Windows Azure one year later: Walking the cloud vs. on-premises tightrope

By | August 12, 2010, 10:17am PDT

Microsoft’s Windows Azure development engine is chugging along, following closely the original path the team outlined for its cloud operating environment. But the marketing and positioning of Azure isn’t tracking as smoothly.

As I noted in part one of my ‘Azure year in review’ post yesterday, Microsoft has made a number of under-the-cover additions to Azure. Microsoft is now in the position of leading with its cloud on the Windows development front. In other words, new Windows Server features are developed for and launched in Windows Azure before they make it into a new release of Windows Server software.

Microsoft is in the process of attempting to lead with the cloud on the Azure marketing front, as well. But its messaging here is murkier. Company execs abruptly stopped touting “Software + Services” as the way Microsoft is going to market with its products. Chief Operating Officer Kevin Turner recently told Wall Street analysts that playing up customer choice between software and cloud services wasn’t a good move strategically and that Microsoft is now “course-correcting” by convincing customers to go with its cloud wares over its on-premises software.

The problem is Microsoft makes far and away most of its money from software, not services — and is likely to do so for a number of years ahead. Despite Turner’s claims “the cloud actually helps better position Microsoft to sell more on-premise products than we ever have before,” there’s little to back up that assertion. Microsoft officials have made a case for how/why leading with the cloud offers the company new opportunities to reach brand-new customers, but haven’t offered any real evidence that the cloud will generate the high margins that software sales traditionally have.

In short, Microsoft can’t — and won’t — suddenly turn the switch and stop selling software in favor of cloud services. In spite of the corporate edict to “lead with the cloud,” officials still seem conflicted about how to tell customers they still have a choice. Example: Microsoft is touting its recently announced Windows Azure Appliances as the way large enterprise customers will be able to run a private Azure cloud at their sites. But it also is continuing to offer its Dynamic Datacenter Toolkit, Windows Server AppFabric, BizTalk Server and other software components the building blocks for customers desiring their own private clouds.

In spite of the company’s “We’re All In” cloud messaging, you still find Microsoft using charts like the one below that highlight the software and services options available to users:

When I asked the Softies about the challenges of positioning Windows Azure and cloud services vs. Windows Server and on-premises enterprise software products, I received this statement from a company spokesperson:

“Ultimately, it’s  up to the customer if, when and how they move to the cloud. We see it as our job to provide the choice and the right solutions, guidance and tools to enable them to use their existing skills and achieve the fastest time to business value. For those organizations and businesses that want a highly optimized, scalable environment where we prescribe the hardware and normalize the cost of operations, that’s our services platform, the Windows Azure platform. For those that want the versatility to enable environments of any scale, or that need custom hardware configurations and operating models, that’s our server platform, built on Windows Server.”

Next Page: Customer choice vs. confusion

Topics

Mary Jo has covered the tech industry for more than 25 years for a variety of publications and Web sites, and is a frequent guest on radio, TV and podcasts, speaking about all things Microsoft-related. She is the author of Microsoft 2.0: How Microsoft plans to stay relevant in the post-Gates era (John Wiley & Sons, 2008).

Disclosure

Mary-Jo Foley

Freelance journalist/blogger Mary Jo Foley has nothing to disclose. WYSIWYG (what you see is what you get). I do not own Microsoft stock or stock in any of its partners or competitors. I have no business ventures that are sponsored by/funded by Microsoft or any of its partners or competitors.

Biography

Mary-Jo Foley

Mary Jo Foley has covered the tech industry for 25 years for a variety of publications, including ZDNet, eWeek and Baseline. She has kept close tabs on Microsoft strategy, products and technologies for the past 10 years. In the late 1990s, she penned the award-winning "At The Evil Empire" column for ZDNet, and more recently the Microsoft Watch blog for Ziff Davis.

Got a tip? Send her an email with your rants, rumors, tips and tattles. Confidentiality guaranteed.

Talkback Most Recent of 21 Talkback(s)

  • RE: Windows Azure one year later: Walking the cloud vs. on-premises tightrope
    The thing I keep thinking about (and recently blogged around at http://www.zdnet.co.uk/blogs/500-words-into-the-future-10014052/microsofts-data-driven-black-hole-10018228/) is how much the expertise of internal Microsoft teams in deploying their own products has fed out to customers to help them deploy - and whether going cloud-first on those products makes it harder for them to have that expertise...
    ZDNet Gravatar
    mary.branscombe
    12th Aug 2010
  • ZDNet Blogger

    telemetry and the cloud
    That's a good and interesting question! Cloud first means lots of smaller features get rolled out faster and with far less testing... MJ
    ZDNet Gravatar
    Mary Jo Foley
    12th Aug 2010
  • Windows Azure..
    @mary.branscombe I bet Kinect will not be magical either.

    sohbet could have made chat magical if they wanted to, they could have hired a man in a turtleneck to give a magical presentation and BAM... a mynet sohbet Event (maybe a forum product too, who knows.)

    izlesene would have been much cheaper to cinsel sohbet too. No wonder portal overtaking chat sohbet , sohbet odalari know where NOT to spend their money.
    ZDNet Gravatar
    atrok
    27th Jul
  • I think MS should approach the public cloud vs. private cloud issue ...
    ... the same way real estate approaches renting homes vs. selling homes. Push businesses to adopt private clouds first, then public clouds second. Why? Because MS will make more money that way. A lot more money. In fact, to a large extent, the public cloud should be used to introduce services and functionality MS encourages its customers to incorporate into their own private clouds. As for public clouds cannibalizing private IT, I think that is rubbish. If on premise vendors do not respond to public clouds, this may be true to some extent. But people have always paid more for the privilege of owning stuff, and people use public services largely because they have no choice - not because they prefer them over private services. Therefore let companies like Salesforce.com pursue a public cloud only strategy. They will simply end up with income levels closer to those of Linux vendors, whereas companies that span private and public clouds, can use public clouds to introduce new services they up sell to private clouds, as well as provide services to customers who simply can't afford them, or don't want to own them.
    ZDNet Gravatar
    P. Douglas
    12th Aug 2010
  • RE: Windows Azure one year later: Walking the cloud vs. on-premises tightrope
    @P. Douglas This could be Steve Ballmer's next genius move - the private cloud!
    ZDNet Gravatar
    MSFTWorshipper
    16th Aug 2010
  • genius move?
    @MSFTWorshipper: Yep - which will put them approximately a couple of years behind VMWare (which does that now, and has done so far a couple of years now... wink )
    ZDNet Gravatar
    Random_Walk
    16th Aug 2010
  • RE: Windows Azure one year later: Walking the cloud vs. on-premises tightrope
    @MSFTWorshipper
    I have been exploring for a bit for any high quality articles or blog posts on this kind of area . Exploring in Yahoo I at last stumbled upon this web site. Reading this information So i?m happy to convey that I have a very good uncanny feeling I discovered just what I needed. I most certainly will make sure to do not forget this web site and give it a look on a constant basis.

    Regards,
    dison
    things to do in sydney | go karting sydney | unique article wizard discount
    ZDNet Gravatar
    intelligente21
    18th Aug
  • Will it really be cheaper?
    My question to the cloud services is, what do you do with your exsisting licenses? I would love to move my exchange server to the cloud, but will it cost me more? I don't need to worry about mailbox sizes, since storage is relatively cheep, neither do i need to renew my licence every time there is an upgrade, since I don't have to upgrade. How will all this change when it's hosted by MS?
    ZDNet Gravatar
    vhaakmat
    13th Aug 2010
  • need help for our web site
    hi, my name is indrajit, i need web desiner who want to desine our web site for his own experiance & who want to work with us,who want to speare his time & share his desine experiance
    please visit on http://www.myspace.com/548658564/blog
    and submit your comment and you can vist & submit your coment on twitter.com/e2italk
    ZDNet Gravatar
    indrajit92
    30th Aug 2010
  • RE: Windows Azure one year later: Walking the cloud vs. on-premises tightrope
    That's a good and interesting question! Cloud first means lots of smaller features get rolled out faster and with far less testing
    sohbet odalari
    sohbet Chat
    Sohbet Odalari
    chat odalari
    Sohbet et
    cet
    Muhabbet
    Sohbet siteleri
    Sohbet odalari
    ZDNet Gravatar
    beyzam
    6th Aug
  • ummm
    @beyzam


    The same advertisers that brought us Seinfeld (lets play footsie and wiggle our shorts Bill), Laptop Hunters (that got all sorts of bad press for lies (incorrect pricing and customer never actually went into an Apple store) and portraying windows as "cheep"), And Windows 7 was Macs idea (where a college kid who can't get laid and get kicked out of his dorm room (by his Mac roommate) has to watch TV in the hall because he doesn't even have a friend whom he could visit).

    I bet Kinect will cinsel sohbet not be magical either.
    IE8 had multi-process architecture before Chrome launched, and in fact sohbet was the first browser to announce the feature. gay sohbet That's why both Chrome and IE use far more memory than the other browsers. mynet sohbet Chrome is a bit more strict than IE, IE will allow tabs with the same integrety level to mynet sohbet share a single process. mynet mynet sohbet Outside of that MS beat Google to the punch. mynet Good try though. indirmeden film izle If MS came out with touch UIs for at least Word, Excel, forum OneNote, and Outlook, with super slick, and highly youtube effective integrated virtual keyboards, that would be mind blowing! I think canli sohbet that would be like lighting a rocket under PC touch computing. bedava film izle
    ZDNet Gravatar
    exibir
    6th Aug
  • RE: Windows Azure one year later: Walking the cloud vs. on-premises tightrope
    I believe Rudy de Haas (Murphy) has room in his museum at the moment - why not apply?

    I bet Kinect will not be magical either.

    sesli sohbet could have made sohbet et magical if they wanted to, they could have hired a man in a turtleneck to give a magical presentation and BAM... a islami sohbet Event (maybe a mirc sohbet product too, who knows.)

    video izle would have been much cheaper to cet too. No wonder cinsellik sohbet overtaking chat , dini sohbet know where NOT to spend their money. chat siteleri cinsel sohbet mirc
    ZDNet Gravatar
    harbialem
    13th Aug
  • RE: Windows Azure one year later: Walking the cloud vs. on-premises tightrope
    I've been browsing online more than 3 hours today, yet I never found any interesting article like yours. Its pretty worth enough for me. In my view, if all webmasters and bloggers made good content as you did, the internet will be much more useful than ever before.
    ZDNet Gravatar
    intelligente21
    18th Aug
  • ZDNet Gravatar
    intelligente21
    18th Aug
  • RE: Windows Azure one year later: Walking the cloud vs. on-premises tightrope
    services largely because they have no choice - not because they prefer them over private services. Therefore let companies like Salesforce.com pursue a public cloud only strategy
    ZDNet Gravatar
    sohbet et
    27th Aug

Talkback - Tell Us What You Think

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources