Dick, Jane, and MySQL: why recessions favor open source

Summary: Recessions are good for open source simply because they force non IT management to face the costs of IT -and think a bit about what they know it can do for the business.

Lets imagine that you've magically become the owner of a small business with just over a hundred employees. Times are tough and getting tougher: higher taxes, higher energy costs, increasing legislated entitlements, and serious inflation are all incoming - and you're already getting squeezed on all sides because your bankers and your customers are living in the same climate of financial fear you are.

The bottom line is simple: if your business is going to survive, something's going to have to give.

So what to do, what to do? Laying off people who make the money will increase unit costs while leading to decreased sales; reducing quality might work for a while, maybe buy some stuff from China, but it's a death spiral and you know it. So what's left is the overheads.

You can let the bank do payroll - they keep proposing that - and maybe layoff Sally, but somebody's still got to enter the data and there's no way the bank can give Jim, your plant foreman, the flexibility Sally gives him now in terms of managing time, advances, and special payments.

There's no fat in transportation or purchasing either, they're one man bands and you're lucky to have them. Sales might be a little fat, but only Jack's not really carrying his weight, but he's new, and his customers are new to the company - and Anne says they're not people she can switch to Jill without having them thinking about their suppliers some more.

Your IT department is two people first hired as office clerks who talk a good talk about Windows and know how to use the latest cell phones - but they pretty much don't do their original jobs anymore and instead generate a never ending stream of requests for more money for computers: new gear, upgrades, licenses, services - it just never ends - and just last week the bank didn't get its inventories log on time again - and you know they're looking pretty closely at every outstanding penny right now.

The web sales stuff the accountants sold you on hasn't panned out - but Anne says it takes weight off her people because customers get information from there she'd otherwise have to hand feed them, and it has generated a few good leads -one of which led to Jack and couple of decent volume sales- so it's early days and probably a mistake to shut down and anyway it doesn't cost much, does it?

So now you look closely at IT costs. It's kind of surprising: an almost daily nuisance that's built up a lot more than you thought. You never realized, for example, that with 26 desktops and five laptops you had nine "servers" - two of them less than six months old; or, that 19 of your 31 PCs haven't had anything changed on them for two years - three nobody can find, and the other nine have an average cost, just this year, of nearly $4,000 in new hardware, upgrades, licensing, and professional support.

Richard says the older desktops and the inventory management servers will need to be replaced pretty soon - but he's asked for the money before, and they're still working.

The accounting system runs on nine PCs and two servers - and the software on those two servers cost you $11,000 each just on installation -apparently upgrades needed to migrate from the old gear. That's coming up for renewal in another six months too.

Looking more closely, you discover two of the eight servers are being used for the materials management and procurement system, but have no charges against them this year; two more being used for your web presence are costing a few hundred dollars a month to lease in some co-hosting center, but aren't on your books at all - one is in your office supporting email and word processing, and four others are on the books but disconnected and in storage - Jane says that's because they're over two years old and useless so they're just keeping them till the depreciation runs out and they can be thrown out. Probably where the two laptops and the PC went too.

Add it all up, including the two salaries salaries plus overheads, and it looks like you could be spending over $140,000 a year on IT.

According to Richard and Jane, (and a guy you asked at your accounting firm), this is all good and reasonable - just a cost of doing business, they say; but there's a niggling doubt: a guy you know who runs a small law firm was just telling you about how he's saving a bundle by switching everything to Linux. It's free, he says - and free sounds pretty good.

Explore that a bit, and you'll see that recessions are great for open source because you can layoff off Dick and Jane, hire an IT professional to switch everything to Linux, save over $6,000 a month for the next three years, and end up with a pretty good chance that the bank will get its inventory change logs on time every week.

Topics: Banking, Open Source, Servers

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Talkback

79 comments
Log in or register to join the discussion
  • A few questions

    + can you give me an accounting open source software that is accepted by accountants that produces year in year out up to dates forms accepted by the fiscal administration ?
    + can you give me the name of an open source "materials management and procurement system" that does not need IT service thecost of which won't dwarf license cost of a commercial one ?

    going to linux for your 30 system will save you 30 * 70 $ over the next 3 years, that is 700$ a year ! that is two days of it consultancy to study the migration.
    s_souche
    • There is no OSS accounting...

      solutions worth a hoot. This is the main reason we still run so many Windows machines in the office. Of course this is the main drawback of any OSS adoption. There is a serious lack of good applications.

      OSS has worked great for my servers. But I can't ever see adopting it at the desktop. It would be great to see major app vendors port their products to Linux. But there is not enough return for them to do so. If we were to see this happen, Linux would definitely take off. Then we would see a bigger mix of OSS and proprietary solutions running side by side.
      bjbrock
      • Two points.

        Accounting software, not business versed, but google's first hit was this. Have you really explored enterprise accounting solutions?
        http://www.fitrix.com/?gclid=CLeQicf3gZcCFRJdxwodnEYr_w

        OK, accounting aside, and the odd CAD application aside, what applications are you lacking?

        TripleII
        TripleII-21189418044173169409978279405827
        • why this link

          it is no OSS accounting solution it seems....

          as you mentionned CAN, but also video post production, video editing, publishing workflow, OCR, stress analysis, flow simulation.

          OSS application today target either backoffice, or desktop general applications. niche application or application requiring massive investment to produce are not yet in the OSS, because that would require too much of too few. In te end, mature solution ( ie field with few inovation ) will have their OSS solutions, but we'll have to wait for that...
          s_souche
          • Oh, and US Government websites...

            [i]OSS application today target either backoffice, or desktop general applications. niche application or application requiring massive investment to produce are not yet in the OSS, because that would require too much of too few.[/i]

            Have you checked out http://usaspending.gov/ ? A website the US Government put up to allow it's citizens to see what it's spending their money on, and written in Open Source.
            914four
      • Really?

        Have you looked at OpenBravo, TinyERP, or Compiere? There are also several smaller packages more along the lines of Quickbooks, but I can't remember the names of them at the moment.
        Turntwo
    • basics are wrong

      looks like the author is considering licensing as the only cost in IT. Compared to overall costs, licensing is just one small part.. the rest are reason enough to stick with existing systems.
      soulxfer@...
  • Why the insistence on replacing perfectly good...

    ...software? If the budget is tight why would this company be thinking of replacing their software? Unless there's a specific business driver keep what you've got.
    ye
    • Unlike buying your software for home use

      commercial software is a yearly license fee. You never really "buy" the software - you end up renting it. The major cost of changing would be migrating of the data - not really the licensing costs.
      Roger Ramjet
      • Is there any reason to believe the software is being...

        ...licensed on an annual basis?
        ye
        • From inference

          [The accounting system runs on nine PCs and two servers - and the software on those two servers cost you $11,000 each just on installation -apparently upgrades needed to migrate from the old gear. That?s coming up for renewal in another six months too.]

          This is a hint, but it doesn't spell things out that way. Most commercial software have some sort of annual support cost (and I do mean MOST).
          Roger Ramjet
          • Which OSS would not address

            [i]This is a hint, but it doesn't spell things out that way. Most commercial software have some sort of annual support cost (and I do mean MOST).[/i]

            The assumption being there is not an OSS equivalent to replace said software.
            ye
          • And OSS has yearly support costs

            Red Hat, Novel, IBM, take your pick: They all have annual support costs. If you don't pay it and the New IT admin can not figure out the problem, well, that free software is quite useless.
            GuidingLight
      • Migrating the Data!?!?

        The main cost would not be migrating the data, unless you consider business rules, reports, interfaces, customization and staff training as data!!!
        jorgebraga
    • How about so you can roll it out to all students and parents, and they can

      use it at home. No more keeping track of licenses, disks, doing installs, updates, patches.

      And, let us not forget when those yearly license fees come due. You seem to forget about the fact that businesses only get discounts by going with software assurance.
      DonnieBoy
      • You didn't answer the question. Which was:

        "Why the insistence on replacing perfectly good software?"

        Presumably the software has already been purchased. Without a business driver why would the business be replacing it?
        ye
        • "Why the insistence on replacing perfectly good software?"

          Because software is never "perfectly good," or you'd, presumably, still be running Windows 3.11.

          Because software requirements change. I'm not into that branch of the industry, but I'd bet Sarbanes-Oxley changed the way accounting software has to work.

          Because the vendor of your existing software has end-of-lifed it and won't support it anymore.

          Because your business has gotten bigger and the s/w that worked fine for 100 employees isn't adequate for 200.

          etc., etc.
          Henrik Moller
          • Is there any evidence to suggest the current software...

            ...is not meeting the organizations needs?
            ye
          • Getting desperate, ye?

            Afraid you're not going to get your quarterly FUD-distribution bonus from Redmond?
            Henry Miller
          • What FUD? Aren't you zealots the bearer of all FUD?

            Ye is asking a valid question. If a Windows 3.11 is still working perfectly then what's the use for an OS change? If MS stops support for it then again we go back to the it's still working argument so why change it. And for the last comment no company would hire more when the economy is in recession....
            transposeIT