Report: Customers scrutinizing Microsoft license agreements more than ever

Summary: Tough economic times are leading customers to scrutinize their Microsoft licensing agreements more than ever before -- a fact that's leading Microsoft to provide some substantial deals and discounts. That's one of the take-aways from long-time Microsoft watchers at Directions on Microsoft are providing in a new report, due this week, on Microsoft's volume licensing programs.

Tough economic times are leading customers to scrutinize their Microsoft licensing agreements more than ever before -- a fact that's leading Microsoft to provide some substantial deals and discounts.

That's one of the take-aways from long-time Microsoft watchers at Directions on Microsoft are providing in a new report on Microsoft's volume licensing programs, slated to be available this week. (An executive summary of Directions'  licensing report is available now.)

"There's a perfect storm brewing," said Directions analyst Paul DeGroot. "Customers are looking at licensing harder than ever before. And volume licenses are critical to Microsoft's well-being. When people don't renew, Microsoft loses immediate revenue. But these customers might not be back for two to three years," leading to more substantial losses for the Redmond software maker.

Microsoft is slated to announce its earnings for the third quarter of its fiscal 2009 on April 23. During the subsequent call with Wall Street analysts and press, Microsoft will, no doubt, be asked about its renewal rates for its volume license agreements -- the best-known of which are its Enterprise Agreement (EA) and its accompanying Software Assurance (SA) program.

The various promotional deals that Microsoft has been offering its volume licensees -- not to mention overall EA price cuts of up to 26 percent -- "tell us that it's tough out there," DeGroot said. Microsoft also has been increasing the rebates it is offering its large-account resellers (LARs) for selling EAs to smaller companies, DeGroot said.

As it has largely saturated the large and mid-market business areans with its volume programs, Microsoft is seeking to get smaller users into its volume programs, DeGroot said. Directions on Microsoft estimates that Microsoft already has volume license arrangements with 70 percent of companies with 5,000 or more PCs and 40 percent of companes with between 1,000 and 5,000 PCs. Among companes with fewer than 750 PCs, only about 12 percent have signed up for Microsoft's volume-licensing programs, according to Directions.

While customers can gain some substantial savings via EA and SA, there are certain customers for whom those programs make sense and others for whom they are not optimal, DeGroot cautioned.

For some customers, EA/SA might be the cheapest way to upgrade to Windows 7 when it becomes available, as a result of Microsoft extending coverage deadlines to include users who enrolled in the SA program last August. DeGroot said as a result of more liberal SA terms, some of those users could end up being able to upgrade to Windows 7 from previous versions of WIndows for $109 per copy.

That said, customers who are looking to maximize their capital and cash flow may not find EA/SA to be the best use of their funds.

"If you don't renew, nothing immediate happens. These agreements don't promise you any new software will be delivered" during a user's coverage period, DeGroot acknowledged.

But he pointed to the lesser-known Microsoft Open Value licenses as being "a very good tactical buy," especially for smaller companies that want some of the volume-licensing benefits that larger companies typically enjoy.

Directions on Microsoft is making its new licensing report available to its existing subscribers for free. It plans to sell copies to non-subscribers to its research services for $749.

Microsoft volume licensees: What's your take? Are you sticking with your EAs, SAs and/or open licenses through good times and bad? Or do you feel it makes more sense to use your IT budgetary dollars in other ways?

Topics: Microsoft, Legal, Software

About

Mary Jo has covered the tech industry for more than 25 years for a variety of publications and Web sites, and is a frequent guest on radio, TV and podcasts, speaking about all things Microsoft-related. She is the author of Microsoft 2.0: How Microsoft plans to stay relevant in the post-Gates era (John Wiley & Sons, 2008).

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Talkback

18 comments
Log in or register to join the discussion
  • Everything is negotiable

    When we decided to skip Vista, we terminated all but one Microsoft contract. MS rep jumped up and down, begged and pleaded, and told us dire things would happen. Two years (and two reps) later, they have come back to us with very sweet proposals in anticipation of our moving to Windows 7.

    But with our support call volumes at all-time lows, there is a real debate as to when (or if) we would do a desktop upgrade at any price. Hell, we just got our last few hundred W2K users switched to XP! There was one downside impact to our findings; the CIO put our desktop Linux pilot on hold. The low call volumes has really helped us reduce our overall cost structure this last year, and he doesn't want *anything* to drive those costs back up, even if it's zero-cost Linux desktops.

    So we are *firmly* locked on XP/Office 2003 right now, and it's going to take a "killer app" or something momentous to make us change. And that means we have no desire to sign any license agreements with MS in the near future.
    terry flores
    • Nice one Terry.

      Good on you to report that people are finally awakening.
      Amelioration
  • There are good times.

    There are bad times. And then there are the Linux times. Unfortunately for Microsoft the Linux times are not going away. Only $107 for Windows 7? They can thank Linux and Open Source it's not $307.
    kozmcrae
  • SA May Make Sense to Some

    If you replace everything every three years, it may work but what if you use thin clients that last ten years? I do not think it makes any sense then. We can change servers every five years and change software every couple of years to stay current with GNU/Linux. SA is just a way of evening out the cash flow if you are locked into M$. If you are free of M$, it is not the least bit tempting.
    pogson
  • Why use a Microsoft licence when there is Linux ?

    Frankly, I wouldn't touch a Microsoft licence with an 80foot barge pole. Perhaps I am lucky, but I can do everything I need to do with a Linux system: office suite, email, browser, image manipulation, Crossover Office for legacy Windows apps and Java for certain essential software packages. Who needs Windows licences anyway. I run a small business and all of my software needs are free...........and every bit of my hardware has Linux drivers.......It's wonderful in a Microsoft free world.
    TonyOz
    • Ok I have to train 5 thousand people on new EVERYTHING

      Not going to happen, the cost of implementing an open source solution only looks cheap when you start out. The MS stuff works for the people that know how to use it. There's a reason why Linux netbooks have failed despite getting a head start, people want to use what familiar.
      tech_walker
      • Not necessarily so ...

        It depends a lot on what those 5,000 people use the computers for. For any web-based work, no retraining is necessary, at all. For routine word processing and spreadsheet work, and I stress *routine*, no retraining needed.
        <p>
        There certainly are some environments in which the retraining needed would be significant, though I'm not willing to accept without careful examination that a shift to Linux wouldn't make sense in most of those cases.
        <p>
        I'm sure there are a small number of environments in which the cost of switching would be too high. For those, you may be stuck with MS, but the switch to Linux is far easier than most people realize, and because of that, they are losing out on the savings that are possible.
        goldston
  • RE: Report: Customers scrutinizing Microsoft license agreements more than ever

    Microsoft are desperately trying to upgrade their install base from the largely successful Core CAL suite to the twice the price "but I don't need all of this" enterprise CAL suite.

    New changes on OCS like voice CALs (to be brought in around OCS 2010) and exchange 2010, (windows rights management CAL requirements to mark a voicemail private) means expensive changes to Enterprise Agreements and Software Assurance.

    Enterprises need to realize that although you think you may have the licenses and upgrade rights it doesn't mean that you will get an upgrade or that it makes sense to upgrade, nor does it mean that Microsoft won't change the structure to the agreement with the old "ah you need another type of CAL for that" argument.

    Get your discount on EAs now, you will surely pay for it in un-neccessary licenses or SA over the next three years!
    TBartoni
  • RE: Report: Customers scrutinizing Microsoft license agreements more than ever

    For most small businesses volume licensing does not make sense. They replace computers as they quit working or purcase additional computers if the business expands. They are not on a schedule were new software is deployed to all computers in one big rollout. Given this it is much cheaper and easier for them to use OEM licensed software purchased with the computer. To switch from this model Microsoft would have to drop the requirement that volume licensed OS software is an upgrade and allow businesses to purchase a new computer without an OS and move the license from an existing computer to a new computer. With their existing model you must purchase the OS with a new computer then use the volume license to upgrade the OS. The only advantage to this is if you have standard images that are deployed to all computers. Small businesses don't do this.
    Kerry from BC
  • RE: Report: Customers scrutinizing Microsoft license agreements more than ever

    Given that Vista Home Premium is limited to running on only two processors, you should also look at this for you compnay given that quad cores will be the norm.
    rkempthorne
  • RE: Report: Customers scrutinizing Microsoft license agreements more than ever

    I have seen the same behavior when it comes to Microsoft Office. Not everyone needs all the functionality of Office, and some enterprises are starting to distribute lower cost productivity suites (OpenOffice.org, Sun StarOffice, Zoho) to some employees.
    gcreese
  • RE: Report: Customers scrutinizing Microsoft license agreements more than ever

    Microsoft has some of the best enterprise software on the planet....and healthy competition. Each company needs to think like Warren Buffet..."Price is what you pay, Value is what you get". Don't pay moe than you have to but don't put your company or yourself in a bad position with short-term thinking. Sometimes it makes sense to use a competitor and many times it makes sense to go with Microsoft. For those looking for "free" software for their critical applications...who are you going to hold accountable when it doesn't work as planned?
    herkyjerky
    • Short-term thinking.

      By short-term do you mean until the next upgrade cycle?
      kozmcrae
    • Accountability

      Since when has M$ been accountable to customers? The EULA reads:
      see http://www.microsoft.com/about/legal/useterms/default.aspx
      Microsoft directly
      Windows Server 2003 Enterprise
      "Microsoft warrants that the Software will perform substantially in accordance with the accompanying
      materials for a period of ninety (90) days from the date of receipt.
      "
      Not much to rely on there.
      pogson
    • Accounting?

      http://www.howtoforge.com/ledgersmb_debian_etch

      http://www.gnucash.org/

      http://www.roseindia.net/opensource/open-source-accounting-software.shtml

      http://www.compiere.com/accounting.php

      http://leisureguy.wordpress.com/2008/03/26/open-source-accounting-software/

      http://www.pbooks.org/blog/

      ?

      Microsoft Corporation

      (Public, NASDAQ:MSFT)

      18.97
      +0.36 (1.93%)
      Apr 21 - Close Open: 18.61 Mkt Cap: 168.65B P/E: 10.16 Dividend: 0.13
      High: 19.08 52Wk High: 32.10 F P/E: - Yield: 2.74
      Low: 18.57 52Wk Low: 14.87 Beta: 1.01 Shares: 8.89B
      Vol: 60.93M Avg Vol: 69.64M EPS: 1.87 Inst. Own: 59%
      After Hours: 18.61 -0.36 (-1.90%) - Apr 21, 8:01PM EDT

      Errr, did you mean accountability? Sorry, worse yet!
      Ole Man
  • RE: Report: Customers scrutinizing Microsoft license agreements more than ever

    I work for a large MS Partner who specialize in MS Licensing and I am an MCP in MS Licensing, so this is an area I know well :-)

    I find that larger corporations (those with EA's) tend to be reviewing what their contracts include and often find extra licences they don't need. On the flip side, smaller companies are, because of the economy, investigating the benefits of volume licensing and most find it will save them money and/or add value.

    Microsoft's SA helps add real value to businesses through App-V and MED-V so I don't think there's any need to worry about MS losing their place!

    http://richfrombechtle.wordpress.com
    richfrombechtle
  • RE: Report: Customers scrutinizing Microsoft license agreements more than ever

    I've to thanks for this epic web-site .I definitely liked any quite tiny little bit of it. We have you bookmarked your <a href="http://www.buy-mulberry.co.uk/" style="text-decoration: none; color: black;">mulberry bag sale</a> internet site web page to look at aided by the existing things you construct.
    jackson1984-24316069205748857739440257893812
  • RE: Report: Customers scrutinizing Microsoft license agreements more than ever

    My [url=http://www.buy-mulberry.co.uk/]mulberry bag[/url] hubby and i corresponding to this article [url=http://www.buy-mulberry.co.uk/]mulberry bag sale[/url] offered and it's really made you several time and effort [url=http://www.buy-mulberry.co.uk/]buy mulberry[/url] having doing well lots of enhanced grounds, for that reason take care of the great 100 %.
    dfwekrdfe28-24353597632192352986897683842976