Microsoft partners to allow Eclipse interop on Win7, WinServer 2008 R2, Azure
Summary: Microsoft has made another play at interoperability with a key open source software offering.At Eclipse Summit Europe on Wednesday, the Redmond, Wash.
Microsoft has made another play at interoperability with a key open source software offering.
At Eclipse Summit Europe on Wednesday, the Redmond, Wash. software giant announced that it is working on four open source projects with two open source companies -- Tasktop Technologies and Soyatec -- to enable Eclipse users to develop on Windows 7 and Windows Server 2008 R2, Windows Azure and Microsoft Silverlight.
TaskTop, of Canada, will provide enhancements to the Eclipse IDE in the first quarter of 2010, according to Microsoft's interoperability blog.
"Microsoft and Tasktop will collaborate to extend the Eclipse Rich Client Platform (RCP), and in particular the Standard Widget Toolkit (SWT), to include the mapping of new features offered by Windows 7," the blog reports. "This will allow Eclipse developers to take advantage of the new user interface features offered by Windows 7, directly from the Eclipse IDE and from any desktop applications built on top of the Eclipse platform."
Microsoft also announced that partner Soyatec of France will develop Java and PHP interoperability tools for Eclipse that will enable development on Microsoft's Windows Azure cloud computing platform and with Microsoft's Silverlight IDE.
From the press release issued today, Soyatec will provide:
- Windows Azure Tools for Eclipse, a new open source plug-in that will enable PHP developers using Eclipse to create web applications targeting Windows Azure.
- Windows Azure Software Developer Kit (SDK) for Java, an open source project that consists of tools and resources to help bridge Java developers to Windows Azure.
- Eclipse Tools for Silverlight, the release of version 1.0 of the Eclipse Silverlight plug-in, an open source, cross-platform plug-in for the Eclipse development environment that enables Eclipse developers to build Silverlight Rich Internet Applications (RIAs), and includes support for the Macintosh platform. The plug-in provides guidance for greater interoperability between Silverlight-based applications and Java-based web sites and web services, including REST, SOAP, JSON and other standards.
Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.
Talkback
Eclipse should decline the 'plug ins'
Self interests always......
Who?
As a Debian user I'm not interested in Windows except where MS efforts to hamper or damage GNU/Linux are concerned. Then they should rightfully be opposed.
The writing is on the wall. Linux owns embedded and HPC. Current economic conditions will be a boon to Linux in the server room. MS risks being relegated to consumer desktop OS status.
MS has built some nice integration into it's line for the computing challenged but more and more the cost cannot be justified compared to much less expensive *nix solutions. Add to this Amazon and Google's cloud offerings and you have more alternatives which are less expensive.
Really?
The first is that, dude it's a plugin... the onus is on Mircosoft and it's partners to keep up.
The second is for Azure to really take off like mircosoft hopes, they really need the open-source community to help them.
That doesn't mean that those in open-source trust Mircosoft intrinsically, but it does mean that Mircosoft is engaging with an environment that has few secrets (if any at all), so to keep engaging... it's going to have to put up and do good. That is a good thing.
Dont waste time responding to the geek
And I agree with you, MS can only benefit if Open Source gets involved in Azure.
RE: Microsoft partners to allow Eclipse interop on Win7, WinServer 2008 R2, Azure
RE: Microsoft partners to allow Eclipse interop on Win7, WinServer 2008 R2, Azure
That's it
Many devs prefer Eclipse. If MS can't bring devs into their VS ecosystem they will get their hooks into Eclipse.
MS is showing here that they have no problem undermining third party proprietary Windows apps to benefit themselves. One of the huge threats to MS is the existence of many quality free software apps which run on *nix. MS would love to see all of those FOSS apps ported to Windows also. This would bring the a large part of the allure of FOSS to Windows.
Most people who buy OEM boxes don't really see or think about the included cost of Windows. If all of the great FOSS apps like Amarok and K3b and Pidgin, etc...(to name a couple) were available to Windows users for free then why would they ever need to look at alternatives like Linux?
MS knows that they can't kill *nix but they are doing their best to try to marginalize it.
RE: Microsoft partners to allow Eclipse interop on Win7, WinServer 2008 R2, Azure
Who is Linux?
If I understand correctly, Linux as an organization tries to control and improve a kernel - that's it. There are businesses, like Red Hat, Novell, Canonical, Oracle, that market products and provide services based on that kernel, but I don't think there is a "Linux" that is trying to do what you suggest.
Right....
Ah, the serial killers
Silly me, of course you're right.
Honestly....
Oh no, not "the FOSS"
Software Foundation, the Apache Foundation, the University of California
Regents (who released BSD), the FreeBSD project, X.org? Maybe the
Electronic Freedom Foundation? Perhaps Canonical? IBM perchance? Is
Pentaho part of the FOSS? How about MIT, they released Kerberos under
the MIT license. I see a diverse group of organizations that compete and
cooperate with each other, but I don't see 'the FOSS'.
Thanks....
The answer...
serial killers. In exchange for free software,
unsuspecting users subject themselves to built in
tracking software. There have been cases in
California, Massachusetts, and Utah where users
intended to purchase a Windows laptop but instead got
a Linux distribution pre-installed. By utilizing the
laptop's built in web camera and gps, a linux
programmer successfully tracked down, and killed his
unsuspecting victim. In all three cases, the
detectives investigating the cases stated unequivocally that had the users been running Windows,
they would still be alive.
Oh, I see
Is this some kind of Internet meme? It's be mentioned several times here in the comments at ZDNet's blog site, but I have yet to see anyone offer up some corroborating evidence. Links, please!
Here's something else for ya: Windows has been used many times over the years by criminals - murder, theft, larceny. That doesn't make Microsoft a party to those crimes. Why are you insinuating the same with Linux?
Sadly, the astroturfers, FUDsters and trolls are out in force this week. I guess all the positive press for the new Linux releases by Ubuntu, Fedora, Mandriva, etc. have you guys running scared.
There's plenty of evidence...
Good, but lacking....
So far, the pattern that you are suggesting doesn't exist
Man....