2010's Top Five Linux and Open-Source Stories
Summary: 2010 was a heck of a year for Linux and open-source software. The biggest story though was the one that was invisible: Linux went everywhere.
Sure, unlike me, you're probably not reading this on a Linux desktop--Mint 10 for those who care about such things--but do you use Google, Facebook or Twitter? If so, you're using Linux. That Android phone in your pocket? Linux. DVRs, network attached storage (NAS), trade stocks? Linux, Linux, Linux.
I think one of the most telling stories about Linux this year came from a friend of mine, Joe "Zonker" Brockmeier, who told me of a friend who said "Linux was too hard." When Zonker asked him about his Android phone, he replied something like, "Oh, but Android is easy. It's not Linux!"
Oh my. Android is indeed Linux, as is so many other devices and Web services and sites. Open-source developers have just gotten very good at hiding the dirty technical details from you. It just took them a lot longer than it did for the Mac OS X designers to hide its Mach, OpenBSD, and FreeBSD Unix roots from users. In the last few years though, they finally got the hang of it.
We're going to see this trend grow only stronger in 2011 with the rise of Google's Linux-based Chrome OS. That's why Chrome OS is my first big story of 2010.
1. Chrome OS Finally Arrives
Google took its own sweet time about getting Chrome OS out the door, but Chrome OS is finally, sort of, here. Is Chrome OS, with all its applications based on the Web, for people like you, who read ZDNet, or me, who cut his Unix/Linux teeth on Version 7? No, of course not. But, would it make a great operating system for office-workers, non-tech savvy people, and students. Yes, yes it would. I predict that, by early 2012, Chrome OS, while not a traditional, fat-client desktop operating system, will become a major desktop contender.
2. Red Hat: The First Billion-Dollar, Open-Source Company
I predicted earlier this year that Red Hat would be the first billion-dollar open-source company. I think I blew my prediction though. I thought it would take more than a year--it looks more like Red Hat will become the first billion-dollar Linux company in 2011. Indeed, when it comes to servers, Red Hat is getting ready to take on Microsoft.
Page 2: [Oracle/Sun, Attachmate/Novell, & Ubuntu and Unity] »
Oracle/Sun, Attachmate/Novell, & Ubuntu and Unity
3. Oracle Remakes Sun's Open-Source Legacy
Sun had a long and odd history with open source. On balance, Sun was good for open source. Oracle is also an open-source company, but Oracle only supports open-source if it directly contributed to Oracle's bottom line. So it is that Oracle has killed off OpenSolaris; has forced Apache into an open-source Java fork; and effectively forked OpenOffice into the Oracle branch and the one that most OpenOffice developers now support, LibreOffice. .
4. Attachmate (Who?) buys Novell
Attachmate is in the process of buying Novell. Well that's the official story anyway. I don't buy it. Personally, I see, Microsoft pulling the strings on this deal. SUSE Linux and openSUSE will continue, but when the deal is said and done early next year, I see Novell as being Microsoft's de facto Linux.
No, I don't see Novell acting like a branch of Microsoft. Instead I see Novell ending up like Citrix Systems, a remora fish that follows and profits from the great white shark of Microsoft's business moves.
5. Ubuntu tries to revitalize the Linux desktop
Canonical, Ubuntu Linux's parent company, has been focusing on the server and the cloud, but they also recently renewed their desktop commitment with the introduction of Unity as its primary desktop interface.
Besides being an interesting new take on how to make the Linux desktop as friendly to new users as the Mac OS X's Aqua interface. Canonical also plans on using Unity as its smartphone and tablet interface.
Unity won't be for everyone. Old-school Linux users won't like it much at all, but it's not meant for us. Unity is meant to be a new, easy-to-use Linux desktop for those same people who now use Android and don't realize that Linux is under its shiny surface. Considering how well Android has worked out for Linux phone users, I know Ubuntu is hoping the same thing happens for tomorrow's Linux desktop users. I'll be watching closely to see how well it works out.
In 2011, I also expect Linux to make great gains in tablets, but that's an idea, along with others, to be explored on another day in another story.
Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Talkback
best year for Linux so far
THE year of Linux
RE: 2010's Top Five Linux and Open-Source Stories
Actually, it isn't just hating change
RE: 2010's Top Five Linux and Open-Source Stories
Security, stability, speed.
RE: 2010's Top Five Linux and Open-Source Stories
Stability- I haven't had any stability problems from my Windows 7 laptop.
Speed- Windows 7 is very fast.
Any gain would be minimal, I assure you. Also, web browsers seem to be faster on my Windows 7 partition than on my Linux Distribution. I don't know why, but I think it could be that my Windows Distribution browsers that I use have hardware acceleration that my Linux Distribution browsers cannot compete with.
RE: 2010's Top Five Linux and Open-Source Stories
RE: 2010's Top Five Linux and Open-Source Stories
<a href="http://www.papermoz.com/research-papers/">Research Paper Help</a>
<a href="http://www.papermoz.com/term-papers/">Term Paper Help</a>
<a href="http://www.papermoz.com/essays/">Essay Help</a>
RE: 2010's Top Five Linux and Open-Source Stories
<a href="http://www.papermoz.com/book-reports/">book report help</a>
<a href="http://www.papermoz.co.uk/dissertations/">Dissertation Help</a>
RE: 2010's Top Five Linux and Open-Source Stories
Who would you choose?
Novell? Who knows what's going to happen to Suse since that's being put up for sale independently from Novell's other products.
Ubuntu? Canonical doesn't even break even and exists purely at the will of investors with deep pockets along with Shuttleworth's dwindling fortune.
The best bet may well be IBM, HP or some other world-class services organization. But now you're gotten into bed with organizations who's core mandate is to keep you paying for services. Is this really any better than paying the likes of Microsoft or other product vendors for their products with a smaller amount spent on ongoing services and support?
I for one would not risk my business by betting the farm on products from companies who are not financially stable - doing so would be suicidal.
Sometimes, free is too expensive.
RE: 2010's Top Five Linux and Open-Source Stories
As for Canonical, they're close to breaking even and Shuttleworth's fortune seems to be doing just fine. After all he just bought bought the most expensive condo in downtown Manhattan for, gulp, $31.5 million.
http://www.nypost.com/p/pagesix/space_tourist_mark_shuttleworth_lU3w89KgEyjMH7IzxLKEjO#ixzz19QRggB00
So, I'm not worried about Ubuntu disappearing anytime soon.
And, then, of course, there's this company named Red Hat.
Steven
RE: 2010's Top Five Linux and Open-Source Stories
While you argue that free is sometimes too expensive, I would argue that this is only the case when free is not really free. That unfortunately is a problem with any provider, and the same could be said about Microsoft who lures small and medium sized businesses with preferred pricing then absolutely rapes and murders them on the CALS for the various products needed to make the system scalable. Since Linux distros like UBUNTU and Redhat for all their short-comings have the advantage of being scalable out of the box. I see it having as good a chance as any for a company that intends to grow.
RE: 2010's Top Five Linux and Open-Source Stories
RE: 2010's Top Five Linux and Open-Source Stories
Same old FUD. When I need help from Oracle it is usually simpler to ask on a forum than go through their support lines (ughhh). Going through the MS support is just as awful and is inexplicably:-) costly.
Of course vendors like system76 and zareason also offer support at a fraction of what MS charges.
But you would not know this, would you?
RE: 2010's Top Five Linux and Open-Source Stories
RE: 2010's Top Five Linux and Open-Source Stories
It isn't just ABM
shis:going after apple
very true, google etc don' see microsoft as competitive or relevant anymore.
RE: 2010's Top Five Linux and Open-Source Stories
RE: 2010's Top Five Linux and Open-Source Stories
I'll try to remember to check back for your response so I can check out your claims. WHICH programs run better under wine than windows, and how so?
That's a claim that deserves some rubber on the road.