow 65,536 rows in a spreadsheet.
            2. The data pilot used to replace Pivot Tables (only when you install the addin) doesn't support graphs
            3. I'm not aware of any Hyperion Essbase or Microsoft Analysis Services addins that allow you to connect to an OLAP cube.

            Word vs Writer

            1. Although many critisize the ribbon layout of Office 2007, it's mostly a learning curve thing. The ribbon is an improvement because it groups functionality better.
            2. Word supports LaTeX, which makes word documents that include formula's and mathematical equations look MUCH MUCH better.
            bmonsterman
  • RE: Office 2010: RTM's getting closer

    I just wonder about this. Office Web Apps is, I presume, considered to be a part of Office2010 and is built into Windows Live. Thus, do they have a dependancy on Windows Live Wave 4 being released before they can release Office2010?

    Just a thought.
    jamiet
    • Anxiously awaiting

      WLW 4. Good stuff coming along :)
      The one and only, Cylon Centurion
  • Their isn't enough there to upgrade more than 5% of your staff

    That's the truth :-(
    Over and Out
    • Nonsense

      Use it for a week and then tell me that.

      Office 2010 is to all prior versions of Office what Windows 7 is to all prior versions of Windows.

      It's been MASSIVELY improved in NUMEROUS areas. Outlook, in particular, is FAR faster, almost never blocks, hangs or stutters when dealing with BIG mailboxes and it's new thread compression feature is a VERY welcome addition. All other members of the Office suite have been subtly improved and enhanced across the board resulting in a significantly smoother, faster more stable product.
      de-void-21165590650301806002836337787023
      • Customer Focused for a Change

        The folks out in Redmond took great effort in making Office 2010 something hospitable, having completely reworked many features to be easier to use and work with for your average user.

        However, they need to follow that philosophy with everything that they do. Not just when they feel like it. ;)
        tawells
    • You've nailed it...

      Too bad they are locking it down already (but I was expecting it). I've been using the 2010 Beta since it was released, and am still sending in comments (adding to my 60+ observations so far). Not that I expected them to act on many (any?) of my suggestions before GA.

      You are right, the incremental change between Office 2007 and 2010 is about the same as between Office 2000 and 2002 (excluding the 2010 "improvements" to Outlook which I haven't tried).

      For the relatively few people who use the advanced features that have been enhanced there may be justification for the expenses (capital and re-training/loss of efficiency) of going from Menu to 2010 Ribbon "Gooey"

      As for no upgrades since Office 97, I can see that point of view too since for the "average" user they had all the features they needed back then.

      Sure the "capital cost" mentioned by de-void is in the ball park, but why spend even that much for small incremental changes (between 2007 & 2010) unless you need them to directly generate new revenue/reduce costs (not likely), especially in tight economic times.
      Ron_007
  • Hmmmmm, I got

    bored with Office upgrades shortly after Office 97.

    Next.
    SystemVoid