Intel and Nokia set Linux up for MeeGo fail

Summary: I have a bad feeling about this Nokia-Intel thing called Meego.

I have a bad feeling about this Nokia-Intel thing called Meego. My spidey sense is tingling.

Let's start with the name. OK, you're combining Nokia's Maemo with the Linux Foundation-hosted Moblin. But Meego? Who came up with this, the eTrade babies?

Second, this is aimed not just at Intel's chips, but those of ARM? When was the last time Intel gave first class support to someone else's chip, and can you riddle me this while you're at it -- why should they?

Third, let's look at the partners.

  1. Intel doesn't do consumer software. Their relationships with Taiwanese OEMs remain poor.
  2. Nokia dropped the ball in mobile a half-decade ago and still hasn't found it.
  3. The Linux Foundation.

Linux.com is now owned by the Linux Foundation and they insist "the magic is back." They're right. Let's watch a bunch of money disappear and you get blamed for it.

This is not just me being snarky. Let's look at the home page of the new project. See the third bar down? Read it -- Learn about Meego at the Collaboration Summit. The next Collaboration Summit is in AprilNovember, at (wait for it) the Kabuki Hotel in San Francisco.

I can't make this stuff up. I'm not that good.

Let me play straight for a minute. Right now Taiwanese OEMs and their Chinese partners are finalizing designs for CompuTex in June. MeeGo does not even have a reference platform, let alone one written in clear, concise English, to show these people.

Which means you're waiting at least another product cycle before you can get into the game.

The summer selling season is going to come and go with a ton of Android kit, with Chromium delivered, with iPad fever and whatever Blackberry and Microsoft have up their sleeves, and with MeeGo where?

The New York Times has all the corporate intrigue details right. But I'm not making a corporate intrigue argument. I'm asking, when was the last time any of these players succeeded at anything like this?

Oh, and who's in charge?

My advice to Jim Zemlin is to find an entrepreneur who knows how to herd cats fast, and bring them on board. Preferably someone fluent in Mandarin, who can read Traditional Chinese characters.

Wish I had a name for you.

Topics: Linux, Intel, Nokia, Open Source, Operating Systems, Software

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Talkback

20 comments
Log in or register to join the discussion
  • on the contrary

    this will divert funds from M$ backed platforms toward Linux, where the best distro wins.
    Linux Geek
    • why should I buy something

      that is even not comparable to Chrome OS based netbook or Android
      Tablet (forget about better engineered Microsoft Windows slate platform
      or Apple iPad for a moment) cheaper and better supported by much
      bigger corporate entity than Linux Foundation. I see even average Linux
      enthusiast would buy google product than Nokia MeeGo.
      --Ram--
      Ram U
      • in answer to the first part of your question

        because Chrome OS and Android are both forms of spyware for Google. Use them at your own risk.
        jorjitop
      • RE: Intel and Nokia set Linux up for MeeGo fail

        Nokia set Linux up for<a href="http://www.sixtyfour81.com/"><font color="light&amp;height"> about it</font></a> is bank that <a href="http://www.stopthecoalition.com/"><font color="light&amp;height">website</font></a> attacked from the <a href="http://www.mediabanger.com/"><font color="light&amp;height">site support</font></a> from any soldier <a href="http://pikeplacepolitics.com/"><font color="light&amp;height">site</font></a> to the light <a href="http://www.brawlnball.com/"><font color="light&amp;height">home page</font></a> is great MeeGo
        musdahi
    • RE: Intel and Nokia set Linux up for MeeGo fail

      Nokia gain a partner with the sincere intent to develop Linux-driven product. That sincerety has been manifest in<a href="http://ipadbagblog.com/"><font color="light&height"> ipad bag blog</font></a><a href="http://www.sutudeg.org/"><font color="light&height"> sutudeg </font></a> <a href="http://wposfv.com/"><font color="light&amp;height">education news</font></a> and<a href="http://www.pcloshwdb.com/"><font color="light&height"> pclos hwdb</font></a> Moblin.<a href="http://www.sutudeg.org/"><font color="LightGrey"> l</font></a>
      edward polling
  • I do not like the looks of it either. First Maemo was good when it was GTK

    based, but, the switch to Qt was not good, and it has
    been down hill ever since. Now, they want to combine it
    with a company that only wants it to work with x86.
    Double trouble!
    DonnieBoy
    • Wait what?

      You have used a version of maemo based on QT? Im impressed seeing as the current version of maemo, maemo 5 is entirely written in gtk. In fact the official nokia QT release only came out today, the currently supported version is a community version of qt 4.5.
      So its all been downhill since that switch that hasnt taken place yet, ok then...
      bobbob13
      • Well, the future for the project is Qt, since Nokia now owns Qt.

        With Android now available, no reason to even think
        about Maemo anymore.
        DonnieBoy
        • your point?

          "Well, the future for the project is Qt" what exactly is the problem with this, QT is an extremely powerful well designed toolkit,with many language bindings. It also immediately gives you cross platform support for symbian, windows, linux desktop, mac osx and more.

          "With Android now available, no reason to even think
          about Maemo anymore. "
          How about because some people dont like being tied to google for everything,
          because some people dont like having no choice but to develop in Java,
          Because some people like working with a standard linux stack,
          because some people dont like that som applications vital to the OS (the market app)are closed source and propriety making any fully open source versions useless.
          Because Meego is being designed from the word go to work on phones, netbooks and a whole host of platform, while android was designed primarily for phones and is being shoehorned on to devices its not suitable for,
          and because google is competing with itself with ChromeOS,
          that enough reasons or would you like some more?
          bobbob13
      • RE: Intel and Nokia set Linux up for MeeGo fail

        Preferably someone fluent in Mandarin, who can read Traditional Chinese characters.<a href="http://ipadbagblog.com/"><font color="LightGrey"> k</font></a>
        zakkiromi
    • Not exactly

      If you look carefully at the press release behind
      one of the links you will see that this will work
      with the ARM architecture as well.

      True, Intel has not got a great history of
      supporting other folks' chips, but maybe this time
      there will be a pony.
      DanaBlankenhorn
      • I agree that there will be nothing stopping people from using it on Arm,

        just that this project will not get much love for
        the Arm support.
        DonnieBoy
    • RE: Intel and Nokia set Linux up for MeeGo fail

      @DonnieBoy You have used a version of maemo based on QT? Im impressed seeing as the current version of maemo, <font color="light&amp;height"></font></a><a href="http://www.revivalymaske.com/"><font color="light&amp;height">pembe maske</font></a> <font color="light&amp;height"></font></a><a href="http://www.energybalancebileklik.com/"><font color="light&amp;height">energy balance</font></a> <font color="light&amp;height"></font></a><a href="http://www.oynaoyunu.com/"><font color="light&amp;height">oyna oyunu</font></a> <font color="light&amp;height"></font></a><a href="http://www.moliva.web.tr/"><font color="light&amp;height">moliva</font></a> <font color="light&amp;height"></font></a><a href="http://www.orjinkrem.net/"><font color="light&amp;height">orjin krem</font></a> <font color="light&amp;height"></font></a><a href="http://www.tutunesun.web.tr/"><font color="light&amp;height">tutune son</font></a><font color="light&amp;height"></font></a><a href="http://www.nanomatik.gen.tr/"><font color="light&amp;height">nanomatik</font></a> <font color="light&amp;height"></font></a><a href="http://www.complex41.net/"><font color="light&amp;height">complex 41</font></a> <font color="light&amp;height"></font></a><a href="http://www.fx15new.com/"><font color="light&amp;height">new fx15</font></a>maemo 5 is entirely written in gtk. In fact the official nokia QT release only came out today, the currently supported version is a community version of qt 4.5.<br>So its all been downhill since that switch that hasnt taken place yet, ok then.
      gaberdiye03
  • RE: Intel and Nokia set Linux up for MeeGo fail

    Why, what exactly is wrong with QT, have you ever actually used it, its a great toolkit and out of the box you have an app that supports linux(and all its flavours, meego included) symbian, windows, windows mobile, mac osx.
    With Android youve got em Android support thats it.Also android means Java. Whywould you use Android again(see how I did that)?
    bobbob13
  • RE: Intel and Nokia set Linux up for MeeGo fail

    And linux failing is a bad thing? I can see it only as being a good thing. With no linux, no hassles or headaches :) RIP linux.
    Loverock Davidson
    • Read my lips

      MeeGo, not Linux. Linux is alive and well. It will haunt you into your grave.
      Economister
  • If you'd have picked up a Nokia Internet Tablet three years ago

    running Debian Linux, GTk Maemo, you'd see the natural progression.

    Nokia bought Trolltech and see the virtue of a remake of Maemo with the Qt framework, which is the same framework used to develop KDE 4.3, only the richness of QtEmbedded, QtWebKit is hands-down superior to GTk, as much as I like what was done with Maemo Hildon UI up to this point.

    My Nokia N800, still stands as a technology marvel in terms of what it does, engineering-wise, and was done way before any other vendor was shooting for the palm- and netbook-based touch tablet market.

    At the same time, Nokia are holding Apple's feet to the fire on their touch screen interface across all of Apple's product line.

    In a matter of six months Apple's business may face a permanent injunction or fold and settle to remain a fractional player in the 'GLOBAL' market.

    I really don't think you have a grasp of what's going on with Nokia Dana.

    Intel gains a partnership with a vendor with ARM mask rights.

    Nokia gain a partner with the sincere intent to develop Linux-driven product. That sincerety has been manifest in Moblin.

    Where they put their resources will pay off and with Nokia that is a powerful combination.

    All good for the future of Linux.
    D.T.Schmitz
  • Better:

    iWent ;-)

    Edit: On a more serious note:

    http://www.ars-technica.com/open-source/news/2010/02/intel-and-nokia-unite-their-linux-platfroms-to-create-meego.ars
    Economister
  • RE: Intel and Nokia set Linux up for MeeGo fail

    "I?m asking, when was the last time any of these players succeeded at anything like this" - So I guess it isn't worth trying right Dana? After all, Nokia, the worlds largest cell phone manufacturer is full of bumbling idiots, who know nothing of innovation. Stick to "journalism" instead of stand-up.
    jakeZ2
  • RE: Intel and Nokia set Linux up for MeeGo fail

    Great !!! thanks for sharing this information to us!
    <a href="http://www.yuregininsesi.com">sesli sohbet</a> <a href="http://www.yuregininsesi.com">sesli chat</a>
    efsane