Microsoft buys Netscape Web patents from AOL to attack Google
Summary: Microsoft didn't just buy AOL's patents, they bought what was left of its one time fierce Web browser rival Netscape's intellectual property to use in attacking Google's Android and Chrome.
When AOL agreed to sell more than 800 patents to Microsoft for a cool 1.1-billion in cold cash, it didn't just sell patents. Microsoft seems to have bought, according to AllThingsD, the “underlying patents for the old [Netscape] browser." However, AllThingsD may not have realized just how incredibly vital those Netscape patents are to all Web services and browsers.
There was a time when this deal would have been enormous news. Netscape was once a fierce rival to Microsoft. Indeed, it was Microsoft's illegal attacks on the Netscape browser that led both to Netscape's eventual decline and death and the Department of Justice's taking Microsoft down a peg.
Netscape, today, though is little more than an obscure brand name, a URL and an ISP, which AOL will keep, and little else. Indeed, in AOL's Security & Exchange Commission 8-K describing the deal, AOL merely states that, in addition to selling Microsoft patents and granting them the right to use all of AOL's other patents, “The transaction is structured as a purchase of all of the outstanding shares of a wholly-owned non-operating subsidiary of the Company and the direct acquisition of those patents in the portfolio not held by the subsidiary.” What is “that non-operating subsidiary? That would be Netscape.
Guess what? This is still gigantic news.
Microsoft certainly doesn't have any plans to bring back the Netscape browser. AOL stopped developing it years ago. Its code-base eventually became the Firefox Web browser. Netscape's intellectual property (IP), however also included such universal Web browser mainstays as Secure Socket Layers (SSL), cookies, and JavaScript. It's these old Netscape patents that Microsoft is paying a billion bucks for. And, you know what? For a mere billion Microsoft got a steal of a deal.
For example when Netscape patented SSL back in 1997 the company said it had no plans to start charging developers for the source code or to charge for an SSL license. Will Microsoft will take such an attitude towards letting others use this universal Web security standard? Come on! Will the New York Yankees try not to beat the Boston Red Sox?
Could this deal really be about Microsoft trying to get a bigger share of the online map and directions business?. Maybe. But, the cookie, JavaScript, and SSL patents are so fundamental to the Web that I have to think they're the real reasons why Microsoft pulled the trigger on this deal.
Indeed, while AOL and Microsoft would like to see this deal go through within 18-days I expect it will take much longer. I expect lawyers are already at work on briefs objecting to the deal to the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) at this very moment. How ironic is it that more than a decade after United States vs. Microsoft came to its end that Netscape's fate will once more emerge as a legal issue for Microsoft. Still, if Microsoft can get the patents, it will be worth the billion plus all the legal expenses they'll need to pay before the deal is done.
So what will Microsoft do with these core Web patents? My bet is that they'll use them, or threaten to use them anyway, against their top rival: Google. Consider, Chrome is on its way to overtaking Internet Explorer as the world's most popular Web browser.. Microsoft wants Windows 8 to be a major player on tablets and smartphones, and Google's Android is one of the leaders there. What better way to try to trip their opponent than that early 21st century business favorite tactic: the patent lawsuit?
AOL's patent sale to Microsoft: stripped clean, or savvy move? Microsoft's purchase of AOL patents may be about a Google map war AOL, Microsoft announce $1.056 billion patent deal
Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Talkback
SVJN's assumptions presented as facts.
EDIT: And I just helped SJVN earn his bread by commenting !!!!
I agree, he never offers facts, just lines like
He claims that Android is one of the leadersd in tablets, yet there are only two tablet operating systems on the market at the moment: iOS, and Android, which is a far distant second. Google probally assumed that there would never be an ARM based version of Windows, and have now become worried about Windows 8 as there is an ARM based version for tablets.
I believe that Google is worried about ARM based Windows 8 tablets overtaking Android, so they spent (overspent, by many an analyst estimation) 12 billion on Motorola.
I believe the more accurate assesment is that Microsoft is well aware of Google's purchase of Motorola as an attempt to try and derail Windows 8 on a tablet, as they see it as a threat to Android's future on a tablet, and have countered by purchasing these patents from AOL.
It is a logical assumption,as what better way to try to trip up Windows 8 push onto ARM based tablets than that early 21st century business favorite tactic: the patent lawsuit.
:|
I'm sure Windows XP Tablet Edition
Really, x21x
what are you talking about?
http://techrights.org/2012/04/07/hypocrisy-from-duopoly/
M$ and other patents trolls are threatening the software freedom with invalid patents. We the community, are fighting back on behalf of the people all over the world!
Steven may have a few valid points here, though..
A billion dollars for a "non-operating entity (that used to make a relatively slow and bloated web browser - which would be pretty useless by today's standards), oh yeah, and a few piddly patents."
I disagree
@pepe-el-Toro
Don't try to fool people who were not using web browsers at the time.
If these patents were so fundamental
On an equivalent series of assumptions one could argue that........
The headline is stated as fact
I also think it's about time we had voting on blogs as well as posts as the number of posts SJVN receives are the result of a lack of quality rather than an agreement with his outlandish claims.
.
Defensive patents
My guess is that the newly enlarged patent portfolio is a defensive measure - nobody but a pure patent troll without product would dare sue Microsoft over any web-tied technology now. The countersuits would be lethal.
At One Time
No, the sad reality is that these days all the tech giants, whether we're their fans or not, are up to their arm pits in the big muddy of competing via courts or earning from others' engineering.
I may be mistaken........
Not defensive anymore
Not defensive any more?
You are talking from emotion
I find it interesting that the moment Google is looked at as an agressor, you are quick to jump to their defense, even after all that has been released about them from former employees that have left to pursure that which Google claimed they offered, but had no desire to deliver.
You mean a Patent Troll Like
Is this history repeating itself?
Since the same corporate culture