ie8 fix

Psst: I don’t care what gadget or platform you use

By | November 11, 2011, 3:55am PST

Summary: Some folks believe articles about technology they don’t use themselves are an affront to their choice. The truth is that’s not the way mobile tech coverage actually works.

I have a secret that I need to share with you. In spite of what some commenters on posts seem to think, I really don’t care what platform or gadget you use. I figure it must be a secret, as every time I write about a device I get reams of correspondence taking offense that I wrote about something other than the correspondent’s favorite gadget.

The platform defenders are the worst of the lot, as the imagined offense is greatly magnified. It’s obvious that choice of platform is a very personal decision with many folks, more so than any other reason. Just writing about another platform is perceived as a personal attack against their choice, it seems.

I won’t whisper this in your ear, let me state it loud and clear. I do not care what platform you use. I care even less what gadget you own. My only care is that your preferred mobile device and the platform that powers it works well for you and does everything you need. I like it when people find a good fit with mobile technology, as that is a joy to behold. Just be assured that I have no intention to prevent you from finding that good fit, nor disparaging you for it.

I am platform agnostic, which is why I move around among the various platforms running mobile tech. I cover all aspects of mobile tech as that is my job, and I switch gadgetry as often as some folks change socks. I have a natural curiosity about the technology, and I am always looking for ways to best leverage it in both my personal and professional life.

When I write an article about platform X, I promise I am not shooting barbs at all the other platforms out there. I am certainly not trying to get as many people as possible to also use platform X. I honestly don’t care how many people nor which individuals also use it. My reporting about it is to explain what I use, why I use it, and how well it works for me. That’s it, really. There is no promotion of anything going on here.

Let me dispel another apparent secret– competition is actually a good thing. It is the only thing that provides us with lots of good choices, especially in the mobile space. The last thing any of us want is to only have one choice to make, as that is not really a choice. Let’s have as many companies making products on multiple platforms as possible, so our choices are plentiful and varied.

If I write that I prefer product A over product B, I am not slamming those that own the latter. I am simply stating a personal preference, and not implying anything about you or your choice in products. I am definitely not trying to get you to switch to my preferred product A, because I don’t think less of anyone who uses something different. I like to hear why, as a matter of fact.

As a late friend once told me, “I learn more from those who disagree with me than from those with the same POV.” Those words are so true and I have come to live by them. Share with me why your POV is different and I may learn something, but if you rant because you don’t understand how I work I surely won’t.

Continue to share with me what you use and why, but not from a defensive stance. It’s not necessary because while I am interested in your choices in a curious way, I really don’t care what tech you use. I just want you to be happy in your choice.

This article was written tongue-in-cheek for the benefit of a very few readers of this column. The readership of this blog is by-and-large some of the most tech-savvy people on the web. I learn something new from you folks almost every day and appreciate the dialog in the comments section. I thank you for that.

Image credit: Flickr user Alaskan Dude

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Topics

James Kendrick has been using mobile devices since they weighed 30 pounds, and has been sharing his insights on mobile technology for almost that long.

Disclosure

James Kendrick

James Kendrick has no affiliations or relationships that need to be disclosed.

Biography

James Kendrick

James Kendrick has been using mobile devices since they weighed 30 pounds, and has been sharing his insights on mobile technology for almost that long. Prior to joining ZDNet, James was the Founding Editor of jkOnTheRun, a CNET Top 100 Tech Blog that was acquired by GigaOM in 2008 and is now part of that prestigious tech network. James' writing has appeared in many print publications: Smartphone and Pocket PC Magazine, Information Week and Laptop Magazine to name a few. James' coverage of the mobile technology sector has regularly appeared in the New York Times, Salon.com and CNN/ Fortune online. Not just a writer, James has filmed numerous video reviews and how-tos that have garnered well over a million viewers. He has appeared on local news segments and been interviewed by the Associated Press on mobile technology topics. Additionally, James has been podcasting about mobile technology for years.

36
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

RE: Psst: I don't care what gadget or platform you use
Psdie 14th Nov
@John L. Ries - .. which "discussing the merits of one's own purchasing decisions" doesn't do - that would be "reviewing one's own purchasing decisions". Otherwise it's a one-sided, unbalanced praise fest - e.g., see the "Typical day in the life of an iPad 2" article earlier today.
I have the same issue from day to day. People think its wise to attack me personally for choosing a certain platform that I find perfect.
0 Votes
+ -
There are four categories
rhonin 11th Nov
@DreyerSmit
1. Tech users
2. Non tech users
3. Fanpersons ( pc term )
4. Married to it but don't announce it

I'm a 1.

This would make a great poll as an out take from this article.
grin
@rhonin 5. NO mobile tech people exist as well.
Here I can also say that I bash apple. I do so notoriously. I also own an ipod touch for the girlfriend, she has music, books and a few games on it for a long daily 6 hour bus ride. I have owned an iphone 3gs modified to work for ME with settings I had to add like background app closing. I own an adroid phone now. I am a working tech. I fix everything, apple products, PC products, other mobile products.

To me, as someone that works on it all, I'm not putting down a company or product unless I know something about it. I get to see it all as it really is.
The worst of it is when people belittle your choice because it's not popular.
I'm sorry but I often don't do things just because the herd does.
The herd instinct drives fashion and fashionable causes, often against the practical, logical, and fact base best practice.
@Agnostic_OS Popular has advantages, it's almost like a feature, a box you can tick. It means you can get docks, audio equipment, cases, software, books - you name it. So choosing something different, just to be different - isn't that smart.

I don't believe people buy stuff "for fashion" much. I think people do buy the same thing as their friends for all kinds of reasons:

1) Because there is a service that will work because all your friends have it (BBM, iMessage are examples).

2) Because your friends recommend the product.

3) Because you know they can "help you out" with inside tips, or even just loaning you a charger when you forget yours!

... and many more.

These are all reasonable, and logical things.
0 Votes
+ -
I feel your pain. I use 3 different phones on a regular basis (I haven an iPhone, Android (htc Sensation) and a WP7 phone (Mozart)). When I dare to reply to a false statement about one platform, I get a kicking. If I dare to criticise a feature on one of them, I get a kicking.

It doesn't matter, if I say WP7 is good in one post, then praise iOS or Android in the next post, I still get abuse from some corners.

It is the same on the PC side, I have Windows, OS X and Linux machines at home and work and I use each platform every day. I always try to give balanced comments, but somebody will always take offence...

Although, I did go through a period, where if I made a balanced comment on a thread about Windows or OS X, the thread would grind to a halt, because nobody could actually argue against it. It is a great feeling, when you can bring both sides of an argument to silence. :-D
Tribalism is one of our most primitive, pervasive and stubborn instincts. And what's worse is that we celebrate it. Whether is be "school spirit" or regionalism or nationalism, we wear our tribal identities with pride from a young age and look suspiciously upon the universalist who declares himself first and foremost a "citizen of the world."
0 Votes
+ -
You forgot political parties
John L. Ries 11th Nov
@dsf3g
Partisan politics is one of the most virulent forms of tribalism.
Amen James!

I "borrowed" a signature that I use with most of my online forums - "The 'P' in PC stands for personal." For example, I'm currently wedded to a $299 HTC Flyer because of the price, size, build quality, expansion, and active digitizer (mediocre, but much better than the capacitive stylus experience). I can guarantee that it keeps you out of the cool kids circle not having an iPad or at least a 10" Honeycomb iPad wannabe. Yet it fills the bill for me with a need for a digital Daytimer that can play media and fetch my Exchange email (all hail NitroDesk Touchdown). Worse yet, I'll be salivating for at least 12 more months for the tablet of my dreams - an iPad size/weight Windows 8 tablet with REAL MS Office...nirvana for me, but like a case of Ebola to many other tablet mavens (especially the iFan crowd).

If we could all just be secure in the superiority of our own choices, it would be a much more pleasant place in the tech cyberworld.
@dksmidtx

Wow, are we twins separated at birth? I too own a Flyer, and am lusting after that same Windows 8/Office combo that you describe.
take the endless "WP7 sucks" from the fanboys like SB, ITG, ect and you start to see a pattern.
I have an HTC Trophy, and it works great - my Comcast, POP3 email, Hotmail and Exchange all work flawlessly. The phone works great, the apps run just fine, No Wifi or Bluetooth issues, ect. A totally stable OS if I've ever used one, and I deal with all of them. Side by side with Android and iPhone, iPhone is equal, Android, depending on the OS version, has different problems. So how can WP7 be so bad when put side by side with Android phones here at work? I never get an explanation as to why WP7 "sucks", nor why I'm seeing various issues with various versions of Android, just that I must be a shill because I gave WP7 a thumb's up, and "disrepected Android!

