ie8 fix

Linux and Open Source

Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols & Paula Rooney

Linux Mint 12's Three Desktops

By | November 21, 2011, 2:04pm PST

Summary: The Linux Mint distribution is giving users three different flavors of GNOME to choose from for their desktop use.

Mint 12 with GNOME 3.2 & MGSE looks and works a lot like a Mint with GNOME 2.32.

Mint 12 with GNOME 3.2 & MGSE looks and works a lot like a Mint with GNOME 2.32.

The popular Linux distribution, Mint, will be giving its users three different distinct flavors of the GNOME for their desktop in its next release, Linux Mint 12, Lisa.

Like any Linux you can, of course, switch it to your own choice of desktop. Many, indeed, offer users a choice of desktops. Mint, for example, while primarily a GNOME-based distribution, also offers its users a version that uses the LXDE desktop for its interface.

By and large, though, Mint is best known GNOME-based desktop Linux. In particular, its most recent claim to fame that while Ubuntu has moved on to its controversial Unity interface, Mint stuck with the older and well-liked GNOME 2.32 interface… until now.

Clement Lefebvre, Linux Mint founder and project leader, explained in a blog posting that while “in Linux Mint 11 we made the decision to keep Gnome 2.32. The traditional Gnome desktop, although it’s not actively developed by the Gnome development team anymore, is still by far the most popular desktop within the Linux community. As other distributions adopted new desktops such as Unity and Gnome 3, many users felt alienated and consequently migrated to Linux Mint. We recorded a 40% increase in a single month and we’re now quickly catching up with Ubuntu for the number #1 spot within the Linux desktop market.

But, “as much as we’d like to keep Gnome 2.32 a little while longer we need to look forward and embrace new technologies. This doesn’t mean we need to change the way people use their desktops, not at all, it means we need to try and do our best for people to feel at home again, but on top of a brand new base, a new layer of technology, one that is actively supported upstream and that can be maintained properly going forward.”

All well and good but many people, including myself, really dislike GNOME 3.x, so Lefebvre and his crew elected to not just force users to switch to GNOME 3.2 but to develop “‘MGSE’” (Mint Gnome Shell Extensions), which is a desktop layer on top of Gnome 3.2, that that makes it possible for users “to use Gnome 3 in a traditional way. You can disable all components within MGSE to get a pure Gnome 3 experience, or you can enable all of them to get a Gnome 3 desktop that is similar to what you’ve been using before. Of course you can also pick and only enable the components you like to design your own desktop.”

The Three Faces of Linux Mint Gallery

In addition, for those who really can’t stand GNOME 3.2 even with a MSGE wrapping, the Mint team elected to support MATE. This is a GNOME 2.32 fork. But, while you “could have both MATE and Gnome 3 installed on your computer and be able to switch between desktops from the login screen. In practice, MATE is a brand new project and it does conflict with Gnome 3 in many areas. We’re currently working hard in collaboration with the MATE developers to identify and fix these conflicts so that we can have both Gnome 3 and MATE installed by default on the DVD edition of Linux Mint 12.”

Today, November 21st, Mint 12 is close to shipping. The Mint 12 release candidate, Lisa, is now available.

Users, however, still aren’t sure they want GNOME 3.2 with MSGE or MATE for that matter. In a more recent blog note, Lefebvre wrote, “As expected, the introduction of Gnome 3 is dividing the Mint community. We were delighted to see that MGSE was well received and that it helped people migrating to Gnome 3. MGSE received a lot of noticeable improvements since and the final release of Linux Mint 12 will come with a Gnome 3 experience that is significantly better than in the RC release.”

Still, “I personally understand the fact that some Gnome 2 users are extremely concerned. Whether it’s Gnome 3 or MATE, these technologies are recent and they’re not as mature as Gnome 2. It’s important to understand that they represent our future though, and that sticking to Gnome 2 would make the situation in terms of packages and runtime conflicts with both Gnome 3 and Ubuntu completely unmanageable. In other words, if we were to stick to Gnome 2.32, Linux Mint would no longer be compatible with Ubuntu and you would not be able to run Gnome 3 in Linux Mint. We were one of the last distributions to support Gnome 2, we’re amongst the very few to support MATE and we’re innovating on Gnome 3 to ease this transition and make people feel at home on this new desktop. With Linux Mint 12 we’re giving Mint users the option to try MATE and to migrate to Gnome 3/MGSE. Though it might be considered a step backwards, these two desktops will improve rapidly and this is a process which needs to be done at some stage. Previous releases of Linux Mint are still available to users who prefer Gnome 2 of course, and by the time they become obsolete, both MATE and Gnome 3/MGSE will have matured, MATE into an ever-closer incarnation of Gnome 2, and Gnome3/MGSE into a brand new implementation of the vision we have for the Linux Mint desktop.”

So, how do both actually work? I’ve been using Mint with GNOME3/MGSE and also with MATE for several days now.

I’ve found that GNOME 3 with MGSE actually works quite well. While it’s not quite as smooth as Mint with GNOME 2.32 was, I had no trouble doing my daily work with it. I had no trouble using my usual assortment of programs-the Firefox and Chrome Web browsers; LibreOffice, for my office suite; Evolution for e-mail and scheduling, Pidgin for e-mail; Banshee for music; and Bluefish for HTML editing. For the most part, I didn’t have to interact with the GNOME 3.2 shell and that was just fine by me.

I wish I could say the same for MATE, but I can’t. While, on the surface, MATE looks even more like GNOME 2.32 than MGSE does, once I started using GNOME applications on it I kept running into one problem after another. None of them were show-stoppers. I could usually find a way out of them. But, taken as a whole, it’s clear that MATE is still early beta software.

So, while I’ll do a full review of Mint 12 later, I can tell you today that most dyed-in-the-wool GNOME 2.32 users will be happy with Mint and MGSE. MATE, that’s another story. In the end it may be what GNOME 2.x fans really want to use, but it’s not there yet. At this time, I can only recommend it for people interested in developing it and helping to debug it.

Related Stories:

The most popular Linux is…

Mint 11: The “Un-Unity” Ubuntu desktop Linux

OpenSUSE’s new Linux distribution is for the clouds

Fedora 16, Red Hat’s new community Linux distribution, arrives

Ubuntu Linux 11.10: Unity comes of age (Review)

New Desktop Interface Flops

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

More from “Linux and Open Source”

Topics

Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols, aka sjvn, has been writing about technology and the business of technology since CP/M-80 was the cutting edge, PC operating system

Disclosure

Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols

Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols is a freelance writer. He does not own stocks or other investments in any technology company.

Biography

Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols

Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols, aka sjvn, has been writing about technology and the business of technology since CP/M-80 was the cutting edge, PC operating system; 300bps was a fast Internet connection; WordStar was the state of the art word processor; and we liked it!

His work has been published in everything from highly technical publications (IEEE Computer, ACM NetWorker, Byte) to business publications (eWEEK, InformationWeek, ZDNet) to popular technology (Computer Shopper, PC Magazine, PC World) to the mainstream press (Washington Post, San Francisco Chronicle, BusinessWeek).

77
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

Re: Linux Mint 12's 3 Desktops
The Rifleman 27th Jan
Even with LinuxMint 12 installed, Gnome-3 still SUCKS! I installed MGSE and even Cinnamon only to find out that section of the configuration is still a blank box!!!! GRRRRRRR! So Mate it is. It runs nicely and returns me to a well thought out desktop and menu system that never should have been deprecated under Gnome-3 as it apparently has on my system. If we have to go this way, I much prefer the KDE Menu in Mandriva One. NOW THAT'S REALLY NICE AND WORKS ON ALL SYSTEMS! LinuxMint Dev's take notice!

Mate suffers no issues and seems rock solid on my machine. So Mate will stay until something better and equally solid comes along. My thanks to Gnome and Ubuntu for screwing up my user experience worse than Microsoft can when I go from one full release to the next. With MS it's always hunt and search as-well-as figuring out what they named something I was familiar with this time around! Change for the sake of change is not change or innovation!
0 Votes
+ -
I moved to Mint from Ubuntu a couple of months back, and I really like Mint 11. I can't see a reason to move forward (from 11) at least until the dust settles and the choices (MGSE, MATE) become clearer (and less buggy).

I still use Unity on my netbook, but for a normal screen, it just drives me nuts.
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Linux Mint 12's Three Desktops
IndianArt Updated - 22nd Nov
@dimonic That's why I hope Ubuntu also does something on the lines of Mint.
I wish we can have the best of both worlds of Unity & Classic, where one can choose any one of them or both.
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Linux Mint 12's Three Desktops
skudera@... 22nd Nov
@IndianArt
I'm not sure if anyone has posted this but in Ubuntu 11.10 the Gnome shell is right in the software center, and can be installed with a single click, no scripts to run, nothing. Just open the software center, search for Gnome and click the icon that appears. It will download and install. Then the next time you logon, there is a wheel to the right of your logon name, click it and you can choose Ubuntu or Gnome as your logon shell. Could not be any simpler. See this if you need more help.
http://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2011/10/gnome-shell-ubuntu-11-10-guide/
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Linux Mint 12's Three Desktops
YetAnotherBob Updated - 22nd Nov
@Skudera

Gnome 3 is no better than Unity. That's what Mate and such are all about. Fixing Gnome shell and Gnome 3 to be what users actually want. Loading the default Gnome stuff will just give you a different mess.

What SJVN doesn't say is that Mint also gives you other options. XFCE, LXE or KDE. Personally, I tend to like the old fashioned Unix approach with a good GUI. Least mouse movement is a plus. Multiple virtual screens for different workloads. different programs running in each screen. That's good on a laptop or desktop.

Unity and Gnome3 are designed more for the limited display and limited resources of a tablet or phone. If the Gnome folks are sensible, they will take what the Mint people are doing, and make it easy to integrate, or even make it the default for Gnome.

KDE seems to be taking that sort of approach. Maybe when they get it right I will willingly go to a KDE distro again.
Having to choose between (or getting to choose, depending on how you look at it) shows the fractured nature of Linux on the desktop. I can't imagine a major IT department looking at Mint with three choices for desktops, and thinking anyone can support Mint. Too many choices, too confusing and too many upset customers.

Linux works well when completely locked down, like Android. While I can install applications, the number of choices is minimized so the "average Joe" can do something and not spend inordinate amounts of time figuring out how to set the neat desktop.

Android successful, though pretty much locked down. Linux unsuccessful, wide open and complete choice.

Gotta be a lesson there somewhere.
0 Votes
+ -
@Cynical99, your post actually demonstrates either a lack of experience with corporate IT governance or a tendency to see problems where none exists. Or maybe both. wink

Are you aware that Microsoft sells 6 different versions of Windows for the desktop? Do you imagine that any major IT organization supports all 6? Of course not! Any sane IT organization defines one standard desktop configuration (most commonly Enterprise), and enforces it across the corporation with few exceptions.

Similarly, if an IT organization decided to deploy Mint, it would simply choose one standard desktop and disable the rest.

Nor is this speculation on my part. Our IT group just changed to a new desktop Linux vendor, and among the first decisions to make was the desktop environment (notice the singular there) that we will support.

I suspect that your bias against Linux is driving you to make up issues where none exists, though perhaps you are just unfamiliar with corporate best practices.
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Linux Mint 12's Three Desktops
PollyProteus 22nd Nov
@ricegf - The six different "versions" (aka SKUs) of Windows 7 (using 7 as an example) all come from one source, so the code is all the same, it's just a matter of what's enabled (example, no domain or bitlocker support on Home Premium, no Windows Media Center on Professional, etc.)

Apple takes it even further, offering exactly one SKU of each version of OSX.

You can't really say that of all the Linux distros.
0 Votes
+ -
Don't worry about It
YetAnotherBob 22nd Nov
@ricegf

Don't worry about it. You are looking at this as a corporate computer manager.

Cynical and Polly are looking at it as Windows only users. They will never be in the position you are, because they don't know Linux.

They think they are 'Power Users', but lack the basics to run really powerful systems. As they only understand Windows, they will be limited in your world to 'help desk' level jobs.

You are looking at this as someone who needs to understand what it takes to run a business.

Different world views, different worlds.
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Linux Mint 12's Three Desktops
fatman65536 23rd Nov
@ricegf

For a moment, I thought I was reading one of LD's posts!
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Linux Mint 12's Three Desktops
anothercanuck 21st Nov
@Cynical99 Ya fractured markets with varying products offering differnet features and price points, from multiple makers, never work, well except for cars, stereos, TVs, appliances, printers, lawn mowers, snow blowers, batteries, furnaces, air conditioners...
Wait a second, looks like virtually every market for everything under the sun is fractured. It appears your argument is baseless.
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Linux Mint 12's Three Desktops
PollyProteus 22nd Nov
@anothercanuck - The arguement isn't baseless. If the Linux community would band together and offer one quality distro of Linux instead of the fractured "distro" scheme that exists now, Linux might actually make a considerable dent in the Windows desktop numbers, but until that happens, Linux will continue to be in an extreme minority for desktop numbers.

And given that there are far more desktop users than servers, that's the number where you really want to be successful.
0 Votes
+ -
@PollyProteus

The argument is completely without merit. There are many quality Linux distros. You are basing Linux success on putting a "dent in the Windows desktop." That's your mistake.




happy
0 Votes
+ -
@Cynical99

I can name at least 4 different launchers for Android, basically different desktop choices. Its not about being "locked down" because most distros offer better security to keep users away from crucial file systems than Windows XP or 7. Its only about how you interface with the system, not about what you have access to changing.

LInux, wide open and complete choice to administrators, lock down tighter than Alcatraz for users.
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Linux Mint 12's Three Desktops
james.vandamme 22nd Nov
@biglama Put it on your mom's machine, and stop getting those phone calls.
0 Votes
+ -
@Cynical99

Microsoft Playbook 101:

For the other guy;
Choice = Fractured
Frequent fixes = security problems (& don't mention severity, or actual attacks, EVER!)
Attacks on programs running on the OS = Weakness of the OS
1 person in 1,000 having to compile ANYTHING = Having to compile everything
Manufactured (Cooked up) IP Claims = Questionable legality

For MS;
Extorsion = Protecting IP
Stealing = innovating for customers sake
Bribery = encouraging the political system
Using 3rd part proxies in the above = no corporate responsibility for their actions
Driving "partners" out of business = strategic marketing changes
Failing in given market = either,...
No interest in that market or Someone taking something of theirs, "because we invented computing, after all!"

Yep,... Each competitive situation, just another entry in the Siebel database, and another number picked out of the Playbook... And if you really DON'T work for them, I'm sure they appreciate free help... As well as the surprise of people actually drinking the Kool Aide...
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Linux Mint 12's Three Desktops
PollyProteus 22nd Nov
@JasePow

--> "Bribery = encouraging the political system"

Did you know that until the first anti-trust suits were brought against Microsoft, not one cent of Microsoft money ever went to lobbyists?

Did you know that it was Microsoft's competitors that use the government as a bludgeon against Microsoft because they couldn't compete adequately to make a difference?

Did you know that when Microsoft did their original exclusivity licensing, it was standard industry practice, not just for computing , but for pretty much everything made in America and still happens in restaurants (example: Many restuarants in America are still "Coke products only" or "Pepsi products only") and many other businesses.
  • Flagged
0 Votes
+ -
@Cynical99
Major IT departments are generally pretty knowledgeable, and I can't think of one which would install what amounts to a consumer desktop like Ubuntu or Mint. Suse, Red Hat Enterprisr Linux, Cent, Debian or Mandriva would more likely be chosen. That which you regard as a negative is regarded as a very large positive by most who are familiar with Linux. The "confusing" choices allow one to construct an environment tailered to the needs of the organisation.
0 Votes
+ -
I am just going on the picture provided in this post, but why is it so ugly? Do they use designers on open source?
Do designers value their contributions and therefore not contribute to Open source?
Just curious begause that desktop picture looks like it was done by an engineer with no eye for design!
0 Votes
+ -
@nanderto

The original artwork comes from an artist called Gelsan.
0 Votes
+ -
It is, however...
jasonp@... 21st Nov
@nanderto
... far better than a bunch of tiles.
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Linux Mint 12's Three Desktops
bmonsterman 22nd Nov
@nanderto,
Yea...the system icons don't look very sophisticated. That should be relatively easy to fix though.
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Linux Mint 12's Three Desktops
Federico Churca Torrusio 22nd Nov
@nanderto
At least that's better than a heterogeneous covering of purple and brown stuff like in Ubuntu :P
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Linux Mint 12's Three Desktops
YetAnotherBob 22nd Nov
@nanderto

Having used Linux Mint, I can answer your concerns.

What is shown is the 'default' screen on a fresh install. Most people don't keep it. Mint is 'theme-able' meaning that you can change the appearance of nearly everything. Sets of these changes constitute a 'theme', and can be saved and shared. There are literally hundreds of different themes available on line. You can spend days looking at them to find something that satisfies your personal sense of style. The Default is there because Linux Mint was originally an Irish effort, and you know about Irish green, Right?

I like that better than Ubuntu Brown, but then I always change that too.

Personally, I like bigger icons, with printed program names, and softer colored title and task bars. I also usually like a larger script than shown, and usually a picture of the family as the background. That takes about 5 minutes to set up.

I do the same things to most Windows set ups too.
0 Votes
+ -
Compromise never works
linuxcanuck@... 21st Nov
Mint needs to fish or cut bait as the saying goes. Whenever you compromise you lose some people on both ends. It leads to mediocrity and confusion. I can't see a good end to this story, even if they get the bugs out.

They should have chosen an option at installation to install classic GNOME or GNOME 3 and then go from there or to have separate ISOs. While experienced users may figure it out, and some may even end up happy, newbies (who can barely use the session manager) will wonder what is going on.
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Linux Mint 12's Three Desktops
YetAnotherBob 22nd Nov
@linuxcanuck@...

There is a good end to this. Have you looked at the Linux Mint Debian? If you are willing to read a little, you can have almost literally anything.
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Linux Mint 12's Three Desktops
Home Grown IT 21st Nov
If the new Gnome three with the extensions is so close to the Gnome 2 experience, why did they not just go with that? Seems a like a total no brainer to leave the experience the same and just move on. Experienced users can install any desktop they want anyway.
0 Votes
+ -
@Home Grown IT

Probably overhead from MGSE. Gnome 3.X isn't very lightweight to begin with, on old hardware any additional lag from an overlay is only going to drive users away. Anyone know if MGSE runs on Gnome 2D? or does it require 3D acceleration? Could be a real game changer for anyone using an Intel GMA500 netbook or tablet.
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Linux Mint 12's Three Desktops
YetAnotherBob 22nd Nov
@Home Grown IT

It's more than just the screen manager. Gnome 3 uses a different set of back end libraries. Newer programs and newer versions of the older programs will use the newer libraries. To use Gnome 2, you would have to have the libraries for Gnome 2, KDE, and Gnome 3. After a while, it all gets kind of messy. Plus, some of the updated libraries have the same name and are not backward compatible. Attempting to fix Gnome 3 was the least harmful choice.
No Desktop Linux can afford to stay with gnome 2. I see people saying give my gnome 2 back. That is not going to happen. Mint went on trying to solve the problem in wrong domain. None of their solutions is elegant. If they wanted to go for gnome 2 like look on gnome 3, they should not have choose default gnome desktop and add a menu to bottom (it complicates things, and provides an intention they are trying to get everywhere). Move mouse to top left (you have gnome 3, get to bottom its mint, it is all wrong). They should have gone with gnome 3 classic look, enable compiz, rewrite or reconfigure the start menu (e.g removing me menu, that comes by default on classic), provide icons for places and menu, work on enabling right click add on panel, provide better notification area, session controller (shutdown etc). That would clearly have shown their intentions to say to Linux world "treat desktops as Deskops and not like mobile".
0 Votes
+ -
@dell_comp

That's what Mate is all about,... But you need to realize that the fork is presently immature, and there hasn't been a groundswell of developers helping,... yet. Give it time. Given the relatively short turn around time versus the number of people working on it, I'm actually impressed it's as far along as it is...

And EVERYBODY is switching to "mobile friendly" interfaces. It's a consequence of Moore's Law. The hardware is getting smaller, cheaper and more powerful. Eventually, 80-90% of what the average user does on a desktop will be done on a more portable form factor. I've actually moved 20% or more of my work to my Android tablet, since it's largely communication & project management. PDF editors, for example, that where once the domain of desktops are now easily run on a tablet. Granted, the complex editing (typeable form creation, etc.) must still be done on a desktop. But, USING the forms is better done on a tablet.

I understand you viewpoint, and partially agree... But, the other part of me realizes these new form factors are here to stay, are the future, and different form factors must integrate to facilitate workflow.
0 Votes
+ -
A Whirlwind Tour of Distros in a Month
Dietrich T. Schmitz * Your Linux Advocate Updated - 21st Nov
I have been on a tour in search of the perfect Distro for the last month. Why?
Well I too am among the Unity/Gnome3 refugees who feel left in the lurch by decision making that really 'makes no sense'.

I've spent time with both and it comes down to the fact that either you accept the premise that it's ok to take away features (regressions) in the name of 'progress' or you do something about it by moving to either a new Distro or UI, if you can.

In my case, I've spent about a month since the October 13 release of Ubuntu 11.10 in search of an alternative Distro.

I didn't want to leave Ubuntu because of the rich Developer ecosystem and awesome package management system, but I felt compelled to do something.

So, I ventured out sampling Distros: Xubuntu, Kubuntu, Chakra, CrunchBang, ArchBang, Linux Mint 11, Linux Mint 12, only to finally return to Ubuntu.

The twists and turns made me realize that I actually liked KDE 4.x. I was in the KDE 3.5.x camp but found the initial KDE 4 release to much to deal with. But now that the UI is stable and matured I have discovered that it is really as good as I remember 3.5.x was AND BETTER with the Plasma Oxygen UI.

I now have a solution to my dilemma: Do I give up Ubuntu or not?
What I have done is to install Ubuntu and then install kde-standard.

Looking at KDE today I see that they are positioned in the right place at the right time.

So, if you have been unhappy with Unity/Gnome3, then don't despair. Just install kde-standard and switch your login session to kde FOR GOOD.

Be Happy with KDE. You won't regret it.

Hats off to the KDE Developer Team and Aaron Seigo!

BTW, Linux Mint is nice. Clem, $hit can Gnome3. Bring back KDE and maintain Mate please. Mate will be a major undertaking but you can help by giving users the option of a KDE flavor, yes?
0 Votes
+ -
Yeah
Tim Patterson 22nd Nov
@Dietrich T. Schmitz * Your Linux Advocate

Good luck with that. Clem doesn't seem very motivated to do anything with regard to KDE. You're on the right track with Ubuntu and KDE-standard. Since my main Mint 10 KDE box is starting to become a bit 'stale', I'm going back to building my own KDE on a Debian testing/sid base.
0 Votes
+ -
Btrfs
Dietrich T. Schmitz * Your Linux Advocate Updated - 22nd Nov
@Tim Patterson

I finally figured out why 'all' of the alternative, server, and minimal isos errored out on the 'Install software' step:

Btrfs

When I changed the filesystem to ext4, the problem went away.

This is a bug Folks, if you are trying to build a minimal ubuntu with no gui as a starting point.

When you download mini.iso, be sure to select the 'Command Line' option for your installation method.
0 Votes
+ -
I'll give you credit
toddybottom 22nd Nov
@Dietrich T. Schmitz * Your Linux Advocate
You put an incredible amount of effort into changing, rechanging, installing, bug fixing, changing again, tweaking, and changing again your OS.

Me, I prefer an OS that just works. Me, I prefer Windows.
0 Votes
+ -
Talk about...
Tim Patterson 22nd Nov
@toddybottom

...missing the point. The many options Dietrich tested ALL "just work". It's about having things the way the users want them. The choice of a UI which works for any given individual. They all "just work". Unlike the Windows world where you get the UI Microsoft puts out and that's your only choice.
0 Votes
+ -
my oh my
oneleft 22nd Nov
@toddybottom
what are you doing here? you also popup on every article about apple to spout your all microsoft all the time agenda. we get it.

take a day off.
0 Votes
+ -
I like people like you!
B.O.F.H. 22nd Nov
@toddybottom

It's a good thing that you posted as such, this means (or indicates) that you are cheap and easy to replace! Temp much?
0 Votes
+ -
@toddybottom

If you prefer windows, why are you reading and commenting on a Linux story? To me, windows creates useless computer professionals that cannot think unless daddy gates tells them too. It always amazed me how many windows techs cannot install linux or even troubleshoot issues that may arise.
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Linux Mint 12's Three Desktops
Unusual1 Updated - 22nd Nov
@Dietrich T. Schmitz * Your Linux Advocate
Ummm - or you could just use Kubuntu in the first place. You say you tried it, yet went back to Ubuntu and installed KDE on top. Why did you do it that way? What's the difference?
0 Votes
+ -
That is a good question
Dietrich T. Schmitz * Your Linux Advocate 22nd Nov
@Unusual1

I installed it and didn't like the 'Netbook' layout.
Of course, one can tweak the KDE to suit one's tastes as I have since discovered as I circled around the globe and came back to Earth. :/

I don't think I gave it enough time as Tim Patterson can attest from my antics over at Google Plus. He and I shoot the $hit there along with a bunch of others sharing the same points of view.
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Linux Mint 12's Three Desktops
PollyProteus 22nd Nov
@Dietrich T. Schmitz * Your Linux Advocate

-> Be Happy with KDE. You won't regret it.

I prefer KDE over Gnome, however I'm not a fan of the current implementation of KDE in CentOS 6. I did a clean install yesterday in a VM and it's taking me a while to get things back to the way I like it.
0 Votes
+ -
Nice Polly. Nice.
Dietrich T. Schmitz * Your Linux Advocate 22nd Nov
@PollyProteus nt
0 Votes
+ -
@Dietrich T. Schmitz * Your Linux Advocate
Just a suggestion; I've been using SimplyMEPIS for many years now, and am quite happy with it. Based on Debian, using KDE, and (for me, anyway) it just works. Warren Woodford has always done an excellent job with it.
For you people that always rant about Linux (Polly, toddy, LD...to name a few), if you want to use Windows, that's fine. I've used Linux for almost 10 years now, and it doesn't bother me if someone uses something else. Their choice. And don't make childish comments, like compiling EVERYthing...hell, I have no idea how to "compile" anything. But Linux just works for me.
0 Votes
+ -
XFCE
Mr_Tech Updated - 22nd Nov
Out of them all, I like XFCE (4.8 is the latest at time of writing as far as I am aware) the best. So I'd choose either Mint with XFCE or PCLinuxOS with XFCE.
0 Votes
+ -
The trouble with Linux is it's too accommodating--whatever preference you want, Linux will give it to you. Giving customers what they want is not the way to succeed in business--you have to present them with a "take-it-or-leave-it" option, and make it clear that if they leave it, they will regret it for the rest of their lives. If they live that long. Then they will fall over themselves to hand over their money to you, with only the slightest whimper.

This is the lesson that Apple under Steve Jobs understood so well. This is why their platform is the only one succeeding in the marketplace, and why everybody else is crashing and going bankrupt and generally haemorrhaging shareholder value up the wazoo. Time to forget all that "capitalism" and "free-market competition" nonsense, and start collecting some patents!
0 Votes
+ -
. . . and so Linux starts splintering in a time when it really needs to unify.

They still don't get it, do they?
0 Votes
+ -
Nope
Tim Patterson 22nd Nov
@CobraA1

No splintering at all. What we have is people at GNOME and people at Canonical who stopped listening to users. Similarly MS has also gone down this road with the unusable Metro UI.

Thankfully, for Linux users who want the power and configureabilty of the World's best UI there is the amazing KDE desktop.
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Linux Mint 12's Three Desktops
PollyProteus 22nd Nov
@Tim Patterson

Actually on Windows Phones, the Metro UI is a fairly perfect solution and alternative to iPhone and Android. There are things I would change, but I'm not in a position to affect those changes.

I can't say that Metro on Windows 8 will be a hit, if there were a way to make a slim Windows with Metro on a tablet, it might work, but then again it'd just be an overgrown Windows Phone (much like the iPad is an overgrown iPod Touch).
  • Flagged
0 Votes
+ -
@CobraA1

it really needs to unify.

Says who??



happy
0 Votes
+ -
new to linux
oneleft 22nd Nov
so i decided to buy this 11.6" netbook for the sole purpose of playing with linux. i bought 5 usb drives to play with and it's been fun.

the problem is it's very confusing. i read every article i can find to get a better handle on it but there are some tech parts that confuse me.

anyway, probably not the place to ask, but i'll ask anyway.
why is it some of the distro's don't have some basic features?
case in point. i tried:

mint
peppermint
lubuntu
ubuntu
zorin
joli os
bodhi
simplymepis
fedora

some of these did everything out of the box. others wouldn't do 1366 screen resolution. others had no sound icon, no sound options and no sound. others had very limited trackpad options - no side scrolling, no two finger tap for double click, no two finger scrolling. to change from 24 hour to 12 lock some had code you had to look up to change instead of a toggle switch (%R, %X).

i finally installed ubuntu which did everything. then i tried to install lubuntu desktop on top of it because i prefer that ui and suddenly the side scroll/two finger scroll and sound no longer worked. if it's based on ubuntu why dont' those things basic things work?

i'm still not clear on the whole "desktop" issue in regards to how it interacts with the system but i'm plugging along.
0 Votes
+ -
Re: Linux Mint 12's 3 Desktops
The Rifleman 27th Jan
Even with LinuxMint 12 installed, Gnome-3 still SUCKS! I installed MGSE and even Cinnamon only to find out that section of the configuration is still a blank box!!!! GRRRRRRR! So Mate it is. It runs nicely and returns me to a well thought out desktop and menu system that never should have been deprecated under Gnome-3 as it apparently has on my system. If we have to go this way, I much prefer the KDE Menu in Mandriva One. NOW THAT'S REALLY NICE AND WORKS ON ALL SYSTEMS! LinuxMint Dev's take notice!

Mate suffers no issues and seems rock solid on my machine. So Mate will stay until something better and equally solid comes along. My thanks to Gnome and Ubuntu for screwing up my user experience worse than Microsoft can when I go from one full release to the next. With MS it's always hunt and search as-well-as figuring out what they named something I was familiar with this time around! Change for the sake of change is not change or innovation!

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix