Linux and Open Source

Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols & Paula Rooney

Can open source make MapQuest relevant again?

By | July 12, 2010, 6:39am PDT

Summary: How much benefit can you get if the work done on your open source site uses an incompatible data store?

You can always tell when a company is losing market traction. They treat open source like a corporate Hail Mary.

So here comes AOL’s Mapquest division, hoping that open source can give it back its mojo, maybe even its youth, lost these many years to Google Maps and the GPS on smartphones like the iPhone and Android.

The site opens on a clickable map, but it’s not the usual MapQuest map, with the search box and buttons. Instead what you get is data from Open Street Map, an open source data store.

In other words the MapQuest data is still proprietary.

Which leads to the obvious question. How much benefit can you get if the work done on your open source site uses an incompatible data store? In theory the new maps can be updated more easily and quickly, with road work announcements or other changes added by anyone.

But doesn’t that just turn Open Street Map into the dominant player? They have over a quarter-million users now, and now in theory they also have more software power.

Curious. Perhaps y’all can explain it.

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Topics

Dana Blankenhorn has been a business journalist for 30 years, a tech freelancer since 1983.

Disclosure

Dana Blankenhorn

Dana Blankenhorn has been a journalist, writer and part-time futurist for over 30 years.

At the present moment I run only a personal blog in addition to my ZDNet open source blog.

DanaBlankenhorn.Com has the subtitle The War Against Oil. In the past I have used it to write about political history, e-commerce, personal matters, some ideas related to open source, and The World of Always On, which is the idea of using sensors, motes and RFID to turn WiFi links into platforms for applications which live in the air.

My IRA account at Schwab holds a few tech shares, most notably some Intel and Applied Materials, but there are no open source companies in it. I don’t even own any CBS stock.

Biography

Dana Blankenhorn

Dana Blankenhorn has been a business journalist for nearly 25 years and has covered the online world professionally since 1985. He founded the Interactive Age Daily for CMP Media, and has written for the Chicago Tribune, Advertising Age's "NetMarketing" supplement, and dozens of other publications over the years.

7
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

Care to support the "Hail Mary" assertion?
daboochmeister 16th Jul 2010
Just curious, you stated it as if it's a pattern, companies struggling to stay relevant using open source as a "hail mary" desperation pass. While an interesting metaphor, is that actually true? You have enough other examples to form a pattern? I'm trying to think of examples, and can't. IBM?
0 Votes
+ -
Is anyone still using mapquest? I know I haven't even thought about using it in over 5 years. I'm sure the brand has already lost most of its value. AOL and Mapquest will sink together.

Open Street View IMHO has a very positive future.
0 Votes
+ -
@nicey1966
Is anyone still using mapquest?

I can recall when MapQuest was a go-to years ago. Then things shifted over time, and they sort of fell behind. Shame really. Like so many other things that went AWOL (er, AOL).
0 Votes
+ -
I still use MapQuest
LeonBA 14th Jul 2010
Maybe I'm behind the times, but MapQuest has always provided me decent driving directions so I've never felt a need to go anywhere else for them. In fact I used it just a few days ago to find my way to someone's house to buy a WiFi card the guy had put up on Craigslist.
0 Votes
+ -
I don't think its "still proprietary"?
peter_erskine@... 12th Jul 2010
If the data is OSM, then MapQuest can't alter the public-domain nature and licensing of it.
But there's really no point in MapQuest. Just use OSM or its routable derivatives.
0 Votes
+ -
Competing Open Source data...
dsonnen@... 13th Jul 2010
Google and OSM both crowdsource much of their data and call it "open". But, as recently as the Haiti earthquake, the two organizations could not merge their data sets because of licensing restrictions -- even though the resulting data would have been more useful.

Now, MapQuest is supporting/endorsing OSM. The IP issues, as far as I know, have not gone away.

Maybe the puzzle here is what does "open" mean?
0 Votes
+ -
It would be more appropriate to ask if Mapquest can make open source relevant. Not to be critical of open source, but more consumers---your regular home users---are more likely to use MapQuest than understand what open source is.
0 Votes
+ -
Care to support the "Hail Mary" assertion?
daboochmeister 16th Jul 2010
Just curious, you stated it as if it's a pattern, companies struggling to stay relevant using open source as a "hail mary" desperation pass. While an interesting metaphor, is that actually true? You have enough other examples to form a pattern? I'm trying to think of examples, and can't. IBM?

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix