ie8 fix
madison

Networking

Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols

The FCC’s plan to bring the Internet to the poor

By | November 10, 2011, 10:48am PST

Summary: The FCC’s “Connect to Compete” plans on bringing the Internet to the U.S.’s poor.

I know about poor. I grew up in the backwoods of West Virginia. I was lucky. I had several gifts and made the most of my chances. Thus, I was able to move from a dirt road to Manhattan skyscrapers in a few years. Most poor people don’t get that kind of shot. The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) has decided to help today’s poverty-stricken youth get their chance to move up by unveiling a plan to bring broadband Internet connections to eligible low-income families, Connect to Compete.

Working in partnership with National Cable & Telecommunications Association (NCTA) ISPs the FCC has arranged for poor families to get broadband Internet connections, without an installation/activation fee and no modem rental fees (with an option to purchase a $10 modem) for $9.95 a month. Eligibility for Connect to Compete will be limited to households that have a child enrolled in the national school lunch program and that are not current or recent broadband subscribers.

According to the NCTA, “Broadband is an increasingly integral part of getting a quality education, yet too few of the most needy kids have the service at home. Research shows the barriers to broadband adoption involve a complex mix of digital literacy, perceived relevance of online content, and access to low-cost computers and Internet service. Compete to Compete is the largest private sector initiative ever to address one key prong of the adoption problem: getting broadband Internet into the homes of students where the adoption problem is most acute. [It] can give millions more students the tools to do homework at home and to develop the skills they will need to find a job in the 21st Century economy.”

In a statement FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski expanded on this theme, “There is a growing divide between the digital-haves and have-nots. No Less than one-third of the poorest Americans have adopted broadband, while 90%+ of the richest have adopted it. Low-income Americans, rural Americans, seniors, and minorities disproportionately find themselves on the wrong side of the digital divide and excluded from the $8 trillion dollar global Internet economy.”

You’ll get no argument from me on that point. Tomorrow’s good jobs are technology jobs. Basic technology literacy is as important as reading, writing and arithmetic was to earlier generations. When I say “technology literacy,” I’m not talking about being able to program in C. I’m talking about simply know how to use a Web browser and how to send an e-mail.

As Genachowski points out, 80%+ of Fortune 500 companies require online job applications, including major employers such as Wal-Mart, Target, Costco, and ExxonMobil. Increasingly, if you’re not on the net you can’t effectively apply to go to college or get a job.

How much of a difference does Internet access make? A lot. Genachowski cited a Federal Reserve study that “found that students with a PC and broadband at home have six to eight percentage point higher graduation rates than similar student who don’t have home access to the Internet.”

I expect that the gap between those with access to the Internet and technology and those without will only increase. For example, libraries are beginning to close their doors to patrons without e-readers. Oh, it’s early days still, but you can see the trend against physical books and the buildings that hold them starting from here. You may be OK with that… if you have a e-reader and an Internet connection.

In short, we, the people of America, need Internet access for all and Connect to Compete is a step in that direction.

Related Stories:

CodeNow teaching tech skills to underrepresented youth

Digital Underclass 2: The future of books and libraries (PODCAST)

Digital Underclass: What Happens When the Libraries Die?

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Topics

Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols, aka sjvn, has been writing about technology and the business of technology since CP/M-80 was the cutting edge, PC operating system

Disclosure

Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols

Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols is a freelance writer. He does not own stocks or other investments in any technology company.

Biography

Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols

Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols, aka sjvn, has been writing about technology and the business of technology since CP/M-80 was the cutting edge, PC operating system; 300bps was a fast Internet connection; WordStar was the state of the art word processor; and we liked it.

His work has been published in everything from highly technical publications (IEEE Computer, ACM NetWorker, Byte) to business publications (eWEEK, InformationWeek, ZDNet) to popular technology (Computer Shopper, PC Magazine, PC World) to the mainstream press (Washington Post, San Francisco Chronicle, BusinessWeek).

Related Discussions on TechRepublic

Did you know you can take part in these discussions with your ZDNet membership?
33
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

RE: The FCC's plan to bring the Internet to the poor
chaoticdad Updated - 15th Nov
Who determines the ISP to be used? Do they get a subsidy for providing service and modems at discounts? What the criteria in determining whether I have one ISP versus another (and we all know there are indeed vast differences between them)? Will there be any kind of "standard" or "quality control" and (dare I use this bad word) "OVERSIGHT" of whether or not these ISPs are indeed providing the level of service that they are getting subsidies for (assuming they do)? This is why people need to understand the full complexities of legislation, the costs to the taxpayer and (most importantly) any alternative motives of those that seem to benefit from such legislation that may have had good intent, but was manipulated into a "cash machine" at the expense of others. Not saying this is one of them, but this article certainly doesn't address some fundamental questions that should be considered either.
0 Votes
+ -
Great article, Steven
Rabid Howler Monkey Updated - 10th Nov
I can only hope that there is no 'fine print' in this broadband program which specifies that the price will double after 6 months and will double again after 1 year.

I am also hopeful for an article dealing with "access to low-cost computers" from you in the near future. Perhaps, on the Linux and Open-Source blog.
@Rabid Howler Monkey "Low cost computers for school is on the way already. Raspberry PI project should be available by December. http://www.geek.com/articles/chips/raspberry-pi-planning-incremental-launch-of-25-pc-in-december-2011112/
@Rabid Howler Monkey
what about "fine print" that everybody else picks up the bill for that
in a form of additional regulator charge added to your phone/cable/.. you fill the blank.. bill as it is now with telcos
0 Votes
+ -
@vl1969 Yes, new pass-thru tax line items like the old telco Universal Service Fee are coming as the FCC switches focus to the new Connect America Fund for expanding broadband to rural areas. As for carriers passing on Connect to Compete charges to broadband customers, it does explain why my TWC broadband internet-only service price was just upped about 10% ($5/mo) for extremely nebulous reasons in a neighborhood where I have lots of carrier choice.
It is a step in the right direction, but it is just as important to bring broadband to rural America. I live within 50 miles of the nation's capital and we still cannot get decent broadband. The only semi-broadband we have available is either unreliable and limited satellite or unreliable cell modems - both of which are limited in speed and download amounts. Both are also very pricey compared to cable, DSL, or FIOS.
0 Votes
+ -
I don't understand how this will help poor seniors, most of whom are not likely to have children enrolled in the national school lunch program. Wouldn't a simple income limit provide a more broad based eligibility test? I also agree with RadarBob on the rural issue.
@MikeyrInFL This is not for the gross poverty of America. This is an investment in our future which is our kids.
I am all for going paperless (we all know the many benefits) in the schools. The technology is available to do so. So is the technology to provide free Internet service. With the 4G outbreak, WISPs are going to be a more viable solution for many users, even those not in school. Unfortunately, the government (as usual) is fixing a 10 year old issue with solutions from 5 years ago without the forethought of future issues. My first thought would be to have these $40 & $50K a year tuition schools chip in to help. We all know Education in the US is one of the most screwed up issues there is. Luckily there are people like Eben Upton that see the need for ALL students to have computers.
@xtanmanx ,,, NO, all students do not NEED ccomputers, but all students need ACCESS if they want iit. For many it would be a waste of money regardless of who pays for it. Waste is waste, so some semblence of sanity needs to be retained.
0 Votes
+ -
Change Article Name
xtanmanx 11th Nov
After reading a few of the replies, I feel that naming the article a little more specifically towards the underprivileged STUDENTS of America might have been a better choice. Being enrolled in a school lunch program (which many programs use this a prequalifier) clearly indicates this move is for students and not just anyone that is using it for recreational purposes. and YES, email is a recreational purpose.
0 Votes
+ -
+1
tom@... 12th Nov
@xtanmanx ,,, +1. It seems to be lost effort to get titles to match articles way too often here.

HTH,

Twayne`
Not sure this makes a lot of sense. If you can afford to buy a computer, you can probably afford the 19.95 a month for basic internet access. If you can't afford a computer, discounted internet doesn't do you a whole lot of good. Did I miss something?
0 Votes
+ -
@TJWJ There are also plans to work in concert with this program to provide very low cost or free computers for those who can't afford that either.
@TJWJ ,,,
Computer = $400 one time spend.
$20/month = $400 EVERY YEAR. Big difference in expenditures there. Ever hear of ROI?
0 Votes
+ -
@TJWJ Not everyone buys their own computer. I have, on a few occasions, gave my own computers to family members when I built a new PC. Also, I have obtained used computers, repaired and upgraded them and then gave them away to friends. Some charity organizations do this as well. So since I have done it, and charity organizations have done it, I can safely say many others have done it.
0 Votes
+ -
Free computers are commonplace
Greenknight_z 15th Nov
@jollygreenguy@... You're absolutely right - economy model computers more than a couple years old are worth so little that they're often given away.
0 Votes
+ -
Bringing access to everyone, not just students, would definitely have benefits. Broadband connections would help keep seniors engaged with the world even if their physical limitations prevent them from going out much. In addition it will be more and more useful to keep them in touch with doctors. There is at least one insurance system that uses connected medical devices to constantly monitor at risk patients for sudden changes in weight or blood pressure to help head off emergencies. The devices are wireless but think how much easier if they only needed WiFi to a broadband connection.
0 Votes
+ -
And it would also be useful for job retraining for those who can no longer afford a full plan after losing their job. It goes on and on.
HORSE HOCKEY!
One more step for Big Brother to locate and catalog everybody. Might be good for finding deadbeat parents and those with warrants, but could easily turn into an invasion of privacy. Plenty of room for legitimate and nefarious uses.
@JMCStark ,,, And that's dfferent from today how?
This country was built on self-reliance, and most people work their way out of poverty over time (85% of poor people do). Unelected bureaucrats at the FCC need to step-off. Local communities can take care of their own, we don't need big goverment picking winners and losers. Thanks, but no thanks.
@albumen@...
Then, please explain why we have so many hungry and homeless roaming the streets daily??? Local communities--where they at??
@windozefreak : "So many"????? Where???? In your inagination?????? I admit we have many PANHANDLERS on the streets, but please do not make the error of classifying these "con people" as poor or hungry - they are nothing more than opportunists, and they tend do "do well" at what they do.
0 Votes
+ -
Guessing schools don't have computers anymore ?

Best way to bring people up out of poverty is investment in early-years pre-school education. Period.
It's no great or new revelation that students have always had a lot of distractions that keep them from learning, like sports and Television and other extracurricular activities.

And, those whose families could already afford computers and broadband connections, had the internet as a bigger distraction.

Now, even the poor who didn't have broadband, will be able to take advantage of the distractions that exist on the internet, like Facebook and Twitter and YouTube, to keep them from "being good students" and getting good grades.

Besides, there hasn't been a credible study conducted that has proven, beyond doubt, that computers and the internet have actually improved grades in school.

What would improve grades and the futures of our kids, would be to keep students from using computers and the internet while school is in session, and if they needed to use computers, then perhaps a local library equipped with a large number of computers would be preferable.
0 Votes
+ -
@adornoe@... I think maybe a solution to the distractions would be to restrict sites and treat the internet more like an intranet. Although this may raise some new concerns such as why restrict what sites can be accessed when the internet is being paid for?

Since the purpose of this is for educational use only, then I personally don't see a problem with restricting sites. However, whats the hidden cost? Someone will have to hire an admin to keep up with the restrictions, who would decide what can be accessed and what couldn't and some teachers use facebook to communicate with their students (I know there was a lawsuit concerning teachers using facebook to keep in touch with students and I think the teachers won - good! I have to read the article to know for sure but one thing I know is we shouldn't limit the ways a student can contact a teacher to ask questions about homework - it should be strictly professional, though!)
walled-garden ecosystem, where the Fire would be used for consumption of only what can be obtained through Amazon's resources. Another similar system would be the closed system offered by Apple, although Apple's systems are more open.

Alternately, perhaps a Chromebook, with only the sites and resources approved by the school system would be accessible. That would include news and information sites, like those offered by newspapers and tv/radio stations, and Wikipedia (although that one is frowned upon). There would be blocking of any social media site and perhaps, depending upon the ideology of those doing the blocking, sites such as FOX news or CNN or MSNBC.

Come to think of it, it would be an impossible task to create a tablet ecosystem that could teach the students while pleasing the ideologies of all of the "decision makers".

So, it remains a really bad idea.
Mr, Vaughn, very important program! And, Sir, A very well written and thoughtout article. Thank you!
The major thing that gives me pause, personally, is the ever recurring question these days: "Is THIS really (or SHOULD this really be) within the bounds of what "government" has for a charter???" While I am not a "dyed in the wool" Tea Party activist", I do believe any government action of this nature begs the question to be revisited - again, and again!
Add to that the thought that if private industry can not do such task efficiently and with reasonable cost contstraints, how much worse will the program be for cost and efficiency if run by "the government"?
Don't these kids have Internet access at school? Isn't the tax payer burdened enough by that? No one *needs* Internet access! You need food, clothing, and shelter. Past that it is all luxuries. When I moved out into the sticks I survived without Internet access for 4 years. It simply was not available where I was. I lived.

I actually managed to get a lot done then. Oh well, I'm off to go read a paper book now. They're edited much better than electronic content is in my experience.
I think this is worthy idea to help low income families. However, are eligible households based on free lunch status of children? In the school I worked for, free lunch status was granted to those who applied for it. There was never any checking out true monetary need. I don't know if this is true for all schools, but if it is, I can tell you many who are signed up for free lunch have done so for the proverbial "free lunch. Let's not make this another on of those programs.
0 Votes
+ -
Who determines the ISP to be used? Do they get a subsidy for providing service and modems at discounts? What the criteria in determining whether I have one ISP versus another (and we all know there are indeed vast differences between them)? Will there be any kind of "standard" or "quality control" and (dare I use this bad word) "OVERSIGHT" of whether or not these ISPs are indeed providing the level of service that they are getting subsidies for (assuming they do)? This is why people need to understand the full complexities of legislation, the costs to the taxpayer and (most importantly) any alternative motives of those that seem to benefit from such legislation that may have had good intent, but was manipulated into a "cash machine" at the expense of others. Not saying this is one of them, but this article certainly doesn't address some fundamental questions that should be considered either.

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix
Click Here
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix
ie8 fix