Linux and Open Source

Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols & Paula Rooney

Gnome 2.2 now available, planned for Ubuntu 8.04, RHEL 6, SLES 11

By | March 12, 2008, 1:08pm PDT

The GNOME Foundation announced the release of version 2.22 on Wednesday, an update that offers enhanced multimedia support, new file system, and enhanced e-mail, internationalization and accessibility features. GNOME is used in many popular Linux distributions from Ubuntu, Novell, Red Hat, Mandriva and Debian.

The version 2.22 announced today will be incorporated into the soon-to-be-released Ubuntu Linux V. 8.04, code named “Hardy Heron,” Mandriva’s 2008.1 and in forthcoming distributions such as Red Hat’s Enterprise Linux 6 as well as Novell’s SUSE Linux Enterprise Destop 11. In the interim, the GNOME update will soon be in Fedora 9, Debian and in Novell’s OpenSUSE 11 due in early summer. It is also incorportated in an update of Foresight Linux released today.

Those distributors may also opt to use the GNOME 2.24 update, which is due in six months, a GNOME spokesman said. GNOME also said it is hard at work on GNOME 2.24, due in six months. Planned features include a new version of its Ekiga VoIP client with a redesigned user interface and SIP presence support, an Empathy IM client that uses the Telepathy framework and a column and list view in the file manager.

According to a recent survey from desktoplinux.com in 2007, GNOME has 45 percent of desktop share, ahead of rival KDE with 35 percent.

GNOME 2.22 offer a variety of new features to enhance its use in multimedia applications. One is a new feature called Cheese that allows users to take photos and make videos using a computer’s webcam. Additionally, the MoviePlayer offers enhance support for DVD playback and new support for digital TV (DVB).

Cheese

The update also offers a new virtual file system on GTK+ that replaces GNOME-VFS. The network transparent file system offers improvements such as the ability to recollect login credentials for a full session, enhanced reliability and use of the Freedesktop.org’s Desktop Trash Can to handle the storage of deleted files. The File Manager offers improved handlong of removable media.

The GNOME Foundation also emphasized that version 2.2 offers significant accessibility improvements, including enhanced screenreading and magnification and better mouse accessibility.

As part of its close collaboration with the Mozilla.org, GNOME 2.22’s Orca screen reading technology offers better support for Rich Internet Applications and Live regions. The update also features new support for Level 3 Braille, enhanced screen magnification for smother scrolling and support for colorblind filters.

That’s not all. Version 2.2 offers a host of those enhancements and new features including:

 Drop shadowing on Windows and transparency effects
 Evolution’s client support for the Google Calendar
 Remote Desktop Viewer
 Improved text editor printing
 Download notifications in the Epiphany
 Faster document viewer
 Inhibited automatic suspend and hibernate when burning CDs
 7-zip support in archive manager
 Network multiplayer in chess
 Deskbar opens Evolution contacts
 PolicyKit integration for administrators
 Anjuta IDE is now in the GNOME Developer Suite
 Support for international clock and more than 46 languages

Evolution supports Google Calendar

The release of GNOME 2.22 is dedicated to Raphael Higino, member of the GNOME translation team and GNOME Brazil who died in a motorcycle accident last year. He was 24 years old.

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Topics

Paula Rooney is a Boston-based writer who has followed the tech industry for almost two decades.

Disclosure

Paula Rooney

Paula Rooney owns no stock in the companies that she covers. She holds a 401K that is managed by Morgan Stanley.

Biography

Paula Rooney

Paula Rooney has covered the software and technology industry for more than 20 years, starting with semiconductor design and mini-computer systems at EDN News and later focused on PC software companies including Microsoft, Lotus, Oracle, Red Hat, Novell and other open source and commercial software companies for CRN and PCWeek. She received a silver award from the American Society of Business Publication Editors in 2005 for her profile on Linus Torvalds and edited and co-authored "Partnering With Microsoft," a book about Microsoft's channel published by CMP Publishing in 2004. Rooney graduated from the Columbia University Graduate School of Journalism in 1997. In her off time, she enjoys scuba diving, sailing, sun worshipping, running, reading, surfing (the net) and hanging out with her family. She resides on the shores of Scituate, Massachusetts.

36
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

Note
1djk1 11th Apr 2008
I wonder why the writer capitalised the word windows. Microsoft Windows is not the subject in this story, the windows under Gnome are. Shows how brainwashed people are.
0 Votes
+ -
Gnice.
james.faction 12th Mar 2008
There's a fair few Gnome applications that are really excellent, but must confess I'm not fond of the Gnome desktop interface. It seems inflexible and old fashioned to me, a poor compromise between the flashier, much more impressive KDE and plainer, thinner, zippier interfaces like fluxbox.

I find the default Ubuntu look of grey strips top and bottom slow to get around, and depressingly reminiscent of 2000-and-before era Windows and Mac interfaces. Neither of those are things I particularly want to be reminded of when I'm using Linux. :P
And, let us not forget other lightweight window managers that are possible, with all applications still compatible. What could be better?
0 Votes
+ -
Note
1djk1 11th Apr 2008
I wonder why the writer capitalised the word windows. Microsoft Windows is not the subject in this story, the windows under Gnome are. Shows how brainwashed people are.
0 Votes
+ -
KDE is so similar to windows with the bar at the bottom.
Gnome is so similar to the old Mac Classic, but with a bar at the bottom...

either way, it's an effort to access some familiarity that people have...

But hey, I like the taskbar at the bottom for KDE (thus, I'm using it right now!)
GNOME remains too simple and limiting, in my experience. KDE has a lot more power and doesn't limit a user's actions. GNOME is an exercise in frustration, and a lot of the above improvements already exist in KDE 3.5 (currently at 3.5.9).

KDE wins this poll from LinuxQuestions.org by a wide margin:
http://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/2007-linuxquestions.org-members-choice-awards-79/desktop-environment-of-the-year-610190/

Of course, to each their own -- thats the beauty of Free Software!
there is choice. With Windows, it is take it or leave it.
0 Votes
+ -
How about support for Exchange 2007 in Evolution
DarthRidiculous 13th Mar 2008
Sorely needed.
0 Votes
+ -
there should be a binary installer
berlindsucks 13th Mar 2008
There should be a an easy way for users to retrofit new Gnome versions into an existing Linux installation... why can't this be accomplished?

The distro builders should list their modifications to the default in a given .xml file, so when a new Gnome desktop is installed by the user, it would read that xml file, apply the changes, and put new applications (not available before) in a "new applications" folder.

This way, if you've got, say, Fedora, or Ubuntu7, you'd install the latest greatest Gnome, and always have the same look and feel as you did with the original...

Is this too difficult to do?.
I'd like to be able to have a settings copy file, where I export all my personal settings to a single file, which I could later apply to another installation (of the same or newer interface... even if it was a SET of setting files, with 1 per program, I'd be fine with it.)

oh, and why force it to be binary? anything where I don't have to do the work, I'm good with. A script to install it would be just as good for that reason... oh, and an undo for it would be nice, if we're going to be talking about what we want/would like to see...
I'll give it a try when it's readily available... but I've always found it to be incredibly frustrating and it gets in the way.

Which is why I'm using KDE (the OpenSUSE flavour to write this... but don't forget that KDE can also be abused - just look at the flavour of KDE that comes on the KDE version of Mint 4.0 - that's starting to bug me just as much as Gnome does.

Guess this girl's going to be staying with OpenSUSE for the foreseeable!
That is why GNOME has 45 percent of desktop share, and KDE has 35 percent.

The continued license problems with Qt of course do not help. The KDE group also needs to ditch Konquerer.
0 Votes
+ -
Konqueror
super_J 13th Mar 2008
I agree with you regarding Konqueror. It tries to be both a file browser and a web browser, and a multitude of other things, and doesn't do, IMHO, any of them very well.
0 Votes
+ -
Well then...
TtfnJohn 13th Mar 2008
use Dolphin if you don't like Konq.

Either one is far far better than the brain dead file manager in GNOME.

ttfn

John
0 Votes
+ -
re: "Well then"
super_J 13th Mar 2008
Dolphin is excellent, and a step in the right direction, I think.

Also, I think the KDE devs should make a simple KHTML based browser (web browser only).

That way, those that want file management and web browsing to be separate concerns and therefore in separate apps, like me, can have it.

And they can still have Konqueror for those that prefer kitchen sink apps.

Nautilus is far from perfect, certainly, but it is far from "brain dead". It works well enough for me.
"but I've always found it to be incredibly frustrating and it gets in the way."

You say that about Gnome, but I've always said that about KDE - constant application crashes, a bazillion options, configuration upon configuration, poorly designed menus, messy layout of buttons and menus and options, and so on.

By contrast, Gnome offers a clean, intuitive, smooth, comfortable, highly productive environment that gets out of my way.

But to each his/her own.

But those are the classic Gnome vs KDE arguments.

And I like KDE as well - it's eye candy and it's endless multitudes of configuration options make it amazing and powerful.

I'm just happier, and more productive, with Gnome. It looks nicer to me, and it's easier.

The thing I notice, though, is that every time someone does a piece on Gnome, KDE fans have to chime in with their criticisms. By contrast, when someone does a piece about KDE, I don't notice Gnome fans chiming with criticism nearly as much.

It just seems to me that the KDE camp isn't content just using their favorite desktop - they feel the need to convince the rest of the world that "Gnome sucks".
0 Votes
+ -
Two different user groups, I expect
TtfnJohn 13th Mar 2008
"It just seems to me that the KDE camp isn't content just using their favorite desktop - they feel the need to convince the rest of the world that "Gnome sucks"."

Perhaps it's that the KDE "camp" tends more to the power user than GNOME does. As you say, though, to each their own.

For my part I find GNOME gets in the way of what I need to do far too often to make it a particularly useful desktop. It's all about the GNOME way or the highway bent that GNOME has adopted and I'm not thrilled with the GNOME way.

To me it looks bad, probably as much to do with the awful GTK widgets as much as anything.

And contrary to DonnieBoy the QT libraries used in KDE are GPL'd so there is no licensing problem and there hasn't been in quite some time.

As for the rivalry between GNOME and KDE it's done the Linux desktop nothing but good.

Oh, and nothing in GNOME 2.2 that KDE hasn't had for some time and it doesn't hold a candle to KDE 4.02. (You know I had to get some kind of dig in, didn't you? happy )

ttfn

John
0 Votes
+ -
gnome/kde
super_J 13th Mar 2008
"As for the rivalry between GNOME and KDE it's done the Linux desktop nothing but good."

I agree with you 100%. Long live both Gnome and KDE.

"Oh, and nothing in GNOME 2.2 that KDE hasn't had for some time and it doesn't hold a candle to KDE 4.02. (You know I had to get some kind of dig in, didn't you? happy )"

We'll see about KDE 4.0 in about a year. I've seen screenshots, reviews, etc, and it seems that KDE 4.0 still needs a lot of time in the oven before it's really usable, or production ready. But it does look nice.
and Mandriva 2008.1
and Mandriva 2008.1
"The bar at the top/bottom" is a "default" setting that can quickly be changed in GNOME or KDE.

Oh, and this applies Microsoft Windows a well (but to a lesser degree).

In KDE you can also turn on the Menu Bar which duplicates the Menu bar function in Mac OS (and appears at the top of the screen.

Got a *real* comparison to show us?
I actually like and use both GNOME and KDE.

Is that OK or am I supposed to pick one over the other? wink
0 Votes
+ -
Use both!
super_J 13th Mar 2008
"Is that OK or am I supposed to pick one over the other? ;)"

Please continue using both. There's no reason to pick one over the other, unless you really just want to deal with only one.

Both Gnome and KDE have their individual strengths and weaknesses.

I too use both, but it's probably about 60/40 Gnome/KDE for me, as I generally feel a bit more comfortable in Gnome. But I do switch back and forth when the mood strikes me.
0 Votes
+ -
Good old UNSTABLE Gnome
wackoae 13th Mar 2008
The reason I don't use Gnome (and probably never will) is because it is too UNSTABLE to use.

For the past 5 years, every time I tried Gnome I end up with a crash system after just 10 mins of usage. It always cashes with the same bugs I submitted 5 years ago and got closed as "not a way a user should do this and that". Guess what, that is how I work and Gnome brings down the box while KDE happily works.

Also, Gnome has the tendency if removing useful features, just because they can't figure out a way to fix something.
0 Votes
+ -
Thats so weird...
Tech-Fun 13th Mar 2008
I could have written the exact same thing about KDE. I love the IDEA of KDE but every time I try to use it on a serious basis I get so many minor crashes and little annoyances that I end up back in Gnome within a day or two.
0 Votes
+ -
crashes
super_J 13th Mar 2008
"For the past 5 years, every time I tried Gnome I end up with a crash system after just 10 mins of usage. It always cashes with the same bugs I submitted 5 years ago and got closed as "not a way a user should do this and that". Guess what, that is how I work and Gnome brings down the box while KDE happily works."

I've used Gnome for six years (KDE, the same), and I've never had a Gnome crash.

But if they responded with "that's not how it's designed to be used" to your bug reports, that's a legitimate response. If you tried to use Gnome in a KDE fashion, it wouldn't be surprising if it did crash. That's true of any software, if you try to use it in a fashion it was not designed to be used, it will eventually crash.

Really, if I try, I can pretty much make any software crash, particularly when it comes to desktop environments or apps.
0 Votes
+ -
crashes
philip.robar@... 13th Mar 2008
But if they responded with "that's not how it's designed to be used" to your bug reports, that's a legitimate response [snip] if you try to use it in a fashion it was not designed to be used, it will eventually crash.

Balony! The goal of any good developer is software that never crashes. If software crashes it's a bug, period, no excuses. Saying otherwise is just an easy out for lazy developers.
0 Votes
+ -
crashes -- say what?
rgetsla 14th Mar 2008
I have been using Ubuntu 7.04 with Gnome and have not experienced any Gnome crashes. I have tried KDE, but I do not use KDE much. I have never experienced any KDE crashes, either. I tend to use Firefox and Open Office most of the time, so I'm not looking at the Gnome desktop for long, so eye candy is not an issue for me, either. I get my work done without much pain or suffering, and that's what I expect. I find that what I have "just works." What more could I ask for?

If you experience repeated crashes, I would look for a user feedback wiki or message board, and bring up your problem, because I'll bet there are some folks who would want to help you get to the root cause of those crashes and fix the problem. Crashes should not be accepted as a fact of life. The whole idea of open source is to find and fix problems that cause crashes by feeding back the details to the folks who can do something about the problem. Despite a lot of beta testing, your particular configuration may present a condition that has not been tested, and your configuration might just be singularly blessed. But if you do not give the folks who can fix the problem any feedback, how can you expect them to solve the problem?

Free and Open Source Software uses a development model that is a participatory process. As a user, your part in the process is to report the problems you encounter, and assist the folks who are the code maintainers to find out what they did wrong. I'm sure they don't want to see your system crash any more than you do.

Neither KDE nor Gnome are maintained by organizations like Microsoft. I'm sure that the code maintainers of both KDE and Gnome pay attention to user feedback.
Both KDE and Gnome seems to have been converging. Fro a user porint of view once the themes are setup and the panels are where you want them, it's actually hard to tell which environment you're using.
I stll wish one of them would let you move the scroll bars to the left of the windows though. Us lefties on tablets have to put our hand over the screen where we're reading to scroll up and down. Oh, and have lefthanded mouse pointers installed as optional themes by default. Not hard to do, just mirror the icon and move the clickpoint to suit. A pain for me to have to do with every theme I install for myself in Gnome and KDE. Maybe it could be considered an "Accessability" feature for us sinister users. 8)
0 Votes
+ -
The emphasis on, and "News" support for Gnome is there because the corporations that support Gnome want a way onto your desktop, "No Matter What!" Your Linux Desktop is targeted for ad views and being counted. You will be told what you can do on your desktop by co-opted designers that will strip features that give you real choice and Autonomous Control. Mono is Microsoft on Linux and a virus, as well as a back door to Corporate Control Just Like Flash! They are only called Internet Technologies in name only, they are network control desktop applications which break the Neutral modality of the internet as a federation and co-opts the technology for classist ideology. Gnome is there to herd you to corporate slaughter where no one is responsible for the death of your freedom, because corporations are soulless entities by design. You are doing it to your self. You are suffering from a variety of the Helsinki syndrome and have been under the barrage of advertising designed to break your Will and inculcate you to mindless, unequally soulless consumers. Followers. You are Prisoners. Your first duty is to Escape. I wish you Luck.
0 Votes
+ -
Ya'll right there, fella?
hasta la Vista, bah-bie 13th Mar 2008
We wouldn't want ya to go off the deep end now, would we....

wink
0 Votes
+ -
TakeIT2 15th Mar 2008
Well it's just a passing thought.
0 Votes
+ -
because it is the default with the big name in Linux, Ubuntu. I wonder how many people who hear about, and download Ubuntu, even think to download and try Kubuntu? Most people who try computer systems just go for the default. I am sure it is less the case with Linux users, but I would bet that it remains the dominant behaviour.
0 Votes
+ -
Not Gnome 2.2
daengbo 13th Mar 2008
Please change the article's title. This is not Gnome 2.2. It is Gnome 2.22, not to be confused with 2.2.2. 2.20 was released 9/2007. 2.18 was released 3/2007. 2.16 was released 9/2006. 2.2 was several years ago.

Leaving the title like this makes it look like you don't know what you're talking about -- kind of like all the people referring to Ubuntu 7.1.
When the sun rises then the landscape will be seen
I've always used both.

However....

KDE4 needs serious work before it's useable.

Right now I'm running Fedora 9, which has chosen not to include KDE 3.5.x, but only KDE4 (as well as GNOME and XFCE of course).

That was a stupid decison on thier part. Ubuntu, Mandriva and openSUSE are including both versions of KDE in their upcoming releases.
0 Votes
+ -
How about Evolution support for Exchange 07
DarthRidiculous 8th Apr 2008
I need that,not integration with Google calendar.

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix