Ray Ozzie hangs up his Chief Software Architect hat

By | October 18, 2010, 1:54pm PDT

Summary: Just days after he started blogging again, Ray Ozzie has announced plans to retire from Microsoft. Ozzie is stepping down as Chief Software Architect, as Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer announced in an e-mail to employees on October 18.

Just days after he started blogging again, Ray Ozzie has announced plans to retire from Microsoft.

Ozzie is stepping down as Chief Software Architect, as Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer announced in an e-mail to employees on October 18. Ozzie will remain with the company for some undisclosed period of time to handle his teams’ transitions. He also will be “focusing his efforts in the broader area of entertainment, where Microsoft has many ongoing investments,” according to Ballmer’s mail.

Ballmer said he will not be appointing another Chief Software Architect. There’s no word on what Ozzie’s plans are following his Microsoft departure.

Ozzie joined Microsoft in 2005 and penned one of the most forward-looking memos in the company’s history (his “Internet Services Disruption” memo.) After that, he went quiet and made very few public appearances.

He championed Microsoft’s Live Mesh and FUSE Labs/Docs.com projects and also helped create the team that developed Windows Azure.

When I wrote my Microsoft 2.0 book in 2007, I questioned whether Ozzie was the right guy to fill Bill Gates’ Chief Software Architect’s shoes. I thought he’d end up as a researcher at Microsoft or in some other role. But I didn’t expect him to leave completely so soon…

Thoughts?

Update: In December 2009, Strategic News Service analyst Mark Anderson predicted Ozzie would leave Microsoft in the near-term.

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Topics

Mary Jo has covered the tech industry for more than 25 years for a variety of publications and Web sites, and is a frequent guest on radio, TV and podcasts, speaking about all things Microsoft-related. She is the author of Microsoft 2.0: How Microsoft plans to stay relevant in the post-Gates era (John Wiley & Sons, 2008).

Disclosure

Mary-Jo Foley

Freelance journalist/blogger Mary Jo Foley has nothing to disclose. WYSIWYG (what you see is what you get). I do not own Microsoft stock or stock in any of its partners or competitors. I have no business ventures that are sponsored by/funded by Microsoft or any of its partners or competitors.

Biography

Mary-Jo Foley

Mary Jo Foley has covered the tech industry for 25 years for a variety of publications, including ZDNet, eWeek and Baseline. She has kept close tabs on Microsoft strategy, products and technologies for the past 10 years. In the late 1990s, she penned the award-winning "At The Evil Empire" column for ZDNet, and more recently the Microsoft Watch blog for Ziff Davis.

Got a tip? Send her an email with your rants, rumors, tips and tattles. Confidentiality guaranteed.

Related Discussions on TechRepublic

Did you know you can take part in these discussions with your ZDNet membership?
73
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

RE: Ray Ozzie hangs up his Chief Software Architect hat
dsfwrryd88-24353648351994798997222005474665 10th Nov
nyxyuf,good post!
0 Votes
+ -
I wonder if this is his decision or someone elses..

Azure is big for MS but I can't say he had Bill's impact..
@kdimitris33 - and therein lies the entire issue. I don't think there is anyone who could step into Gates' shoes and command sufficient respect from the rest of the troops to cause them to rally to his side.

While he's a very capable guy, he just doesn't have the caliber to survive in Microsoft's ultra-competitive environment.
0 Votes
+ -
Time to promote ScottGu to CSA
LBiege 18th Oct 2010
He has my back.
0 Votes
+ -
He sees no reason to take the slow painful ride down into oblivion. He can get out now, take a good vacation to reflect, and then jump into a startup to fill Microsoft's vacuum as they slowly taper off. He was NEVER happy with the direction at Microsoft, they NEVER embraced his ideas (which would have been best for Microsoft), he hated Microsoft speak. Balmer, and a number of others, will ride the two sick monopolies as long as they can. Many more, like Ozzie, will leave.
@DonnieBoy You are an idiot.
0 Votes
+ -
As much as it hurts...
cosuna Updated - 19th Oct 2010
@Jimster480 : seems to me you're a MS fellow, afraid of change.

As for DonnieBoy, he might be troll sometimes, but today he's right. Microsoft is milking only three cows at this moment.

Windows, which is healthy but stuck in an old frame set (no ARM version, no pure touch interface, etc)

Office, on the other hand, which is an nice product with a clear path (Office 2010 is clearly touch oriented and the new file formats are thought out for web based interaction), but internal politics has hindered its evolution. MS prefers to dedicate resources creating an Office product for Windows Phone 7 (a limited Silverlight small screen offering) than create a full blown suite to compete with iWork for the iPad where the rewards are greater and the platform's establish. Also they can leverage the Mac Office team.

Finally, there's XBOX where Microsoft has currently the lead, but that can change any time.

So essentially Microsoft has been caught in IBM like vortex, in the middle of successful legacy and lots and lots of unsuccessful new products sucking the life of the three workhorses.
You and trolls like Donnie Boy who is 0 for 100000000 in his wishful thinking predictions don't seem to understand.
ARM is for consumer electronics and cannot power business class machines at this time.
But the larger point is just like SAAS and Cloud computing and list goes on and on....MS is not so much "lagging behind" but playing it conservatively.
You don't understand that it still has to serve nearly a billion users who will be on laptops and desktops to run their personal and business machines for years and years to come? YOu think they just drop 90% of their business to stay up with the cutting edge startups?

YOu are as foolhardy as DB. The technology being reported on ZDNET today reaches the lions share of users and businesses normally at least 10 years down the road. Use SAAS as a yard stick. It was going to be the death of MS over 10 years ago...and meanwhile MS found a way to keep it's current customers happy (software) with a firm grasp on the futres (serives).
That approach has kept them the leader they have been and still are today.

Cosuna, did you notice that MS revenues are still continuing to climb? When is the decrease going to occur that you and DB have been predicting for 10 years.
Any fool could predict a company will show some loss and be right eventually. When you are 90 years old, please come back and you can get the satisfaction of saying "I told you so".
IN the meanwhile, Azure is a very strong offering and if you've not tried the FREE online Office Live Apps, then you wouldn't know they blow Google out of the water and keep even low budgets in current technology with the best interface going.
You admit that they are doing the right things with Office now but didn't for a while. Why do you think that was? You don't realize it has as much to do with their client mix as anything?
I think MS revels in people like DB and apparently yourself thinking they are always behind, only to find out they are as healthy as ever with record revenues every year.
They are not a startup, so unless you are foolish, don't expect them to act like one. Most of those are a flash in the pan and teh technology they are pushing never reaches mainstream. It takes years for new technologies to settle in on something the mainstream will adopt but apparently that's not very clear to certain people here.
A slow steady mixed approach is needed by a large company like MS.
And as for the technology you claim they don't have, apparently you've not been following MS very well.
And WP7 is going to be a major phone contender, even though phones are not really Microsoft's gig.
Apple has skyrocketed but they have no path to future sales other than brand loyalty. There is no "infrastructure" to sustain it. It's consumer electronics and nothing more and as we all know, the star of that arena one day, can be knocked off much faster than in the world of, oh, let's say business software and the infrastructure it builds which lends itself to self perpetuating sales.

Sorry to burst your bubble but MS knows exactly what they are doing. Their record revenues show this, but keep your predictions going and some year down the road you are sure to be right. In the meantime the rest of us are getting our work done with the best software on the planet.
@Cosuna :

WP-7 is being developed for ARM, and includes touch. The balance which MS chooses to strike between WP-7 and "desktop" Windows isn't clear, at this moment, and netbooks+pad computers running WP7 with "too much" functionality WILL displace Windows "desktop sales....

But MS certainly has the resources to create and sell a non-crippled "Office" for WP7, if/when they choose to do so.
0 Votes
+ -
What about Ozzy Osborn?
comp_indiana 18th Oct 2010
I think he has a better grasp of technology than anyone at MSFT.
@comp_indiana: No. Not even close.

Ozzie is a really nice guy and is pretty good at the visionary stuff, but only in a very narrow, enterprise-centric field. He lacks the charisma and public-facing charm necessary to lead as the public face of Microsoft. And he definitely lacks the cold, hard, political chops necessary to win in head-to-head battles with the likes of Mundie and Muglia.
@De-Void Gates is charismatic? I like Bill. Bill is a super smart guy, but I've never thought of him as charismatic.
his personality. Ozzie personally could stand up to people, but, he did not have the position with power, and they could ignore him. Balmer could have given him the power, but, he was suckered by the other idiots.
@notsofast - I didn't say Gates had charisma. I said Ozzie DIDN'T. There's a big difference there.

Gates was/is as sharp as a tack and unbelievably tenacious - which is why he was able to meet all-comers head-on. Gates was the IT industry's equivalent of mad scientists like Einstein - brilliant mind and quirky as hell.

Ozzie had none of that . He was pretty smart, but not overly so. He was a nice guy, but didn't really exude the technical chops nor the breathtaking vision that others wanted to rally around.

Most of what he came up with has now been done: Azure. I get the feeling that once Azure transitioned to STB under BobMu, Ozzie had run out of ideas.
0 Votes
+ -
Scott Hanselman
xuniL_z 19th Oct 2010
happy
at Microsoft. Let the others take the long slow painful ride down.
0 Votes
+ -
dupe sorry
xuniL_z Updated - 19th Oct 2010
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Ray Ozzie hangs up his Chief Software Architect hat
unclefixer@... Updated - 18th Oct 2010
@comp_indiana I personally think it would be great to see Ozzy Osbourne working at Microsoft! After all, I'm a guitar geek, just disguised thinly as a computer geek! When you get down to brass tacks, it might be good for PR to have him there!
www.dfwsupergeek.com
@comp_indiana : how about kelly osborne. She could help revive Kin and the solve the SideKick mess.
0 Votes
+ -
A pity
Anonymous45 Updated - 18th Oct 2010
I really liked Ray's commitment to a more connected, open and privacy-respecting platform. I always remember his statement in his first company meeting "everyone online is partying like it's 1984"
0 Votes
+ -
Pooch Screw
rjohn05 18th Oct 2010
This is crazy. This man was one of the few people at that company that understood how to integrate the various "silos" of Microsoft to create great products.
This may hurt in the short run....but in the long run it will help. "Retiring" is better than just "leaving"
@htotten : "retiring" is just company speak for "we fired him, but don't want investors to cry foul for firing the only guy who could create a Microsoft for the next decade (2011-2021)". Spinning it that way, company will argue that he is senior and he needs a rest.
0 Votes
+ -
@cosuna
And, what proof do you have that this is not his decision??
0 Votes
+ -
@cosuna, can you please provide your credible source for this accusation?
Appreciate it. thanks.
0 Votes
+ -
MS should pick up someone from a small company how actually knows how to do things. You know like one of the ones it tries to copy. Only cost about 10M to create products that will bring in billions.
Ray did come from a small company and he ABSOLUTELY knows what he is doing.
0 Votes
+ -
@Don't Ask Me
Why don't someof you ZD Net talkback experts apply? Donnieboy???
0 Votes
+ -
What's the real inside story?
YukioCowboy 18th Oct 2010
MJF, please post the inside story here when you get it. Why did he really want to go? What does this say about Microsoft's internal politics and future products? Thx.
0 Votes
+ -
Contributr
The inside story
Mary Jo Foley 18th Oct 2010
My take (and not from anyone inside) is -- as I wrote -- wrong guy for the job. He had some big ideas and was good at forming teams. He championed a number of smaller projects and Azure at its outset. He didn't seem to want to be the public face of Microsoft's future.

There were rumors of internal political battles (including Mundie vs. Ozzie). I do not know how much of this was Ozzie deciding to leave vs. him being encouraged to leave. MJ
"I do know that Ozzie decided to leave but do NOT know if any of it involved any encouragement, or how much if so, for him to leave.

Thanks.
0 Votes
+ -
MS is becoming a headless chicken.

Seriously, and he's not hiring another chief architect??
@reinux Steve has decided to become his own Chief Architect wink He thinks he can do everything else better too, right?
0 Votes
+ -
Contributr
Chief Architect
Mary Jo Foley 18th Oct 2010
My two cents: Since Gates left, "Chief Software Architect" at Microsoft was more of a visionary title than an actual function that needed filling... MJ
0 Votes
+ -
@Mary Jo Foley - I never saw Gates as a visionary, either. I'm sure he's a nice guy, but throughout Microsoft's history, both he and Ballmer have been very poor at predicting which way technology is headed.

Only this year, Bill Gates was quoted as saying that the iPad would only ever be a niche product. Now iPad sales are exploding.
@Tree Frog: "A computer on every desk and in every home running Microsoft software".

That's a pretty good vision and one which a 23-year old college drop-out was laughed out of the room for proclaiming on more than one occasion.

After all ... IBM only predicted it'd sell 10,000 PC's in total ... ever. How could this spotty kid think he'd get a PC into every home? Ha ha ha ha ... oh crap ... he did it!
0 Votes
+ -
@reinux Do you think Ozzie bit the head off the chicken? wink
(very small joke there...)
www.dfwsupergeek.com
0 Votes
+ -
@unclefixer@... Oooh! But a classic!
@reinux...Ozzie was not the sole architect. It's been a long while since MS announced that he was acting as part of a team and not as a chief and sole architect.
0 Votes
+ -
Seriously, these departures are not good for the Company's image. I am sure Melinda will do a fine job running the Foundation while Billg returns. If Gates can't do it, then the next best person for the Chief Software Architect role is Stephen Sinofsky based on his results with Office and Windows 7.
@Mr. Dee : nah. Sinofsky is more a "legacy" guy. Ray was a "future looking" fellow, but it seems that Microsoft can't put one feet off "legacy" (aka Windows Vista) without loosing balance. Witness Windows 7 which is mostly a back port to C++ from Vista's mainly C# code.
@cosuna - you couldn't be more wrong.

Approximately 99% of Vista was written in C/C++. The only parts that were not written in C/C++ was the new Management Console shell and Powershell.

Sinofsky is exceptionally talented at getting teams of people working together systematically. Compared to the utter confusion of Allchin's reign, Sinofsky's Windows org is well organized, well structured and eminently capable of delivering well engineered product that delights customers.

But, as MJF said, The "Chief Software Architect" role is not a role that needs filling at Microsoft. There are already any number of exceptionally talented technicians at Microsoft.

What Microsoft NEEDS is a little of the comprehensive, far-reaching vision that Gates embodied combined with the ability to get it built and get it shipped. Sinofsky can do the latter, but I'm not convinced he has the vision role sewn up.
@cosuna Wow, where the heck did you pull that idea out of?
0 Votes
+ -
@Mr. Dee
I can't agree with you more...BillG had a vision. I am not that confident about SteveB unless he has some magical vision, which I can't understand
0 Votes
+ -
@Mr. Dee - I'd love to see Bill Gates back, too. I miss his long term vision.
@winfaralimite
I see several here who wish that Bill returned to the company. What makes you so sure he could have an impact? At least for me Bill isn't associated with technological advancements, no I remember him for extremely screwed business management. The market is different now than then. You can't really get away with such business schemes today, because everyone is already prepared and any such move would likely end up in court. Furthermore you have to deal with vicious businessmen like Larry Ellison. If we think in terms of product appeal I doubt Bill Gates is the right guy. He doesn't have the intuition like the Apple camp; it's enough to look at Microsoft commercials over the years.

In a business sense, Bill was the right guy at the right time. But I doubt his right time and place is now and here.
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Ray Ozzie hangs up his Chief Software Architect hat
kronox@... Updated - 18th Oct 2010
so many people leaving MS these days... honestly I think that the bottle's cork for all the leaking is Ballmer's departure lets see if MS stands until then...
0 Votes
+ -
Well, this is an opportunity...
zkiwi 18th Oct 2010
ZDnet has a number of "luminaries" who should rush off to Redmond and offer themselves as Ozzie's replacement. There's Ed Bott, LoveRock, NonZealot, and Ye to name but a few. Go for it guys!
0 Votes
+ -
@zkiwi
You got the wrong guys. Donnieboy, oldguy, linuxnut, and some of the other big mouths, know everything that is wrong with windows. Surely they would like a crack at fixing this "dogbite" piece of technology. What say you guys???
zkiwi. Yep, zkiwi, along with Donnieboy, Ole Man, Linux Geek and his other counterparts on his "team", is the only one who has portrayed himself as a leading technology "know it all" and has pointed out every possible thing, down to the tinyest minutiae, wrong with Microsoft.
Who else could best fill the shoes of Ray Ozzie than someone that knows more about MS technology than the rest of the world.
Go for it zkiwi and put your money where your mouth always is.
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Ray Ozzie hangs up his Chief Software Architect hat
dsfwrryd88-24353648351994798997222005474665 10th Nov
nyxyuf,good post!

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix