Windows Azure one year later: Walking the cloud vs. on-premises tightrope

Windows Azure one year later: Walking the cloud vs. on-premises tightrope

Summary: Microsoft's Windows Azure development engine is chugging along, following closely the original path the team outlined for its cloud operating environment. But the marketing and positioning of Azure isn't tracking as smoothly.

SHARE:

Microsoft's Windows Azure development engine is chugging along, following closely the original path the team outlined for its cloud operating environment. But the marketing and positioning of Azure isn't tracking as smoothly.

As I noted in part one of my 'Azure year in review' post yesterday, Microsoft has made a number of under-the-cover additions to Azure. Microsoft is now in the position of leading with its cloud on the Windows development front. In other words, new Windows Server features are developed for and launched in Windows Azure before they make it into a new release of Windows Server software.

Microsoft is in the process of attempting to lead with the cloud on the Azure marketing front, as well. But its messaging here is murkier. Company execs abruptly stopped touting "Software + Services" as the way Microsoft is going to market with its products. Chief Operating Officer Kevin Turner recently told Wall Street analysts that playing up customer choice between software and cloud services wasn't a good move strategically and that Microsoft is now "course-correcting" by convincing customers to go with its cloud wares over its on-premises software.

The problem is Microsoft makes far and away most of its money from software, not services -- and is likely to do so for a number of years ahead. Despite Turner's claims "the cloud actually helps better position Microsoft to sell more on-premise products than we ever have before," there's little to back up that assertion. Microsoft officials have made a case for how/why leading with the cloud offers the company new opportunities to reach brand-new customers, but haven't offered any real evidence that the cloud will generate the high margins that software sales traditionally have.

In short, Microsoft can't -- and won't -- suddenly turn the switch and stop selling software in favor of cloud services. In spite of the corporate edict to "lead with the cloud," officials still seem conflicted about how to tell customers they still have a choice. Example: Microsoft is touting its recently announced Windows Azure Appliances as the way large enterprise customers will be able to run a private Azure cloud at their sites. But it also is continuing to offer its Dynamic Datacenter Toolkit, Windows Server AppFabric, BizTalk Server and other software components the building blocks for customers desiring their own private clouds.

In spite of the company's "We're All In" cloud messaging, you still find Microsoft using charts like the one below that highlight the software and services options available to users:

When I asked the Softies about the challenges of positioning Windows Azure and cloud services vs. Windows Server and on-premises enterprise software products, I received this statement from a company spokesperson:

"Ultimately, it’s  up to the customer if, when and how they move to the cloud. We see it as our job to provide the choice and the right solutions, guidance and tools to enable them to use their existing skills and achieve the fastest time to business value. For those organizations and businesses that want a highly optimized, scalable environment where we prescribe the hardware and normalize the cost of operations, that’s our services platform, the Windows Azure platform. For those that want the versatility to enable environments of any scale, or that need custom hardware configurations and operating models, that’s our server platform, built on Windows Server.”

Next Page: Customer choice vs. confusion

As of June 2010, Microsoft officials said there were 10,000 customers (each with an unspecified number of users) hosting/developing applications and services on Azure. Fifty percent of these customers are running their applications in "steady state" (i.e., as replacements for onsite/on-premises software), according to the Softies. Users are relying on Azure to do on/off batch job computing; create quick start-ups (with no need or money to build out a private data center; and to handle unpredictable and predictable bursting.

Having a relatively long test/beta period helped Microsoft figure out what customers wanted with Azure, said Yousef Khalidi, a Microsoft Distinguished Engineer and one of the original members of the Red Dog team.

"We've been talking to customers for the past year about what we've shipped and what we will ship. We've been asking them what was good and what was bad," Khalidi said.

When Microsoft surveyed current and potential Azure developers earlier this year about the features they'd most like to see, lower pricing was the No. 1 request. Microsoft hasn't introduced a cheaper entry-level Azure tier (so far), but it has introduced a couple of new free trial programs.

