ie8 fix
madison

The Mobile Gadgeteer

Matthew Miller & Joel Evans

MWC 2010: Is Microsoft's Windows Phone 7 Series a game changer?

By | February 15, 2010, 8:28am PST

Summary: At long last Microsoft has unveiled its newest version of Windows Mobile. Long rumored to be known as Windows Mobile 7, it’s now known as Windows Phone 7 Series. Last week I commented on some of the rumors around what functionality Windows Phone 7 Series would offer, and now we have official word on what Windows [...]

At long last Microsoft has unveiled its newest version of Windows Mobile. Long rumored to be known as Windows Mobile 7, it’s now known as Windows Phone 7 Series.

Last week I commented on some of the rumors around what functionality Windows Phone 7 Series would offer, and now we have official word on what Windows Phone 7 Series is all about.

First off, the user experience of Windows Phone 7 Series is a complete departure from everything we’ve seen before in a Windows phone. Modeled after the Zune and in fact …

“Every Windows Phone 7 Series will be a Zune …”

according to Joe Belfiore, VP of Windows Phone.

User Interface
The Windows Phone 7 Series experience is revolved around six hubs which include People, Pictures, Games, Music & Video, Marketplace and Office. The Hubs, also referred to as Tiles, allow the user to go into that experience and then interact along the same line of that experience. For example, starting with a picture of a friend, you can then see the latest status updates from your friend, your friend’s photo album, share pictures and videos, and more.

A lot of emphasis is also being placed on the phone’s ability to separate your work life from your personal one. This is mostly highlighted in the Office hub, which offers access to Office, OneNote and SharePoint Workspace.

As for the hubs themselves, their names tell you what you can expect, but one in particular worth highlighting is the Games hub. This one brings the Xbox LIVE experience to your phone, which includes gamer profiles, achievements, avatars, and even Xbox LIVE games. If the experience is anything like the Zune HD’s games, there could clearly be a mobile gaming contender here.

Hardware
On the hardware side, Microsoft is enforcing certain requirements and one of those includes the standardization of some design features. Most prominent is the need for three buttons on the front of each Windows Phone 7 Series device and the use of a capacitive touch screen. The three buttons are Start, Search (powered by Bing), and Back. As you might expect, Search is context-aware and can be used from any application, anywhere in the OS. Microsoft did a great demo of it showing its ability to find local sushi places. Unfortunately, it all required typing, whereas I was hoping for some Tellme integration, since Microsoft now owns the technology. Maybe in a future release?

Syncing
The Windows Phone 7 Series phone itself can sync to the cloud and also tether to a PC to get updates and new content. When tethered to the PC it interacts with the Zune client, as opposed to ActiveSync and Windows Mobile Device Center.

Overall, I’m glad to see Microsoft finally overhauling its antiquated Windows Mobile interface. Unfortunately, I think this time around, they’ve focused a bit too much on the consumer and left the enterprise behind. I’m not sure if Microsoft is still targeting the enterprise as heavily, but from the looks and functionality of the interface, and its emphasis on social experience (gaming, photos, videos), I would say that the enterprise user is probably stuck on Windows Mobile 6.5 for the foreseeable future.

The big question that will come is whether or not Microsoft is competing against the iPhone with Windows Phone 7 Series. According to the company’s latest marketing video, it’s acknowledging the role and utility of Apps but believes that they needed to

“… start over with a phone that doesn’t make you go in and out of apps”

I actually agree with that philosophy and look forward to having some hands-on time with the new UI. It seems intuitive enough, so now it’s more a matter of whether or not the experience actually limits a user’s ability to get things done efficiently.

As an iPhone user, I have adapted my work style to the iPhone UI. I used to customize my Windows Mobile experience and now use Apps on the iPhone to fill that customization void. It appears that Windows Phone 7 Series is fairly limited in its customization options, other than the ability for me to “pin” my favorite person to my Start page, but we’ll see what functionality is offered by the time the devices ship around holiday time 2010. In the meantime, check out the promo video below.

What do you think of Windows Phone 7 Series? Is it a game changer? Will it actually keep Microsoft relevant in the mobile space?

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Topics

With more than a decade of mobile, Internet and wireless experience, Joel specializes in taking existing brands and technologies into the mobile and wireless space.

Disclosure

Joel Evans

Joel is a serial entrepreneur with his most recent business, CronkSoftware (cronksoftware.com), focusing on consulting and building games and applications for mobile devices. Joel has consulted for Microsoft’s Windows Mobile division and advises other companies on how to incorporate mobile into their existing brands and products. Joel purchases many of his devices and others are sent for review on a 30-day loaner basis and then returned to the supplier. If any devices are provided as “keeper” Joel will clearly disclose this in his reviews.

Biography

Joel Evans

With more than a decade of mobile, Internet and wireless experience, Joel specializes in taking existing brands, technologies and services into the mobile and wireless space. Joel is currently serving as the Managing Director of Cronk Software, Inc., a company he founded to offer full-service, end-to-end mobile strategy, design and development services.

Joel is the former founder and "Chief Geek" of Geek.com, a website praised by The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal, The Economist, and others as one of world's best sources of information for technology professionals and enthusiasts.

Joel also serves as a technology expert for a number of well-known publications and regularly advises corporations, analysts, journalists and bloggers on what the future of technology will bring. He brings decades of relationships with leading game publishers, online communities and publishers, along with both hardware and software product management and delivery expertise. Joel can be found online as "JoelGeek" and you can follow him on Twitter @JoelGeek.

53
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

Yep, you're crazy...
Narg 17th Feb 2010
Don't put the cart before the horse. Your statements are just about as identical to the original iPhone review statements...
0 Votes
+ -
YES!
mailbox01 15th Feb 2010
Everything about Windows Phone 7 Series is fantastic. They need to reveal Hardware details so the experience will be "magical". But one of the things I noticed was how this Presentation was great compared to other MS presentation. Even the CES wasn't good. Hopefully they don't screw up the Marketing/Advertising.
0 Votes
+ -
c'mon Ballmer
Monkeypox 15th Feb 2010
Have the cajones to register under your real name.
0 Votes
+ -
No. But it keeps them in the game.
Bruizer 15th Feb 2010
For as far behind as they were, that is something in its self.
0 Votes
+ -
But what game?
NameRedacted Updated - 15th Feb 2010
Windows Phone 7 appears to be heavily geared toward the consumer market where WinMo is weakest. But how does all this work for business users like myself? I mean Facebook is nice and all that, but I don't want all my friends from school showing up in my contacts list. And it only works with touch screen devices, so I guess those who like a QWERTY keypad instead of the slide out keyboard are out of luck.

I suppose I'll keep an eye on this and see how and when WP7 hits the market. In the meantime, I'll stick with my Nokia smartphone, since it's a far better alternative than the Clunkberry.
0 Votes
+ -
Plain and simple. In your case, you are not a WinMo user anyway:

"I'll stick with my Nokia smartphone, since it's a far better alternative
than the Clunkberry."


Didn't you know: Friends don't let friends buy Nokia. Learned that
one after my first (and hopefully only) Nokia.

So it is not like they "lost" you. I am sure there is really good
integration to Active Sync (better than your Nokia) as well as Word and
Excel (also better than your Nokia).

The question is, will "business" users be interested in the social
centered HUB concept? Personally, I am not into the whole "social" my
life is a web page thing but many of my friends are. They also work
and have jobs and would prefer a single phone VS several.

Don't know.
"$500! Fully subsidized with a plan! I said that is the most expensive
phone in the world and it doesn't appeal to business customers because
it doesn't have a keyboard. Which makes it not a very good e-mail
machine."
0 Votes
+ -
?500 bucks
nothingness 15th Feb 2010
Where did you get the number from? There has been NO mention of any hardware spec's, much less pricing....
0 Votes
+ -
That was Balmer on the iPhone.
Bruizer 15th Feb 2010
nt
0 Votes
+ -
@nothingness
Axsimulate 15th Feb 2010
uh, nothingness, that was called sarcasm.
before. This will slow the slide, but not stop it. Google
might go through a couple of Android iterations before this
even ships!!
0 Votes
+ -
Face it
Rama.NET 15th Feb 2010
On the consumer front (Global):
1. Nokia
2. iPhone and WinMob
3. Android

On the Enterprise Side:
1. BlackBerry
2. WinMob

--Ram--
0 Votes
+ -
Now why would he face that?
storm14k 15th Feb 2010
WinMob is NOWHERE on the consumer front. To be
honest its nowhere on the enterprise front either.
The only thing that should be listed there is
BlackBerry.
0 Votes
+ -
Ok, but at least it has better sales
Rama.NET Updated - 15th Feb 2010
figures than Android with all OEMs in 2009.

Do you really think that Blackberry is the only enterprise phone?
Enterprises are investing Windows Mobile because of its
programmability for their Enterprise level apps.

When it comes enterprise level adaptation with custom application
definition, there are only few mobile platforms and WinMob is the one
which has better development environment than most of them.

And if you still feel WinMob is not good for enterprises, go and
convince MS partners.

I never argue with fanbois and zealots who happen to know only one
or two platforms, it is waste of time.

I actually had a great opinion about you, but this post made me realize
that I should add you to the list where LG and LATW lead.

--Ram--
0 Votes
+ -
Consumer Vs. Enterprise!!
Nsaf 15th Feb 2010
"I would say that the enterprise user is probably stuck on Windows Mobile 6.5 for the foreseeable future"...Now, if MS had skipped the consumer aspect of this phone, then we would grip that what hapapened to consumers' wishes in mind???. As an iPhone user, you shuold know better.
No.

It is an vague attempt to catch up. The problem is that even if its
RTM is not delayed yet again, at least one more iPhone will be
released before WinMob7 comes out.

The Redmond warriors have shown no capability to anticipate
competition. Likely this be more of the same.
0 Votes
+ -
What will the business user do now?
mnpattison 15th Feb 2010
The new phone clearly focuses on competing with the iPhone and Android. As one of those boring business guys who has made a substantial investment in apps for my Windows Mobil 6.x phone, I seem to be getting the shaft.

I will start investigating migrating to a non-Windows Mobile environment soon. I need to hear a direction statement from my app vendors on this topic soon.
0 Votes
+ -
I strongly feel based on the same WinCE. Microsoft will never ditch
enterprise. They are the only player in addition to RIM on enterprise side.
--Ram--
0 Votes
+ -
Only player besides RIM?
Bruizer 15th Feb 2010
Hardly.
0 Votes
+ -
No; Hideous
itguy08 15th Feb 2010
What's with the HUGE fonts?
What's with the mess as a home screen?
What's with the cut off text?

Concepts are nice but MS needs to hire a real design team!
0 Votes
+ -
I knew I wasn't crazy...
storm14k 15th Feb 2010
Every time I looked at a video I kept
saying...ok...these concept drawings and art are
ugly..when will we see the real phone. Then I
realized this is actually how the phone will
look and work. The home screen is a huge step
backwards and flat out ridiculous. Its just a
jumble of what they felt you might want at the
forefront.

I mean seriously...it might have some good ideas
IF you can play Xbox Live Arcade games on it but
its really off to a garbage start.
0 Votes
+ -
Yep, you're crazy...
Narg 17th Feb 2010
Don't put the cart before the horse. Your statements are just about as identical to the original iPhone review statements...
0 Votes
+ -
very few people worldwide have or would want a
smartphone given the extreme expense.
And, they aren't even great phones!

For me, a touch phone was a great experience, but it made
a lousy phone. Too big (fine for web or watching videos,
but #1 task is phone or text), when you enable the wifi or
gps, the battery runs out too quickly, compromising the
prime function (phone/text).

You can use the internet and gmail, messenger/skype on
just about any 3g phone, as you can upload photos to
facebook, take photos, edit them and so on.

The touch/flashy interface is just about trying to get folks
to part with their money.
Some 30-45 million people worldwide use an Apple
iPhone, more than any of the other also-rans put together.
The question is, is Windows7 going to sell more units?
I don't think so.
I just don't think enough people want to get anything like
this. Hey if it was $50.... but it's probably more like
$500+.
Yeah definetly, strong appeal on the consumer side with zune, x-box social software stuff, and also delivering on the enterprise platform with MS office mobile. Top that off with a strong developper platform. Tadaa, looks like a winner
I surely hope MS would price competitively with iPhone for
sure. iPod Touch vs. iPhone cost with a contract and the
same Windows Phone 7 with contract Vs. Zune HD.

--Ram--
0 Votes
+ -
Who actually thinks...
CowLauncher 15th Feb 2010
that Microsoft can actually deliver on this mock-up,
provide the ecosystem to support it and then have it all be
compelling enough to get enough users to make it viable?

I agree it is a game changer for Microsoft, but they have a
lot to accomplish before getting into the real game.

Quite likely it will be as popular as the Zune. I find it
fascinating that Balmer bashes everything Apple does and
a year down the road Microsoft is slipping in their own-
poop the copy them.

Gates dismissed the iPad last week so it will be interesting
to see what Microsoft is doing next year at this time.
0 Votes
+ -
Apple's moved on to iPad -nt
Davewrite Updated - 15th Feb 2010
nt
0 Votes
+ -
Sorry, but iPad is also a dissapointment
Roque Mocan 15th Feb 2010
Apple has moved on to the iPad - but this "moved on" is not that compelling... maybe another thing they have in their sleeves...
0 Votes
+ -
"Also" means something else apple did was a disappointment so since
this article basically talks about Zune, Win 7 I have to assume you
mean iPod, iPhone were the 'also" disappointments.

IF SO..

Why is Msft Slavishly copying them? LOL! (even looks like an iPhone!)
and years late as well!

I remember Apple haters and Ballmer also made fun of iPod, iPhones.
250 million iPods, 75 million iPhone OS devices, 140,000 apps, nearly
10 billion songs downloads, 3 billion app downloads, Apple making
more profit in iPhones alone than Nokia does with all its phones,
iPhones selling more than Win Mo in just 3 years... Apple supporters
are laughing at you!

iPad is going to be a MONUMENTAL success!!!

and 3 years later Ballmer will be sniffing around with another too late
copy....

0 Votes
+ -
well
Rama.NET 15th Feb 2010
iPad may be a successful, I also wish for it, because I develop apps, it
may have to face a lot of hurdle, because it is late in the field and it has
Slates and Android Tablets to face off. Only potential for it is apps and I
don't know how many iPhone and iPod Touch users would buy it. I am
not saying none of them, but how many of them would buy, that would
be interesting.
--Ram--
competition like the Archos tablet?

cnet Archos review:

"but we're fraught -- that's right, fraught! -- with concern over its
schizophrenic, overly complicated user interface.

"When you spend years using and reviewing every device known to
man, it's an extremely bad sign when you have to keep asking, "Sorry,
how do I activate that?"

"But while both Android and Archos user interfaces are great on their
own, combining them is like forcing a horse to procreate with a chimp"

Phyorg review on Archos 9
"Archos 9 is lethargic because it runs Windows 7 on a processor that's
even slower than those used in netbooks -- those slow, small laptops.
How slow is it? Windows rates computers from 1.0 to 7.9 based on
how fast the hardware is, and places the Archos 9 at a 1.3 -- the
lowest I've seen. It takes nearly two minutes to boot up. TV shows on
Hulu.com stutter so badly they're like slide shows with a soundtrack."

"It's a little disconcerting that the Windows tablet experience is so
poor, nine years after Microsoft made a big push for its Tablet PC
version of Windows XP"

-----

or maybe you're thinking of the Crunch Pad or JooJoo tablet made by
a company which at startup had 14 employees (wikipedia: In July 2009
it was reported that Arrington founded a company of 14 employees
around the tablet (Crunchpad Inc.) in Singapore and that there would
be a public presentation of a finished product later in the month.) vs
Apple with a market cap of 180 billion and 40 billion in cash...

---
but perhaps your're thinking about a BIG company, maybe like low
cost manufacturer ACER?

well Acer has already given up:

Yahoo news:

"Acer refuses to follow the pack with a tablet like Apple's iPad, saying
it's too hard to compete with iTunes and the App Store.
Acer Taiwan president Scott Lin said the iPad's strength will lie in the
iTunes music and video library, and the App Store's ever-growing
software library, DigiTimes reports. Apple essentially created its own
niche with those storefronts, and it'd be too difficult for competitors
to duplicate even if a tablet is technically feasible, Lin said."

etc etc

----
We've seen story before:

everyone said Apple's iPod would be eaten alive by Sony (remember
the walkman), Samsung, San Disk, iRiver, Zune... gues where they are
now?

They said big phone players Nokia, HTC, RIM will kill iPhone within
months of launch. Apple like I mentioned before three years later
makes more money just of iPhones than Nokia does with all its
smartphones AND dumb phones put together...
-----

according to Ars Technica from Gartner data apple's App Store took
99.4% of App sales of all mobile phones.

Engadget says the number is wrong: Apple only took 97.5%!!!
0 Votes
+ -
I am saying how many existing iPhone and iPod Touch owners would buy
it. I am not comparing it with Archos version of Android Tablet. It is a
disaster and i don't want to talk about. I am also saying the advantage of
iPad is existing Apps. I think you should re-read it.
--Ram--
0 Votes
+ -
No?
Synthmeister 15th Feb 2010
In order to be a game changer you need at least three components.
1. Killer product (doubtful, remember, you still have to wait several
months to buy this thing. Any seriously cool features can be added by
Apple and Google by then.)
2. Great ecosystem both hardware and software. (not really, MS is
starting from scratch.)
3. Make money. Lots of it. MS may have the greatest smartphone OS
ever but they can't make any money at $8 to $15 per license,
especially since Android is "free." If they could have wrapped up 60 to
80 % of the cell phone market, they could extort the OEMs like they
did with PCs, but that's a distant fantasy now. Meanwhile Apple is
making over $600 per phone, not including ecosystem sales of music,
e-books, movies, tv shows, apps and peripherals.
0 Votes
+ -
Price
Economister 15th Feb 2010
I agree. The smart phone prices will keep dropping to around $100 in a few years. MS will still have to charge a per copy fee for their OS, while Android and others will probably be free. MS will continue to struggle to make money in the low end of the PC market and this will be replayed in the smart phone market in a few years, even if Windows Phone 7 is successful initially. The consumer SW business will get more and more difficult for MS.
0 Votes
+ -
Enterprises currently using Windows Mobile will be forced to migrate some time in the near future. They're going to migrate to established platforms like Android, iPhone or BlackBerry, not a promised Zune Phone platform.
0 Votes
+ -
What?
Rama.NET 15th Feb 2010
I hope you don't do market analysis for living. Why would enterprises
move away?
1. They have full exchange and office support including Sharepoint
services.
2. The underlying SDK will support .NET and I hope it will be much
better than .NETCF for sure.
3. Ubiquitous UI, which would also be interestingly define new corners
of User Experience, so gives much control on developing in house
mobile apps for the enterprises for their users.
4. Cloud Services integration and rich interfaces for cloud operations.

I am not saying some of them are not available in iPhone or Android,
but it has more natively available.
--Ram--
0 Votes
+ -
Bad for Business
gjafg 16th Feb 2010
Forcing a platform change, and forcing everyone to rewrite software (for Silverlight) gives enterprise the perfect opportunity to change platforms.

The other platforms offer are more established, more popular, growing, and have a better chance of longevity than Microsoft's next attempt at mobile.

Also, Exchange support is improving on all platforms.
0 Votes
+ -
START button???
Userama 15th Feb 2010
What a riot! Microsoft requires that each WP7 phone has a START button! Do
you have to go there to power down the phone, too?
0 Votes
+ -
Is WP7 a game changer?
Userama 15th Feb 2010
Windows geeks: "Of course! Fantastic! East my dust, Apple!"
Apple geeks: "Nope."
Android geeks: "Games?!?!? Games??!!"
Linux geeks: "Is it free?"
0 Votes
+ -
Rama.NET 15th Feb 2010
n/t
What the UI does is not clear. At least they tried to do something different from the iPhone, but IMO, they did not succed to make it simple to understand and to use. And why did they present such concepts and not the real thing (at least a prototype) ? It's hard to see what they propose.
Hey guys!you know Microsoft has never competed in the mobile industry before ,and i'for one am stoked that they
are finally stepping up to the plate!they,we can't let apple rule the phone kingdom ,check out the
all the latest about the Windows Phone 7 Series,this article highlighted microsoft's strategy,
to kick some apple ass.and maybe set a bench mark or two!
http://ketiva.com/Computers_and_Internet/windows_phone_7_series.html
0 Votes
+ -
What?
Pete "athynz" Athens 16th Feb 2010
Hey guys!you know Microsoft has never competed in the mobile industry before

And I suppose Windows Mobile 5, 6, 6.1, and 6.5 are all figment of our collective imagination? Reread the article - Microsoft is NOT making the phone hardware, it stipulated the requirements for it (touchscreen, 3 buttons - one Start, one Back, one Search [Bing])...
0 Votes
+ -
Let us count
Rama.NET 15th Feb 2010
how many mee-too phones are there out. Every one copies the other in
business and sometimes they fail in copying and sometimes they cheat
sitting in other company board meetings and silently transfer the crucial
information and sometimes they wait and see how others are making
successfully and look for gaps and fill them. All is in the game and is also
known as business. Now tell me who is not a copy cat in the business.

--Ram--
0 Votes
+ -
Just curious
LiquidLearner 15th Feb 2010
what about the OS is so "me too". It looks quite different from the iphone clones...
0 Votes
+ -
More than anything, users want something that works and is easy to use. So, if it's buggy or cumbersome, it will fail, otherwise it will succeed.

Microsoft can afford to be late to the game ...

Someone on this talkback said Apple has shipped 75 million iPhones (I don?t have a clue) like if that is insurmountable... but there are 6 billion people living on the planet. So, if it is a top notch product, let's have this conversation again 5 to 10 years from now.
0 Votes
+ -
Leave WinMo now. Go to Android
gjafg 16th Feb 2010
Business users should get out of Windows Mobile quick. It's officially dead. It's bad to leave your migration to the last minute.

Long-term, Android is going to be the winner, for both consumers and business. It's the fastest growing platform. All predictions are that it will eventually surpass iPhone. The business apps will naturally follow.
0 Votes
+ -
If you want substandard functionality...
NameRedacted Updated - 16th Feb 2010
"Go to Android. Business users should get out of Windows Mobile quick."

If you are a business user and move to Android, there is no facility for syncing your Outlook contacts with your phone. You might be able to sync your calendar and tasks with your phone, but even for that it is recommended that you maintain two Google calendars so your calendar events and tasks don't get mixed.

As a business user, I'm not going to jump to a mobile OS that provides weak support for what I consider to be basic functionality for a business device.

BTW, I selected Nokia as my smartphone, as it offers better performance, stability and form factor than either WinMo or Clunkberry devices.

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix
ie8 fix