Verizon tethering police reach into your phone and disable the hotspot

By | July 12, 2011, 12:47pm PDT

Summary: Verizon has pushed an over-the-air (OTA) update to the HTC Thunderbolt that disables the hotspot feature previously possible on the phones.

Verizon has pushed an over-the-air (OTA) update to the HTC Thunderbolt that disables the hotspot feature previously capable on the phones. Big Red had been providing tethering, the ability to use the phone as a connection to the web via tethering over Wi-Fi, free as part of a special promotion. The freebie has ended and Verizon’s update to the Thunderbolt disables the hotspot capability that is integrated in Android.

You shouldn’t be surprised, I warned that the tethering police were coming when AT&T started notifying customers it detected using phones as hotspots without subscribing to the paid service that they would start being charged. I sounded the warning gong again when Verizon made Google remove tethering apps from the Android Market, as they facilitated free hotspot usage. The current move by Verizon to alter the smartphone software to disable unpaid hotspot use is simply the next step in the program for all U. S. carriers to get serious about making customers pay up or shut down the tethering.

This move by Big Red follows the ending of unlimited smartphone data plans for new customers. It paves the way to get all smartphone owners paying for a certain amount of data usage each month, while tacking on an extra fee for mobile hotspot service, commonly known as tethering. Verizon may be the first carrier to disable the ability to use Android’s integrated hotspot capability, but I can bet it won’t be the last After all, the carriers always know exactly where to find your smartphone, to an accuracy of a few feet.

Image credit: Flickr user OregonDOT

See related coverage:

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Topics

James Kendrick has been using mobile devices since they weighed 30 pounds, and has been sharing his insights on mobile technology for almost that long.

Disclosure

James Kendrick

James Kendrick has no affiliations or relationships that need to be disclosed.

Biography

James Kendrick

James Kendrick has been using mobile devices since they weighed 30 pounds, and has been sharing his insights on mobile technology for almost that long. Prior to joining ZDNet, James was the Founding Editor of jkOnTheRun, a CNET Top 100 Tech Blog that was acquired by GigaOM in 2008 and is now part of that prestigious tech network. James' writing has appeared in many print publications: Smartphone and Pocket PC Magazine, Information Week and Laptop Magazine to name a few. James' coverage of the mobile technology sector has regularly appeared in the New York Times, Salon.com and CNN/ Fortune online. Not just a writer, James has filmed numerous video reviews and how-tos that have garnered well over a million viewers. He has appeared on local news segments and been interviewed by the Associated Press on mobile technology topics. Additionally, James has been podcasting about mobile technology for years.

21
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

RE: Verizon tethering police reach into your phone and disable the hotspot
Cmd_Line_Dino 16th Jul
@VBJackson Isn't this misuse of the word "illegal"?
Shouldn't the correct description be "breach of contract"?
0 Votes
+ -
i gave up
sportmac 12th Jul
this tethering, paying extra money for extra data when i'm not using my full data, is bogus. so i dropped my cell/data plan.

i carry a mifi, use line2 and don't plan on going back.
unlimited calls to us and canada, unlimited texting and can use the mifi on all my devices.

line2 has been rock solid, good voice (granted, i'm not the best judge of that being deaf in one ear and not hearing that well in the other). no delays when talking as with some other voips i've tried.
It's ironic that carriers in the US complain about not getting the revenue for the services some people use freely, yet when the argument goes back to people WANTING to pay for something the carriers refuse to offer, the carriers then shut up or begin making lousy excuses.

It doesn't take a wizard to realize why people are tethering - the technology/demand is there. But with carriers imposing data caps and overage charges the only way they can get around it is by doing it illegally.

I think if carriers want to successfully curb illegal tethering, they're going to have to first find a way where consumers can do it "legally". Carriers need to provide a service/incentive that deters the illegal practice in the first place. A 5GB cap at $70 doesn't cut it.
@lgpOnTheMove Verizon has legal tethering though... You just have to pay for it.
Yeah by paying out the_ass for it. Especially when you already paid for the data initially.
@lgpOnTheMove Tethering is Illegal???? Hmmm, I didn't see that bit of legislation come across the local, state or federal house or senate... Saying that something is Illegal implies that it is something that is codified into law.

The carriers just don't want you to do it, because it means less money for them. They are greedy and want to soak the public for everything they can, to that end they will make it sound like that activity is "Illegal" and breaks some law imposed by our law makers.

The simple fact is.. The public tethering apps make use of the core Linux networking feature, which are also present in Windows, to "NAT" (Network Address Translation) connections and make it look like they are coming directly from the smart phone, not another device. It uses the same bandwidth that your already paying for to do this. It is the same technology that is used by your router that you use at the office or home.

Paying for tethering, and paying for phone bandwidth is double dipping, your already paying for the bandwidth with your plan, you use that same bandwidth when you tether other devices.

I have to submit that what the carriers are doing are double charging consumers for the products they are already paying for, in effect, they are defrauding their customers. Any other company that double charges their customer then places a stamp on the bill and mails it gets busted for postal fraud... Of course, I am not an lawyer, so.. I could be off base.

Just my $0.02 worth..
@jason.lambert Your reading comprehension could use some work, since you clearly did not parse correctly his use of QUOTES on the word "legally." In this case he obviously meant "within the terms of the contract between the user and his carrier."
0 Votes
+ -
"Illegal"
VBJackson 13th Jul
@jason.lambert and @The_One_True_Fnerd
I would say that you should both look at the contracts.
If there is a clause that prohibits connection sharing, or that specifies a charge for doing so, then tethering IS in fact illegal in all senses of the word, i.e. it violates your contract which is a legal document.

If, on the other hand, there is no such clause then it is not illegal, and the carriers are simply trying to increase profits.

I will have to disagree with Jason about it being double billing, however. While it IS greedy, the technicality that they are basing it on is that data from a device other than the one that is contracted with them is going thru thier network.
@VBJackson: Your logic would make the use of a bluetooth headset "illegal" since the data (packetized voice) didn't originate from the contracted device.
@VBJackson They should only be billing based on data usage, not the number of devices. It's true that with tethering, it is easier to use more data, but then your bill should increase based on the amount of data you consume.
@VBJackson Isn't this misuse of the word "illegal"?
Shouldn't the correct description be "breach of contract"?
This why rooting is the only way to go these days. Why pay for data twice? I sure won't. Sprint may not be the best company out there but at least they've still got unlimited data (knock on wood).
@razorsyntax
The root tether is what they are disabling so even the root won't work one they start implimenting the rule. The update shuts the linux ability down root just let you unlock it free but they can stop it from working. I use my evo on sprint and now pay 435 a month unlimited everything data talk text gps all of it and I am rooted and use my tether for my Galaxy tab. verizon might be shooting themselves in the foot and I do hope Sprint boost do not follow as the fastest growing market is the no contract prepaid unlimited plans such as boost or virgin mobile.
@Fletchguy Once you've rooted the device you can install whatever firmware you want on it regardless of Verizon's updates, and then use USB debugging to emulate a network card.
@snoop0x7b: You don't need root to use USB debugging, that's why apps like EasyTether and PDANet are so popular .
I use my evo on sprint and now pay 435 a month unlimited everything data talk text gps all of it and I am rooted and use my tether for my Galaxy tab.

Am I reading this right? You pay $435 per month?

LOL I just can't see this happening and somebody willing to do this. Not without a corporate account or rebate to pay for it.
It seems that the time has come for a massive assault on cell phones. Yes, they are hard to get into because the carrier locks them down but it can be done. Buy a data/power cable and have at it. What are the carriers gong to do, shut down their networks?
0 Votes
+ -
surprise, surprise, surprise....
semi-adult 13th Jul
Every bit, every foot, every second.

Meet the new boss......................
My data, my usage. I pay for it and I can use it how I see fit.
When Verizon recently acquired a new section of the bandwidth spectrum from the US government, part of their contract included that they could not limit what devices were able to use this spectrum. They are currently being sued on our behalf, but if we don't complain to our representatives, they may walk with a sweetheart deal.
@ALISON SMOCK The carriers paid big $$ for the spectrum. Where did all that money go?
Having been forced into a "fixed income" status by a ruthless Taiwan based tech company, I am in a position where my appetite is indeed much larger than my pocketbook. I was seriously considering a hookup with VZN using an unlimited data plan and tethering, until these latest ignoble acts came about - now they can pound sand, just like ATT & T-Mobile, as far as any possible revenue from me.
I still seriously believe they simply do not want any more new customers, judging by their actions, rather than any publicity they may erstwhile offer.

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix