OpenOffice 3 launch timed perfectly but will Sun, IBM exploit opportunity?
Summary: Sun and IBM could not have asked for better timing for the launch of OpenOffice 3, a major upgrade of the open source office suite.Both vendors are preparing to ship commercial offerings of StarOffice and Symphony based on the new OO 3 release and have a grand marketing opportunity if they heed what their target audiences really need.
Sun and IBM could not have asked for better timing for the launch of OpenOffice 3, a major upgrade of the open source office suite.
Both vendors are preparing to ship commercial offerings of StarOffice and Symphony based on the new OO 3 release and have a grand marketing opportunity if they heed what their target audiences really need.
Sun plans to launch StarOffice 9 on November 19. IBM? Symphony 1.2 is due to be released in October but I don’t know if it will use OpenOffice 3.0. I didn’t hear back from sources or IBM on the matter.
As the global economic crisis dries up credit and whacks IT budgets, corporate chiefs and administrators are going to be more open to a Microsoft Office alternative that is more compatible with Microsoft Office. And this one reportedly is just that. Version 3.0, for example, offers new support for Microsoft Access 2007 .accdb files and the ability to read Microsoft Office OpenXML files as well as enhanced support for VBA macros. The conversion tools are better, too. For companies that planned to upgrade to Office 2007 in 2009, the money just may not be there anymore.
Version 3.0 also offers native Mac OSX support and a new Start Menu and GUI that is more pleasing to end users. This is a key audience that Sun and IBM and others must pay more attention to if they plan to gain any market traction for their office suites. End users are typically averse to changing software applications but will entertain the notion if they feel the substitute is not inferior to their current Microsoft desktop. Here, marketing and training are necessities.
The bad news is that there are and will continue to be fewer desktops as payrolls shrink and unemployment rates jump globally. In this climate, the notion that IT administrators can deploy OpenOffice to new workers as additive rather than as replacements for Microsoft Office becomes less compelling.
So vendors must sell OpenOffice hard and to do so they ramp up their respective marketing and training programs. If they are serious about gaining market share, they need to dig deep to fund television and Web advertising campaigns to give OpenOffice products the kind of brand recognition they need to be deemed acceptable and to educate the millions of end users who don’t even know that StarOffice and Symphony exist. There are tons and tons of people who don’t realize there is an alternative to Microsoft’s Office suite. Vendors of desktop products must get end user buy-in if they want to succeed.
IT administrators naturally love the pricetag of commercial OpenOffice versions but they worry about disrupting critical business processes in the short term, compatibility problems and support costs over the long term. No doubt, there will be significant training and migration costs involved in switching from Microsoft Office to StarOffice or Symphony. Sun and IBM ought to make training free or at very low cost and guarantee first line of support to customers who experience compatibility problems or application conflicts and generous training benefits such as free vouchers to customers serious about a switch. Sun and IBM should also make long term pledges to guarantee that desktop support costs won't rise too much over time. This will alleviate corporate concerns that the long term ROI won't be there. All of these guarantees will be expensive but worth it in the long run.
The time is right to strike but it may not last. Vendors ought to seriously consider such investments in such an unusual business climate in which companies are downright desperate to cut costs.
So far, interest looks promising. I tried to download OpenOffice 3 myself today but could not due to the heavy traffic hitting the OpenOffice.org web site. According to a note posted on OpenOffice.org when I finally could get connected at 1 pm EST: “Apologies - our website is struggling to cope with the unprecedented demand for the new release 3.0 of OpenOffice.org. The technical teams are trying to come up with a solution.”
Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.
Talkback
I don't think that Microsoft products cost anything to companies marginally
http://www.microsoft.com/licensing/programs/ent/overview.mspx
Additionally it is my experience that desktop software costs are really not an issue in a company. Other costs of running the business are far more significant. I bet my company pays more per month just for my healthcare than they paid for all the software that I have used on my PC since I started working here. However even the smallest business disruption would cost a lot more than software licensees. Therefore companies don't want to rock the boat when it comes to software.
What if ...
What of the fee became problematic to the point that a replacement to Open Office 3.0 would be sufficient for the majority of users while a few were allowed to continue on Office 2003/2007 on a "per need" basis only licensing those copies needed?
Better yet, what if you have a startup company that needs access to a office productivity suite with minimum cost so as not to divert you capital to unnecessary licensing or accumulate additional debt to finance such a purchase?
Each company during this period needs to take a good look at their current situation with regards to technology. These cost cutting measures could be the difference between a reduction in employee benefits or worst the actual staff. ;)
I am sure you can save the money on office if you try, but...
1. Licensing agreement with Microsoft that my company has, covers not only Office, but also Windows and other Microsoft software, so just changing MS office will not save any money. We would need to change OS on all the desktops, SQL server, etc. to realize any savings.
2. Even for small business, costs of desktop software are small. Here in USA, just healthcare per employee is much, much higher than expenditure on desktop software. Salaries are of course even higher.
3. Costs are risks to switching are high. To illustrate that point, in my company we are still running windows XP and Office 2003 even though we could have an upgrade for no additional costs. We are reluctant to put additional workload onto IT department since they are in the middle of major project for a new administration software. (and have been for about a year now).
4. There are risks every time you separate yourself from the herd and go of the beaten part. Will all the files we made with MS office work? Probably not! I myself have made some ugly and complex VB macros in excel that will probably not work on any other Office suite.
Now if I was making my own company from nothing, I would probably use Open Source software like I do at home. However I just cannot see my company bridging that chasm any time soon.
Well said...and pretty accurate. We are a
Yes with Microsoft ...
With anything....
With Microsoft you keep making small compromises until...
I saw the same post on Digg ...
Edit:
I recently read some of your previous posts and determined they appear rather consistent. It's very difficult sometimes to determine if some people posting on zdnet have "ulterior motives".
Ever heard of code reuse?
I figured that ...
We have the same program and we have HomeUse
Fixed fee.
I am not clear on details
RE: OpenOffice 3 launch timed perfectly but will Sun, IBM exploit opportunity?
Anyways, till the time OpenOffice Writer cannot open complex Word Files correctly, i.e. it does not make the formatting go haywire, and while saving the file in .doc format, it does not give a discouraging message about how some of the formatting you have spent hours upon might be incompatible with this file format, i dont think there is any point even discussing migration to OpenOffice.
'Anyways, till the time OpenOffice Writer ......(?)
I proved, to my satisfaction atleast, that Word was the problem by deleting stuff out of the document until Word would open it without crashing, then editing the document in word adding stuff back in. I could add less than a page in Word, save the document and word would crash next time I opened it.
In January I reverted back to Office 2003 after I finally got fed up with the way in which Word 2007 promoted random 'Normal' and 'Body' style paragraphs up to outline level 1.
I don't think OO's formatting issues could be any worse.
RE: OpenOffice 3 launch timed perfectly but will Sun, IBM exploit opportunity?
One of the main reasons governments, civil bodies and businesses around the world are moving away from Microsoft - you really want your corporate body to be beholding to MS developers and whether they decide that Office 2011 won't work with Office 2003 docs?
Downloading not a problem now
RE: OpenOffice 3 launch timed perfectly but will Sun, IBM exploit opportunity?
subrata.datta@gmail.com
They do have bit torrent