The "do not touch" Microsoft Surface touch tablets
Summary: The Microsoft Surface tablets look impressive, but only the touch experience counts.
The recent Microsoft Surface event where the folks from Redmond unveiled the first PC hardware to be produced directly by the firm impressed a lot of people. I count myself in that group, and I quickly realized I am the perfect target for the new Windows RT tablet.
Some of the reaction to the press event has been pretty negative given that Microsoft would not let attendees actually touch the tablets. Oh sure, some got to physically touch the demo units, but no one was allowed to actually use the things. Not the fancy keyboard covers either, which makes all impressions given of them useless.
It's understandable that Microsoft is being careful with the impressions these early version tablets give the public. The approach is standard for not-yet-released hardware for some companies. The problem with that approach is it doesn't speak very highly of what Microsoft feels about this new ground-breaking hardware.
The iPad proved to me that you have to use one to fully appreciate the fluid touch experience. Sexy hardware design aside, there have been too many touch tablets that have failed the user experience test in my book. The Microsoft Surface looks nice, but until folks get up close and personal that isn't an indicator of how good they will be as tablets.
I can't help but draw parallels between the refusal of Microsoft to let any press actually use the Surface at the big event to the HP TouchPad soiree held last year in San Francisco. I attended that event and like Microsoft more recently, HP would not let anybody hold a TouchPad and use it.
We now know that HP was trying to keep folks from discovering how unready for prime time the webOS system was at that time. The subsequent cold launch of the TouchPad led HP to cancel the entire webOS product line in just 45 days. HP knew something that attendees of the press event earlier that year didn't, that the product wasn't ready for the real world.
Let's hope that's not the case with Windows 8/RT and the Surface Tablets. They look so nice and have tremendous potential, but until I can use one that doesn't mean much. After all, the only person at the Microsoft Surface event who tried to use one had it crash during the demo.
Related:
- Surface: Why Microsoft’s big mystery turns out to be a big mistake
- With Surface tablet, Microsoft breaks tradition
- Eight new platform announcements for Windows Phone 8
- Microsoft’s Windows Phone 8: There’s good news and bad news
- Microsoft Surface tablets: Obviously designed for me
- Will Microsoft Surface for Windows 8 Pro tablets be competition for Ultrabooks?
- Okay, let me get this straight. Did Microsoft just kill the Windows tablet OEM market?
- Surface: Microsoft, What the Hell is Wrong With You?
Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.
Talkback
What's the word on WiFi only?
Hmm...
This just in...
"suckage"
If you need a hookup outside of a hotspot, you can tether.
So if you're...
I don't think we have enough info yet
Ever heard of tethering?
Excuse you.
Perhaps it is you who should stop posting, if you can't be civil.
Just an observation. Feel free to attack me, you'll just be proving my point.
Wrong!
Not you or James
In Windows OS, USB is capable of running every type of peripherals. That includes 3G/4G dongles.
You don't need to buy a new account just for the tablet. You buy a single account and plug that damn dongle into your Tablet/Laptop/PC.
Paradigm shifts.
Err
If the product is still being made then perhaps the manufacturer will create one, though I'm fuzzy on how you install it (doesn't it need to come out of Microsoft's Software Market?)
Putting a USB port on the side of something isn't a panacea.
Plus, you really want a USB stick hanging out of your tablet? I think those nifty WiFi ones are the way to go.
Drivers?
Sheesh, USB compatible devices would *naturally* connect so long as they conform to the same standards the MS publishes. Now like that or not, at least with MS there are hardware compatibility standards (actually Windows and Mac).
And talk about things sticking out of the side?
I watch iPad users every day set there little tablet on their little tablet holder, or prop it up with the case that folds out, then they get their little head phones, they they get their little AC adapters (often times), and the spend a few minutes getting all their little cables orgainzed, and then they start using it only after they have wiggled their butt in their chair and gotten all the accessories connected.
And you talk about people connecting a USB device...amazing.
Err (cont. from Jeremy's post)
All current MacBooks running OS X, including the MacBook Air, have USB ports. (Actually several USB 3 ports, running up to 5 Gbs as well as dual 10Gbs Thunderbolt ports.)
So all current Macs (and most older ones) can run peripherals for which there are drivers, including USB "3G/4G dongles," printers, scanners, hard drives, etc.
wmac1 "doesnt get it.. In Mac OS X, USB is capable of running every type of peripherals. That includes 3G/4G dongles."
Misleading article
" not to sell ... but to raise the bar for OEMs"
But only an idiot....
Go Seahawks
Yes
Already making cheap excuses for the failure??