ie8 fix
madison

Networking

Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols

Oh my God! Porn is officially on the Internet!

By | March 18, 2011, 1:38pm PDT

Summary: ICANN finally approved the Internet’s .XXX top-level domain.

Can you believe it! There’s porn on the Internet!

Cue Avenue Q’s The Internet is for Porn.

What really happened was that after a decade-long fight, Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN), at the close of its 40th public meeting in San Francisco finally approved the .XXX top-level domain (TLD http://www.icmregistry.com/news/welcomeapproval.php). According to a PC Magazine report, Peter Dengate Thrush, a New Zealand lawyer and chairman of ICANN, announced today, March 18th, that ICANN had finally approved this red-light district TLD.

If you think this was done with the approval of the adult entertainment industry, you’d think wrong. They hate it. According to a press release by the Free Speech Coalition, an adult industry trade association, FSC Executive Director Diane Duke said, “”Over the past seven years, we have tried to communicate the adult industry’s opposition to .XXX at every opportunity, using every means and forum available. We have participated in public comment periods, letter writing, conversations with stakeholders, and testimony at ICANN’s public meetings. All three of the world’s only existing adult-trade-associations have issued statements in opposition to .XXX.”

Why? Evil Angel, a porn company, founder and adult film star John Stagliano explained in the statement, “I do not support this. I would support it only if there were different criteria for the creation of this entity, that would allow anyone to open a dot porn, or whatever that would compete with .XXX. The effect now is to create a monopoly for one company in this area. The adult community has invested in how it is structured now. It is unfair to us all to add an additional expense to our business without competition for the services that this new business, .xxx, would provide.”

You see, the .XXX TLD already has an owner, ICM Registry. So if you want an .XXX site, the adult industry fears you’ll have to pay ICM big bucks to register it.

ICM, of course, loved this decision. Stuart Lawley, CEO of ICM Registry, the company behind .XXX, said in a statement: “ICANN’s decision to give .XXX final approval is a landmark moment for the Internet. For the first time there will be a clearly defined web address for adult entertainment, out of the reach of minors and as free as possible from fraud or malicious computer viruses”

At the same time, though, ICM also states that it has “no affiliation, current or historic, with the adult entertainment industry.” I note in passing that ICM’s slogan is “Let’s be Adult about It..

There’s already hysteria over this new TLD from some circles. Fox News has already declared that this new TLD will lead to pornographers trying “to get your children while they are looking for something else, say a game called “play with Carly” … and also make sure they have a tight grip on those children who might already be inclined to experiment with pornography and who now will know exactly where to go to find it, the ‘.xxx’ world.” This same Fox News page included an ad for Cialis.

The truth of the matter, of course, that any content-blocking software, such as Net Nanny can be much more easily set to block the entire .XXX TLD then they can be set to block the hundreds of thousands of adult entertainment Web sites already out there.

In the end, I see this as much adieu about nothing. Like it or not, people watch porn, the Internet has made it much easier for anyone and every one to get to it, and approving the use of the .XXX TLD domains isn’t going to make any real difference to this situation. Deal with it.

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Topics

Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols, aka sjvn, has been writing about technology and the business of technology since CP/M-80 was the cutting edge, PC operating system

Disclosure

Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols

Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols is a freelance writer. He does not own stocks or other investments in any technology company.

Biography

Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols

Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols, aka sjvn, has been writing about technology and the business of technology since CP/M-80 was the cutting edge, PC operating system; 300bps was a fast Internet connection; WordStar was the state of the art word processor; and we liked it.

His work has been published in everything from highly technical publications (IEEE Computer, ACM NetWorker, Byte) to business publications (eWEEK, InformationWeek, ZDNet) to popular technology (Computer Shopper, PC Magazine, PC World) to the mainstream press (Washington Post, San Francisco Chronicle, BusinessWeek).

28
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

RE: Oh my God! Porn is officially on the Internet!
radkitten 11th Jul
I got an ad for Clinique at the Fox site. I mean, it isn't like ads are targeted or anything right? (29 y/o woman who has searched for makeup online btw).

But seriously man, LOOK AT THE URL. It says opinion in the URL. It says opinion directly above the title. Stop being an idiot.
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Oh my God! Porn is officially on the Internet!
Loverock Davidson 18th Mar 2011
Its going to make finding my porn easier, but don't think this will do a whole lot of good for the internet overall. The companies with established .com addresses are going to stay with those. No rule says you have to move from a .com to .xxx so you still may run into porn sites during your searches. Not that it bothers me or anything, but I can understand it being a problem for the kids.
by ours current hypocritical "morals" is much worse. Porn (if not in sick version) at least not about abuse, it is about natural thing that related to very essence of life.

While I am definitely not for any porn exposure to children, I was always struck by society's double standards/"morals" about this comparing to violence, which does real life harm, not mostly imagined one.
0 Votes
+ -
Of course the problem is...
wolf_z 19th Mar 2011
@denisrs

...the definition of "sick", isn't it?

According to religious leaders *ANY* porn is sick.

How objective is your definition of sick? Any better than "I know it when I see it?" happy
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Oh my God! Porn is officially on the Internet!
Joey_Smith_Concerned 22nd Mar 2011
@denisrs Porn is definatly NOT natural, sex in the marraige bed is. There is a BIG difference. My mom and step dad own pornoshops and I can tell you it is sick, evil stuff. Here is my story: http://porn-problem.blogspot.com/
0 Votes
+ -
TMI
Stark_Industries 18th Mar 2011
@Loverock Davidson
"Its going to make finding my porn easier"

TMI, Loverock. TMI...
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Oh my God! Porn is officially on the Internet!
bizarrosteveballmer 18th Mar 2011
Glenn Quagmire just discovered porn too...man his arm was huge.
0 Votes
+ -
Can you let us know if
nomorebs Updated - 18th Mar 2011
the .x_x_x will be REQUIRED for companies that deal with things related to sex (e.g., p_0rn)? If so, it means they can no longer use a TLD that is not .x_x_x. Is that correct?

If it is, then I think it's really great. As you said, the whole TLD can be blocked and anybody trying to show p_0rn on sites that use domains in different TLDs will be found illegal and should undergo some type of punishment immediately. I hope I'm right on this.
0 Votes
+ -
Been looking for you
Robert Hahn 18th Mar 2011
You raise a good point. You can't possibly believe that every single thing related to sex is a form of porn... after all you'd be relegating 'birds and bees' movies on the Discovery Channel, high school sex ed textbooks, and a lot of biology materials to the Porn Domains.

So what exactly (as in EXACTLY) did you mean when you asked whether companies that deal with matters related to sex would be required to use a .xxx domain? I ask because Supreme Court Justice Potter Stewart famously said that he could not define obscenity; he knew it when he saw it, but that was the best he could do.

Are you the guy the world has been waiting for, the one who can finally define what is porn and what isn't?
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Oh my God! Porn is officially on the Internet!
nomorebs Updated - 19th Mar 2011
@Robert Hahn : I guess I was a bit broad in my statement. What I meant were websites that require you to verify you are at least 18 years old because the content of the website was sexual. It could be specially easy to target sites that CHARGE you a fee to access that material too.

Does that sound good enough to you or are you going to keep being philosophical about this.

Now, if no one with a site of the type I described is required to NOT use any other TLD than .x_x_x, then I don't see the utility of it. Who the heck wants to be easily blocked by using such TLD? It's useless then.
0 Votes
+ -
@nomorebs@ You make it sound so easy. If the rule is "they charge money for access," then you just banned The New York Times because they went to a pay-for-access scheme. Same with the Wall Street Journal.

Japan is full of porn sites. Are you going to ban all of Japan if they don't go along with requiring use of .XXX? Same with Russia, or Libya, or any of two dozen other countries.

It all sounds easy. Until you try to do it.

