Robotics needs a W3C
Summary: Robotics needs a free, open source, universal platform on which to build. We need compatibility among the various open source projects now seeking programmer loyalty. We need a clubhouse in which to meet, a center, a base.
Willow Garage's move to sell copies of its PR2 to the public at $400,000 (discounts of up to 30% available to researchers) is being hailed as a turning point in the industry's development. (Image from Willow Garage.)
That's because, unlike most Japanese robots, which are either purpose-built or one-offs, and unlike iRobot (which despite its name is a cleaner and military contracting company), the PR2 is built from an open source software base, with modular hardware.
Willow Garage is not the only open source base on which to build a robot. Urbi went open source last month, with a C++ library and an API. CARMEN is Carnegie-Mellon's open source robotics toolkit. Orocos also offers an open source platform for robotic control.
It's clear, then, that such PC ideas as standards and open platforms are starting to pick up in the robotics industry, which until now has been proprietary, military, industrial and (frankly) a little inaccessible to the computing mainstream.
So what does the industry need now? I would suggest it needs an organization coordinating standards, providing compatibility among the various open source offerings, a base on which everyone can grow and develop.
Something like the World Wide Web Consortium.
The W3C has come in for its share of criticism, in the 16 years since the Web was spun. Its standards process moves slowly. Google's bouncing balls, demonstrating HTML5 and CSS, were meant to speed up an adoption cycle that threatens to drag on another decade.
But the group does serve a purpose. It provides a base. Everything built up from the base refers back to the base. There are differences in how browsers render web pages, but these are minor because the base remains intact. Everyone building web pages innovates from a base of W3C standards.
Robotics needs a base.
Robotics needs a free, open source, universal platform on which to build. We need compatibility among the various open source projects now seeking programmer loyalty. We need a clubhouse in which to meet, a center, a base.
Anyone know how to build one? (Cough, cough, JimZemlin, hack. Excuse me.)
Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.
Talkback
RE: Robotics needs a W3C
More seriously, W3C would be happy to host conversations about the intersection between robots and Web technology.
Ian Jacobs, Head of W3C Communications
RE: Robotics needs a W3C
RE: Robotics needs a W3C
RE: Robotics needs a W3C
RE: Robotics needs a W3C
RE: Robotics needs a W3C
<a href="http://www.kolcularltd.com">Hava Perdeleri</a>
<a href="http://www.kolcularltd.com">Hava Perdesi</a>
<a href="http://www.kolcularltd.com">Hava Perdesi Fiyatlari</a>
<a href="http://www.havaperdesi.info">Hava Perdeleri</a>
<a href="http://www.havaperdesi.info">Hava Perdesi Fiyatlari</a>
<a href="http://www.havaperdesi.info">Hava Perdesi</a>
<a href="http://www.nivahavaperdesi.com">Hava Perdesi Fiyatlari</a>
<a href="http://www.nivahavaperdesi.com">Hava Perdesi</a>
<a href="http://www.nivahavaperdesi.com">Hava Perdeleri</a>
<a href="http://www.estilomuhendislik.com">Hava Perdesi Fiyatlari</a>
<a href="http://www.estilomuhendislik.com">Hava Perdesi</a>
<a href="http://www.estilomuhendislik.com">Hava Perdeleri</a>
you should be smart enough to put parts in that can actually support Next Gen Technologies like VOIP over 3G/4G wireless. And how about Dual Band WiFi Direct w/DLNA support and putting hardware with BlueTooth 3.0 built into them? How about actually putting the FM Transceiver in those chips to work for your customers inside your OS (like Android 3.0 will do). Broadcom has done that....
<a href="http://www.havaperdesi.co">Hava Perdesi Fiyatlari</a>
<a href="http://www.havaperdesi.co">Hava Perdesi</a>
<a href="http://www.havaperdesi.co">Hava Perdeleri</a>
<a href="http://www.havaperdesi.co">isitma sogutma</a>
<a href="http://www.havaperdem.com">Hava Perdesi Fiyatlari</a>
<a href="http://www.havaperdem.com">Hava Perdesi</a>
<a href="http://www.havaperdem.com">Hava Perdeleri</a>
<a href="http://www.havaperdem.com">isitma sogutma</a>
<a href="http://www.ukeducation.com.tr">ingilterede dil egitimi</a>
<a href="http://www.ukeducation.com.tr">ingilterede ingilizce</a>
<a href="http://www.ukeducation.com.tr">ingilterede dil okullari</a>
<a href="http://www.ukeducation.com.tr">Londra dil okullari</a>
<a href="http://www.ukeducation.com.tr">ingilterede sertifika programlari</a>
<a href="http://www.britisheducation.com.tr">ingilterede master</a>
<a href="http://www.britisheducation.com.tr">ingilterede yuksek lisans</a>
<a href="http://www.britisheducation.com.tr">ingilterede egitim</a>
<a href="http://www.britisheducation.com.tr">ingilterede universite</a>
<a href="http://www.britisheducation.com.tr">ingilterede mba</a>
<a href="http://www.britisheducation.com.tr">ingilterede sertifika programlari</a>
because they are another company that has seen the light and ease of becoming a part of what that Open Source Future means by doing it themselves directly.... faster! .....that's why ARM got involved and wrote support directly into Android for their Neon Engine to take advantage of Face Recognition and Smile Detection along with other features Apple doesn't have, with the same chip hardware (or the old cheap last gen junk they opted for