SCO is dead, SCO Unix lives on

SCO is dead, SCO Unix lives on

Summary: SCO, the anti-Linux, litigation zombie that would not die is finally dead, but it's Unix operating systems: SCO OpenServer and UnixWare will live on.


SCO LogoSCO, the anti-Linux lawsuit monster is dead. There are still twitches left in the corpse in the bankruptcy court morgue, but when even Groklaw retires from the field, you know SCO's as dead as a doornail. But, SCO's Unix operating systems, OpenServer and UnixWare, will live on under the aegis of a new company, UnXis.

This has some people, including Pamela Jones, editor and founder of Groklaw worried that UnXis might follow in SCO's lawsuit crazy tracks. "Targeting end users? Uh oh. That has a creepy sound, considering the heritage of SCO, if you know what I mean."

I didn't think anyone with a lick of sense would try to re-tread SCO's hopeless lawsuits, but then I'd thought from the very start that SCO taking on IBM, et. al. in the courts was a suicidal move. So, I asked the UnXis' CEO, Richard A. Bolandz, what his plans were.

Bolandz replied, "UnXis has no intention to pursue any litigation related to the SCO Group assets acquired by the company. We are all about world leadership in technology not litigation."

"We acquired the intellectual property, the extremely loyal base of marquee customers in 82 countries worldwide a world class engineering team and a rock solid product on which kernel all new systems will be built. There is no place for litigation in our vision or plan," Bolandz continued.

That sounds great to me, and I know it's what Ms. Jones wanted to hear as well. But what intellectual property (IP) is that? The Novell/SCO litigation proved once and for all that Novell, and not SCO, owned Unix's IP .

Bolandz said, "The bankruptcy court has struck down the objections of Novell and awarded UnXis under the asset purchase agreement (APA) the intellectual property and all assets necessary to run the business. As mentioned above we are reaching out to Novell to partner with us as we see our products as complementary rather than competitive and to cross sell products and services for the good of both our customer bases and the entire market."

OK, that's not the same thing as Unix's IP. The SCO bankruptcy court let UnXis sub-license the Unix source code without paying Novell for what SCO owed on it.

Novell, which is the process of being sold to Attachmate, can't be happy about this judgment. UnXis, which couldn't sell OpenServer or UnixWare without this decision, must be pleased. On the other hand, in the long run UnXis must arrive at a good working relation with Novell or somewhere down the road. Without an agreement, eventually UnXis won't be able to sell either Unix operating system.

There's also the question of the Unix trademark. But, as reported in Groklaw, The Open Group, which owns the Unix trademarks, doesn't foresee any problems with UnXis using the Unix or UnixWare trademarks.

In an e-mail, Meryl Schlachterman of The Open Group wrote, "Under a Trademark Licensing Agreement with The Open Group, SCO is licensed to use UNIX and UnixWare which are registered trademarks of The Open Group in the U.S. and other countries, a fact acknowledged by SCO on its website."

"The acquisition of SCO's operating assets and transfer of its operating systems and software solutions business to UnXis will mean that an assignment and transfer of the TMLA from SCO to UnXis will be required for such rights to pass. We anticipate that this transfer will be successfully concluded in the very near future," she concluded.

OK, so UnXis isn't going to pursue SCO's fruitless legal strategy of the last few years and they seem to be getting their Unix IP ducks in a row, so what are they going to do?

Page 2: [UnXis' SCO Unix Plans] »

UnXis' SCO Unix Plans

According to Bolandz, the former CIO of Qwest Communications, "Our first commitment is to our customers, VARS and channel partners to support their existing needs as well as a whole new generation of hardware, software and requirements of the cloud. We can now focus 100 percent of our attention and energies on bringing state-of-the-art technology capabilities to the Unix platform, improving customer service and support, and capitalizing on the robust and secure SCO Unix operating system for today's cloud-based systems."

Specifically, UnXis plans on updating OpenServer and UnixWare on a quarterly schedule and start introducing cloud computing, 64-bit computing, biometric authentication, VMware compatibility, IPV6 and virtualization features.

Bolandz said, "While SCO currently has two basic families of products: OpenServer and UnixWare....there are many flavors of these products being supported that have been in service for thirty years without an upgrade. Our plan is to eventually merge the capabilities of these two product groups into a 64 bit platform capable of running anything on a virtualized platform."

UnXis also plans to provide a seamless migration path to this platform for all our customers and "to offer cloud based hosted solutions in the SMB segment to enable SMB customers to migrate their applications transparently onto the latest version of our operating systems at a monthly cost without spending a single dime on hardware, IT support, power, cooling etc. and accessing their legacy over Web services."

Bolandz concluded, we want to "further enhance our value proposition by adding features and functionality that add value to enterprise computing missions such as biometric authentication to support single sign on virtualization to reduce the cost of password administration, (2) virtualization to support green data center footprint, power and cooling consumption reduction. The objective is to add more value in our core platform than any other available market offering."

At the same time, UnXis will be reaching out to SCO's old channel partners. "SCO's channel partners have been very supportive of the company and the products over the years, despite the legal issues, and we intend to strengthen and grow these relationships. In fact, we have been in contact with the vast majority of the SCO channel partners and have communicated with them regularity regarding our plans and vision for the products and they have been supportive of our efforts."

UnXis will also be trying to partner with Unix VAR, ISV and distributor associations such as iXorg to develop the product road map and to rapidly deploy the SCO UNIX CLOUD to enable customers in the SMB segment to keep up with the latest O/S releases."

Believe it or not, I actually think UnXis has a shot at this. While I've disliked SCO's policies for the last eight years, I never disliked their products. OpenServer and UnixWare, while they're not open operating systems, are remarkably stable. For businesses that want rock-sold operating systems that would work on commercially available Off-The-Shelf (COTS) hardware, SCO was always hard to beat.

For all that Linux was often a better choice; I also thought that OpenServer and UnixWare had a real, albeit small, server operating system niche. The real question: "Is there any market left for x86 Unix operating systems after all the damage SCO's waste of time and money on anti-Linux lawsuits has done?" is one I don't know the answer too. In time, though, the market will tell us if there's any life left in x86 Unix.

Related Stories:

Mission Accomplished: SCO Loses, Groklaw Closes

Novell's Stockholders approve Attachmate buyout but the Deal's far from done

Novell shares more specifics on patents it is selling to Microsoft, Apple

Does Google's Android violate Linux's Copyright?

Topics: Software, Open Source, Operating Systems

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.


Log in or register to join the discussion
  • SCO lawsuits vs users caused us to move off of the platform.

    They may hold on to the existing cutomer base if they do a good job, but we replaced our SCO UNIX boxes years ago. Our Red Hat replacements are running beautifully. So well, in fact, that we are now replacing our Sun Solaris UNIX boxes as they go end-of-life with new RHEL hosts.

    Sadly Darl & his parasitic buddies have forever sullied the once golden SCO name, and I can't see anyone willing to jump into a new relationship of any kind with it's descendants -- however well meaning they may be.

  • RE: SCO is dead, SCO Unix lives on

    SCO Unix lives on?

    I would think it's more a kind of zombie shuffle, replete with sloughing skin and decaying flesh at this point.

    But I applaud their decision not to try and eat anyone's brains in the process.

    Best of luck to them.
  • X/Open had a bit more to say

    X/Open's reply to me when I emailed them to let them know the claims that Unxis was making over the Unix trademark included the phrase "In the meantime, we are requesting UnXis to clarify and correct its press release that misstates the matter of trademark ownership"
  • That's all well and good, but ...

    I honestly can't imagine anyone who'd be willing to take a chance on SCO products now, which have languished with only meager updates and attention for the last 8-10 years. Frankly, SCO was so focused on its farsical lawsuit that it let its crown jewels -- the inappropriately-named OpenServer and UnixWare -- go to waste.

    They were good products once. But now they're outdated and lots (and LOTS) of "baggage" that will likely prevent companies from taking a chance on them, especially since Linux has matured so well, as have other options from Sun, HP, IBM, etc.

    BTW, as for the "is there a future for Unix on x86" question ... three words: Mac OS X. Numbers-wise (and regardless of how folks feel about it) it's the most successful Unix platform available ... or "ever", for that matter.
    • RE: SCO is dead, SCO Unix lives on

      For desktops maybe - not for servers.
    • MacOS X ?

      Yes, most successful Unix platform ... "on the desktop". Although it has to be said that they seem to be ashamed of it, seen how they seem bend on doing everything they can to make the underlying OS unusable to the average Unix Administrator.

      It has no business being on a server either. That space of the market has been dominated by real Unices like AIX, HP-UX, Solaris and the newcomers on the block : Redhat/CentOS and SuSe.
  • What an SCO UNIX?

    The thing about SCO UNIX is that it is sold by a network of very loyal VARs who are all tightly focused on a vertical market. The average company that buys SCO UNIX never heard of SCO, never heard of UNIX, and doesn't care about either. They are buying "HVAC Wizard" [I made that one up] or something like that... a highly-regarded package for heating & air conditioning contractors that has a thousand happy customers. The software vendor has been in business for twenty years. That's who's out there selling SCO UNIX. They're happy, they aren't going anywhere, and they are so entrenched in their vertical that they will continue to grow and get new customers.

    This is probably the best news the SCO VARs have had since the Santa Cruz Operation sold the business to Darl and The Thugs.
    Robert Hahn
    • RE: SCO is dead, SCO Unix lives on

      @Robert Hahn
      Are there any SCO VARs left?
    • RE: SCO is dead, SCO Unix lives on

      @Robert Hahn I can see it now: "HVAC Wizard -- we Suck Gigantically".

      I thought I'd read on GrokLaw that McDonalds used SCO for their POS computers or something.

      The thing is, Linux runs on many more architectures, including very economical & low-power ones (think: ARM, Loongson) so it's probably a bit cheaper to build a "HVAC Wizard" with a cheap ARM chip inside running Linux instead of an i386 or amd64 running SCO UNIX.
  • RE: SCO is dead, SCO Unix lives on

    The demise of SCO Unix is a good lesson to any company; don?t let lawyers make major decisions in a technology company.
  • What a mess

    Unix has been a bit of a mess since the break up of AT&T. This is one more sad tale in the ongoing saga of Unix, but I couldn't see this ending any other way.
  • Unix on x86?!

    Of course there's life in it. Solaris runs extremly well on x86 and of course most Linux kernel based distributions run on x86.
    It was not the litigation that killed SCO, SCO died because it lost a big chunk of its niche. And not just to the other Unices that run on x86 but mainly to WinNT & Co, which may not have been as stable an OS, but it often won because it had more "eyecandy" aka. a more pleasant Graphical User Interface.