You were right the first time: the XXX TLD is worthless. The people selling porn don't want to use it, and there is no world government that could require it everywhere. And unless it's everywhere, it doesn't work.
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Oh my God! Porn is officially on the Internet!
nomorebs Updated - 19th Mar 2011
@Robert Hahn : Do you also have reading comprehension problems? Does the NYT or WSJ show p0_rn? RE-READ what I said, please! I mentioned sites who warned users that they must be 18 years old or older before entering because they contain material of sexu@l nature. When I referred to paid sites I was referring to the subset of those that show the aforementioned warning that also charge for their access. There seems to be law that mandates them to show the warning.

So, why is mandating them to show such warning not unconstitutional but **also** mandating them to use the XXX TLD is? I don't see it (but it may be, I'm not a lawyer)

NOTE: Since you have problems understanding what I say, I need to clarify that:

* I am not trying to convince anyone that those companies must be forced to register domains with the new TLDs.

* I'm also saying that if they are not mandated to do so, then I don't see the point of the X_X_X TLD since nobody wants to be easily blocked by register a domain in such TLD.

* I have seen the aforementioned warnings mostly in western countries. I don't know or care whether Japanese do the same. If they don't, that's their business. Do the U.S. mandate them to show warnings? I don't think so. Does that prevent states in the U.S. from forcing companies in the U.S. to show such warnings? No. So, why are you bringing Japan and Russia? If they are fine with anybody showing p0_rn content in any TLD, that's their call.

* Finally, you said that a judge could not define obscenity. I don't see how is that relevant to p0_rnography in general. For instance, unlike that judge, I don't think that law enforcement has any problem detecting child p0r_nography sites, does it? If it's feasible to detect child p0_rnography, I don't see why is sooo difficult according to you to detect adult p0r_nography.
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Oh my God! Porn is officially on the Internet!
Joey_Smith_Concerned 22nd Mar 2011
@Robert Hahn I will tell you what porn is: evil, twisted sexually taken out of context. Sex is good and even holy in the marriage bed, no where else. My Mom and dad own these shops and I can tell you it ain't pretty. I am clean but here is my story: http://porn-problem.blogspot.com/
@nomorebs My guess would be no. Requiring adult themed websites to use a .xxx TLD would be equivalent to censoring and would be ruled unconstitutional (at least in the US). There are many ways to prevent and/or reduce accidental exposure, first being by having a frank and open discussion with those whom you are trying to shelter from it. Carte blanche banning is never a good answer.

Remember, what you consider "obscene" and what I consider to be may vary, individual responsibility is key here.
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Oh my God! Porn is officially on the Internet!
nomorebs Updated - 19th Mar 2011
@JT82 Those sites are required now to show a warning before anybody can enter into them. Is that unconstitutional too? I don't see what would be the big jump from that to mandate them to use the .x_x_x TLD, but I'm not a lawyer.
0 Votes
+ -
its not censoring its regulating
Stan57 20th Mar 2011
@JT82
its not censoring its regulating. When was the last time you went into a book store and seen hard core sexuality on the cover?? So why should they be allowed to trick people into thinking your going to a safe web site only to find out its a porn site.
How about porn spam? they cant even follow the law as far as stating they are selling porn in the emails. No everything happens for a reason this is 10000% the porn industry's fault for being a bad community unity
0 Votes
+ -
.xxx will help to double up the number of porn websites, it would be against the law to force adult companies to move to another domain and they are not going to after investing millions on .com, .xxx is just a money spinner giving nothing back to society, I would love to have the monopoly myself, this is also against free market forces.
0 Votes
+ -
I'm curious
UrNotPayingAttention 18th Mar 2011
Is anyone really under the delusion that using the .xxx domain will keep porn - as Stuart Lawley put it - "out of the reach of minors"?

That said, why not? it makes a lot more sense than ".biz"
They should require them to go to .xxx to make it easier to block.
Common sense tells us what porn is. Use it.
0 Votes
+ -
Common sense...
wolf_z 19th Mar 2011
@swcook6

Has no place in a court of law. Which is where this would end up.

If even *A SUPREME COURT JUSTICE* can't define porn, how do you expect anyone else to?

Sure, there are lots of clear cut examples, like if the sex is explicit and intended to arouse the watcher--but then again there are lots of ways to make even *that* non-pornographic.

Of course if you want to be *literal* in your definitions, nothing on the net is truly pornographic, which literally means "written by prostitutes". happy
0 Votes
+ -
But will anybody use it?
CobraA1 19th Mar 2011
But will the porn "industry" really use it?

Chances are, you'll still need to block a gazillion non .xxx domains in addition to the .xxx domain itself. Regardless of intentions, I doubt it will be effective.
0 Votes
+ -
The porn industry has a point...
wolf_z Updated - 19th Mar 2011
...which *should* be easily addressed, but probably won't be.

.XXX makes a *lot* of sense, and I'm flabberghasted that it hasn't been implemented since the earliest days of the net.

Still, the monopoly issue *is* valid. ICM should be forced to agree to some kind of RAND policy toward its customers. You know, a .xxx domain should be close in price to .com, and so on.

Nor should ICM be allowed to have any say over who is granted a domain. You pay the fee, the domain is available, you get it. No terms of service, no gotchas (other than not hosting illegal stuff like child porn, natch!).

Simple, reasonable, non-discrimanatory. Of course ICM wants to jack up prices as high as the market will bear, but so what? ICANN has final say on who sells what, if a registrar gets too excessive they lose their charter.

As far as "forcing" every porn site to use .xxx that simply isn't true. At least for now, politicians being the scum-sucking bribe-hungry monsters they are, but the whole first amendment issue will probably keep that in check--at least in the US.

Iran et al is another kettle of fish, of course.

Personally I have no problem with porn, and keeping it in a single domain that can be blocked at the *consumer* level would solve everyone's problems.

So long as it's opt-in blocking, of course...

Edit "should" replaced "shouldn't"
0 Votes
+ -
Correction
Hallowed are the Ori Updated - 19th Mar 2011
Theres already hysteria over this new TLD from some circles. Fox News has already declared that this new TLD will [...]

Uh... no, they didn't.

The actual NEWS article (which is pretty much the same as what is reported on CNN and CNBC) on the FoxNews site is at http://www.foxnews.com/scitech/2011/03/18/internets-naming-board-oks-new-domains-porn/

What you attributed to FoxNews is actually an opinion column written by Penny Nance, who is the chief executive officer of "Concerned Women for America", a public policy womens organization.

Her column was also picked up by The Washington Times.
0 Votes
+ -
Same old story
klumper 19th Mar 2011
Empire grows weak and flabby, starts to depend on foreign labor to do its deeds (and eventual thinking); the masses grow lazier and more indolent, opting to play with their penises instead of using their brains; bread and circus wagons invariably replace gainful employment. Corpulence widens at the top.

Eventually and inexorably, more dynamic (read: disciplined) outside forces threaten to sweep away the flotsam; decaying republic ends or turns to draconian strong man to save the day. From a historical perspective, nothing new, including the la-di-da attitudes that accompany the growing fissures as they manifest and broaden.

Ironically few see the downward transformation - or appreciate the warning signs - while it's happening. They're too busy "indulging" themselves and justifying their peccadilloes. Then the barbarians strike, packing a prophetic and overdue punch.

SOS
0 Votes
+ -
Much ADO about nothing
msiniscalchi 20th Mar 2011
not "adieu."
0 Votes
+ -
www.lockfashion.com is real web?
0 Votes
+ -
People still use the web for porn?

Usenet: You will never find a more wretched hive of villainy, scum and porn.
Porn should only be at .xxx ,,,, all prono site at .coms or other should be migrated and prono in those should be illegal...
I got an ad for Clinique at the Fox site. I mean, it isn't like ads are targeted or anything right? (29 y/o woman who has searched for makeup online btw).

But seriously man, LOOK AT THE URL. It says opinion in the URL. It says opinion directly above the title. Stop being an idiot.

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix
Click Here
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix
ie8 fix