Windows 7 hits Milestone 3
Summary: I have seen the future -- specifically Windows 7 Milestone 3 (Build 6780). I got a gander at the latest test build of Windows 7 briefly (courtesy of a source of mine) and was not allowed to take any screenshots. But it is real, it does exist and it is, indeed, in certain testers' hands inside and outside the company.
I have seen the future -- specifically Windows 7 Milestone 3 (Build 6780).
I got a gander at the latest test build of Windows 7 briefly (courtesy of a source of mine) and was not allowed to take any screenshots. But it is real, it does exist and it is, indeed, in certain testers' hands inside and outside the company.
From the quick glimpse I got of Milestone 3, it sounds like Bryant of AeroXperience was right on the money with his hypotheses about what's changed in the latest internal test builds. The latest build seems quite stable. The Ribbon user interface from Office 2007 is now part of WordPad and Paint. Home Groups -- the functionality formerly known in "Longhorn"/Vista as "Castle" -- is part of the new Windows 7 build.
I also noticed that the "Graphical Console," a k a PowerShell Version 2, seems to be part of the latest pre-release Windows 7 build.
(Looks like Stephen Chapman over at the UX Evangelist site got to see Build 6780, too, and has a lot more to say on Windows 7's Paint and WordPad.)
From what admittedly little I had a chance to see, Windows 7 does not look or feel like a major departure from Windows Vista.
Sources say there isn't an "M4" currently on Microsoft's Windows 7 schedule. Next up is likely some kind of preview build (which may or may not be distributed to those attending the Professional Developers Conference and/or Windows Hardware Engineering Conference in October and November, respectively.) After that, a broadscale Beta 1, which should be feature-complete and pretty much set in stone, is expected for mid-December.
Like my ZDNet blogging colleague Ed Bott said, it's not impossible for Microsoft to hit a 2009 release for Windows 7 if the first true beta doesn't go out until December. Such a move would not be unprecedented.
Do you think the Softies are going to get Windows 7 out the door in 2009, as they are hoping -- and maybe even early enough to make it onto new machines in time for Holiday 2009 sales?
Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.
Talkback
That's a great tagline
I am so excited about $NEXT_VERSION of Windows. It will surely go beyond just solving all of the problems with $CURRENT_VERSION, it will be an entirely new paradigm. Forget about security problems, that will be all fixed with $NEXT_VERSION. And they'll finally be ridding themselves of $ANCIENT_LEGACY_STUFF. Also there will be $DATABASE_FILESYSTEM. It'll be awesome!
I wonder how $NEXT_VERSION will compare to $NEXT_NEXT_VERSION.
Bizarre (NT)
it's obvious
Obviously
Windows 7...
Driver and Ap support had better be rock solid, and improved speeds for 64 bit options are the carrot needed to entice people.
Otherwise people might as well go with Linux - Windows is supposed to be effortless - Linux is taking steps to make the change easy... Vista has frustrated enough people that Microsoft has to get back or the will start the trip down the slippery slope...
re: windows 7
Average users will never format and install another OS, it just doesn't happen.
"Average users will never format and install another OS"
If a tree falls in the forest, does it make a noise? Must not! You didn't hear it.
"Happens all the time"
Also interesting to note you completely ignored the main point of my post. Cherry picker.
Yip
But that's not news ;)
What exactly is your problem?
If only I could!
Don't have that option. Microsoft quit shipping the last decent version of Windows years ago.
Christmas Rules
There's a fly in that (logic) oinment...
If they do release another undercooked turkey, their credibility will be seriously compromised. They NEED to make sure 7 is finished, solid and reliable before it goes out the door.
Careful with the generalizations there, kid, you'll put your eye out - NT
Now
Actually...
Lovey is serious. That's the difference.
The other difference is Mike Cox, when he's serious knows of what he speaks.
Lovey is willfully ignorant and a bit of an idiot besides.
ttfn
John
Where is Mike BTW?
God save us all
your anecdote
2600... bet your repair shop's named after caption crunch too?
I would counter that