But with the Year 2 emphasis for Azure on enterprise customers, Microsoft is planning to focus on other kinds of features in the coming months, Microsoft will be rolling out a test program for the VM role capability the Redmondians first discussed last year to make it easier for customers to move their existing applications to the cloud.

"We're also now paying more attention to integrating with on-premises servers," Khalidi said. That means Project Sydney, Microsoft's coming IPv6 secure-networking technology that goes beyond the connectivity provided today by the service bus in Windows Azure AppFabric. It also means more  functionality around network monitoring, integration with existing tools and processes, he said. The idea is to raise the level of abstraction around things like configuration management, patching, and network plumbing, he said, while keeping the cloud infrastructure generic enough to support multiple development languages and tools.

"It all hinges around operation and management," Khalidi said. Microsoft's premises is "if you want to build the cloud, you better know how to run the cloud."

Microsoft itself is the guinea pig for a lot of these new cloud technologies. Microsoft's CIO Tony Scott told me recently that Microsoft's plan is to be running 85 to 90 percent of its own internal apps in the cloud before this decade ends. In some cases, that means rewriting existing applications to run on Windows Azure; in others, it means moving employees off on-premises Exchange Server to Exchange Online.

When the Red Dog team needed to test Azure not so long ago, members knew better than to approach any of Microsoft's own IT teams about dogfooding. But these days, the perception is "we've crossed the line regarding trust," said Senior Vice President Amitabh Srivastava.

More and more of Microsoft's internally-facing apps are running on Windows Azure. And "all of the new services from the company are being written for Azure," Srivastava said. That means everything from new gaming services, and Docs.com, to Bing Twitter, and forthcoming Windows Phone 7 cloud services. Srivastava said Microsoft is "in the process" of moving its Business Productivity Online Suite (Microsoft-hosted Exchange, SharePoint, Communications and Live Meeting) to run on Windows Azure, but wasn't ready to provide a timetable as to when that migration will be finished.

Not every Microsoft product is going to be moved to Azure, Srivasta acknowledged. Some older Microsoft applications won't ever go to Azure, nor should they, Microsoft officials said. The same is true for customers' applications: Some applications are so old or so customized that moving them to the cloud would be more trouble than it's worth.

Balance is going to be the watchword for Azure in the coming year, as both Microsoft and its customers seek the right balance in the on-premises vs. cloud mix.

Topics: Cloud, Hardware, Microsoft, Operating Systems, Servers, Software, Windows

About

Mary Jo has covered the tech industry for 30 years for a variety of publications and Web sites, and is a frequent guest on radio, TV and podcasts, speaking about all things Microsoft-related. She is the author of Microsoft 2.0: How Microsoft plans to stay relevant in the post-Gates era (John Wiley & Sons, 2008).

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Talkback

19 comments
Log in or register to join the discussion
  • RE: Windows Azure one year later: Walking the cloud vs. on-premises tightrope

    The thing I keep thinking about (and recently blogged around at http://www.zdnet.co.uk/blogs/500-words-into-the-future-10014052/microsofts-data-driven-black-hole-10018228/) is how much the expertise of internal Microsoft teams in deploying their own products has fed out to customers to help them deploy - and whether going cloud-first on those products makes it harder for them to have that expertise...
    mary.branscombe
    • telemetry and the cloud

      That's a good and interesting question! Cloud first means lots of smaller features get rolled out faster and with far less testing... MJ
      Mary Jo Foley
    • Windows Azure..

      @mary.branscombe I bet Kinect will not be magical either.<br><br><a href="http://www.trsohbet.com">sohbet</a> could have made <a href="http://www.trsohbet.com">chat</a> magical if they wanted to, they could have hired a man in a turtleneck to give a magical presentation and BAM... a <a href="http://www.trsohbet.com.tr">mynet sohbet</a> Event (maybe a <a href="http://www.forumuz.net/">forum</a> product too, who knows.)<br><br><a href="http://video.trsohbet.com">izlesene</a> would have been much cheaper to <a href="http://www.trsohbet.com.tr">cinsel sohbet</a> too. No wonder <a href="http://www.trsohbet.com/portal/">portal</a> overtaking <a href="http://www.trsohbet.com">chat sohbet</a>, <a href="http://www.trsohbet.com">sohbet odalari</a> know where NOT to spend their money.
      atrok
  • I think MS should approach the public cloud vs. private cloud issue ...

    ... the same way real estate approaches renting homes vs. selling homes. Push businesses to adopt private clouds first, then public clouds second. Why? Because MS will make more money that way. A lot more money. In fact, to a large extent, the public cloud should be used to introduce services and functionality MS encourages its customers to incorporate into their own private clouds. As for public clouds cannibalizing private IT, I think that is rubbish. If on premise vendors do not respond to public clouds, this may be true to some extent. But people have always paid more for the privilege of owning stuff, and people use public services largely because they have no choice - not because they prefer them over private services. Therefore let companies like Salesforce.com pursue a public cloud only strategy. They will simply end up with income levels closer to those of Linux vendors, whereas companies that span private and public clouds, can use public clouds to introduce new services they up sell to private clouds, as well as provide services to customers who simply can't afford them, or don't want to own them.
    P. Douglas
    • RE: Windows Azure one year later: Walking the cloud vs. on-premises tightrope

      @P. Douglas This could be Steve Ballmer's next genius move - the private cloud!
      MSFTWorshipper
      • genius move?

        @MSFTWorshipper: Yep - which will put them approximately a couple of years behind VMWare (which does that now, and has done so far a couple of years now... ;) )
        Random_Walk
      • RE: Windows Azure one year later: Walking the cloud vs. on-premises tightrope

        @MSFTWorshipper
        I have been exploring for a bit for any high quality articles or blog posts on this kind of area . Exploring in Yahoo I at last stumbled upon this web site. Reading this information So i?m happy to convey that I have a very good uncanny feeling I discovered just what I needed. I most certainly will make sure to do not forget this web site and give it a look on a constant basis.

        Regards,
        dison
        <a href="http://www.whattodoinsydney.net">things to do in sydney</a> | <a href="http://www.gokartingsydney.com.au">go karting sydney</a> | <a href="http://www.uniquearticlewizarddiscount.net">unique article wizard discount</a>
        intelligente21
  • Will it really be cheaper?

    My question to the cloud services is, what do you do with your exsisting licenses? I would love to move my exchange server to the cloud, but will it cost me more? I don't need to worry about mailbox sizes, since storage is relatively cheep, neither do i need to renew my licence every time there is an upgrade, since I don't have to upgrade. How will all this change when it's hosted by MS?
    vhaakmat
  • need help for our web site

    hi, my name is indrajit, i need web desiner who want to desine our web site for his own experiance & who want to work with us,who want to speare his time & share his desine experiance<br>please visit on <a href="http://www.myspace.com/548658564/blog" target="_blank" rel="nofollow"><a href="http://www.myspace.com/548658564/blog" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">http://www.myspace.com/548658564/blog</a></a><br> and submit your comment and you can vist & submit your coment on twitter.com/e2italk
    indrajit92
  • RE: Windows Azure one year later: Walking the cloud vs. on-premises tightrope

    That's a good and interesting question! Cloud first means lots of smaller features get rolled out faster and with far less testing
    <a href="Http://www.beyzam.net">sohbet odalari</a>
    <a href="Http://www.chattur.com">sohbet Chat</a>
    <a href="Http://www.sohbetsayfalari.com">Sohbet Odalari</a>
    <a href="http://www.chatadresleri.com">chat odalari</a>
    <a href="Http://www.tacsohbet.com">Sohbet et</a>
    <a href="Http://www.sudamlasisohbet.com">cet </a>
    <a href="Http://www.nilmuhabbet.com">Muhabbet</a>
    <a href="Http://www.duzsohbet.com">Sohbet siteleri</a>
    <a href="Http://www.sohbetadresleri.net">Sohbet odalari</a>
    beyzam
    • ummm

      @beyzam


      The same advertisers that brought us Seinfeld (lets play footsie and wiggle our shorts Bill), Laptop Hunters (that got all sorts of bad press for lies (incorrect pricing and customer never actually went into an Apple store) and portraying windows as "cheep"), And Windows 7 was Macs idea (where a college kid who can't get laid and get kicked out of his dorm room (by his Mac roommate) has to watch TV in the hall because he doesn't even have a friend whom he could visit).

      I bet Kinect will<a href="http://www.gopsohbet.net" title="cinsel sohbet" target="_blank">cinsel sohbet</a> not be magical either.
      IE8 had multi-process architecture before Chrome launched, and in fact<a href="http://sohbettir.com" title="sohbet" target="_blank">sohbet</a> was the first browser to announce the feature. <a href="http://www.gopsohbet.net" title="gay sohbet" target="_blank">gay sohbet</a> That's why both Chrome and IE use far more memory than the other browsers.<a href="http://www.alemchat.net" title="mynet sohbet" target="_blank">mynet sohbet</a> Chrome is a bit more strict than IE, IE will allow tabs with the same integrety level to <a href="http://www.eskimynetsohbet.com" title="mynet sohbet" target="_blank">mynet sohbet</a> share a single process.<a href="http://www.eskimynetsohbet.com" title="mynet" target="_blank">mynet</a> <a href="http://www.mynetci.com" title="mynet sohbet" target="_blank">mynet sohbet</a> Outside of that MS beat Google to the punch.<a href="http://www.mynetci.com" title="mynet" target="_blank">mynet</a> Good try though.<a href="http://www.indirmedenfilmizlehd.com" title="indirmeden film izle" target="_blank">indirmeden film izle</a>If MS came out with touch UIs for at least Word, Excel,<a href="http://sohbettir.com/forum" title="forum" target="_blank">forum</a> OneNote, and Outlook, with super slick, and highly<a href="http://eglence.sohbettir.com" title="youtube" target="_blank">youtube</a> effective integrated virtual keyboards, that would be mind blowing! I think <a href="http://sohbettir.com" title="canli sohbet" target="_blank">canli sohbet</a>that would be like lighting a rocket under PC touch computing.<a href="http://www.indirmedenfilmizlehd.com" title="bedava film izle" target="_blank">bedava film izle</a>
      exibir
  • RE: Windows Azure one year later: Walking the cloud vs. on-premises tightrope

    I believe Rudy de Haas (Murphy) has room in his museum at the moment - why not apply?<br><br>I bet Kinect will not be magical either.<br><br><a href="http://www.kalitelisohbet.com">sesli sohbet</a> could have made <a href="http://www.muhabbetteyim.net">sohbet et</a> magical if they wanted to, they could have hired a man in a turtleneck to give a magical presentation and BAM... a <a href="http://www.garantichat.com">islami sohbet</a> Event (maybe a <a href="http://www.sohbetindir.com">mirc sohbet</a> product too, who knows.)<br><br><a href="http://www.izledinletr.com">video izle</a> would have been much cheaper to <a href="http://www.cetturk.net">cet</a> too. No wonder <a href="http://www.cinselliksohbet.org">cinsellik sohbet</a> overtaking <a href="http://www.chatkanali.net">chat</a>, <a href="http://www.chatlax.net">dini sohbet</a> know where NOT to spend their money. <a href="http://www.sohbetindir.net">chat siteleri</a> <a href="http://www.muhabbetteyim.com">cinsel sohbet</a> <a href="http://www.harbialem.net">mirc</a>
    harbialem
  • RE: Windows Azure one year later: Walking the cloud vs. on-premises tightrope

    I've been browsing online more than 3 hours today, yet I never found any interesting article like yours. Its pretty worth enough for me. In my view, if all webmasters and bloggers made good content as you did, the internet will be much more useful than ever before.
    intelligente21
  • RE: Windows Azure one year later: Walking the cloud vs. on-premises tightrope

    I'll be back for more updates from you.
    intelligente21
  • RE: Windows Azure one year later: Walking the cloud vs. on-premises tightrope

    services largely because they have no choice - not because they prefer them over private services. Therefore let companies like Salesforce.com pursue a public cloud only strategy
    sohbet et
  • RE: Windows Azure one year later: Walking the cloud vs. on-premises tightrope

    Good news! If you?re an Android developer <a href="http://www.yilmazetmakinalari.com" title="yilmazlar et">yilmazlar et</a> living in Brazil, Canada, <a href="http://www.yilmazetmakinalari.com" title="kemik kesme">kemik kesme</a> Russia, or 17 other <a href="http://www.yilmazetmakinalari.com" title="kemik testeresi">kemik testeresi</a> countries you can cancel the movers because Google <a href="http://www.yilmazetmakinalari.com" title="kofte makinasi">kofte makinasi</a> will now let you sell Android apps in the <a href="http://www.yilmazetmakinalari.com" title="hamburger makinasi">hamburger makinasi</a> Market. Likewise, you folks <a href="http://www.epoksiuzmani.com" title="epoksi zemin kaplama">epoksi zemin kaplama</a> in India, Singapore, and 16 other <a href="http://www.epoksiuzmani.com" title="epoksi boya">epoksi boya</a> places can stay right where you are <a href="http://www.bagdatdugunsalonu.com" title="dugun mekanlari">dugun mekanlari</a> because in a <a href="http://www.bagdatdugunsalonu.com" title="istanbul dugun salonlari">istanbul dugun salonlari</a> couple of weeks you?ll be able <a href="http://www.bagdatdugunsalonu.com" title="nikah salonlari">nikah salonlari</a> to pay for those apps. That?s right, Google <a href="http://www.bagdatdugunsalonu.com" title="sunnet salonlari">sunnet salonlari</a> announced a large expansion to <a href="http://www.bagdatdugunsalonu.com" title="nisan salonlari">nisan salonlari</a> the Android Market today when it <a href="http://www.bagdatdugunsalonu.com" title="dugun salonlari fiyatlari">dugun salonlari fiyatlari</a> added 20 new countries where developers <a href="http://www.ilgazhacihasan.com" title="koy web sitesi">koy web sitesi</a> of paid apps can live and <a href="http://www.ilgazhacihasan.com" title="ilgaz">ilgaz</a> 18 more places where consumers of those apps can live. However the number <a href="http://www.yilmazetmakinalari.com" title="kusbasi dograma makinasi">kusbasi dograma makinasi</a> still falls far short of the total number of countries <a href="http://www.efecambalkon.com" title="cam balkon fiyatlari">cam balkon fiyatlari</a> in the world. Here?s a copy of the email they sent out to registered developers.
    anadoluweb
  • RE: Windows Azure one year later: Walking the cloud vs. on-premises tightrope

    @ram
    madhav1506
  • RE: Windows Azure one year later: Walking the cloud vs. on-premises tightrope

    @ram
    <a rel="follow" href="http://www.halloween.com/">Halloween Costumes</a>
    I am glad to found such useful post. I really increased my knowledge after read your post which will be beneficial for me.
    madhav1506
  • RE: Windows Azure one year later: Walking the cloud vs. on-premises tightrope

    Really like your blog content the way you put up the things I have read the topic with great interest and definitely will stick your blog routinely for other great posts.
    http://www.cambalkon.gen.tr
    http://www.bagdatgelinlik.com
    http://www.anadoludesign.com
    http://www.terapiuzmani.com
    http://www.dermaturk.com.tr
    skywin