AT&T & T-Mobile: Already Married in Technology
Summary: For all the hubbub about AT&T acquiring T-Mobile, people have ignored that the two have been working hand-in-glove on their technologies for years.
The news that AT&T was going to buy T-Mobile for a cool $39 billion surprised, and even shocked, a lot of people. I don't know why. AT&T and T-Mobile have been working together technically and operationally for years.
As Glenn Fleishman, wireless networking expert, points out in his latest blog, "One of the dirtiest barely secrets of the modern mobile cell world is that AT&T doesn't really have national 2G coverage, much less 3G. AT&T leans on T-Mobile for a large number of areas it never spent to cover. This stems from an agreement years ago when AT&T Wireless consolidated on GSM service, and T-Mobile was building out its initial GSM service. In 2004, the companies dissolved a cooperative agreement (when Cingular bought what was then AT&T Wireless), but roaming never disappeared."
Fleishman continued, "This lack of coverage is why AT&T didn't offer feature phone or smartphone service in large parts of the country outside urban areas. … AT&T also gets the depth of T-Mobile's spectrum portfolio in dense markets where AT&T clearly lacks the ability to deliver service to the level needed, such as New York City's boroughs and San Francisco. It won't be trivial to integrate the networks, but many carriers co-locate equipment with tower and building owners. And if they maintain the current deal and roaming is no longer a for-fee arrangement, AT&T can instantly get the benefit."
The two have also long been working together on their Wi-Fi offering. Odds are that if you were using T-Mobile Wi-Fi, your signal was actually being picked up by AT&T access points (AP)s and being routed over AT&T's share of the Internet.
Besides already working closely together operationally, both AT&T and T-Mobile are also the only two U.S. mobile phone companies that use Global System for Mobile Communications (GSM) for telephony. Both companies also use High Speed Packet Access (HSPA)for 3G data networking.
The pair has also been using HSPA+ (High Speed Packet Access Plus) aka HSPA Evolution and Evolved HSPA for "4G" data networking.
I put 4G in quotes because there's more than a little debate about whether any current wireless data technology is actually 4G. And, even though future iterations of Worldwide Interoperability for Microwave Access (WiMAX) and Long Term Evolution (LTE) have been approved as 4G, no one has given HSPA+ this blessing. Mind you, it won't stop AT&T from advertising their "4G" network.
Eventually, AT&T and T-Mobile, which is already being called T-Mo, will move to LTE, but I don't see this happening anytime soon. In the meantime, speed-happy mobile users will remain stuck in the LTE+ lane. Of course, at this point, there's more hype than there is speed in everyone's 4G claims.
The current joke going around runs: "AT&T is getting married to T-Mobile. There will be no reception afterwards" It's funny, but technically speaking it won't be true. As ABI Research senior analyst Mark Beccue says, "It is most likely a good thing for current AT&T mobile customers as network coverage and quality should improve with the addition of T-Mobile's cell sites." Technically and as far as infrastructure goes, the two should do well together. After all, they already are. If the deal goes through Sprint should be very worried.
Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.
Talkback
RE: AT&T & T-Mobile: Already Married in Technology
RE: AT&T & T-Mobile: Already Married in Technology
Steven
RE: AT&T & T-Mobile: Already Married in Technology
RE: AT&T & T-Mobile: Already Married in Technology
I'm upset, and I'm an AT&T user who was getting ready to jump over to T-mobile. That said, I've never had a problem with AT&T wireless service. I'm happy with the wireless service, but I'm tired of the pricing. After comparison shopping I figured out that I could save about $30 a month at T-mobile and have everything I have now plus a little. So, this news is a bit discouraging! I think T-mobile treated their customers better and that is what I was looking for.
RE: AT&T & T-Mobile: Already Married in Technology
This Is Bad News For AT&T
Wired had a great article about 4G coverage, AT&T ranks dead LAST and T-Mobile isn't much better....Verizon was number 1. I'm surprised the AT&T can get away with saying they have 4G coverage when the speeds aren't even near what Verizon has.
Verizon's iPhone 5 rollout is going to be a smash success as those who have the 3GS are ending their contracts, and if Verizon can pitch a good sale I will pay my ETF fee and ditch the iPhone 4 in mid-contract from AT&T and jump to them.
RE: AT&T & T-Mobile: Already Married in Technology
RE: AT&T & T-Mobile: Already Married in Technology
Damn!
I wonder who I'll upgrade to.
I like Android but I don't trust AT&T.
RE: AT&T & T-Mobile: Already Married in Technology
RE: AT&T & T-Mobile: Already Married in Technology
Australia junked it's CDMA not so long ago...........
RE: AT&T & T-Mobile: Already Married in Technology
There are very few people who are going be taking their cell phones globally. Yes CDMA is predominant in N. America, followed by Brazil, Korea, Japan, China and India. But you would be stuck with second rate service from AT&T/T-Mobile if you selected GSM in N. America...Then there are what are called World Phones available to those who need it with Multi-format capability. And in fact all Qualcomm chipsets (and I mean ALL) have the ability to perform GSM and CDMA network communication. It is up to the carriers and phone manufacturers to decide to produce them. This issue is not simply a matter of how predominant GSM is in the world (never mind the politics of cell providers in Europe shunning any wireless capability developed in N. America for that matter).
RE: AT&T & T-Mobile: Already Married in Technology
RE: AT&T & T-Mobile: Already Married in Technology
RE: AT&T & T-Mobile: Already Married in Technology
There is no way that this merger is in the interest of the consumer. And it is likely to actually send more business to Verizon or Google, once people forced to be ATT customers, have the experience that I had with them when they bought out Cellular One.
RE: AT&T & T-Mobile: Already Married in Technology
RE: AT&T & T-Mobile: Already Married in Technology
RE: AT&T & T-Mobile: Already Married in Technology
RE: AT&T & T-Mobile: Already Married in Technology
T-Mobile Definitely Had Been Preparing for This