Hence my opinion as to why people hate what others buy, it calls into question (at least to them) their choice in purchases.

I have real world experience with all the platforms and chose the best one that works for me.

I bought the iPhone for my wife when her old feature phone bit the dust, which I'm not supposed to do because I'm an "MS shill" for giving only positive reviews of my WP7, so I should have forced her onto WP7, right? But fer her I thought it would be perfect, and it was.

I can't think of anything else as to why what I buy bothers others here to the point it does.
I have an Android phone and I prefer it because the manufacturers bother to make affordable specs & I believe in open source because of the possible solutions you can find for problems (which was the case when I wanted to install an Amharic keyboard and font). This is not easily possible with iPhone, and one of the many reasons I dislike the walled (imprisoning) garden system.

When I say this, however, I do so while acknowledging in Apple's virtues as well; they are great at creating markets, and have almost pioneering designs. Steve Jobs did have a knack for spotting the 'cool' gadgets.

I normally restrain myself from making fanboy-like comments because I consider myself to be above that, but sometimes you can't help it when you see silly dog-bark comments lambasting a product solely because of their POV. I make the comments because I want to set the record straight. Even when I do this, which is very rarely, I do so by finding a spot to include the positive of the other product.

I like balanced and well-tempered comments, even if it is against my favourite, and it makes it easier to respond to them. There's nothing like engaging in a constructive discussion with a total stranger.
0 Votes
+ -
It's not what you say - it's how you say it.
TheWerewolf Updated - 11th Nov
For example, if a tech blogger compares EVERY new product in a class with its Apple equivalent, then they DO care which platform is being used because they've decided Apple's product is the benchmark. That decision alone is going to annoy people who don't agree with that decision. It's entirely possible to write reviews and comparisons in a way that has no bias... most tech bloggers don't even try.

As to you caring which platform I use - I doubt that you care - but that's not actually the issue. The issue is 'why do you have the opinion you have?' When you make a statement like 'I bought and iPad and it's the best tablet out there'.. the implicit additional statement is 'all other tablets - INCLUDING THE READERS' (assuming they're not using an iPad) are worse'. That IS a statement of preference and the fact that you're taking the time to make it says that yes, you DO care which one the reader has simply because you said it. (If you didn't care why are you writing the post in the first place?)

Your recent iPad conversion post is a good example. For a long time you wrote posts on multiple platforms and had good and bad things to say. I don't think I could honestly paint you as a fan of any platform. Then the iPad one came out and it was like you'd drunk the KoolAid. All pretense of objectivity or at least neutrality went right out the window. Denial doesn't make it not so - and as someone one said 'the worst zealot is a convert...'

I've seen this before - Jason Perlow went from writing insightful and cutting articles that pointed out flaws in all platforms including Apple's to be a drooling Apple fanboy of a kind worse than most (I'm still disgusted by his 'I'm ashamed I want an iPad2 while the Japanese recover from the tsunami - so I'm sending my wife to stand in line while I lie around at home feeling guilty' article).

You are, of course, entitled to write what you feel is relevent - and I, of course, have a right not to bother reading it. My regret is that another interesting and enjoyable writer drops off my list as the Apple virus spreads to the few remaining rational writers.

Ah well, at least a few recover. David Coursey, who used to be a major Apple fanboy back in the day, is writing sane and surprisingly hard hitting articles about why Apple isn't quite as wonderful as some think.

PS: If you love the iPad and think it's better than the Android - try using it as an alarm clock...

Cheers.

Disclosure: I was a Mac developer for 17 years then had enough and jumped to Windows and haven't looked back or wanted to. I also own an iPhone, iPad and a couple of Macs and rarely use them other than for development as I don't enjoy the experience they offer or the soul quenching they require.
0 Votes
+ -
Contributr
@TheWerewolf My post you mentioned covered specifically the tablets I HAVE USED, not every new tablet out there as you stated. And it is clear from your long comment that simply because I have a viewpoint that differs from your own that it is not worth your time.

You, sir, are the very reader this article was directed to. Have a nice day.
@JamesKendrick I actually agree to some extent with TheWerewolf. I personally do not care which gadget or platform you use, I just want to be informed about how a gadget or platform performs. Let everyone individually choose what they are going to use. While that is what you've stated is also your goal, your personal preferences have been more obvious recently and it gets in the way of your otherwise fine work. While I'm sure you are not trying to convert others to your point of view, your opinions have become more noticeable and it does distract a bit. Anyway, overall I still enjoy reading your work and I'm not trying to flame you, I just wanted to let you know that for me personally the tone does seem to be different than it used to be.

All the best,
Charles
@JamesKendrick Can you also try some other devices removing your past experiences? You say "Android tablets", but which one? There is tons with different specs and different experiences. Ignorance is not something to be ashamed for, for sure. But certainly you have love for X device, you delete rest in your memory. Obviously not something a journalist would do. Subjectivity is out of question...
0 Votes
+ -
all that
oneleft 12th Nov
@TheWerewolf
just to reveal yourself as an apple hater? dude. take a day off.
0 Votes
+ -
@ AmediaN and Dodgson1832

read TheWerewolf post again. Notice anything? Any writer past or present who bashed Apple was/is a good writer. Anyone who writes something favorable about Apple? Why, there's only one conclusion: they've drunk the koolaid. Those that used to write good things about Apple and now write bad? Why, they've "recovered".
Yeah, his is a reasoned and rational mind. I'm curious as to what flavor of koolaid one has to drink to come up with that scenario.

You're both saying the same thing. You want him to be objective but only as long as he's objective about what you want. If he's not, he's a fanboy.

It's good that you both responded to the same post because Kendrick's response to TheWerewolf applies to both of you as well.
0 Votes
+ -
@oneleft Apparently you didn't understand what I was saying. I agree with James that he doesn't care which platform that I'm using. However, where I agreed with TheWerewolf is that James' writing has changed. It is flavored with more of his personal preference than it used to be. In some areas that might be right (iPad IS the best tablet out there right now, no question), but it doesn't help the objectivity of an analysis of a product to always compare it to what you think the benchmark should be. I prefer agnostic strip-down/reviews. I am sympathetic to this post because I agree that he isn't trying to influence others, but that doesn't mean his writing is as good as it once was before his personal preferences starting popping up more.

I guess the problem I have in general is that there is more editorializing in news today than there used to be and I think it causes the information readers are looking for to be diluted.
0 Votes
+ -
@ Dodgson1832
my apologies. I can't see how what TheWereWolf wrote can be taken in any other way but someone who has an agenda.
If you want straight up tear down analysis then Engadget is the place for you. Certainly not here. Not with some of these hacks.
@oneleft I agree that TheWerewolf came on much too strong, the only thing at all that I was supporting is that the author does not have the same tone he used to have. I replied to this thread because the author did, and I think he is in denial about how his writing has changed.
0 Votes
+ -
Amen
John L. Ries Updated - 11th Nov
While a number of us have strong opinions about particular computing platforms and vendors, what hardware and software people and organizations use is entirely their own decision and is really nobody else's business.
What if you just hate them all?
I'm not even going to read this article, because you most definitely do care just as much as any die-hard fanboi. Your previous articles are proof of this, especially those you write in response to defend your favorite devices and platforms.
@theharveyman
...is not fanboyism. Nor is it necessary to loudly proclaim one's own impartiality in the manner of certain corporate apologists who post right here on ZDNet (I need not mention any pseudonyms). What is necessary is to respect people's right to make their own decisions and to give them sufficient information to make informed ones.
@John L. Ries - .. which "discussing the merits of one's own purchasing decisions" doesn't do - that would be "reviewing one's own purchasing decisions". Otherwise it's a one-sided, unbalanced praise fest - e.g., see the "Typical day in the life of an iPad 2" article earlier today.
With all due respect James, I've seen more blind sycophancy and fanboy nonsense among tech journalists than just about any industry in existence. I've got two perfect examples for you. One is MG Seigler at TechCrunch. The guy is a massive and completely blind Apple fanboy. Every article he writes doesn't have a tinge of objectivity. He's all praise for Apple, and all hatred for Microsoft and Google. The second example is ZDNet's very own Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols, about as obvious a Linux fanboy as the world has ever seen. His articles are poorly researched, with a blind praise for everything to do with Linux, whether it's desktop Linux or Android. By the same token, he has an intense hatred of everything Microsoft. It comes through loud and clear in his insipid blog entries.

So James, you may be platform agnostic. That's all well and good. But spare me the garbage about how tech journalism is filled with unbiased, objective thinkers, because those types are few and far between.
0 Votes
+ -
let's be fair
oneleft Updated - 13th Nov
@jhammackHTH
and point out the cult of softies who try to pass themselves off as Journalists as well. There are many more of them than out right Apple and Linux ones.

If you write a column that has Microsoft in it's name (or Linux or Apple) then you should just shut the hail up when it comes to any other platform (Bott, Foley, take a clue).
The fanboyism is what made me buy a iPhone 4s. I own a Evo 3D, Dell Streak 7, Owned the G2 and Evo 4G. I purchased my wife the Evo Shift. I love My 3D... But the 4s is better on battery life among other things. I don't hate my 3D cause I love my 4s and praise it... I use them both. I knew it was something more to the way humans act when the mention of iOS or Android came up. In my opinion 'MY' Phones are perfect for me. Period. Both have pros and cons... If a person thinks I'm a jerk for having one or the other... Then jerk off and go eat a micro SD card or something... I don't care what you have either!!! If you can contribute constructive criticism, cool! If not, then what you typing for?
0 Votes
+ -
Tongue in Cheek?
Nihon8888 12th Nov
I am sorry but in what way is this article "tongue in cheek"? It seems to me you are trying to make a very specific, and valid, point and it is specifically directed at an intended " few readers of this column".
For me it is the way you express your views and opinions that is off putting and creates doubts. This article is a good example of that. It is unfortunate as otherwise I could find them valuable and insightful.
0 Votes
+ -
here's the deal
oneleft Updated - 13th Nov
I've played tennis for a long time and have two favorite writers that I follow. It's not uncommon for their articles to have hundreds of comments, often over a thousand (your iPad2 had almost a hundred, quite a bit no doubt - an end of season tennis article by one writer just passed 600).
The "platform" fanboi pales in comparison to the tennis fan. The camps change every few years (Sampras, Agassi, Federer, Nadal...) but they all call the writers everything in the book if they cross their man. The comments are brutal.

And the difference? You will never, ever, read an article where these writers attack the fans of any camp, no matter how out of line the comments get. They're professionals. They know what's coming and they stay above the fray. They don't make it personal. And they will never disable a users account regardless of how obnoxious that user is. They remain objective. They're journalists.

You read some of the rubbish that some of these ZDnet writers put down and it's pretty clear this isn't anywhere near professionalism. There are several of you who mostly remain above it and then there are people like Gewirtz and Raymond who can't even pretend to be objective. Gewirtz must have the thinnest skin on the planet. Reminds me of Dvorak back in the day.

Unfortunately the few hacks at ZDnet sour it for the good writers.
0 Votes
+ -
"Some folks believe articles about technology they dont use themselves are an affront to their choice. The truth is thats not the way mobile tech coverage actually works."

Theoretically. Try telling that to some of your other ZDNet bloggers, though. There are lots of articles about hating a particular platform.
Well written James.
Nice article James. People will always be people. Tech people seem to be the especially sensitive when it comes to THEIR chooses and will say some pretty asinine things in support of those choices. I wonder why that is? It may because computer technology in many ways is an direct extension of who we are.
0 Votes
+ -
James, Doc couldn???t agree with you more. We???ve become a world of platform zealots who seem to care more about loyalty than functionality. Doc gets a lot of stares when I bring out my Motorola DynaTAC 8000X cell phone (hey, I like the big numbers). I???ve been called everything from a dinosaur to a Gordon Gekko wannabe. But my choices work for me, and I don???t honestly care what is most popular or most revered. Keep up the reporting for ALL of us. But hey, how about a few more articles on hand sets like mine?
http://www.zdnet.com/blog/doc

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix