Linux and Open Source

Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols & Paula Rooney

Google's Chrome operating system gets a much needed update

By | August 11, 2011, 4:13pm PDT

Summary: Google Chrome OS has been greatly improved, but for most users it’s still not good enough. Here’s what’s new and improved and where it still falls short.

I quite like Google’s Chrome operating system (OS)–a Linux variant that use the Chrome Web browser as its interface–but as it’s being shipping today, Chrome OS has problems. Fortunately, in the latest Chrome OS stable channel release, Google is finally addressing some of these rough spots.

To put it to the test, I installed the new Chrome OS, Chrome version 13.0.782.108, to my Samsung Chromebook. It took a while to install-not the installation itself, that took about a minute-but to get it going. I had to click the update button several times to get things going. I’m not the only one who found that to be the case.

Once installed, everything ran smoothly. While I was making sure nothing had been broken in the update, it occurred to me that one neat thing about Chromebooks is that, more so than with conventional PCs, you don’t need to update your hardware to get major new functionality. With Chrome OS, or any cloud-based operating system, the goodness is baked into the operating system and the Web. Ah, if only that promise had been better kept in this release of Chrome OS.

That said, what’s really new and improved in this Chrome OS update? The first thing I noticed is that it’s now easy to use Chrome OS on a Virtual Private Network (VPN). Before this update, you had to turn on the VPN functionality-as an “experimental” feature. This was annoying.

Now, you can use a Layer 2 Tunneling Protocol/Internet Protocol Security (L2TP/IPSec) private network with a pre-shared key by just clicking on the network icon and selecting “private network.” In my trials, using Windows Server 2008 R2 as my VPN server on both my home network and over the Internet, I had no trouble setting up VPNs and using them for work.

That’s the good news. The bad news is L2TP/IPSec is still the only VPN protocol Chrome OS supports easily. So, if like me, you prefer to use OpenVPN for your VPN, you’re out of luck. Chrome OS needs broader VPN protocol support.

On the plus side for private networking, Chrome OS no longer “forgets” VPN settings. In its last iteration, it would do that sometimes and I had to try very hard not to throw my Chromebook across the room.

Chrome OS also now supports auto-connecting with 3G. If you’re frequently stuck miles away from the closest Wi-Fi hot spot this can be very handy.

The operating system also now supports 802.1x. This, in turn, means your Wi-Fi connections are safer if you’re using a network built around RADIUS servers

Chrome OS’ printing mechanism has been made easier. You can now head to the Google Cloud Print settings under Wrench > Settings > Under the Hood.

The operating system also comes with an assortment of other security and stability fixes.
Last, but not least, the Netflix app. finally works, so you can use a Chromebook or other Chrome OS empowered device as your own portable TV. On the more serious work-a-day side of life, the Citrix Receiver, which enables you to run Windows applications from a Citrix application server, is now available for Chromebooks.

That’s all well and good, but I also noticed that a lot of what I thought of as simple problems are still in Chrome OS.

For example, even though Chrome OS knows that it uses Google Docs to open Microsoft Word .DOC or OpenXML or LibreOffice’s Open Document Format files (ODF) in Google Docs. It still can’t open these files if they’re kept locally. Come on! If I can get to them from the file manager, which I can, when I try to open one, Chrome OS should use Google Docs to open the file up for me. Or, at the very least, it should give me a choice on what program to use to open a given file. This isn’t rocket science.

The operating system’s documentation also remains mediocre. Want to get to the Linux shell under Chrome OS’ pretty face? You do that by simultaneously pressing control-alt-T. Once there, you can do things like rune Secure Shell (ssh) and other low-level controls. This command sequence isn’t listed the Chrome OS keyboard overlay. Oh, that by the by, you get to by simultaneously hitting the control-alt-? keys.

I still believe that Chrome OS has great promise and Chromebooks could be winners. But, both are a long, long way from there yet.

Sure, as a techie kind of guy I think my Chromebook is a great and useful toy, but can I see ordinary businesses and people using it? No, not yet. And, if Google doesn’t start improving it fast, I’m not sure I will ever see Joe and Jane User using it.

Related Stories:

Google packs Chrome Web Store with more education, business apps

The first Chromebook Review: Samsung Series 5

Five Chromebook concerns for businesses

Five Reasons why Google’s Linux Chromebook is a Windows killer

How to install Google’s Chrome OS

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Topics

Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols, aka sjvn, has been writing about technology and the business of technology since CP/M-80 was the cutting edge, PC operating system

Disclosure

Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols

Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols is a freelance writer. He does not own stocks or other investments in any technology company.

Biography

Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols

Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols, aka sjvn, has been writing about technology and the business of technology since CP/M-80 was the cutting edge, PC operating system; 300bps was a fast Internet connection; WordStar was the state of the art word processor; and we liked it!

His work has been published in everything from highly technical publications (IEEE Computer, ACM NetWorker, Byte) to business publications (eWEEK, InformationWeek, ZDNet) to popular technology (Computer Shopper, PC Magazine, PC World) to the mainstream press (Washington Post, San Francisco Chronicle, BusinessWeek).

Related Discussions on TechRepublic

Did you know you can take part in these discussions with your ZDNet membership?
49
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

RE: Google's Chrome operating system gets a much needed update
codecrackx15 19th Dec
Since the Acer Chromebook was reduced to $299.00 on amazon it has been selling out with each new shipment. 300 seems to be the sweet spot.
0 Votes
+ -
An unneeded toy
otaddy 11th Aug
Google should be focused on updating and improving android.

What were they thinking with this? Do they really need another platform to push?
0 Votes
+ -
@otaddy Actually, I think that Chrome OS is more compatible with Google's cloud infrastructure and services than Android. It is a true post-PC client device. However, I'm not convinced that the broadband infrastructure can currently, or even within a few years, support the model of computing that Google envisions. Except for some very localized geographic areas.

And Android may soon be taken care of courtesy of Microsoft, Apple and Oracle. And Google's good OHA 'partners' like Verizon creating their own app stores and, in exchange for cash from Microsoft, making Bing the default search engine on their devices. Ditto for their competitors such as Amazon.
@otaddy They needed something like Android because HTML5 didn't yet exist. Android is just a 'necessary evil' for Google.
0 Votes
+ -
Questions for SJVN
Rabid Howler Monkey 11th Aug
From the blog article:
??I?m not sure I will ever see Joe and Jane User using it.

Let?s look at some tasks that Joe and Jane User probably do:
o surf the web
o make online purchases
o print coupons from web sites to make purchases at local brick and mortar stores
o access and use Facebook (sorry, Google+ is beta and not ready for Joe and Jane User)
o instant message with family and friends
o chat with family and friends
o use webmail (e.g., gmail) to read, forward, reply to, create and print email messages
o read and print documents posted on the web (e.g., PDF, DOC files)
o perform online banking
o play some online games
o read books
o listen to music, news, etc. (audio streaming)
o watch videos (video streaming)
o online tax preparation
o leave it on the coffee table and use it while watching TV
o leave it on the kitchen counter and use it while standing or sitting at the breakfast bar
o take and use it on vacation to stay in touch and keep informed

Can the Chromebook easily do all of these tasks? If not, which of these tasks are difficult and why?

Finally, will Joe and Jane User want to spend more than $200 for a Chromebook, a 'companion' device to their PC?
@Rabid Howler Monkey
+1
0 Votes
+ -
I guess it is possible
silentlennie 12th Aug
@Rabid Howler Monkey Most of these things already work just fine. Everything on your list which has 'online' or 'web' like webmail in them obviously works.

Printing works, Office works. Reading books, I guess you mean ebooks ? Works through for example Amazon Kindle Cloud Reader.

Audio and video works, I haven't tried a chromebook myself, but Chrome does support video-chat too I think. If not they started on this earlier this year and should be 'available soon'.

Printing works, although it is a bit of a workaround I think. You'll need an other computer with a printer attached to it and have Chrome installed.

I guess that was the end of your list.

So yes, it works.
@silentlennie Thanks for your response. However, I was hoping to hear from someone who has actually performed (or attempted to perform) these tasks on a Chromebook. Steven? Anyone?
@silentlennie

I have read seveal books on Project Gutenberg as HTML. IT works just fine in the browser. The Publishers will probably want to have some kind of DRM, but that could be included in the JavaScript of the web page.

I would expect Amazon to do that as soon as they see enough market share to make it worth their while.
@Rabid Howler Monkey I've had a Cr-48 since a few weeks after they started shipping. You can do everything on that list and a lot more. The Cr-48 doesn't handle graphics terribly well, but I think the newer hardware in commercial chromebooks really fixes that issue. The biggest issue I see with Chromebooks is price. They really need to make them closer to $250. Then I'd recommend everyone to buy one.

I use my Chromebook all the time. With 10 hours of battery life, I just charge it about once a week and carry it with me everywhere to use as needed. Its really handy.
@superlinkx Thanks for the response. It's good to know that Chromebooks, at least functionally, are ready for use by Joe and Jane User. I actually suspected as much.

One issue that I have seen some other Chromebook users comment on is that there are still web sites that do not support the Chrome browser very well. For example, some bank and eCommerce sites have been mentioned. And with Chrome OS, the only choice is the Chrome browser as it is the only local app provided. It would be useful if Google provided users the option of running Firefox tabs inside the Chrome browser. This would give users a bit of choice with the web browser as well as more complete coverage of the web.

Anyway, I eagerly await Google and some OEM to come out with a Chromebook priced at or below $200.

Cheers
@superlinkx
It will probably get to $250 + $70 = $320 for 3G modem and 2 years 100MB/month for something with netbook class (low) build quality and battery life when you get a little bit of market competition. The current Acer and particularly the Samsung look like they have been specified for business users, with high build quality and long actual usage battery life, rather than the "switched on with display dimmed and no apps running" battery life quoted for most Windows netbooks and laptops.
@Rabid Howler Monkey
It already does everything most home users want to do as you have listed out, although there are more goodies still to come.

It is a complete replacement for the PC for non-computer-hobbyist home and casual users, and also for schools, public and information access terminals/kiosks (eg. libraries, use inside airliners, information workers, enterprise information and data entry systems, etc).

The killer features compared with Windows is its statelessness, low maintenance and security aspects which are a real boon in these areas, and which Windows (nor any other fat OS) can never hope to match.

Users are prepared to pay $500+ for the convenience and portability of iPad so I don't think the price is as sensitive as you make out, although it will no doubt come down with competition.
0 Votes
+ -
This doesn't have market at all
adacosta38 11th Aug
If you can have people spending $1,000 on hardware like the MacBook Air to run traditional OS's like OS X (and Windows 7) in this what we now call Cloud savvy days, its safe to say, nobody is interested in this mediocre screw-up from Page and Brin.
0 Votes
+ -
Well said!
jscott418 12th Aug
@adacosta38 Its really not about how bad Chrome is, its about how limited it is and how much it costs? If Chrome was introduced on a Netbook spec'd hardware for $300 or less, it really would be a valid choice. I can see a lot of home users who could be fine with Chrome. But the way it was intro'd its just not worth it.
@jscott418

Recast that to $200.00 or less, and i would be with you. However, never fear, that will happen. Probably with Arm as the processor(s). It may take a couple of years, but we will get there.

That's when I expect to see the Home Server market begin to take off. An integrated home web server/Video/Computer server would make a real nice appliance. One could handle perhaps a dozen TV's, tablets, Chromebooks, and a few Video games.

But, it's still too soon to look for that.
0 Votes
+ -
... more so than with conventional PCs, you don?t need to update your hardware to get major new functionality.

I'd like to highlight a couple of things.

First, modern OSes, Windows 7 included do not reqiure updates to hardware to both: be easier to use and achieve the same level of performance. So, Chrome OS is not original in this regard.

Second, what more functionality?

New fancy graphics? Well, even Atom-based netbooks can play Netflix. Many ARM-based phones and tablets can, too. This wasn't exactly the case where Vista was released: Intel embedded graphics, baked into many laptops was inadequate, no matter which OS was used.

More file copying speed? For Chrome that is limited by the network bandwidth, not your local SATA-III or SSD. Of course, there is no need to upgrade. But then there is no need for any other OS, when cloud storage is used.

I am afraid that as far as Chrome is concerned, "more functionality" means making it actually usable at a level comparable to Windows 95 or Mac OS. Well, for that there is hardly need for new hardware either. But then there is no need for the new hardware for any other OS. There is not even need for a new OS - Windows XP or Mac are way better already and will be for quite some time even if they don't evolve. But they do evolve; Chrome is chasing a moving target there.

Returning to upgrading hardware. This is necessary only if one wants an insanely hi-res monitor for heavy gaming or a "green" version of a computer that consumes 10x less power than a similarly performing hardware just a few years old. Both Intel and AMD are getting better each year in this regard, and ARM is getting better at making CPUs that can compete with Atom. This has nothing to do with the OS being used.
@Earthling2 Dude - it's sjvn - Google wrote the Bible in his eyes... the wall in our room would give you a better response.
But I remember reading here that Chromebook does not need a update, and that was supposed to be a big plus over Windows computers.
0 Votes
+ -
When you see a salesman
LBiege 11th Aug
....throwing two contradictory pitches at you in order to make it stick you know that thing he sells is of snake-oil nature, and that's what this ChomrOS and HTML5 as a platform thing is all about.
@LBiege

It's still too soon to tell about Chrome as an OS, but everyone except Apple is all over HTML5 right now. JavaScript is Turing complete, which means that it can do anything any other computer programming language can do. Microsoft, Mozilla and Google have been in a race for the last two years to get the speed up to where it can compete with native applications. It's now as close as Java or C#. Once again, Apple seems to be the only hold out.

This, we are being told is the future of personal computing.

If you are thinking Google is selling Snake-Oil, then they have lots of good company.

Oh, and Apple will be on board with this soon too. That should make a complete list of the snakes for you.

Chrome OS is just a light weight Linux, with a Chrome browser installed. It is as good, or as bad as Chrome is. Your Phone probably has a heavier OS. It certainly does if it is iPhone, Android or Win Phone 7.

Personally, I prefer Firefox to Chrome.

Well, Mozilla should have out a Firefox based tablet/netbook in a year or so. Microsoft too. I do wonder about Opera, though.
@Raju Das The idea is that you don't need to update it manually (you can if you choose thought). The system will automatically update itself and then install the update the next time you reboot, with no annoying popups and forced reboots.

If zdnet said something else, that's their problem. If you really want to know about a product, its best to consult actual information, in this case http://www.google.com/chromebook/
Seriously folks, you are sounding like dinosaurs.
Chrome OS is rapidly evolving. Where connectivity is not an issue (lucky me) it only requires a small change in mindset to make huge amounts of sense.
The article reads like your head is firmly rooted in the past... wake up, the Chrome boat is getting up steam and you're still wondering if it will float.
@mik9dt Cell phones, tablets, and notebooks are also rapidly "evolving."

And honestly the vision of "web only" is crumbling as everything is going to apps and app stores. It was an interesting vision, but a flawed one. I do not see it as an ultimate, inevitable future.

Besides, technology is only making local storage and processing easier than ever. Why not use it?
@CobraA1
I am not too sure the app store thing is a good in the great scheme things. I fear that it lead us to a few closed ecosystem for very specific things with little interoperability between them. Unfortunately the excessive success of Apple is pushing more and more companies toward the same model. However such a model is not viable for most companies and unless companies pack together to build a few viable ecosystems, many of them will die.
But i disgress.
The cloud only approach is clearly stupid.
The best approach is the hybrid one. Use cloud solutions when it make sense and local solutions otherwise.
Moreover, i will always prefer private cloud solutions to public one.
I think that the private cloud approach has a much bigger potential than the public cloud approach.
With the rise of the mobile devices, which are however closer to consumption devices than to productive devices, PC can evolve to powerful application and multimedia server for all the mobiles devices (laptops,tablets,smartphones,etc...) of a private cloud unit. A private cloud unit could either be a home, a suburb, a town ,an enterprise ,etc...
A private cloud unit could have one or several private cloud servers.
Those servers can take full advantage of the increase
I think that if Microsoft and partners have the right strategy, they can come a very interesting and profitable business model.
Microsoft can for example significantly lower the price of the Windows 8 license for mobile devices and focus on making money from apps and services. By apps i mean either apps for mobile devices or laptops or private cloud servers.
Of course apps for private cloud servers would be way more expensive and capable than apps for mobiles devices or laptop.
@CobraA1

Yes, the default Chrome Book is set to use Google. But, you could easily set it to use a server in your home. There is really no reason that a powerful computer should use a GUI for control it makes sense to use a tablet or netbook for that. It's not a choice of Chromebook or a 'real' computer. It's not about chosing one or the other, you will really choose both. Remember, for the home, a computer is an appliance, not a religion.

Using storage on the web is wonderful, if you don't have or don't want the power of a local server. other than that, it makes life easier on the road. But i would still not like to place all my eggs in one basket.

But then, I am not a member of the Facebook Generation.
@timiteh
"The best approach is the hybrid one. Use cloud solutions when it make sense and local solutions otherwise."
AMEN - The companies that seem to be gathering attention are those that have this setup or setting up. Apple and MS are doing this and see others following. When you can have 24X7 connectivity at - LOCAL APP SPEEDS - and now downtime no matter where I am - then you have something. Infrastructure is not there yet, even in the tiny countries that can boast they have global coverage - they are size of IN - give me a break.
@mik9dt So far at our company 20 rolled out and they have not left the dock because they cannot generate steam... Macbook Air's have made more headway and the CIO and Director of development have stopped using Chromebook and moved to MBA where they have W7 and OSX. Chromebooks are a very niche at this point in the evolution, and have some serious issues with connectivity when traveling. They are probably ahead of their time.... neat idea, just not there yet.
expover microsoft internet working at sites with the
- and sohbet odalari - and mynet - mynet sohbet -
turkey the microsoft is a good format is also face -
- metin2 pvp -
operiation facebok - twitter
Behaviour of desdek bigger role in these sites sohbet Microsoft A network connection to the game s dada gubve unwanted surprises
metin2 pvp serverlar -
facesohbet -
and yonja - and facebok - sex sohbet - sex hikayeleri - and- and facebook - and fesbuk - and sohbet - and cet - - and metin2 indir - and metin2 resimleri - and metin2 kaydol - ang metin2 -

fesbok giris
room turkey
twitter sohbet portallari netlog and twitter t?rkce and twitter giris and twitter kaydol
fesbuk

turkiye mt2, metin2 online games serverlar
and and and mt2 pvp server and metin2 pvp server and metin2 and pvp server and metin2 pvp serverlar and metin2 pvp serverler and
pvp serverler and pvp serverlar



istanbul sohbet istanbul sohbet sitesi istanbul sohbet odasi istanbul sohbet odalar?


ankara sohbet ankara sohbet odalar? ankara sohbet sitesi ankara sohbet odas? izmir sohbet izmir sohbet odalar? izmir sohbet sitesi izmir sohbet chat bursa sohbet bursa sohbet odalar? bursa sohbet siteleri bursa sohbet odasi seviyeli sohbet seviyeli sohbet odalar? seviyeli sohbet siteleri seviyeli sohbet kanalalr? yonja netlog twitter face facebook pvp


Bunu mu demek istediniz? Cok guzel bir oyun be?eni ile oynuyorum ama bunun metin2
Metin veya web sitesi adresi yaz?n ya da bir dok?man? ?evirin.
?ptal
Dinleyin
Fonetik olarak okuyun
T?rk?e dilinden ?ngilizce diline ?eviri
I play a game with very nice, but it metin2
metin2 pvp
metin2 pvp serverler

and install servers by lara s depending on the tour game bilrisiniz
0 Votes
+ -
Rome wasn't built in a day
Dietrich T. Schmitz * Your Linux Advocate! 12th Aug
Anybody who thinks rolling out a new operating system is easy or happens all at once is misinformed.

Google will iteratively hone ChromeOS into a fine product.

I have a Google ChromeBook myself and will update it this weekend to check out access to our corporate vpn.
@Dietrich T. Schmitz * Your Linux Advocate!
I am very surprised that as Linux Advocate you defend Chrome O.S as this O.S the worse thing which can happen for customers freedom.
I would have prefered that Google come with or use a true Linux distro which would enable the user not to rely on Google at all if he/she decides so.An O.S which would take full advantage of the cloud but let enough freedom to the User to be productive without the cloud.
Such an O.S packed on Google sponsorized and funded hardware would have done much more for the Linux cause than anything before that.
Instead of that Google is pushing an O.S which has the potential to be worse for customers freedom than whatever either Microsoft or Apple has done up to now.
And no i don't believe Google mantra as they sure look quite evil.
@timiteh
There's already an OS that fits your description. Try ubuntu.
Oops double post
NT
NT
0 Votes
+ -
Agree
linux for me 12th Aug
@Dietrich T. Schmitz * Your Linux Advocate!
How many versions of Windows did it take to get a "reasonable" running version of Windows, say Win98?

Windows 1?
Windows 2?
Windows 3?
Windows 3.1?
Windows 3.11?
Windows 95?

Which all required DOS by the way, is at least 6 attempts to have a reasonable OS to use. It will take Google a couple of tries to refine an OS which was somewhat usable on the first attempt. I'd say that they are way ahead of Microsoft with their first attempts.
@linux for me

Windows 3.1 was useable, as was 3.11 )Windows for Work groups) Given the hardware back in the day.

Windows 95, yeah, though die-hard windows fans thought that the Computer was supposed to crash once a day.

Windows 98 was very good, especially 98SE. It only crashed about once a week. But you had to remember to turn it off that often anyway, because of the memory leaks.

Sorry, but, Microsoft seems to get it right about every other OS release. Vista wasn't great. but Vista SP3, AKA Windows 7 seems to work fine. It's almost as good as Linux for it's own applications. Of course, neither does real well with applications for other platforms.
Hahahahaha. No thanks.
@Cylon Centurion

It figures, It doesn't come with a little wavy window on it, so you can't use it. that's OK, this is technology for five years from now, not ten years ago.
Wow, that's the bggest buncha nuttin' I've read in some time. Like a car accident you can't avoid looking at.
can i connect it to my zune?
can i connect it to my ipod?
can i use dreamweaver on it?
can i install firefox on it?
what about sony acid pro?
call of duty?
@mrefuman

You'd have to wait for the services. They always follow the release of a new platform, not precede it.

But, There is Steam available on the net, as well as several others. If any titles you like are available yet, I don't know. You would have to check. but, probably not for a year or two. After that? Probably. The various Smart Phones are driving the required connectivity and service. Chromebooks are piggy backing on that pull. HTML5 will allow practically and device to play anything. But, it will take two or three years to get to universal use.
I couldn't help but let out a loud laugh when I read that you can use Citrix to run WINDOWS applications.

Really--using Google Chrome OS to open WINDOWS applications? Doesn't that defeat the purpose of running an alternate operating system???
@BigBrownTXBear

No, the purpose of using ANY OS is to get things done. Whether that is to play games, or to do your taxes, or to design a new Space Shuttle system is immaterial.

Of course, you have to have access to the computer power to do any of those things, but that power doesn't need to be in your hand. And, yes, there are many people who use a Windows computer remotely. The same is true with Linux. Probably more so that Windows, since Linux allows for much more powerful machines, applications, and number of users. The future isn't about what OS to use. That is already starting to pass away (except on sites like this one).
@BigBrownTXBear We have 20 of them and are playing with them to see if they are really a viable alternative. Lukewarm if not flat response from the users. We are using Citrix to get to the legacy apps. The ChromeOS just came out this past week or so, and it works. - it is very slooooow coming up. The UI is a little 'awkward' feeling (from a user quote). They are cute little machine, but they feel - 'cheap' was another quote from our test beds. It's a niche, and right not the geeks love it, the everyday joe - not so much... we are also seeing if they are really TCO friendly.
0 Votes
+ -
Chrome OS is farse. . .
fm-usa 12th Aug
Downloaded Chrome OS several times. Downloaded the periferals to get it going, . . . nut'n. Been trying off & on for 1.5 years.
To me, Chrome OS is just a farse.
I think what Microsoft needs to do is bully Google into making IE (and other Microsoft products) available on Chromebooks - just like Google (and all the other software makers) did concerning Microsofts OS'es. What if Microsoft chose not to support Chrome, Firefox, Safari, or Adobe (not a browser but still bug ridden) on any of thier platforms? Everyone would either have to write their own OS or complain the Microsoft isn't playing fair [which most of them have already did at one time or another.]
@Cueball433@...

It takes no bullying. Microsoft can make any Microsoft application available on a Chromebook by just putting it on the web. In fact, they already have. Look up Office 365.

As for other browsers on something like Chromebook, it's coming. Ubuntu makes a small version that would install on a Chrome Book. Microsoft keeps talking about one for the future, (maybe Win8?). Apple isn't interested in inexpensive devices, which is what this is aimed at.

but, I could see a future where a server with say, 16 Arm processors (or maybe 8-8 processor chips) sits on a shelf and serves just my family. the access would be tablets and netbooks. cheap display devices would make sense in that case.
0 Votes
+ -
Hah!
Gisabun 13th Aug
Already they are updating the crappy OS. Looks like Chromebooks will match the buggy Chrome browser. Big updates for every month....
Since the Acer Chromebook was reduced to $299.00 on amazon it has been selling out with each new shipment. 300 seems to be the sweet spot.

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix