Windows 7 to get new touch features
Summary: It's still early in the Windows 7 development process, but it sounds like new touch features already have made it onto the user-interface feature list. My question: Do Windows users want Microsoft to make the Windows experience more and more Mac-like?
It's still early in the Windows 7 development process, but it sounds like new touch features already have made it onto the user-interface feature list.
Hilton Locke, who is with Microsoft's Windows Shell team, in blogging about the newly introduced Dell Latitude XT Tablet PC, mentioned Windows 7's planned touch support in a post this week:
"All I will say that if you are impressed by the 'touch features' in the iPhone, you'll be blown away by what's coming in Windows 7. Now if only we could convince more OEMs that Windows Touch Technology is going to drive their sales."
Not being a Tablet PC fanatic, this touch UI revelation doesn't do much for me. But it did get me thinking about a point made by a Mac-user friend of mine recently.
His theory: Neither Windows Vista nor Apple's Leopard interfaces have met with universal user approval for the simple reason that Microsoft and Apple are trying too hard to emulate each other's UI. Micorsoft tried too hard to appeal to users interested in a Mac-like experience, and Apple was too intent on making Leopard appealing to Windows switchers, my Mac-using chum posited. The result? Neither vendor made its core constituency happy.
What do you think? Is Microsoft erroneously trying too hard to make Windows more Mac-like? Or do the Redmondians have no choice on that front?
Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.
Talkback
Mimicing UI
Can not agree
My neice (and others) were told in college by a professor (when asked) to "buy a MacBook as they do not get viruses or crash".
She does not like the OSX GUI, but she is stuck with it.
She's not stuck with it
that's right
perhaps
Perhaps she can't afford the full Windows license on top of what she already spent for the Mac?
actually...
Would like some WINE with your cheese?
that's too geeky
======
why Microsoft Office costs hundreds of dollars.
======
Because it's a great product. Period.
I have used OO.org and it sucks (although v2.0 is a huge improvement over the completely crappy v1.1) and offerings from Apple are just too basic. In fact, if it were not for MS office I would probably not be using the Mac laptop (with Tiger) I got assigned. I would be using a Linux based laptop for what I have to do.
Why MS Office is expensive
So use Linux
education licenses
windows vista home premium only cost $129 i don't see where
the cost...
Windows Vista Home Premium costs 240 dollars. Source:
http://www.amazon.com/Microsoft-Windows-Vista-Premium-VERSION/dp/B000HCZ9AW/ref=pd_bbs_sr_3?ie=UTF8&s=software&qid=1197518986&sr=8-3
If you're getting it for 129 dollars, it is just for an upgrade. And by the way, Vista Ultimate, which has all (not just some) of the features Microsoft is proud of, costs $400! Give me a break...
vista home premium only cost $129
:o)
Whoops! (apology)
:o)
vista prices
Duh
Duh
Office 07' Ultimate goes as low as $60.
http://ultimatesteal.com/
Reeeeel cool!
You can thank OpenOffice for forcing them to
lower the price (by providing competition).
That is if you don't want to seem cheeky.
who cares about Win7? Vista will be my OS for years!