Remaining Novell antitrust complaints against Microsoft dismissed
Summary: Novell's victory on March 30 in a longstanding Unix patent case with SCO overshadowed another court ruling on March 30 involving the Utah-based company. The U.S. District Court in Maryland dismissed the last two outstanding antitrust claims Novell filed against Microsoft in 2004 involving WordPerfect and Quattro Pro, two software products Novell owned between 1994 and 1996.
Novell's victory on March 30 in a longstanding Unix patent case with SCO overshadowed another court ruling on March 30 involving the Utah-based company.
The U.S. District Court in Maryland dismissed the last two outstanding antitrust claims Novell filed against Microsoft in 2004 involving WordPerfect and Quattro Pro, two software products Novell owned between 1994 and 1996.
Back in 2004, Novell settled one potential antitrust suit with Microsoft involving NetWare for $536 million. But Novell refused to settle with Microsoft WordPerfect and Quattro Pro at that time.
Novell claimed Microsoft withheld interoperability information it needed to enable those products to run well on Windows. Microsoft tried to get Novell’s complaint dismissed, claiming that it was Novell’s “own mismanagement and poor business decisions” that tanked WordPerfect and Quattro Pro. Plus, Microsoft argued, since Novell sold WordPerfect to Corel now 12 years ago, their claims should be barred under the Statute of Limitations. Four of Novell's claims in this matter had previously been dismissed. But two were allowed to go forward.
Here's a copy of the March 30, 2010 ruling dismissing Novell's remaining antitrust complaints. (Thanks to TechFlash for the link).
“We are pleased and gratified by the court’s ruling," said Kevin Kutz, Director of Public Affairs with Microsoft.
Update (April 1): Novell says it is planning to appeal the decision. The official company statement: "As contemplated in the Court’s decision, Novell does intend to seek appellate court review. Novell remains confident in the fundamental validity of its claims and is pleased the court’s ruling also independently recognizes the same."
Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.
Talkback
that's crooked justice!
....
quilty? M$ is "Quilty"? ROFL
you're probably right... a preschooler might know that "M$" was quilty. Ya know, Firefox has a built in spell checker.
Cottony soft too?
So ALL charges brought against MS are true, on you planet, and MS should just keep paying damages until they die? Right - Your opinions on ALL OS's are now easily dismissed.
And all this time...
That's prejudice! (Another form of bigotry)
Especially the juvenile '$' instead of the proper letter 'S'? ;)
[i]~~~~~~~~~~
Only when the tide goes out do you discover who's been swimming naked.
~ Warren Buffett[/i]
Wow, Apple is lucky Novell lost that one!!!
information it needed to enable those products to run
well on Windows.[/i]
Yikes, if companies were able to sue others for
withholding interoperability information then Apple could
be sued by every single browser maker and media manager
maker in the world for not allowing browsers and media
managers on the iPhone. Steve Jobs must be breathing a
HUGE sigh of relief!!!
Apple is not a monopoly
Monopolistic company can destroy competition by playing dirty, while small company is hurting itself by playing dirty.
For example, I think that both Apple and Microsoft are awful companies. But while I will never buy any of Apple iCrap, I was forced to give money to Microsoft couple of times just because there was no choice.
Ah, but they are!
Whilst they got away with this when their machines were largely proprietary, I wonder how long it'll be until they have to answer to why they do not allow their OS to run on any other PC since their own machines are, these days, basically PC's in pretty boxes.
The fact that Apple have hunted down and eradicated anyone who came even close to competing with their hardware line is, in my view, cause for an investigation.
Novell spokesman: "We are going to appeal the decision"
http://blog.seattlepi.com/microsoft/archives/200109.asp
Novell vs SCO was about copyrights, not patents
RE: Remaining Novell antitrust complaints against Microsoft dismissed
RE: Remaining Novell antitrust complaints against Microsoft dismissed