They may hold on to the existing cutomer base if they do a good job, but we replaced our SCO UNIX boxes years ago. Our Red Hat replacements are running beautifully. So well, in fact, that we are now replacing our Sun Solaris UNIX boxes as they go end-of-life with new RHEL hosts.
Sadly Darl & his parasitic buddies have forever sullied the once golden SCO name, and I can't see anyone willing to jump into a new relationship of any kind with it's descendants -- however well meaning they may be.
Regards,
Jon
SCO, the anti-Linux lawsuit monster is dead. There are still twitches left in the corpse in the bankruptcy court morgue, but when even Groklaw retires from the field, you know SCO’s as dead as a doornail. But, SCO’s Unix operating systems, OpenServer and UnixWare, will live on under the aegis of a new company, UnXis.
This has some people, including Pamela Jones, editor and founder of Groklaw worried that UnXis might follow in SCO’s lawsuit crazy tracks. “Targeting end users? Uh oh. That has a creepy sound, considering the heritage of SCO, if you know what I mean.”
I didn’t think anyone with a lick of sense would try to re-tread SCO’s hopeless lawsuits, but then I’d thought from the very start that SCO taking on IBM, et. al. in the courts was a suicidal move. So, I asked the UnXis’ CEO, Richard A. Bolandz, what his plans were.
Bolandz replied, “UnXis has no intention to pursue any litigation related to the SCO Group assets acquired by the company. We are all about world leadership in technology not litigation.”
“We acquired the intellectual property, the extremely loyal base of marquee customers in 82 countries worldwide a world class engineering team and a rock solid product on which kernel all new systems will be built. There is no place for litigation in our vision or plan,” Bolandz continued.
That sounds great to me, and I know it’s what Ms. Jones wanted to hear as well. But what intellectual property (IP) is that? The Novell/SCO litigation proved once and for all that Novell, and not SCO, owned Unix’s IP .
Bolandz said, “The bankruptcy court has struck down the objections of Novell and awarded UnXis under the asset purchase agreement (APA) the intellectual property and all assets necessary to run the business. As mentioned above we are reaching out to Novell to partner with us as we see our products as complementary rather than competitive and to cross sell products and services for the good of both our customer bases and the entire market.”
OK, that’s not the same thing as Unix’s IP. The SCO bankruptcy court let UnXis sub-license the Unix source code without paying Novell for what SCO owed on it.
Novell, which is the process of being sold to Attachmate, can’t be happy about this judgment. UnXis, which couldn’t sell OpenServer or UnixWare without this decision, must be pleased. On the other hand, in the long run UnXis must arrive at a good working relation with Novell or somewhere down the road. Without an agreement, eventually UnXis won’t be able to sell either Unix operating system.
There’s also the question of the Unix trademark. But, as reported in Groklaw, The Open Group, which owns the Unix trademarks, doesn’t foresee any problems with UnXis using the Unix or UnixWare trademarks.
In an e-mail, Meryl Schlachterman of The Open Group wrote, “Under a Trademark Licensing Agreement with The Open Group, SCO is licensed to use UNIX and UnixWare which are registered trademarks of The Open Group in the U.S. and other countries, a fact acknowledged by SCO on its website.”
“The acquisition of SCO’s operating assets and transfer of its operating systems and software solutions business to UnXis will mean that an assignment and transfer of the TMLA from SCO to UnXis will be required for such rights to pass. We anticipate that this transfer will be successfully concluded in the very near future,” she concluded.
OK, so UnXis isn’t going to pursue SCO’s fruitless legal strategy of the last few years and they seem to be getting their Unix IP ducks in a row, so what are they going to do?
