ie8 fix
madison

Networking

Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols

Firesheep’s Real Lesson: Take Wi-Fi Security Seriously

By | October 27, 2010, 9:27am PDT

Summary: Firesheep has people in a panic because it makes it easy to grab useful information when you’re using public Wi-Fi. Big deal. You could always do that. The real worry is that businesses’ Wi-Fi networks were, and are, often just as vulnerable.

From all the yammering, you’d actually think there was something new about Firesheep, the Firefox extension that lets you grab login IDs, passwords, and other important information . What a joke. I, and any hacker or network administrator worth his salt, have been able to do this kind of stuff for years.

The only thing “new” about Firesheep is that how it easy makes it to do. I’m unimpressed. Anyone who was serious about grabbing your personal information has already been doing it for years. Trust me, if someone really wanted your data and you’ve been using open Wi-Fi networks, they’ve already grabbed it.

No, the real worry isn’t about some jerk grabbing your Twitter password in a coffee house. The real worry has always been that your office Wi-Fi is easy to compromise and then someone can use a packet-sniffer to get something that really matters like your Accounts Payable password.

As an experiment I recently sat outside an office building and start scanning for Wi-Fi Access Points (AP). It took me a hour to find about 40 APs and “break” into 28 of them. Was I able to do this because I’m some kind of expert cracker? Hardily. At best, I’m a good network administrator but a mediocre cracker.

No, the real reason I was able to be so successful with minimal efforts is that many network administrators don’t have the first clue on how to secure a wireless network. Five APs didn’t have any security. Three of those used the default passwords for their wireless routers and APs.

Another ten were using, I kid you not, Wi-Fi Wired Equivalency Privacy (WEP). WEP has been broken for almost a decade. More amazing still, people still recommend its use! Consumer Reports, as recently as 2009, recommended using WEP.

Another dozen used WPA (Wi-Fi Protected Access), with the built-in Temporal Key Integrity Protocol (TKIP) security protocol. There, I used a rainbow table, a list of the most common WPA passwords, to pop open APs almost as quickly as I could open up a coke bottle. I also managed to pry open a pair of routers using WPA2 (Wi-Fi Protected Access 2) with TKIP using rainbow table.

If you really want to secure a Wi-Fi network in 2010 you must use WPA2 with Counter Mode with Cipher Block Chaining Message Authentication Code Protocol (CCMP), aka Advanced Encryption Standard (AES). If you don’t, trust me, if someone really wanted your important information out of your business network they’ve already got it and then they didn’t a baby cracker tool like Firesheep to do it.

So, I guess, in a way I should thank Firesheep. Maybe it will finally make it clear to the vast majority of people that network security is important.

What am I saying? Most people, not even many network administrators, ever learn these lessons. Still, maybe a few people will start taking security seriously. I live in hope.

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Topics

Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols, aka sjvn, has been writing about technology and the business of technology since CP/M-80 was the cutting edge, PC operating system

Disclosure

Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols

Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols is a freelance writer. He does not own stocks or other investments in any technology company.

Biography

Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols

Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols, aka sjvn, has been writing about technology and the business of technology since CP/M-80 was the cutting edge, PC operating system; 300bps was a fast Internet connection; WordStar was the state of the art word processor; and we liked it.

His work has been published in everything from highly technical publications (IEEE Computer, ACM NetWorker, Byte) to business publications (eWEEK, InformationWeek, ZDNet) to popular technology (Computer Shopper, PC Magazine, PC World) to the mainstream press (Washington Post, San Francisco Chronicle, BusinessWeek).

32
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

Illegality???
techboy_z 29th Dec
And...the illegality of you cracking those private APs doesn't bother you at all? Not even nervous about publicly posting that you did it??? Wow.
0 Votes
+ -
yea, switched to AES years ago.
Been_Done_Before 27th Oct 2010
Just use the security auditor toolkit iso to discover if your network is easily compromised.
0 Votes
+ -
People use the same password for FAR too many services. And I doubt this will change many habits.

There are options for people to use WiFi more securely but most are over the technical abilities of the majority of users.

I'm working with a company that's built a beta version of a Firefox plug-in www.getCocoon.com and it provides secure SSL encryption on any connection and is literally just plug and play, instant protection. It also hides your ip address and will let you create temporary anonymous email accounts to protect you from spam.

It's free while in beta, so please check it out and share your feedback, we'd love to know what you think. Thanks! David
0 Votes
+ -
Cocoon can look at your private data
zackers Updated - 28th Oct 2010
@Davidkris2 I think it's only fair to point out that while your data is encrypted on Cocoon's servers and not available to the internet at large, Cocoon does have the encryption keys, not you. Their terms of service make it clear they will decode your database for debug issues (at least during the beta period), as well as to respond to any legal request by a court. I have no reason to believe that they would casually look at your data, but I would prefer a system where all encryption is done on your local machine using keys only you have access to.
One of the reasons people don't practice good online security is because people don't think they're going to be targeted. "I only have $200 in the bank - why would someone want to get my banking credentials?". That ignorance was just backed up and affirmed by this article: "No, the real worry isn?t about some jerk grabbing your Twitter password in a coffee house."

Absolutely, that's a real worry (granted, not the only one). People get paid by crime syndicates, albeit nickles and dimes, for each and every legitiamte account user/pw compromise they can deliver. Sit in an airport, and sniff a few hundred facebook/twitter/yahoo/hotmail/gmail/etc accounts in an hour or so, and you just made a quick hundred bucks.

There are over 1.5M compromised facebook accounts available for purchase right now if you know the right IRC channels to look in. $25 gets you a group of 100 accounts. $40 gets you a group of 100 accounts that are "garuanteed" to be active (although, good luck getting your money back).

Associate those newly-compromised fb/twt/yh/hm/gm accounts with a bank account (as Davidkris2 pointed out, the majority of people use the same password), and your hundred bucks just turned into a cool thousand.

So, yes, this sniffing capability has been around forever... it's been exploited forever... and it's nothing new. But, giving out this tool to the masses just garaunteed that the number of compromised accounts is going to go up exponentially. No matter how secure that "free airport wireless" actually is.

I agree with you that I hope this firesheep wakes up SysAds to the need for better security... but I also hope it wakes up Joe Q. Public to the fact that they're "running around online, buck naked, with their account numbers and pin numbers tatooed all over their body, for the whole world to see".
0 Votes
+ -
@Steven J.
SonofaSailor 27th Oct 2010
out of curiosity, what toolset did you use to crack the 28 networks?
0 Votes
+ -
Contributr
@SonofaSailor Several, and after that, let me just say that if you know how to use WireShark and AirPcap there's not a lot you can't track on a network. But, those stories for another day.
0 Votes
+ -
Get Windows 7!
NonZeal0t 27th Oct 2010
0 Votes
+ -
Man, do you guys ever need an editor to review your blogs before they are posted! Sheesh...
0 Votes
+ -
Contributr
@GVC2031 Welcome to blogs. We don't have editors. Trust me. I wish we did.
in our neighborhood, I ASSUME that some of the kids are hacking wi-fi and secure accordingly
I agree with GVC...
He can hack but he can't type....in intelligible English.
0 Votes
+ -
The Consumer Reports story was updated just 5 days following the orginal posting regarding the use of WEP and changed that to WPA... It would be wise to at least read the ENTIRE story before pointing out a bad recommendation.

Regardless, I use various methods to prevent outside access and sniffing including, as mentioned, using AES encryption.

My WiFi/router security practices include WPA2/AES encryption, not broadcasting my SSID, using a non default channel number, use MAC filtering, and reduce transmit power (most routers have this option) to reduce distance of the signal, and obviosuly do not use the default settings including passwords. I have other tricks I use as well that are more advanced concepts. Skepticism has been the best security of all for me.
0 Votes
+ -
@ryanstrassburg you dont need to do all of that, first of all if someone is hacking into your wifi network they are probably using backtrack or a similar linux distro. changing ones mack address is elementary. the best thing you can do is of-course keep the wpa2 and set a STRONG atypical password, a combination of things or atypical names and numbers and characters, that way no dictionary has it. the next thing you can do is change your subnet mask so that it allows for only 2 ip addresses (you and your gateway, this is assuming you only need one on your wifi network) and lastly turn off your dhcp. also since sniffing requires arp poisoning put static entries into your arp table for your gateway (router), that way the hacker cant do a mitm on you.
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Firesheep's Real Lesson: Take Wi-Fi Security Seriously
dieseltaylor Updated - 28th Oct 2010
My action has been to rely on a wired network around the house. I think that the trade off between convenience and safety has been lost to many. Why engage in a never ending war with potential hackers when you could just operate off-air in absolute safety apart from a major league operation on your house or office.

If my employment was enhanced by the importance of keeping a secure system would I suggest a Luddite solution!? I doubt it.
@dieseltaylor

This.

Not only does it sidestep the Wifi packets being sent hither and yon, it also sidesteps the "everyone and their brother having a Wifi AP" interference issues. Multiple radio sources (digital or otherwise) WILL step on each other when in close proximity, and there's not that many channel frequencies you can choose from.

That, and I swore off Facebook months ago. I don't care if FB starts using HTTPS, I don't trust Zuckerberg with my info in the first place, he's just going to give it to Zynga anyhow.
0 Votes
+ -
I sold security assessments briefly. I would pick up the customer in a cab, have them buy a random laptop with a wireless network adapter, then cruise around looking for open networks at random.

My last stop would be their business. After discovering multiple insecure routes into their business, the customers response was invariably "I'll have my guys look at it" (rather than commit to a security assessment by an outside company).

Pointing out "your guys were the cause of the problem, is it realistic to assume that they are going to be the cause of the solution?" got me dirty looks.

Asking them to allow an outside company to do an assessment, so "their guys could focus their efforts" got me no traction.

I'd love to think that it was my style alone that caused me to not close sales... but unfortunately I truely believe that it's apathy.

One of the clients was a bank where I had an account. After the customer didn't commit to an audit, I walked into a branch with the customer and closed my account. After that (oddly enough), they signed.
@Marc Jellinek I've found that most insecure networks are not insecure because the in-house talent can't or won't secure them, it's because the management won't let them.
0 Votes
+ -
@jred I've found that most insecure networks are not secure because someone hid a consumer-grade wireless access point in a closet, under their desk or in the ceiling somewhere, and forgot about it.

Another favorite is someone turning on Internet Connection Sharing. They'll have a secure wired connection to their corporate LAN, then share it out via their laptops wireless network adapter.
0 Votes
+ -
He probably used the aircrack-ng toolkit. It is easy to use, widely available, and any schoolkid with their head on straight could break into 70% of networks with it, just like he did.
0 Votes
+ -
Oh, and if you want to know how to make it run, I recommend using Puppy Linux 4.3.1 with the developer tools added in to compile it, along with iw and nl available as .PET files (self-installing in Puppy)

Then /usr/local/sbin/airmon-ng start wlan0
and /usr/local/sbin/airodump-ng mon0
will get you headed in the right direction.
0 Votes
+ -
I use WEP at home
Jimster480 28th Oct 2010
Becuase some devices we have around here don't support anything better (like the DS). But I don't worry about anyone trying to grab data or crack my network around here. There has never been any wardriving or anything in this neighborhood.
WiFi will always be deemed unsecure. For businesses, I would advise treating the wireless like the internet or at best a dmz type network and use vpn to access any internal data/systems. Every wifi security protocol has been hacked and thus having open systems directly accessable to the wireless network is a huge risk.
0 Votes
+ -
All the Typos ....
NonZeal0t 29th Oct 2010
Proof these people use Macs!


http://fakesteveballmer.blogspot.com
I also desire to signal in your RSS feeds. Thank you as soon as once again and maintain up the great operate! nccma cooler
I used to be more than happy to seek out this internet-site.I wanted to thanks in your time for this glorious read!! I positively enjoying each little bit of it and I have you bookmarked to check out new stuff you weblog post. this thread is amazing i like your work and i appreciate you that you have share a useful stuff thanks for sharing the i shop abatwa
I used to be more than happy to seek out this internet-site.I wanted to thanks in your time for this glorious read!! I positively enjoying each little bit of it and I have you bookmarked to check out new stuff you weblog post.Bookmarking now thanks please consider a follow up post. power sa shop
I think the representation of this article is actually superb one. This is my first visit to your site. Thanks a lot and keep sharing the information. Keep updating the information for all of us. Thanks ZDNet Government was launched as the brand's first industry vertical, with a mission to cater to IT professionals in the public secto I agree with your post. However, do you have any sources I can cite for my paper wheel car com bury
Well welcome, hopefully you can become a vital member of the community and really help to push far ahead of google. Which Im sure the development team would love. This will of course earn you alot points too and get you on the leaders board. z d n e t t h a n k Im not sure i come to an agreement with you on every level, howevor it absolutely was a good posting, many thanks for taking the time to put up your ideas.
Thanks nice info z d n e t I really liked your current article write more..let me add you to its favorite The articles you have on zdnet s i t e are always so enjoyable to read. Good work and I bookmarked it.
Fantastic news about the new release.I positively enjoying each little bit of it and I have you b o o k m a r k e d to check out new stuff you weblog post.Im not sure i come to an agreement with you on every level, howevor it absolutely was a good posting, many thanks for taking the time to put up your ideas
Good day to confirm this comment I would appreciate T h e b e s t o f Z D N e t d e l i v e r e d your website very nice to everyone Yes, Oracle is the only one with shared-disk architecture, but that is there advantage. It means you can add or remove nodes and the database lives on. In a shared nothing architecture, if you lose a node, you lose the system. I'm sure Oracle appreciates EMC highlighting their advantage.I also desire to signal in your RSS feeds. Thank you as soon as once again and maintain up the great operate Awesome post! Thank you very much || thanks for nice content this is really benefit to me.
0 Votes
+ -
Illegality???
techboy_z 29th Dec
And...the illegality of you cracking those private APs doesn't bother you at all? Not even nervous about publicly posting that you did it??? Wow.

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix
Click Here
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix
ie8 fix