Mint's Cinnamon: The Future of the Linux Desktop? (Review)
Summary: Can a back to the past Linux desktop win more fans than GNOME 3.x, KDE 4.x, or Ubuntu's Unity or HUD? I think so.
Over the last few years, we've seen radical changes to the Linux desktop. Some, despite initial opposition, such as the KDE 4.x re-start, took a while to gain favor, but eventually became popular. Others, such as GNOME 3.x have alienated many users and first Ubuntu's Unity and now it's Head-Up Display (HUD) have not been greeted with overwhelming approval even by hard-core Ubuntu Linux users. So, Linux Mint's developers have decided to go back to the past with a GNOME 2.x style desktop: Cinnamon. So, how well have they done? I give them an "A" for effort, but only a "B" for execution.
To put Cinnamon to the test, I used my faithful old Lenovo ThinkPad R61. This 2008-vintage notebook is powered by a 2.2GHz Intel Core 2 Duo processor T7500 and has 2GBs of RAM. I also used it on my Dell Inspiron 530S powered by a 2.2-GHz Intel Pentium E2200 dual-core processor with an 800-MHz front-side bus. This PC has 4GBs of RAM, a 500GB SATA (Serial ATA) drive, and an Integrated Intel 3100 GMA (Graphics Media Accelerator) chip set.
For the operating system, although Cinnamon will run on Ubuntu 11.10, Fedora 16, OpenSUSE 12.1, Arch Linux, and Gentoo, I elected to run it on its "native" Linux Mint 12. Cinnamon runs on top of GNOME 3.2, but its look and feel comes from GNOME 2.x.
A walk through Mint Linux's new/old Cinnamon desktop (Gallery)
As Clement Lefebvre, Linux Mint's lead developer said when he introduced Cinnamon, "I'm not going to argue whether Gnome Shell is a good or a bad desktop. It's just not what we're looking for. GNOME 3.x certainly wasn't the desktop I wanted either so I was very interested in seeing what Mint's programmers would come up with since I've long liked their design work.
My first impression of Cinnamon on both computers was great. It felt just as if I were back using GNOME 2.x. It was really nice to have my good-old GNOME menu back again, and better still that when I was done with a session, I could easily shut it down, suspend, or restart my desktop without the keyboard shenanigans that GNOME 3.x requires.
Cinnamon also has some nice extras added in. For example, I can automatically search in the menu, ala GNOME 3.x, by sub-string when I can't recall exactly where a program is hiding in the menu. A related change is that, unlike GNOME 3.x in this case, when you open a new window it gets the focused by default--instead of, as Lefebvre puts it so well, "appearing in the back with an annoying 'Your window is ready' notification."
You can also once more change your desktop's layout. I, for instance, really like having the menubar at the top of the display instead of at the bottom and Cinnamon lets me set it up that away again. I could also set it with panels at both the top and bottom of the display. There is one small gotcha though: To change the layout you have to set it and then restart Cinnamon.
Cinnamon also has a new configuration tool called "Cinnamon Settings." With it you can switch themes, apply desktop effects, add applets and extensions to your desktop and configure some of the settings of the desktop. You cannot, however, use Gnome 3.x Shell themes in Cinnamon.
Themes are also a little hard to manage in this first "shipping" version of Cinnamon. You still have to go hither and yon to manage them. The theme control problem, fortunately, is already being addressed.
The applets are what I found most interesting. There are optional desktop mini-programs. They are installed by default, but you decide if you want to use them or not. These include an excellent set of accessibility tools; the power to set up a Recent Documents icon on the system tray itself; control over your removable drives and trash; and some basic display tools. I'm already using the Recent Documents control all the time.
That's the good news. Now, here's why I can't get Cinnamon an "A" yet. First, the new animation settings felt really jerky to me. Now, I'm not running Mint 12 on very fast machines, but they're not slow either and I found the Windows effect, even after tuning them, to be just to annoying to be useful.
There are also some bugs in the Cinnamon. For example, the Pidgin, my favorite IM client, icon disappears from time to time. A more noticeable example is that I couldn't add some applications to "Favorites" from within the menu or by using the dconf-editor. Curiously, I could add them to the Desktop or Panel. This is a known problem, and it's already been fixed in the source code. I also see display quirks such as oddly overlapping windows from time to time.
What concerned me the most though is that some applications, the Evolution e-mail client and LibreOffice would sometime freeze up under Cinnamon. I can forgive a lot, but having my e-mail and word processor lock up on me is close to unforgivable. It doesn't happen very often at all, but even once a day or so is really vexing.
Still, these are very early days for Cinnamon, so I'm willing to give this desktop a good solid "B." If Mint continues to improve Cinnamon at the rate it's been going at though it won't be long before Cinnamon will have earned not just an "A" but an "A+" for all GNOME Linux desktop users.
Want to see if you think Cinnamon gets a passing grade? You can download Cinnamon from Mint today.
Related Stories:
Linux Mint releases Cinnamon, GNOME 2.x style desktop
Linux Mint's Cinnamon: A GNOME 3.x shell fork
Linux users cautiously optimistic about Ubuntu's Head-Up Display desktop
Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Talkback
RE: Mint's Cinnamon: The Future of the Linux Desktop? (Review)
[i]First, the new animation settings felt really jerky to me. [/i]
I see linux still hasn't resolved those media issues yet, its only been 15 years. Maybe the issue of playing one stuttering sound at a time will get resolved one of these days before linux is gone.
You made no mention of security so we are going to assume this distro like all other linux distros leaves the telnet port open as well. That's just inviting hackers to own your PC. Based on your less than favorable review of Cinnamon I'll have to pass on it and will not be recommending this distro.
RE: Mint's Cinnamon: The Future of the Linux Desktop? (Review)
RE: Mint's Cinnamon: The Future of the Linux Desktop? (Review)
The desktop is dead
"Dead" is the king of bad metaphors.
Linux is not a business, therefore, it can't be put out of business. It's going to be here after the current market conditions have long since evolved into something else.
Evolution
Linux is no exception. It is evolving, It is not there yet but it is getting close. The part I like is that so many people use it every day and don't even realize it is there.
http://www.zdnet.com/blog/open-source/where-linux-crushes-windows-like-a-bug-supercomputers/9890
If it was a failure, I could see your point, but since it is such a success, I know it is only a matter of time before people wake up to a new and improved LINUX. Once they get the taste for it, nothing can stop it. Windows had thousands of lines of bad code and crashed when it was first introduced to the public. Linux will be clean, open and FREE by then.
Windows will just be another ATARI or AMIGA and all the discussions just won't matter any more. Until then, I am going to enjoy it for what it is and know that I was there when it evolved. Just like the Internet.
Did I mention I am using Linux Mint 13 on a 64 Bit Dell Laptop to write this?
Thank you
RE: Mint's Cinnamon: The Future of the Linux Desktop? (Review)
Your comments are so over the top do you really expect people to believe you?
And why do always comment on Linux articles? I thought you said avoid Linux, yet you always take the time to spread some FUD on Linux, which you wouldn't be needing to do if Linux wasn't a threat.
RE: Mint's Cinnamon: The Future of the Linux Desktop? (Review)
Cut him some slack. He's just doing his job.
Again, no credibility
RE: Mint's Cinnamon: The Future of the Linux Desktop? (Review)
Who...
Odd sentiment
Ideals aren't even necessary to appreciate a free Operating System that expands my work capabilities without forcing me to spend money I don't have. I can't afford to be this productive on Windows.
RE: Mint's Cinnamon: The Future of the Linux Desktop? (Review)
Why...
Because
If people want stuff to just work they could just go for Mint or Ubuntu, hassle-free.
RE: Mint's Cinnamon: The Future of the Linux Desktop? (Review)
+1
RE: Mint's Cinnamon: The Future of the Linux Desktop? (Review)
Every startup deserves a chance. UBUNTU had it and now is on the way to fully abandoning the desktop. UBUNTU will have servers, tablets, and will send you to Debian for the classical desktop development environment.
So, if Mint can hang in a bit, Mint may win the UBUNTU desktop users who cannot make the move to tablets.
RE: Mint's Cinnamon: The Future of the Linux Desktop? (Review)