Kindle Fire and Nook Tablet: Not quite as open as we thought
Summary: Amazon and Barnes & Noble want you to buy only their content on the Kindle Fire and Nook Tablet respectively, and new owners are finding out the companies are serious about that.
Both Amazon and Barnes & Noble made it clear at the respective launch events for the Kindle Fire and the Nook Tablet that the two tablets were aimed at selling you content. While the tech-savvy crowd quickly determined that as tablets they could be used for content from outside sources, the reality is just settling in that outside content may not be as welcome as first thought.
Before the two tablets were in owners' hands, I reported that I didn't think either company would want their tablet to be open for general usage. Whether they would lock them down to prevent hacking, or require you to buy content only from the provider I wasn't sure. It turns out they are using everything at their disposal to lock buyers into content purchased from the respective company.
B&N made a big deal about the internal memory on the Nook Tablet being twice as much as that on the Kindle Fire (16GB vs. 8GB). Then yesterday the real story came out that the 16GB of memory on the Nook Tablet is restricted. As ZDNet's Rachel King confirmed with Barnes & Noble, only 12GB is open for user content. More significantely 11GB of that storage is only available to content purchased from B&N. That's a drastic hardware measure for a tablet, and only leaves 1GB of storage for content from other sources out of the box.
It's true that the Nook Tablet has a microSD slot for additional user storage, but a storage card will cost another $20 - 40. That takes the cost of a Nook Tablet with more than a gig of memory up towards the $300 mark. Not quite as cheap as we thought.
While the Nook Color has been open to hacking since its release, one looking to do the same with the Nook Tablet has discovered that Barnes & Noble has apparently used a locked bootloader. This means the tablet will not be very easy to hack, and particularly difficult to install custom ROMs. This is a complete difference in philosophy with the Nook Tablet over the Nook Color, and is likely to protect the content sales the company needs to make.
The Kindle Fire only has 8GB of internal storage, with no slot for expansion. Owners have indicated that 6GB of that storage is available to the user out of the box, which is less than many smartphones being sold today. Amazon has lots of streaming content available for purchase which alleviates the need for a lot of storage. That's Amazon's plan, to lock you into buying streaming content from them with little onboard storage.
Not surprisingly, Amazon has the Kindle app preinstalled for buying and reading ebooks. Kindle Fire buyers wanting to use competing apps and ebookstores will notice they are available in the Amazon Appstore but not visible on the Fire. You can see them in the Amazon Appstore on desktop browsers, but not on the Fire. Savvy owners will find a way to get these competing apps on the Kindle Fire, but mainstream consumers will likely only use what they can see on the Fire. Amazon is basically letting competing apps in the Appstore on the Kindle Fire, but hiding them from view from these casual owners. Not quite as open as it appears.
Both companies have positioned their tablets to sell you content, and the memory situation pushes owners to do that very thing. While buyers may have visions of getting content from other sources, as indicated that may not be easy to do. For many customers it will just be easier to buy content from the tablet provider and be done with it, and that is the plan. Given the approach the companies have taken so far, it leads me to wonder what they will do when the expected hacking begins in earnest.
Image credit: Flickr user lavocado@sbcglobal.net
Related:
- Nook Tablet already in stores: Let the cheap tablet war begin!
- Kindle Fire besting Nook Tablet with more third-party partners
- Google and Barnes & Noble get serious about Android patent lawsuits
- Amazon Kindle, B&N Nook duel plays out on retail shelves
- New Nook Tablet has a shot against Kindle Fire
Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.
Talkback
RE: Kindle Fire and Nook Tablet: Not quite as open as we thought
Er, just like the AppleTV - 8 Gigs of storage - but none available for actual content.
RE: Kindle Fire and Nook Tablet: Not quite as open as we thought
I don't think I ever purchased video content from iTunes to play on my Apple TV. I used that device in conjunction with iOS 4 and 5 devices to stream content from my iPad to my HDTV for viewing on the "big screen".
RE: Kindle Fire and Nook Tablet: Not quite as open as we thought
Tu Quoque fallacy
You get what you ...
No kidding. Everyone knew this was a loss leader device
RE: Kindle Fire and Nook Tablet: Not quite as open as we thought
RE: Kindle Fire and Nook Tablet: Not quite as open as we thought
RE: Kindle Fire and Nook Tablet: Not quite as open as we thought
Good point, I think I'll hold out another year and see what comes to the market. Hoping the new transformer prime won't disappoint.
RE: Kindle Fire and Nook Tablet: Not quite as open as we thought
The problem with this viewpoint is that it doesn't reflect the average consumer. The average consumer doesn't care as long as he can watch the new episode of House or listen to his music. These are the same people who buy iPads despite its limitations, which are many. The issue has never been about what any tablet WON'T do, but about what it will do.
Amazon has the ecosystem to support users in what they want. People will buy it and love it. You and I won't, but we aren't average consumers. Average consumers don't visit this site and they will love the Fire.
RE: Kindle Fire and Nook Tablet: Not quite as open as we thought
RE: Kindle Fire and Nook Tablet: Not quite as open as we thought
NOW - the Nook situation which hardware wise is the premium version of the Fire and likely has a manufacturing cost above it's sales cost alone (not including distribution), rather than at the break even point of the Fire. There are multiple indicators they went the lockin route, and were "malicious" about it. The biggest being the locked bootloader, and the interesting arrangement of their storage which limits user content to 1GB.
RE: Kindle Fire and Nook Tablet: Not quite as open as we thought
One other thing to keep in mind: CS. In a word BN is abysmal, Amazon is near the top. I have been a big customer of both since the early 90's. Amazon has always been best on price, and CS.
The OTHER difference is that B&N is limited to book sales. Amazon ...
RE: Kindle Fire and Nook Tablet: Not quite as open as we thought
RE: Kindle Fire and Nook Tablet: Not quite as open as we thought
edit: Barnes and Noble does not have the applications to make a serious case for itself. If it wants to be a tablet, it needs more than just media content, it needs better services. Google services would be a good start... but if they think there's a market for another cloud music and video shop, I don't know. The competition is now light years ahead.
e-Pub Authors
Re: e-Pub Author
I think it's awesome that eReading has become the war it is. Thinking back to the 90's and video everything, I never imagined companies would be fighting over the 7" tablet/eReader market. I got a Nook Color a month ago and am running CyanogenMod 7.1 using the B&N app and am reading the most I've ever read in about 20 years (almost thru my 3rd 400 page book since I bought it).
There is yet hope our minds won't go completely to mush.
taking mine back
RE: Kindle Fire and Nook Tablet: Not quite as open as we thought
ditto, I will give the B&N folks a chance to respond to this article but if I'm not satisfied it's going back. Probable alternative will be the Lenovo Ideapad A-1 for $200.