First test for Googlarola: ICS updates
Summary: Motorola has recently stated that Ice Cream Sandwich is too much for anything but current hardware. Google needs to squash that bug firmly now that it controls Motorola.
The ink is barely dry from the Google/ Motorola acquisition deal but there's already a situation brewing that must be addressed. Even though Google insists it will keep Motorola at arm's length, the Android update situation at Motorola better be high on Google's to-do list. Android's credibility with partners is at stake.
See also: CNET: Google closes $12.5B deal | A daunting to-do list ahead | Google: We now own Motorola Mobility | Android tablet surge will be led by Google-Motorola, HP, Dell | The tablet revolution is coming
Literally just days before the merger was finalized, Motorola published a detailed list of its phones and noted which ones would be getting an update to Ice Cream Sandwich (ICS), the current version of Android. More importantly Motorola admitted which phones would not be getting ICS, and gave the reason that ICS required the best hardware components to handle it.
“We work very closely with Google and cell phone carriers for every software update. And, obviously we want the new release to improve our devices. If we determine that can’t be done—well then, we’re not able to upgrade that particular device.”
This sent Motorola phone owners into a tizzy, although it was relatively quiet given the small number of them. The admission that ICS was hard on phones was in effect a slap in the face of Android. There has been lots of speculation that ICS updates must be hard to do given how few phones have received it. We even publicly questioned why it was so hard to put ICS on phones, even Google's own Nexus line.
Now that Google has taken over at Motorola, even though it claims it will keep the operation separate, with Jelly Bean about to be announced Google better get ICS in order. It would be in Android's best interest for Google to sit down with Motorola and revamp that phone update list for ICS, and get all recent handsets on a timetable for the update. Google needs partners to get moving quicker with updates, and it better start with cleaning its own house.
It's bad enough that the phones that will get ICS from Motorola won't do so before the last half of this year. Throw in recent phones like the Droid 3 that won't get it at all and if you are Google you have a situation on your hands. Jelly Bean will be announced this summer, and virtually all of Google's own phones will not even be running ICS.
Very few Android phones have ICS, and once Jelly Bean gets released the vast majority of phones will be at least two versions behind. Owning Motorola gives Google the advantage over all partners, with control over the OS, all software, and the Motorola hardware. There is no excuse for Motorola phones to not have at least ICS onboard, and Google better make this a high priority post-merger.
Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.
Talkback
Googlarola? I thought it was Mooglerola
I dont think you realize what a POS android is. It really does take high
As an Android user
Yes I do
It's no surprise that ICS features the same inefficient code.
Yes, I can say that it does not work as well as WP7
Yes it is!
As for stability, my NOTE is perfectly fine and my Sony Tablet S is nice as well.
yes I do.
iPad2, iPhone 4 from Apple, Titan, Titan II, Lumia 900 from WP7 camp.
I can tell WP7 is the smoothest OS out there. And WP7 runs only on single core unlike the Androids and iOS devices.
Yes, I can!
Just check the video comparisons on youtube. It's almost sad how Android lags, on any phone, compared to WP. The most noticeable difference is in pinch to zoom.
Except it doesn't
Re: Except it doesn't
:-)
Exactly right
Definitely won't be replaced with an iOS based device because I can't look at US Dept of Health and Human Services auditors and guarantee that nothing on them is calling home unless the device is never turned on. Same for Windows Phone. Blackberry is dying slowly, so their devices are becoming fewer; though still secure. Android, root it and I can dump the image and obtain the source for full inspection by any auditor or programmer.
Nexus S With ICS is Outstanding!
Mr. Kendrick, I would suggest that maybe you either have a bias against Android or only look at phones that are hobbled by the carriers and device makers. I'm hoping that Google streamlines the Motorola line and pushes updates immediately upon release of new versions of Android JUST LIKE THEY DO WITH THE NEXUS phones.
Goodbye Mr. Kendrick
You should actually thank Google for the multitude of problems, you "feel," it has... Without them, it seems you wouldn't have much to write about. It's all you seem to talk about. It's an obsession. You haven't been possessed by the late Mr. Jobs, have you?
For anyone interested in the benefits of android, you should check out these videos: http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL04FC66EC25CBE28E&feature=plcp
I was actually shocked at the things Android can do that idevices, could not. I think both devices have it's good and it's bad.
Look, I get that it's your job to talk about mobile devices, but I j just get this feeling that most of what you write when it comes to Android has an ulterior motive. Maybe it's the jump in traffic you get from slamming Android... I don't know?
But do you ever plan on writing anything helpful? Maybe an article on upcoming phones, or applications on any platform that could maybe help, someone out? Just something to take away the sigh I get ever time I see the title of one of your articles! Maybe it's just me, but you're becoming a one trick Pony.
So I have to say goodbye to your articles and maybe soon to ZDNet in general, like I did with CNet. I see ZDNet has become just another arm of CNet. I know that you write a blog, but this is becoming ridiculous.
I am not
On this though, Moto knows it is their front end that will not work.
So you mad because he said something bad about Android
It isn't the occasional call-outs...
It's ironic and I totally agree with you!
I'm a huge Windows Phone fan and haven't the slightest desire to pick up an Android something or other (played with them before), but I still recognize that this is written with a negative twist towards Android. Sure, there might be some issues with updates or whatever, but there are plenty of ways to state that without it sounding so negative.
How many people have upgraded their own computers with software that makes the performance decreased relative to the pre-upgrade? Given that so many people are still running Android 2.x and Windows XP, people are clearly just fine waiting for their next product purchase to get the update/upgrade.
james is running low on clicks
running low
Funny, I must have missed something...
And it annoys me to defend James, because I agree that most of his articles are a waste of space. I usually read them for a comic interlude in my day.
The update situation for Android is pretty bad, it reminds me of the Windows Mobile update situation when I was working for Dell and supporting Axims. The biggest problem is that most OEMs and carriers don't want to spend a penny on an update, because they aren't making any $ from it. It is a cost, so reducing the number of devices that they update makes sound financial sense....sort of.
The problem is that they are trading $ for customer satisfaction. They spend fewer $, but they have fewer satisfied customers, which could have an effect when the time comes to update. Unfortunately...maybe not unfortunately, Google takes the blame. Android gets a bad name. Of course, it doesn't help that none of the Android OEMs do any better than Motorola.
What James is trying to say is that maybe Google can improve the standing of Android by getting one OEM, the one they own, to update more of their phones and improve customer opinion of Android.
And what I am trying to say is that the lack of updates may have more to do with $$ than it does with hardware. But, Motorola isn't going to say....
"Sorry, we aren't going to update these phones, because it costs money to build the image, and we aren't getting any additional revenue from an update."
Then again, these comments show that there are a lot of satisfied Android users that at least read James' article. Could it be that fragmentation and the lack of updates is another tech media generated problem?