Apple vs. Android: The way it may go down

By | July 27, 2011, 6:31am PDT

Summary: The international court ruling that HTC has infringed on Apple’s patents has brought Apple and Android to an important crossroad that will likely impact the mobile segment for a long time.

Companies involved in mobile tech turn to patents to protect research and innovation from being used by competitors. Getting intellectual property (IP) protected is a major effort by all companies, not only to protect its own IP but to keep from getting challenged by competitors as is happening regularly. Apple and HTC are going head-to-head currently over patent infringement, and the former has won its first victory in court where it has been determined that HTC has improperly used Apple’s IP in some of its Android smartphones. This has brought Apple and Android to an important crossroad that will likely impact the mobile segment for a long time.

HTC has stated it is willing to negotiate with Apple over the patents under litigation. That’s not surprising, as companies are always willing to avoid legal battles when it makes financial sense to do so. HTC is in a very vulnerable position having a court already ruled against it, so it must count on negotiating a license agreement with Apple to keep producing Android phones. What isn’t clear is what Apple’s response to HTC will be regarding such a license deal.

HTC recently announced it was buying graphics company S3. This was in no doubt due to the legal situation with Apple, as S3 has won infringement suits against Apple. HTC probably hopes to trade IP licenses with Apple to make the infringement decisions against both sides go away. Apple hasn’t acknowledged this situation yet, and probably can’t until HTC closes the deal to buy S3.

Apple is not in the business of licensing its technology, and the company is in such a strong financial position there is really no reason for it to do so. HTC is probably ready to hand over a billion dollars or so to make the Apple situation go away, but this money won’t really impact Apple’s core business. There is a mistaken belief that companies like Apple must license their patented technology to competitors, but that’s not the case. Apple could simply tell HTC no deal, and get injunctions to stop them from producing any Android devices in the future.

I can envision Steve Jobs appearing on camera for a simple statement in reaction to the outcry that would happen should Apple refuse to deal with HTC. He might point out that Apple is not in the business of licensing its technology, it builds things. Things based on technology it develops, and it recommends that HTC and others do the same.

If Apple puts HTC out of the Android device business, its next order would likely be to go after Samsung. Samsung is coming on strong in the mobile segment, due primarily to its Android business. Apple laid the groundwork to go after Samsung with the current suits for copying design, and the next step will be to file infringement suits for the same Android technology it has successfully defended in court against HTC. That would almost be a slam-dunk.

That would pave the way to stop Samsung from selling Android devices since the infringed technology is actually part of Android. With the top two Android device makers out of play, the platform would be in serious trouble. That is when Apple might finally go directly after Google for developing the infringing Android platform.

However this shakes out it is going to be a bumpy ride for Android device makers. Apple was brilliant to go after them and not Google, as it keeps the platform under a dark cloud for a longer period. It is not certain that Apple will ultimately win all legal battles against Android, but the ruling against HTC gives it a great start.

Image credit: Flickr user Tsahi Levent-Levi

Related:

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Topics

James Kendrick has been using mobile devices since they weighed 30 pounds, and has been sharing his insights on mobile technology for almost that long.

Disclosure

James Kendrick

James Kendrick has no affiliations or relationships that need to be disclosed.

Biography

James Kendrick

James Kendrick has been using mobile devices since they weighed 30 pounds, and has been sharing his insights on mobile technology for almost that long. Prior to joining ZDNet, James was the Founding Editor of jkOnTheRun, a CNET Top 100 Tech Blog that was acquired by GigaOM in 2008 and is now part of that prestigious tech network. James' writing has appeared in many print publications: Smartphone and Pocket PC Magazine, Information Week and Laptop Magazine to name a few. James' coverage of the mobile technology sector has regularly appeared in the New York Times, Salon.com and CNN/ Fortune online. Not just a writer, James has filmed numerous video reviews and how-tos that have garnered well over a million viewers. He has appeared on local news segments and been interviewed by the Associated Press on mobile technology topics. Additionally, James has been podcasting about mobile technology for years.

Talkback Most Recent of 329 Talkback(s)

  • RE: Apple vs. Android: The way it may go down
    Apple needs to get off its high horse and realize HTC has been making touchscreen mobile devices for longer then Apple. Apple needs to respect its elders! Apple would not be in the mobile devices world with out others paving the way
    ZDNet Gravatar
    teknami
    27th Jul
  • ZDNet Gravatar
    techtastic83
    27th Jul
  • No, Apple was the first with touch screen with Newton (1993) -- long before
    @techtastic83: HTC and other major competitors.

    Also, this monotouch/resistive thing did not pave any way to multi-touch capacitive UI that Apple came-up with in 2007.
    ZDNet Gravatar
    DeRSSS
    27th Jul
  • actually IBM had the first touchscreen smartphone
    @DeRSSSS
    The IBM Simon was both the first smartphone and the first touchscreen phone; that's by the by as the patents Apple has predate all smartphones...
    ZDNet Gravatar
    mary.branscombe
    27th Jul
  • No, Microsoft was first with multitouch...
    @techtastic83
    ...in 2005 with the Surface, which Apple borrowed in 2007. Funny how AT&T now uses the Surface in their stores to sell IPhones. But HTC and Google are WAY behind both Apple and Microsoft. Android is still an infant.
    ZDNet Gravatar
    josh@...
    27th Jul
  • RE: Apple vs. Android: The way it may go down
    The patent office simply should not have granted Apple patents for the touch screen phones. They weren't the first touch screen phone, nor the first touch screen handheld device. Blame the monkeys are the patent office.
    ZDNet Gravatar
    .ray
    27th Jul
  • Microsoft Surface went on actual sale in 2007, and you say it was 'earlier'
    @josh@... only because Microsoft shows demos of products that years ahead of their real availability, and Apple does not.

    And, anyway, table multi-touch has nothing to do with Apple's multi-touch in both UI (two hands waving against fingers) and technology (cameras et cetera against capacitive screens).
    ZDNet Gravatar
    DeRSSS
    28th Jul
  • RE: Apple vs. Android: The way it may go down
    @techtastic83 yes i am also agree with your point that apple have to get off its high horse and realize HTC early and get more positive to the brand. thesis
    ZDNet Gravatar
    linasmith
    23rd Aug
  • RE: Apple vs. Android: The way it may go down
    @teknami
    Whaat? It's ITC's ruling! Are you saying you know the case better than the experts? Are you an IP attorney? That's a heck of an opening argument "respect its elders" LOL
    HTC= High Tech Copycat
    ZDNet Gravatar
    lqr_up_frnt
    27th Jul
  • Don't care, Don't care, Don't care!
    @lqr_up_frnt I'm not an IP attorney or any other type of lawyer. I also understand a company's right and desire to protect its IP. But I am so sick of law suits I could barf. Ever since the beginning of the tech industry we have seen nothing but a never ending series of court cases. While there have been winners and losers, the overall impact has been to line the pockets of law firms and drain cash from the industry as a whole.

    Like I said, I understand a company's need to protect it's IP. But there has just got to be a better way. I'm not saying I know what that is, but there has got to be one.
    ZDNet Gravatar
    cornpie
    27th Jul
  • RE: Apple vs. Android: The way it may go down
    @lqr_up_frnt

    HTC, Samsung, LG, and Motorola (and the rest of the Open Handset Alliance) have SO MUCH mobile IP combined that they could effectively take Apple out of the picture. Apple had better be REAL careful.

    I like Apple, but they are playing a dangerous game.
    ZDNet Gravatar
    Kangaruhs
    27th Jul
  • RE: Apple vs. Android: The way it may go down
    @lqr_up_frnt He may not be an IP attorney but you are certainly laughable in your assumptions.
    ZDNet Gravatar
    blueskip
    27th Jul
  • RE: Apple vs. Android: The way it may go down
    @Kangaruhs You are most certainly right!
    ZDNet Gravatar
    blueskip
    27th Jul
  • RE: Apple vs. Android: The way it may go down
    @lqr_up_frnt

    http://www.thisamericanlife.org/radio-archives/episode/441/when-patents-attack

    Apple is a troll, the courts haven't kept up in 30 years. Yes, the average person is better able to call bull on this than the courts. Read the patent application yourself. If after having done so, you can't identify at least 300 incidences of prior art or if you fail to consider it obvious, understand that you have no business in tech.
    ZDNet Gravatar
    tkejlboom
    27th Jul
  • RE: Apple vs. Android: The way it may go down
    @lqr_up_frnt It's not ITC's ruling. It was one Judge representing ITC and it was a preliminary ruling which the other judges said shouldn't have happened and will most likely be overturned. You don't read what ITC has been saying? You post this stuff but you don't seem to read.
    ZDNet Gravatar
    Guyver21
    27th Jul

Talkback - Tell Us What You Think

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources