Intel and Nokia set Linux up for MeeGo fail
Summary: I have a bad feeling about this Nokia-Intel thing called Meego.
I have a bad feeling about this Nokia-Intel thing called Meego. My spidey sense is tingling.
Let's start with the name. OK, you're combining Nokia's Maemo with the Linux Foundation-hosted Moblin. But Meego? Who came up with this, the eTrade babies?
Second, this is aimed not just at Intel's chips, but those of ARM? When was the last time Intel gave first class support to someone else's chip, and can you riddle me this while you're at it -- why should they?
Third, let's look at the partners.
- Intel doesn't do consumer software. Their relationships with Taiwanese OEMs remain poor.
- Nokia dropped the ball in mobile a half-decade ago and still hasn't found it.
- The Linux Foundation.
Linux.com is now owned by the Linux Foundation and they insist "the magic is back." They're right. Let's watch a bunch of money disappear and you get blamed for it.
This is not just me being snarky. Let's look at the home page of the new project. See the third bar down? Read it -- Learn about Meego at the Collaboration Summit. The next Collaboration Summit is in AprilNovember, at (wait for it) the Kabuki Hotel in San Francisco.
I can't make this stuff up. I'm not that good.
Let me play straight for a minute. Right now Taiwanese OEMs and their Chinese partners are finalizing designs for CompuTex in June. MeeGo does not even have a reference platform, let alone one written in clear, concise English, to show these people.
Which means you're waiting at least another product cycle before you can get into the game.
The summer selling season is going to come and go with a ton of Android kit, with Chromium delivered, with iPad fever and whatever Blackberry and Microsoft have up their sleeves, and with MeeGo where?
The New York Times has all the corporate intrigue details right. But I'm not making a corporate intrigue argument. I'm asking, when was the last time any of these players succeeded at anything like this?
Oh, and who's in charge?
My advice to Jim Zemlin is to find an entrepreneur who knows how to herd cats fast, and bring them on board. Preferably someone fluent in Mandarin, who can read Traditional Chinese characters.
Wish I had a name for you.
Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.
Talkback
on the contrary
why should I buy something
Tablet (forget about better engineered Microsoft Windows slate platform
or Apple iPad for a moment) cheaper and better supported by much
bigger corporate entity than Linux Foundation. I see even average Linux
enthusiast would buy google product than Nokia MeeGo.
--Ram--
in answer to the first part of your question
RE: Intel and Nokia set Linux up for MeeGo fail
RE: Intel and Nokia set Linux up for MeeGo fail
I do not like the looks of it either. First Maemo was good when it was GTK
been down hill ever since. Now, they want to combine it
with a company that only wants it to work with x86.
Double trouble!
Wait what?
So its all been downhill since that switch that hasnt taken place yet, ok then...
Well, the future for the project is Qt, since Nokia now owns Qt.
about Maemo anymore.
your point?
"With Android now available, no reason to even think
about Maemo anymore. "
How about because some people dont like being tied to google for everything,
because some people dont like having no choice but to develop in Java,
Because some people like working with a standard linux stack,
because some people dont like that som applications vital to the OS (the market app)are closed source and propriety making any fully open source versions useless.
Because Meego is being designed from the word go to work on phones, netbooks and a whole host of platform, while android was designed primarily for phones and is being shoehorned on to devices its not suitable for,
and because google is competing with itself with ChromeOS,
that enough reasons or would you like some more?
RE: Intel and Nokia set Linux up for MeeGo fail
Not exactly
one of the links you will see that this will work
with the ARM architecture as well.
True, Intel has not got a great history of
supporting other folks' chips, but maybe this time
there will be a pony.
I agree that there will be nothing stopping people from using it on Arm,
the Arm support.
RE: Intel and Nokia set Linux up for MeeGo fail
RE: Intel and Nokia set Linux up for MeeGo fail
With Android youve got em Android support thats it.Also android means Java. Whywould you use Android again(see how I did that)?
RE: Intel and Nokia set Linux up for MeeGo fail
Read my lips
If you'd have picked up a Nokia Internet Tablet three years ago
Nokia bought Trolltech and see the virtue of a remake of Maemo with the Qt framework, which is the same framework used to develop KDE 4.3, only the richness of QtEmbedded, QtWebKit is hands-down superior to GTk, as much as I like what was done with Maemo Hildon UI up to this point.
My Nokia N800, still stands as a technology marvel in terms of what it does, engineering-wise, and was done way before any other vendor was shooting for the palm- and netbook-based touch tablet market.
At the same time, Nokia are holding Apple's feet to the fire on their touch screen interface across all of Apple's product line.
In a matter of six months Apple's business may face a permanent injunction or fold and settle to remain a fractional player in the 'GLOBAL' market.
I really don't think you have a grasp of what's going on with Nokia Dana.
Intel gains a partnership with a vendor with ARM mask rights.
Nokia gain a partner with the sincere intent to develop Linux-driven product. That sincerety has been manifest in Moblin.
Where they put their resources will pay off and with Nokia that is a powerful combination.
All good for the future of Linux.
Better:
Edit: On a more serious note:
http://www.ars-technica.com/open-source/news/2010/02/intel-and-nokia-unite-their-linux-platfroms-to-create-meego.ars
RE: Intel and Nokia set Linux up for MeeGo fail
RE: Intel and Nokia set Linux up for MeeGo fail
<a href="http://www.yuregininsesi.com">sesli sohbet</a> <a href="http://www.yuregininsesi.com">sesli chat</a>