ie8 fix

Linux and Open Source

Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols & Paula Rooney

Stop the spectrum auction madness

By | May 30, 2008, 7:02am PDT

Summary: The Wireless Trust and the government are conspiring to maintain the status quo, through spectrum auctions.

stop signBefore one more colleague speculates on rules for spectrum auctions, can I make one suggestion?

Stop.

Over the last several years we’ve had auction-after-auction, all ostensibly designed to provide competition to the Wireless Trust.

Has it? No, it hasn’t. The Trust remains intact. The benefits of Moore’s Law which have impacted our PCs and our hard drives and our iPods and everything else somehow haven’t filtered down to wireless service. It’s been stopped cold.

The reason is simple. The Wireless Trust and the government are conspiring to maintain the status quo, through spectrum auctions. It’s policy.

Policy can change.

When a company pays billions of dollars for a monopoly on the use of spectrum, it can only get that money back by charging you a lot of money to use it.

That money is a tax, a spectrum tax, one you pay on every phone call you make, and every ringtone you download.

But it’s your spectrum. Yours and mine. The electromagnetic spectrum is not government property, and need not be private property. It is supposed to be regulated by the government in the public interest, to prevent interference.

But we can engineer hardware to prevent interference. We don’t need government mandates on who can use the spectrum. We need government standards for hardware to enforce simple rules.

Look at how WiFi speeds have increased this decade, from 10 mbps 802.11b to 100 mbps 802.11n. Look at what’s available through WiMax.

Open, shared spectrum need not be full of interference. You write rules, you implement them in hardware, the hardware makers compete, and the next thing you know everyone’s sitting in coffee shops watching a cat play the piano on YouTube.

Write non-interference rules into a national network of shared spectrum, implement them in hardware, and we’ll have dozens of networks competing for customers, just as we used to have thousands of ISPs before the government made that a duopoly.

And if the Trust which “paid so dearly” for spectrum howls, buy that spectrum back. At cost.

Open spectrum can break the monopoly and bring us all the benefits of Moore’s Law. That’s why the government, and the monopoly, are so anxious to prevent any new open spectrum from appearing, and auctioning off every bit of spectrum that’s left.

Stop.

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Topics

Dana Blankenhorn has been a business journalist for 30 years, a tech freelancer since 1983.

Disclosure

Dana Blankenhorn

Dana Blankenhorn has been a journalist, writer and part-time futurist for over 30 years.

At the present moment I run only a personal blog in addition to my ZDNet open source blog.

DanaBlankenhorn.Com has the subtitle The War Against Oil. In the past I have used it to write about political history, e-commerce, personal matters, some ideas related to open source, and The World of Always On, which is the idea of using sensors, motes and RFID to turn WiFi links into platforms for applications which live in the air.

My IRA account at Schwab holds a few tech shares, most notably some Intel and Applied Materials, but there are no open source companies in it. I don’t even own any CBS stock.

Biography

Dana Blankenhorn

Dana Blankenhorn has been a business journalist for nearly 25 years and has covered the online world professionally since 1985. He founded the Interactive Age Daily for CMP Media, and has written for the Chicago Tribune, Advertising Age's "NetMarketing" supplement, and dozens of other publications over the years.

3
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

Yeah - I Don't See Our Benevolent US Government Doing Anything USEFUL
drprodny 2nd Jun 2008
Not when they chant "Free Market" like some kind of magical mystical mantra, while US society falls to pieces around us consumers and normal people who don't own multinational corporations and have flying squads of lobbyists at our beck and call....
0 Votes
+ -
nice thought but...
Linux Geek 30th May 2008
There is nothing to prevent wireless carriers, Apple, Google or M$ to get a free ride on the free spectrum with locked devices.
Open spectrum would mean nothing without an open protocol to use it and enforced by the FCC.
0 Votes
+ -
You're absolutely right
DanaBlankenhorn 30th May 2008
You enforce non-interference with hardware mandates.
Not when they chant "Free Market" like some kind of magical mystical mantra, while US society falls to pieces around us consumers and normal people who don't own multinational corporations and have flying squads of lobbyists at our beck and call....

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix