Linux patent defense group expands open-source protection

Linux patent defense group expands open-source protection

Summary: The Open Invention Network, a Linux patent protection consortium, is expanding its defense to related open-source programs such as KVM, Git, OpenJDK, and WebKit. Mobile Linux distributions like Android, MeeGo, and webOS will also soon be expressly protected.

SHARE:

The Open Invention Network is extending its patent protection to other Linux-related programs.

The Open Invention Network is extending its patent protection to other Linux-related programs.

The Open Invention Network (OIN) has significantly expanded and updated the Linux System technologies covered by its protective network of royalty-free cross-licenses. Over 700 new software packages--including popular packages such as Kernel Virtual Machine (KVM), Git, OpenJDK, and WebKit--will now receive coverage. In addition, coverage for over 1,000 existing software packages has been updated. Soon, the OIN will also expand its protection over Linux-related mobile operating systems such as Android, MeeGo, Tizen, and webOS.

Patents owned by Open Invention Network are available royalty-free to any company, institution or individual that agrees not to assert its patents against the OIN's broad Linux Definitions. The Open Invention Network license Is designed to spread patent protection among its members. This includes patent cross-licenses and releases from claims of patent infringement among its licensees. This, in turn, encourages collaboration between Linux companies. These patents could also be used to defend Linux vendors and developers from anti-Linux companies' legal attacks.

The OIN was formed in 2005 by IBM, Sony, Philips, Red Hat, and Novell . Since then this Linux intellectual property (IP) defense group has grown by leaps and bounds. Today it has more than 360 members. Two of the most recent companies to join in OIN's defense of Linux's IP are Cisco and Twitter.

The goal of this expansion is to broaden the scope of coverage of the patent cross-licenses and releases from claims of patent infringement between and among the OIN community members. The improved coverage of the OIN license is meant encourage ongoing collaboration and investment from Linux developers, distributors, sellers, resellers and end-users. In addition, during the last year, according Keith Bergelt, the OIN's CEO the thousands of patents covered by OIN's agreements have increased in number by about 35 to 40%.

"This expansion in the coverage of the OIN license furthers OIN's mission to enable and protect Linux," Bergelt added in a statement. It's also meant, Bergelt said in an interview to support freedom of choice for Linux vendors and distributors from attacks by companies like Microsoft.

Bergelt said, "Look at Microsoft. Microsoft's goal is to raise the total cost of ownership of competitive products by forcing companies into signing Microsoft patent cross-licenses so their competitor products are uneconomic compared to Microsoft's products." Indeed you can argue that Microsoft may be the world's most profitable Android company thanks to its patents agreements.

The problem has been that "few, if any companies, actually looked at the patents that Microsoft has asserted against them." For example, in the Motorola case, "Microsoft's patents have been found wanting."

Bergelt noted though that the real issue isn't about quality of patents; it's that Microsoft has "perverted the patent system." Large companies like Microsoft wield patents to stifle competition. The OIN is designed to encourage co-operation, fair competition, and defend companies willing to stand up to Microsoft and other patent bullies, like Apple, in today's non-stop patent wars.

Related Stories:

Eolas loses landmark Web patent case

ITC: Motorola violates one of Microsoft's mobile patents

Apple's Worldwide War on Samsung and Android

World's most profitable Android company? Microsoft!?

Cisco and Twitter join Linux patent protection pool

Topics: Microsoft, Legal, Linux, Open Source, Operating Systems, Software

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Talkback

16 comments
Log in or register to join the discussion
  • Linux patent defense group expands open-source protection

    Kudos to Open Invention Network.
    daikon
  • MS didn't do it alone

    It had lots of help, and not just from SCO.
    John L. Ries
  • one more nail in the coffin of proprietary software

    With no ability to scare people off, evil software companies are dead!
    M$ and apple are slipping into oblivion while the tidal wave of FOSS innovation covers their carcass.
    The Linux Geek
    • What 'oblivion'?

      Somebody is deluded.
      Patanjali
  • Ethics of Proprietary vs Open Source Software

    In a nutshell: Proprietary = Exploitation

    But read more here:

    h-t-t-p-s://dtschmitz.com/blog/the-ethics-of-proprietary-vs.-open-source-software

    Thanks Steve
    Dietrich T. Schmitz *Your
  • In a nutshell: Open Source = Slavery

    Dietrich T. Schmitz -though the guy writing at that site you linked to doesn't have a clue.

    You should really reference a more reliable blogger.

    That guy will say whatever he needs to say to get some customers.
    William Farrel
    • Really?

      How so?
      John L. Ries
    • Really! 2x

      @William Farrel
      How are the writers of the article wrong?
      daikon
    • If it's on his own website

      then I wouldn't trust it, as we don't trust the person himself.
      William Farrel
      • Search

        A search finds, H-t-t-p://www.ethicapublishing.com/confronting/5CH15.pdf
        daikon
      • Then why didn't he post THAT link

        as opposed to the link to [b]his[/b] site?

        What's he really pushing, the article, or his own web site?

        Hence why posts like that should be suspect.
        William Farrel
      • DTS why not a link directly to article?

        @William
        You would have to ask him directly the same question, I have no idea.
        I search other sites for the same info any time someone posts links including the article writers.

        All comments are suspect.
        daikon
      • Who is "we"?

        @William Farrel

        I take it you're referring to yourself with your multiple logins when you say "we", because you have no business presuming to speak for anyone else.

        Personally, I don't trust [i]you[/i].
        Zogg
  • ....

    Long live Linux!
    timspublic1
  • Really! 3x

    I fail to see anything wrong with that article. ANY COMPANY would lock you down to only their products and services if they could get away with it. MS and Apple are just better at it than everyone else. They have been evil longer :)
    smashandgrab
  • Guys... can we step back for a minute?

    This article appears to be about 360+ companies banding together to give something of value away <u>for free</u>. Is that evil or wrong??
    ClearCreek