It’s time for Apple to bring back the Newton

By | January 13, 2012, 5:36am PST

Summary: Apple could launch its next iconic product line by bringing back the Newton.

Apple pushes the envelope when it comes to breakthrough devices that become iconic symbols in the marketplace. Even before the iPod, iPhone, and iPad, there was the ill-fated Newton. The Newton’s short life had as much to do with being too far ahead of the capable technology of the time as it did internal fighting at Apple. It was doomed when Sculley was forced out at Apple and Steve Jobs came back, as the latter was not a fan of the stylus.

It didn’t last long but the Newton became a cult device that is still around today. While the interest is due to being a groundbreaking device with a place in consumer electronics history, the concept is still intriguing. I’ve been giving this a lot of thought, and I think that it’s time for Apple to bring back the Newton. I think it could become the next iconic product line from the company famous for iconic products.

Imagine a 6-inch slate, a mini-iPad if you will, that is thin, light and ties into the Apple iTunes/iCloud ecosystem. Basically a larger iPod Touch, with fast processor and tons of internal storage. The Wi-Fi connected Newton would fit right into the existing Apple customer base.

This Newton would allow Apple to introduce what is essentially a smaller iPad without losing face. There is definitely a market for a smaller iPad, but under Steve Jobs Apple has said no. Introducing the Newton as a “new” product line gets around past statements, and lets Apple test the waters for a small iPad. Tim Cook could make this his inaugural vision post-Jobs.

The new Newton would be a full iPad, but with special apps to make it more personal and tie into the Newton history. I envision a super calendar, contacts, and email experience that make this little guy instantly appealing. Tight integration with social networks and iTunes content would make this a very personal device for the owner. Apple’s penchant for making the device owner feel like the gadget was made just for him/her would permeate the Newton experience.

What about Apple’s disdain for the stylus? The new Newton doesn’t need one. Think Siri voice control integrated into every aspect of Newton operation. The Siri technology is already good enough to pull this off, with dictation, and Apple could expand it to make the Newton the new definition of “personal” assistant.

I believe a Newton could be the Next Big Thing for Apple, one that competitors can’t touch given the Siri technology. Apple would once again have a totally new product line that is built on existing products, but developed in ways the competition can’t touch. This is the very model Apple is famous for following, and I believe it would work wonderfully for a new Newton.

Image credit: Blake Patterson

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Topics

James Kendrick has been using mobile devices since they weighed 30 pounds, and has been sharing his insights on mobile technology for almost that long.

Disclosure

James Kendrick

James Kendrick has no affiliations or relationships that need to be disclosed.

Biography

James Kendrick

James Kendrick has been using mobile devices since they weighed 30 pounds, and has been sharing his insights on mobile technology for almost that long. Prior to joining ZDNet, James was the Founding Editor of jkOnTheRun, a CNET Top 100 Tech Blog that was acquired by GigaOM in 2008 and is now part of that prestigious tech network. James' writing has appeared in many print publications: Smartphone and Pocket PC Magazine, Information Week and Laptop Magazine to name a few. James' coverage of the mobile technology sector has regularly appeared in the New York Times, Salon.com and CNN/ Fortune online. Not just a writer, James has filmed numerous video reviews and how-tos that have garnered well over a million viewers. He has appeared on local news segments and been interviewed by the Associated Press on mobile technology topics. Additionally, James has been podcasting about mobile technology for years.

48
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

sorry double post
pookienookie Updated - 18th Jan
darn double post.... see I'm posting from my G4sawtooth (no kidding) and it's a bit slow.
I had a Newton. I invested a lot in that little device, and when Apple pulled support I was so mad I vowed never to buy an Apple product again. To this day I will not consider owning an Apple product.
@hkindle I had absolutely the same experience. No Apples for me. Haven't felt the worse for it, either !
@hkindle won't buy an Apple product. Sell your stock, your iPhones, iPads, and children. We're doomed!
@godsfault Exactly, who knew that the Newton had such a strong base (must be the same two people that purchased Sculley's book). The Newton was incomplete without connectivity. It wasn't selling well. Get over it. What company has not dropped a product in its history?
@godsfault Exactly, who knew that the Newton had such a strong base (must be the same two people that purchased Sculley's book). The Newton was incomplete without connectivity. It wasn't selling well. Get over it. What company has not dropped a product in its history?
0 Votes
+ -
iPad 2 Sells for $100.03
xpavel 15th Jan
iPad 2 Sells for $100.03
An iPad 2 Just Sold For $100.03 That's 79% OFF the RETAIL Price! Visit http://xpavel.zeekler.com/ Now and Start Saving Today
0 Votes
+ -
If Steve Jobs said no
William Farrel 13th Jan
it was for good reason. Look at Apple's stock price these days as proof that he knew more then anyone else alive.
@William Farrel exactly correct. steve jobs is always right and who does anyone think they are to doubt or disagree with him? consumers don't know what's best for them and whoever speaks positively of a stylus is a complete fool that deserves scorn.
@malert
"whoever speaks positively of a stylus is a complete fool that deserves scorn. "

You obviously haven't used any kind of digital ink technology or *good* stylus digitizer before. It's the same problem with touchpads. The problem is not the stylus but the bad implementation of stylus.
@malert +100 for hooking one.
@William Farrel
But you also forget Jobs also said no to a lot of things and then changed his mind, that includes tablets as well.
0 Votes
+ -
@Samic WTF?
0 Votes
+ -
@William Farrel

Steve Jobs also said:

We don't know how to make a $500 computer that's not a piece of junk; our DNA will not let us do that.
~ Steve Jobs (on Oct 20, 2008).


Yet the iPad is: $499. Isn't a tablet computer still a computer?

Good artists copy. Great artists steal.
~ Steve Jobs


We have always been shameless at stealing great ideas.
~ Steve Jobs


For substantiation, please Google the quotes verbatim, and witness what comes back.

~~~~~~~~~~
The game of life is the game of boomerangs. Our thoughts, deeds and words return to us sooner or later, with astounding accuracy.
~ Florence Scovel Shinn
@WinTard
From this we learn technology goes down in price over time.

WinTards didn't learn anything because they only listen to Ballmer.

"We've have always been shameless at stealing great ideas."

From this Jobs meant, take good ideas (obviously as long as they aren't patent protected) instead of reinventing the wheel.

Ballmer in his rush to copy Jobs forgets the implied (obviously as long as they aren't patent protected) and copies ideas from companies like i4i and gets sued for hundreds of millions of dollars.
0 Votes
+ -
@WinTard
According to Jobs, a tablet is NOT a computer (as they existed when he made the 'not junk' remark). Tablets are "Post PC Devices".

Stealing ideas not implementations. In other words Apple looks for the best concepts (not products) and then tries to make them usable and accessible through unique implementations. In the cases where there is already a product associated with the idea, Apple usually pays for it (windowed desktop from PARC, P.A. Semiconductor, Siri, Anobit, etc...)

For substantiation, look back over nearly 40 years of Apple history. I lived through it and I actually paid attention.
0 Votes
+ -
RE: It's time for Apple to bring back the Newton
kenosha77a Updated - 13th Jan
@WinTard

There is a knack to taking a quote out of context and you have mastered that particular spin skill.

For example, the quote about the $500.00 computer must be kept in the TIME FRAME context that is was spoken in. In 2008, a desktop computer system for 500 dollars WAS junk. (My opinion, of course, but there you go.) And, if memory recalls, Steve Jobs presented the iPad as a device between a smartphone and a computer. He referred to the iPad as a tablet. Only others attributed the definition of computer to the iPad. (BTW, I'm in that camp. I've always considered the iPad a computer. Not the most powerful computer in the world but one, non-the-less.)

But I digress. If you wish to use that particular quote as a reference to an iPad that surfaced two years later, well, go right ahead and display to all the world your ability to spin a topic to your point of view. I'm not saying that the art of spin is not without merit. This is, after all, an election year and the political spin doctors are in great demand. But it has been my experience that spin doctors only protray a rather narrow biased view into the truth of a historical event.

WinTard, the ZDNet Spin Doctor. It has a nice ring to it.
0 Votes
+ -
Yes, but he's not in charge anymore
John L. Ries 13th Jan
@William Farrel
Apple can only be run by seance for so long.
0 Votes
+ -
@William Farrel

Steve Jobs was also the 'mastermind' behind the Apple III and the Lisa, two of the biggest failures in tech history. Steve Jobs is dead, let the myth of his infallibility die with him.
I owned a Newton back in the day and liked it, but eventually moved over to a Palm Pilot 5000. The Pilot's portabililty made it an honest to God, usable PDA. It as the frist true pen computer that could fit in your shirt pocket. I even had Chipmonk basic running on the device so I could complete simple programming tasks. The lack of a 7" iPad is about 90% of the reason why I use an Android tablet instead of an iOS device. Here again, portability is key. My HTC Flyer fits comfortably in a jacket pocket, and I take mine everywhere I go.

You're right that branding the device a Newton would allow Apple to save some face, and I'd love to have a 6" or 7" iPad option, but I suspect calling it a Newton might cause some brand confusion. Not to mention the fact that the Newton was roundly ridiculed for its spotty handwriting recognition, and became the butt of many jokes: with the Doonesbury comic strip running a whole series making fun of the device and its tendency to translate your handwriting in absurd and sometimes colorful ways.
0 Votes
+ -
Newton
bmonsterman 13th Jan
There is not enough product differentiation between a Newton and an iPad. The iPad has more product recognition than Newton ever did. There just isn't any justification for resurrecting the brand.
0 Votes
+ -
Apple doesn't need to "save face"
ckantack@... 13th Jan
Steve Jobs often trashed a product concept publicly right before entering that very market. The fact that Jobs trashed the idea of 7" tablets practically guarantees they will have one out someday.
@ckantack@... I have never heard Jobs trash a product he was about to release. I have heard him lament how certain product segments were poorly implemented or products were of poor quality. I have definitely seen him introduce a better product into markets that were aimless and floundering and then go on to dominate that market.
As far as the 7" tablet goes, I don't think you will see one from Apple- not because Jobs said he didn't want one but because it is a kludge. and not even a functional kludge... It is a marketing kludge. The only reason we have 7" tablets today was because that was an arbitrary size that competitors could tout that they had but Apple didn't. The actual merits of the 7" tablet are such that it is too big to fit in your pocket but too small to view full size documents without zooming and panning around. It doesn't hit any sweet spot.
I don't think so, James.
0 Votes
+ -
When netbooks were introduced around 2008, Apple did not respond by introducing a low-priced, mini-laptop into their product line. Instead, in 2010 they introduced both the iPad and a 11.6-inch MacBook Air (which one could reasonably view as a premium netbook with a sleek and stylish form factor). Both products resulted in new markets, tablets and ultrabooks, that their competitors, save Amazon with its Kindle Fire tablet, are still struggling to enter.

Apple already has a low-priced, small form factor tablet. It's called the iPod Touch. Based on past Apple behavior, I expect Apple to respond to 7-inch tablets with something quite different. And, very possibly, creating yet another new market. It should be interesting, to say the least.
No thanks. I have an iPod Touch at work and find it substandard as a PDA, why would I want a larger one? I carry around the Touch for the one database app they want us to use, for everything else I keep my trusty iPaq.
@fwelsh

" I carry around the Touch for the one database app they want us to use, for everything else I keep my trusty iPaq."

And I so the exact same thing. LOVE my iPaq 211 Enterprise. It does FAR more than any iPod Touch can do.
@IT_Fella Does iPAQ still exist after HP's cancellation of mobile devices?
and 256 levels of pressure sensitive digitization on its fine pixels, in addition to a 5.3" multi-touch sensing capacitive Super-AMOLED display.

Oh, with bandwidth speed of 4G/LTE today.

Where's Apple 4G/LTE on any iOS device?

Then watch out for Apple's propaganda machine when they attempt to copy the Samsung Galaxy Skin and put a twist on it to spin it as "Invented in Apple" BS...

That's the difference between Apple hoarding cash reserves (for litigation), or putting it to work like Samsung's 38.3 USD $ billions in investment just in 2011 alone on future technologies. To the true benefit of all consumers!

True competition via true innovation is great. Hype is pure hypocrisy.

The hypocrite accusing others of stealing, will be revealed and proven as the original ultimate thief.

(For substantiation, please Google the terms in bold.)

~~~~~~~~~~
All the carnal beauty of my wife is but skin deep.
~ Sir Thomas Overbury's,

When you judge another, you do not define them, you define yourself.
~ Wayne Dyer, American motivational Speaker and Author.

How people treat you is their karma; how you react is yours.
~ Wayne Dyer

Truth is generally the best vindication against slander.
~ Abraham Lincoln (1809 - 1865)

The truth is incontrovertible, malice may attack it, ignorance may deride it, but in the end; there it is.
~ Winston Churchill
0 Votes
+ -
Revisionist history at the very least
use_what_works_4_U Updated - 13th Jan
@WinTard
I Googled "Samsung Galaxy Note" and the first thing that came up was "Samsung Galaxy Note impressions: Its just too damn big" Apparently Samsung can't decide if they want it to be a phone or a tablet so they split the difference. Why not? The same basic form factor worked so well for Dell when they introduced the Streak, right? ... Oh yeah, that one failed.
Apple says (and from everything I've heard from users it seems to be right) that currently LTE is a battery hog and they are unwilling to make that trade off. It's a business decision and with the near-ubiquity of WiFi I can't really find much fault with it. If I need fast internet, I go to a computer not a phone, with it's necessarily small screen. Oh wait, the Note has a big(ish) screen. Of course then it becomes very awkward to hold as a phone.
When a product tries to be "all things to all people", it usually becomes "many compromises to few people" in that it does a lot of tasks but few of them are truly done well. The Samsung Note is an interesting concept piece but, much like concept cars, I really don't see it as a good fit for the majority of users. To each their own, or as I would say for this one, you can keep it.

The Galaxy Skin doesn't exist yet, but I agree that it is a nifty bit of kit. If and when Apple adopts flexible AMOLED in their devices (the one big differentiation from other Android phones), they certainly will claim that they created their device (as they do now) and that will be correct. Apple has never claimed to have invented touch screens or IPS displays, etc... They do (correctly) claim to have invented several devices which use these components.

You see, like them or loathe them, this is what Apple does well (and has been since the '70s for the most part) - they take existing technology and develop ground breaking products that are useful and accessible to large segments of the population. To do that they make decisions of what to keep in (ringtones for example) and what to leave out (LTE) and you have the option of accepting those choices or not. More often than not the envelope of consumer technology is pushed in directions that people like, usually bringing that technology to markets that either never saw it before, or never saw it implemented successfully.

For substantiation see the history of the personal computer not built from a kit (pre and post Apple ][ ). Also see the history of MP3 players, the history of portable touch screen devices, the history of consumer-level smartphones, and the history of "tablet computing" (formerly known as that laptop you could write on at very great expense).
Your opinion, stated as fact, does not make it so.
0 Votes
+ -
The market indicates that he's right
use_what_works_4_U 13th Jan
@baggins_z
Time will tell, of course, but the recent successes of the Kindle Fire and the Nook Tablet (as well as the "also ran"s) support the assertion that there is a market for a smaller form-factor touch screen tablet device.
This is n article from The Onion right? No seriously, is it?
0 Votes
+ -
That was my first thought
rbethell 13th Jan
@leskern yep, Onion article.
Why it could not be a Newton for students ? For the education ? Couldn't they introduce it in the incoming event ?
0 Votes
+ -
Um, yeah
rbethell 13th Jan
Right after they bring back the Apple LaserWriter and the Apple II. Not going to happen.
I will be happy to see iPod 5" - 6" but I think Apple concern that such device will drop the sales of iPhone. Therefore, they choice 4"iphone and 9" tablet.
0 Votes
+ -
Steve Jobs had it right in saying that the "high order bit" is connectivity, without connectivity it is pretty worthless. There are apologists saying that, if only they changed the stylus, and added connectivity, and added valuable applications, etc. Yes, you can take any number of products and say if they were made better they would have been better. Steve was right to kill Newton. Now Sculley is trying to attach his reign of idiocy to the present success of Apple via Newton.
I had a couple of friends with Newton's. I used them a few times and really like them. I was a bit envious, but when I got my HP iPaq, it was them who were envious. I actually had a boatload of apps to choose from. But it seems that this niche has already been filled with the iPod Touch and iPhone. No need for the Newton now. sad
0 Votes
+ -
Oh please . . . and while we're at it why not reintroduce the "Edsel"?
0 Votes
+ -
Resentments--let em go...
d0ugparker 14th Jan
@hkindle, I hope you're able to let it go. Resentments only hurt the resenter, and they don't accomplish much. You'll find a supportive and understanding community, one that even agrees to dislike Apple on occasion, but avoiding outright might not be the best approach. DAMHIKT. Warm regards, Doug Parker
What a great idea! When I look at ipad it's a little to big for me to carry around and iphone or ipod on the other hand are too small to get all the work done as an ipad could. What are they gonna call it? iSaac?
0 Votes
+ -
There is a market
genghis7777 14th Jan
I think there is a market. Otherwise why would anyone make A5 notepads? I see them all the time being brought to business meetings.

Handwriting Recognition is pretty good nowadays so provided they can gain access to best of breed HWR technology I don't think there is going to be the negative feedback the original MessagePad got.

What they ought to do is offer HWR as an OS service that all apps written for the device to use. Then we will see something much more closer to a Newton in spirit.

In the end, the name doesn't matter its the combination of features and benefits that counts. A Rose is still a rose...

Finally, I'm surprised by the number of ad hominem attacks used in the feedback to this article. The use of these tactics only undermines the credibility of the user.
Maybe it's just me... I'm a dinosaur...

For me, the Newton is clearly a success. 15 years after its demise I'm still using it daily. From the beginning it has recognized my handwriting flawlessly and way better than anyone else who tried. It is equipped with a backlight so bright that it once helped me keep my fingers clean while changing my offspring's diapers during a power cut. It can emit sounds loud enough to wake even me when the hotel's wake-up call doesn't come in time. I charge the batteries twice a month although I use my Newton daily. I used it to send E-Mails through hotels' WLANs when few people even knew what a WLAN was. Not bad for a device that was discontinued ten years before the first iPhone was unveiled. Granted, my Newton is not an iPhone. Nor an iPad or an iPod. Thank God. Did I mention that I'm a dinosaur?
0 Votes
+ -
The iPad is the Newton
bitchmaster 15th Jan
What is wrong with these technology writers. Bring back the Newton is just hilariously stupid! lol
0 Votes
+ -
Have you ever use a 7 inch tablet?
Doctor Demento 16th Jan
@Tigertank


I have a 7 inch tablet, a 16GB Blackberry Playbook, and I've never encountered any problems related to its size, indeed, I often prefer to use the Playbook than my 10 inch Motorola Xoom because the latter is too bulky and uncomfortable to hold for long periods of time.


A 7 inch tablet is the ideal size, just big enough to distinguish it from a smartphone, but not big enough to be bulky.
Sounds like an great idea. I'm not sure the siri technology is strong enough to sustain a new product line however. I've been using various Windows 7 Phone for a year now and the talk function extensively. Some friends with iphones and I were excited about siri from the commercials. I think it must it still be in beta because we were disappointed that the Windows talk feature's functionality was equivalent to siri, except for the cute responses. When my phone read me a text and I spoke my response, they were shocked. Because of this I would prefer an option for pen input as well as multi touch.
0 Votes
+ -
I bought both the Newton and the Pippin... I still have both. Funny thing was I was trying to convince all my close friends to get the Pippin, they just thought the Newton was dumb thank god. If they would of dropped that kind of coin on either I'd still be hearing about it.
0 Votes
+ -
sorry double post
pookienookie Updated - 18th Jan
darn double post.... see I'm posting from my G4sawtooth (no kidding) and it's a bit slow.

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix