ie8 fix

Linux and Open Source

Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols & Paula Rooney

Texas moves emphasize need to open source education

By | May 25, 2010, 6:50am PDT

Summary: Texas has created an enormous opportunity for states, for communities, for publishers, and for authors to use open source and mass customization to transform education, just as those savings are most needed.

I didn’t intend to get into the Texas school board controversy.

Personal reasons. After I left college I was a close friend of a guy who is now a member of that board, one of its most controversial.

Back in 1978 David Bradley was drifting, but the woman he married around the time I knew him straightened him out. Last I saw him he was living in the mansion where the papers creating what later became Exxon were signed.

But his latest silliness (only stupid kids believe the history they’re taught in high school) got me to thinking of the enormous opportunities there are for open source in education, starting in the area of textbooks.

What lefty political types will tell you is that Texas’ school book standards are followed in lockstep by most other states, because Texas is such a large market and publishers don’t want to publish multiple books.

What is really 1950 here is not the lesson plan, but the business model.

Why are states relying on early 20th century manufacturing technology for 21st century education?

States are going broke, right? They’re laying off teachers, increasing class sizes, looking to save money wherever they can. But they’re still centralizing lesson plans, still teaching kids in ways Horace Mann would recognize.

There’s your insanity.

If Texas wants to teach kids lies, fine — become AngloMexicana if you want. But that doesn’t mean Rhode Island has to follow suit, does it?

California has an open source textbook project, but this is becoming a real industry, and Texas has opened the entire K-12 market to this kind of innovation.

Flat World Knowledge, for instance,  gives away textbooks, in the form of PDF files. You can print them for a base fee, you can get additional materials as well, and you can work a lot more closely with the author than you can with the old model.

Imagine what a company like that could do in K-12 where the orders are bigger, the books simpler, and the cash flow more certain?

Best of all, their business model lets authors make money even while it gives educators unbelievable bargains. Which means states can have their own standards, and in places with real federalism so can individual school districts.

Texas has created an enormous opportunity for states, for communities, for publishers, and for authors to use open source and mass customization to transform education, just as those savings are most needed.

Will anyone seize the chance my old friend David Bradley is giving them?

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Topics

Dana Blankenhorn has been a business journalist for 30 years, a tech freelancer since 1983.

Disclosure

Dana Blankenhorn

Dana Blankenhorn has been a journalist, writer and part-time futurist for over 30 years.

At the present moment I run only a personal blog in addition to my ZDNet open source blog.

DanaBlankenhorn.Com has the subtitle The War Against Oil. In the past I have used it to write about political history, e-commerce, personal matters, some ideas related to open source, and The World of Always On, which is the idea of using sensors, motes and RFID to turn WiFi links into platforms for applications which live in the air.

My IRA account at Schwab holds a few tech shares, most notably some Intel and Applied Materials, but there are no open source companies in it. I don’t even own any CBS stock.

Biography

Dana Blankenhorn

Dana Blankenhorn has been a business journalist for nearly 25 years and has covered the online world professionally since 1985. He founded the Interactive Age Daily for CMP Media, and has written for the Chicago Tribune, Advertising Age's "NetMarketing" supplement, and dozens of other publications over the years.

34
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

RE: Texas moves emphasize need to open source education
gorians Updated - 2nd Sep
for communities, for publishers, and for about it is bank that website attacked from the site support from any soldier site to the light homepage is great authors
Its what conservatives like me have been telling people for years. I happen to like the changes in Texas text books, but there will come a day, just as it has for liberals, when a government will be elected that will make changes I don't agree with. Better, therefore, to get education out of the hands of Government so that we have choice.

Education is too important to be left to Government Bureaucrats and Elected Officials. Get the Government out of the education business.
0 Votes
+ -
Privatized schools?
crazydanr@... 25th May 2010
@shollomon
You think a for-profit corporation is going to provide better schooling? I'll be the first to admit, trusting the government is not a good idea. But the idea that the private sector will fix the ills of the nation... well, look at Wall street, Halliburton, et al. That's not working out so well.
0 Votes
+ -
Hey Socialist, ok, yea right
jznoy-dallas 25th May 2010
The fastest growing universities (Phoenix and Kaplan) are private and web-based. They have less statutes/unions/tape to follow so they are more fluid in executing a cheap yet effective program.
0 Votes
+ -
Phoenix? Yeah, right!
djchandler Updated - 26th May 2010
@jznoy-dallas
Yeah, Phoenix, there's a great paragon of education for you, with high default rates for tuition loans due in part to high tuition and also in part to lack of accreditation for some programs. They may give you some kind of education, but it's not worth what people are paying. And the guy running that whole organization didn't even attend any college. See the piece PBS's Frontline (College, Inc., May. 4, 2010 ) did on Phoenix and other organizations following that model. I certainly can't bring myself to call them "institutions." I hope my grand-children get a better opportunity than what they offer.

Their programs are not cheap and the model would not work at all if not for government-subsidized student grants and loans. Yeah, these jokers are laughing all the way to the bank while students and taxpayers are left holding the bag.

Obviously you have zero appreciation for the labor movement. How cushy would your job be if not for labor laws that became necessary to protect workers, forged by the blood and sweat of workers that had to fight for labor reform? I am no socialist, but I know history. Did they revise that at your university too?
0 Votes
+ -
Texas has created an enormous opportunity for states, for communities, for publishers, and for authors to use open source and mass customization to transform education, just as those savings are most needed. a b c d e f g h i j
0 Votes
+ -
for communities, for publishers, and for about it is bank that website attacked from the site support from any soldier site to the light homepage is great authors
0 Votes
+ -
@shollomon I'm not arguing about government involvement in the schools. America's strength as a nation is built on its mass education of youth. But governments of all sizes should be able to make their own decisions, and not have them made for them by others simply because they're too lazy to challenge old, outdated business models.
0 Votes
+ -
You, sir, are not a conservative.
djchandler 26th May 2010
@shollomon You are a reactionary. You want good educations to only be available to those able to pay for them. Perhaps you would like a return to the feudal system, slavery and the Dark Ages as well.

Locally controlled public eduction is the backbone of this country's educational system. It provides a resource of skilled individuals that made America the great nation it was and can be again. Education is not a business. And an educated pubic is a resource we should foster and treasure.
0 Votes
+ -
and not just in history either but in all facets of the socialist left agenda. and its not just the "silly" kids that believe it because it continues throughout college, and it continues in the mainstream media new. tv. and movies. Texas might have a couple minor places where it tightropes the line but on balance its far far better than what they replaced.
0 Votes
+ -
@Johnny Vegas You can't have your own facts. You can have your own opinions but not your own facts. You can't call evolution "just a theory" and put the Flintstones against them as an alternate theory. And you can't teach a history the rest of society denies because all your smart children will laugh at you.

Hate to break it to you, but the Texas history books just approved look an awful lot like what was taught in the 1950s, and you know what that led to. Dope, sex, rock and-or roll, long hair, and (gas) Bob Segar.
0 Votes
+ -
@DanaBlankenhorn
Fact: Evolution is a theory. Your opinion is that it is true.
Fact: History is what really happened, despite the denial (or concurrence) of society.
The state has the power to teach facts or opinions. In fact, many governments teach opinions. If we can't force the state to teach facts, I'd prefer they'd err toward my opinions, as you've already shown you also would.
0 Votes
+ -
Shocked that I almost agree
John J. Jordan 25th May 2010
I completely agree that the use of large bound text books is ridiculous and antiquated way to teach kids. These books and study guides for these books should all be available online. This is a prime example of how technology can be used to reduce costs to school systems.

I am not sure why this is an open source issue. Publisher's will still control their content. However because the content is now online they could allow participating school system pick and choose what material is part of their curriculum. So if a school system wants to strike references to certain historical figures they could select the portions of the material that best suit their needs.

Right now teachers teach to a standard that is set by the states and the feds. so there is a core curriculum that they just have to teach. The rest can be customized to meet the requirements of the local community.
0 Votes
+ -
@John J. Jordan Interesting point about who controls the content. You say "publishers will continue to." But they don't under the present Texas system. My friend David Bradley does.

There is no longer any loss of efficiency in having local authorities control what texts will be used. The only state function should be grading the results, not determining what's an historical fact.

The key root to the word history is story.
0 Votes
+ -
I tend to agree
itpro_z 25th May 2010
Not with your usual Leftist drivel of course, just the idea that textbooks and our entire educational system is outdated. Why do states continue to spend vast amounts of money on antiquated textbooks? Because the textbook industry has a very powerful lobby, powerful enough to get laws passed in almost every state mandating that a large portion of the money dedicated to education MUST be spent on textbooks. Not technology, not ebooks, old fashioned textbooks, and anyone who has been to college in recent years knows how much textbooks cost these days. Those of you with kids should know that their backpack has over $1000 dollars worth of books inside.

In order to change the system we must first change the laws. Eliminate the requirement that money must be spent on textbooks and allow school districts to begin modernizing. Of course, this will take time. Don't expect to see the kids come home with tablets instead of a bag full of books anytime soon.
0 Votes
+ -
@itpro_z Even if there's libruls on the Internets? And pron! And cats whut haz cheezeburgers!
0 Votes
+ -
@DanaBlankenhorn

And to think ZDNet pays you for this kind of nonsense? Typical liberal reaction when they don't like the fact that someone disagrees with their fantasy world.
0 Votes
+ -
@itpro_z LOL!! you sound pretty LEFTIST to me! What are YOU if not LEFTIST with these comments?
0 Votes
+ -
Meddling
sboverie 25th May 2010
The Texas school board slanted the suggested schooling a long way because they are convinced that the liberals slanted the facts for so long. This is a problem with having partisans setting the adgenda for schools.

It is shameful that the class rooms have to become a source of propaganda (from either the left or right) when our schools are failing to prepare the children to become productive members of our future.

The idea that the text books can be open sourced is probably the better way to eliminate the slanted material. It helps to keep from passing ignorance and opinion as facts to those who haven't learned enought to think for themselves.

What happened to the concept of the literacy rate of a nation to show its stature as a nation? This was the big reason for opening schools up so that even the poorest child can have an opportunity for their future. Why would we want to go back to being a stratified society with rigid and unbreakable boundaries between the well to do and those in dire poverty?
0 Votes
+ -
I do wonder sometimes about local control
DanaBlankenhorn 25th May 2010
@sboverie@... This is really a business post, not a political one. The Texas program had a business case to make 20 years ago -- it was more efficient to have one central authority then. But now we have PCs and iPads and the Internets and the economic cost of local control is negligible.
0 Votes
+ -
With tablets appearing to get a jump start (iPad, followed by hopefully many competitors), perhaps the printed book will become a more rare beast.

The ability to check facts across many sources may settle the "Bias" and "agenda" charges from both sides and re-focus the material on education.

Time will tell.
@woot!
Really, you think the solution is to pay for an ipad for every kid who would probably break or lose one every other week. How is that saving you money.
@rengek

Didn't say to buy an iPad, just that tablets were starting to come into their own. Competition should bring innovation, etc.

Perhaps even drive the cost down to the point where they become feasible alternatives.

Today they are not ready for school (maybe university).
0 Votes
+ -
@woot! Lots of enabling technology is cheap. You don't need iPads. You can offer Netbooks. And Internet connectivity should be everywhere, although the SBOE might just bowdlerize that beyond all recognition.
@DanaBlankenhorn
I'm in agreement - though I think the tablet form factor may actually be better in some regards (for replacing print media) than a net book or notebook.

I see some of the emerging technologies to be very interesting and may serve more of an impetus than some of the current devices.

The bottom line, is technology can solve some of the issues by providing multiple sources of information in real or near real time.

You still have governance issues and material suitability questions, but those are better issues to deal with, IMNSHO.
0 Votes
+ -
Please tell me Dana, what specifically you disagree with when it comes to what the Texas school board decided. You build straw men and then destroy them, but we all can create something easy to destroy. Speak of specifics and then we can have a real debate.
0 Votes
+ -
@mrissman1@... This was not a political post. It's not about the specifics of what David & Co. did. It's about the whole idea of mandating a single textbook across the state and having that become the textbook used across the country, which is 19th century. You may have noticed this is the 21st century.
0 Votes
+ -
Texas State can't get half their professors to utilize the Online portal we already have. There are going to be schools that embrace technology and those that don't. Until schools mandate that e-texts be used, it won't happen. I've used a tablet and E-texts for the last 5 years, and it has allowed me to become a much more organized student, that has much more ready access to information than my co-students. It's a no-brainer that befuddles me as to why it hasn't been implemented sooner.
0 Votes
+ -
@MurphysLaww Well if you want to mandate something, mandate that. Don't mandate the lesson plan and then have that plan created by politicians like David Bradley, who did one year at Texas A&M and then dropped out.
0 Votes
+ -
Texas' move
djchandler 26th May 2010
It's a move to undermine and render public education irrelevant, whether intended or not. Hopefully most local and other state's school boards will see through this hokum.

Remember the Kansas State School Board attempt to get Intelligent Design into the curriculum? That failed then, as this move by the Texas State School Board is doomed to fail as well.

The accrediting bodies should strip any Texas schools adopting this curriculum based on these text books of their accreditation immediately.
0 Votes
+ -
@JimboNobody
Evolution is not a theory (ask any animal breeder!)
"Evolution by natural selection" is the theory and there may be other theories as to why evolution happens but they are all attempts to explain why - not if.
Your theory might be "Evolution by divine guidance" but it's still evolution.
0 Votes
+ -
@JimboNobody re: "Johnny can't have his own facts, but you can?"

It never ceases to amaze me at the complete, ok, sometimes less than complete, lack of rigorousness and intellectual honesty and basic educational achievement as demonstrated by true believers like you.

Not only is Evolution in fact a Theory, as you correctly point out, it also in fact is a Fact.

Yet, you are so narrow minded, and so caught up in making sound bites, and so pleased with yourself for turning a phrase, that you think that if a thing, concept, telling of history, etc., is a Theory that is then mutually exclusive - and a priori counter evidence - of it being a Fact.

That is not just explicitly flawed and incorrect; it is implicitly not logical and not correct.

A concept, a telling of history, what have you, can be BOTH a THEORY and A FACT, as EVOLUTION is.

Once a Theory gains general acceptance OVER TIME, and after MANY SCIENTIFIC CHALLENGES, in a particular community of SCIENTIFIC endeavor, that Theory has then through EVIDENCE crossed over into the realm of FACT, not simply opinion about it being a fact or not a fact.

So, as an example Mr. JimboNobody, and that is truly a fitting moniker for you, when Einstein developed his Theory of General Relativity, his Theory at that time allowed one to make certain predictions about REALITY by following its reasoning, and by logically extrapolating it's claims, and yet, at that time, the instruments and approaches for measuring whether these predictions as predicated upon, and as logical extrapolations of, The Theory did not exist, and so it remained "a Theory" as far as the relevant community of scientists were concerned.

Once the instruments came into being, Red Shift, as well as other naturally occurring phenomena, that would prove the Fact of the Theory, could be measured and the Theory became accepted as Fact based on EVIDENCE.

So, The Theory of General Relativity is BOTH a Theory and a Fact.

The sad and frustrating thing is that what I believe about evolution, or Texas' insanity when it comes to what they choose to lie to their children about, is not even at issue here, what is at issue is YOUR, along with people just like YOU, inability to put forth any kind of reasoned, consistent, and evidence based OPINION of any kind worthy of rigorous discussion and dialogue.
0 Votes
+ -
Hopefully positive criticism:
Based on the lack of content in this article, I could just as easily written a clearly negative article about how open source has FAILED Texas school systems, or WASTED their time in place of more productive things. It wouldn't even take more than a few minutes to put it together, how open source has failed in the Texas school system/s and districts.
It's interesting how anyone found anything to say about the article and to do so, had to also have had a fair knowledge of it before hand. I realize the idea is to generate converstation, but jeez, there's nothing there to really discuss without being the one to insert the content, and then argue for/against t.

Not very useful or informative for a person like me who doesn't already KNOW what it is Texas had done. Lot of alleged results are mentioned, but almost nothing about precisely WHAT it was that achieved those lauded goals other then a vague "open source". Not even any useful links about the subject beyond rhetorical or historical; just that "open source" did it. HOW did open source do it? WHERE was it implemented to do it? And so on.
Johnny Vegas has more facts than most media outlets.

Here are some FACTS:
Thomas Jefferson's influence was never removed from the TEKS; that was a lie spread by the media and Texas Freedom Network to serve their own purposes.

FACT: Thomas Jefferson has always been mentioned in numerous places in the new Social Studies TEKS:
(1) Fifth-grade students will study Thomas Jefferson and his contributions during the American Revolution.
(2) Eighth-grade students will be learning about the history of the United States from the early Colonial Period through Reconstruction, including the study of Thomas Jefferson and the contributions he made to our nation.
(3) High school students who take U.S. Government will "identify significant individuals in the field of government and politics" and will also study Thomas Jefferson.

FACT: The Board voted to make sure that students are taught about the various philosophers whose writings influenced our forefathers to establish a Constitutional Republic. When Ben Franklin left the Constitutional Convention, he said "We have a Republic if we can keep it." Now the term Constitutional Republic is used consistently throughout the new TEKS standards. One board member tried to change the words "Constitutional Republic" to "Democratic society," but the motion failed.

To teach that the US is a "Democratic society" would be the lie; the United States of America is, and always has been, a Federal Constitutional Republic, and it's about time we started teaching the truth.

FACT: One member actually tried to remove references to Confederate generals friom the Texas History standards , but it was explained to him that there were no Union generals from Texas and that students needed to study the Civil War and Reconstruction. The motion failed.

FACT: we have placed stronger emphasis on key historical documents such as the Declaration of Independence and Constitution. Students will learn the liberties and responsibilities guaranteed by each amendment in the Bill of Rights.

FACT: The new Social Studies TEKS include more minority representation than ever before.
0 Votes
+ -
Great!!! thanks for sharing this information to us!
sesli sohbet sesli chat

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix