Linux and Open Source
Dana Blankenhorn & Paula RooneyThe war is over and Linux won
Summary
The truth of the assertion is in a chart near the back of the report. It shows that 83% of companies expect to support new workloads on Linux next year, against 23% for Windows. The move is slower for larger enterprises, but the direction is clear.
Topics
Blogger Info
Dana Blankenhorn
Biography
Dana Blankenhorn
Dana Blankenhorn has been a business journalist for nearly 25 years and has covered the online world professionally since 1985. He founded the Interactive Age Daily for CMP Media, and has written for the Chicago Tribune, Advertising Age's "NetMarketing" supplement, and dozens of other publications over the years.
Paula Rooney
Biography
Paula Rooney
Paula Rooney has covered the technology industry for more than 15 years, starting with semiconductor design and mini-computer systems at EDN News and later focused on PC software companies including Microsoft, Lotus, Oracle, Red Hat, Novell and other open source and commercial software companies for CRN and PCWeek. She received a silver award from the American Society of Business Publication Editors in 2005 for her profile on Linus Torvalds and edited and co-authored "Partnering With Microsoft," a book about Microsoft's channel published by CMP Publishing in 2004. Rooney graduated from the Columbia University Graduate School of Journalism in 1997. In her off time, she enjoys scuba diving, sailing, sun worshipping, running and reading. She resides on the shores of Scituate, Massachusetts.
A new IBM-sponsored study on Linux sent me by Joe McKendrick, our SOA expert, goes a long way toward explaining the big Oracle and Microsoft moves regarding Linux.
The war is over and Linux won. (The original Linux penguin was created by Larry Ewing. This particular bird lives at the LWN Penguin Gallery.)
The truth of the assertion is in a chart near the back of the report. It shows that 83% of companies expect to support new workloads on Linux next year, against 23% for Windows. The move is slower for larger enterprises, but the direction is clear.
At least in the server world, Linux has won.
Web servers and database servers remain the dominant applications, but development environments are now among the most popular systems in production, meaning the trend toward Linux and open source applications should accelerate.
Over two-thirds of the respondents said they will increase their use of Linux in the next year, and almost no one said the opposite.
So if Microsoft is doing a slow take-over of Novell, and Oracle is bringing out its own stack, these are understandable defensive moves, a re-arrangement of forces if you will. Because the war is over and Linux won. And in business that means it's on to the next war.
Dana Blankenhorn has been a business journalist for 30 years, a tech freelancer since 1983.
Disclosure
Dana Blankenhorn
Dana Blankenhorn has been a journalist, writer and part-time futurist for over 30 years.
At the present moment I run only a personal blog in addition to my ZDNet open source blog.
DanaBlankenhorn.Com has the subtitle The War Against Oil. In the past I have used it to write about political history, e-commerce, personal matters, some ideas related to open source, and The World of Always On, which is the idea of using sensors, motes and RFID to turn WiFi links into platforms for applications which live in the air.
My IRA account at Schwab holds a few tech shares, most notably some Intel and Applied Materials, but there are no open source companies in it. I don’t even own any CBS stock.
Biography
Dana Blankenhorn
Dana Blankenhorn has been a business journalist for nearly 25 years and has covered the online world professionally since 1985. He founded the Interactive Age Daily for CMP Media, and has written for the Chicago Tribune, Advertising Age's "NetMarketing" supplement, and dozens of other publications over the years.
More from “Linux and Open Source”
Related Discussions on TechRepublic
Did you know you can take part in these discussions with your ZDNet membership?Talkback Most Recent of 100 Talkback(s)
-
Biting the HAND that FUDs you
That just can't be. Why, we've seen countless studies that prove that Linux is vastly more expensive, less reliable, etc. in the server room than Microsoft's offerings. These companies only think they're saving money.
That, or they've figured out that someone is lying to them.
Next thing you know, they might start wondering if the Received Wisdom might be wrong about the desktop, too.
Yagotta B. Kidding11/09/2006 06:18 AM -
Yagotta, you're so funny
You mean MS funded studies? Stop sobbing about reality.
nizuse11/09/2006 06:52 AM -
Relax. Don't be disconcerted.
The world continues just as you've always known it.
Linux server growth has already slowed into the single digits. Microsoft server sales are already greater than Office sales. Linux servers replace only Unix servers, and Microsoft server sales will surpass those for the combination of Linux and Unix soon enough.
Microsoft has obtained the expertise and assistance of SuSE in creating the migration tools that will ease the Linux to Windows transition. The path was already marked out.
Linux to Windows will soon be far easier than Unix to Windows has ever been. And companies can't wait for their chance to leap into the future.
So curb your impatience. Linux and the rest of op-en source peaked awhile ago. They'll recede soon enough. Not everything has to happen in internet time frames.
Anton Philidor11/09/2006 08:29 AM -
In what world?
"Linux server growth has already slowed into the single digits."
Yet Red Hat experienced 52% revenue growth last qtr over
previous qtr.
Novell's Linux revenue growth is also greater than MS's.
"Microsoft server sales are already greater than Office sales."
I'm sorry, link please! MS's "Microsoft Business Division" revenue
is significantly greater than "Server and Tools". Revenue growth
for the later being largely SQL Server. Add MS margins on their
server divisions are tiny compared to Office and windows and
the scenario isn't as rosy as it has been attempted to have been
painted.
"Linux servers replace only Unix servers, and Microsoft server
sales will surpass those for the combination of Linux and Unix
soon enough."
Can't agree (and neither does the survey data). Linux is picking
up new business, business that might have gone to windows.
"Microsoft has obtained the expertise and assistance of SuSE in
creating the migration tools that will ease the Linux to Windows
transition."
Sorry didn't read this in the announcements. Link please.
Linux is the fastest growing OS in server and embedded spaces.
Only in desktop is it not making significant gains - but neither is
MS having 95% of the market already. Welcome to the real world.
Richard Flude11/09/2006 04:00 PM -
I suppose you live in Mars
Here is the Linux growth in single digits
http://blogs.zdnet.com/ITFacts/?p=11637
Here is Windows growth in double digits
http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/press/2006/oct06/10-26Q1FY07ERPR.mspx
If you feel that you need another source
http://www.itjungle.com/two/two110106-story02.html
"Linux servers replace only Unix servers, and Microsoft server
sales will surpass those for the combination of Linux and Unix
soon enough."
Your reply being - "Can't agree (and neither does the survey data). Linux is picking
up new business, business that might have gone to windows."
A 2005 article but do a search and you'll find plenty of articles
http://www.informationweek.com/windows/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=180206407&subSection=Product%20News
One important aspect to note is Windows Server sales is in 3-4 billion range (thats just the revenue from the Windows OS).
Whereas Linux Server revenue is $5billion which means that the hardware is included in the total. If you included Windows server revenue, it will be a lot lot more.
"Linux is the fastest growing OS in server and embedded spaces."
When Linux is having single digit growth and Windows having double digit your claim is ridiculous.
Embedded space, sure Linux is used in areas where there is no Windows representation. In areas where Windows has a presence there is plenty of competition. In no area is Linux the leader where Windows has a presence.
zzz123456789011/09/2006 07:32 PM -
You two aren't on the same page
In terms of revenue, MS wins that battle hands down. In terms of server deployment growth rate year over year, Linux is way ahead of Windows.
Also, your second link is valid, but not really relevant. It states that the profit MS received from server sales was up 17% (which means they increased their margin), however, MS server sales growth was only in the 3-5% range.
http://www.linuxelectrons.com/News/Hardware/Linux_Continues_to_Lead_Server_Market_Growth
"Linux servers and Windows servers continued to grow unit shipments at double-digit rates, but revenue growth for both types of servers moderated to single-digit growth,"
Again, with Linux, you can't only measure revenue, since as often as not, the server going live was downloaded free or as allowed, that one RedhatEnterprise CD was installed on 20 servers, support no longer needed now that the IT group is completely up to speed.
In any case, you two weren't arguing about the same thing.
TripleII
TripleII11/09/2006 10:00 PM -
Apples and Horse apples
Here is the Linux growth in single digits
http://blogs.zdnet.com/ITFacts/?p=11637
You really shouldn't have given a link. Linux growth was 6.1%, overall server sales were 0.6%, and Microsoft's growth was 3.1%.
If that indicates that Linux is running out of steam, Microsoft is on life support.
Here is Windows growth in double digits
http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/press/2006/oct06/10-26Q1FY07ERPR.mspx
That doesn't say anything about server sales.
The rest of your post is predicated on that -- a Microsoft sales division (which among other things gets support money from SQL Server users) vs. an IDC sales report.
Since the IDC report did make the direct comparisons, I wonder why you chose not to use their Microsoft results?
Yagotta B. Kidding11/10/2006 04:40 AM -
I award you the Ou Medal....
... for statistical comparison. Defconvegas has won this distinguished award for comparing Linux stats from last January with MS stats from last month.
Hint - try and compare things in the same time period to even out seasonal variation. That way you're more likely to be comparing like with like.
bportlock11/10/2006 10:15 AM -
With hairy palm cluster
Defconvegas has won this distinguished award for comparing Linux stats from last January with MS stats from last month.
You missed the fact that he jerked the MS numbers from their divisional quarterlies (with lots of other stuff mixed in) while blindly ignoring the IDC numbers that were directly comparable (in the same report as the Linux ones he cites.)
Yagotta B. Kidding11/10/2006 02:40 PM -
How many more hints do you need....
"It is better to keep your mouth closed and let people think you are a fool than to open it and remove all doubt." -- Mark Twain ..
barstewards11/10/2006 01:08 PM -
Quote sources, please??
Could you quote your sources for Linux "not making significant gains" on the desktop?
I was only aware of tracking of OSes by a few servers, based upon the logs, many of which report MS when the user OS is GNU/Linux and, because perhaps, ~90% of all Linux installs are from freely downloaded CDrom images, there are only sales figures for Microsoft sales of desktop installs.
Actually, in the two clubs which I know set up schools, churches, charities, businesses, and children's computers, over 2,000 switches from Linux are made, annually, with no reports to anyone.
The Indiana State Public Schools' switch of 300,000 student computers to GNU/Linux, starting with the first 20,000 last week, are un-reported to anyone except the media.
Same with the 480,000 desktop systems of IBM, purported to being changed to GNU/Linux starting after Microsoft demanded the entire future year upgrades be paid prior to October 1, 2005.
I propose that the stats on desktop use of GNU/Linux are extremely under-reported.
Anyway, all the 'quotes' of desktop use of OSes by 'for-profit' multiple convicted FELON MS are total vapor, unless I see some accurate stats by bonded third parties who are NOT paid for by Ms!
pberry26@...11/10/2006 04:24 PM -
I can't
"Could you quote your sources for Linux "not making significant
gains" on the desktop?"
except the lack of any data that supports Linux is making
significant desktop gains.
I'm involved in enterprise environments so my experience may
be skewed but as yet I'm not seeing significant Linux desktop
gains - though I'm following closely large scale projects
overseas (Munich, IBM and Novell).
Now this is not to say there are no Linux desktop deployments,
or that there isn't demand for Linux desktops (I believe there is
particularly for Terminal Servers), all I'm saying is compared to
the total install desktop base Linux has not made significant
gains (the one OS market where Linux has yet to make a
significant impact).
Richard Flude11/12/2006 02:54 PM -
Exactly
no one will know how many people switcvhed over to linux Until Microsoft is gone,
and DON'T ANY OF YOU THAT ARE HIRED BY MICROSOFT TO SAY OTHERWISE SAY
OTHERWISE!!!
Graham Fluet12/07/2006 03:19 PM -
Not to mention that one free download can be installed hundreds of times
Which is why it is near possible to get a real time comparison.
For instance I have downloaded 3 versions of Ubuntu Linux so that counts as 3 installs. But in reality it is 90 installs.
How can you track the Linux level? You can't.
We will know when Microsoft starts acting scared of Linux. Since they have already done that, Linux is winning the battles in the fight.
One day just like the servers, you will wake up and find everyone is dumping Windows for Linux.
slim-0112/07/2006 05:15 PM -
The rest of the story
Linux server growth has already slowed into the single digits.
In a period when net server sales growth (including Microsoft's) were negative.
Microsoft server sales are already greater than Office sales.
That's because the "server sales" cited is the sales of full-up systems loaded with MS software, not just the licenses.
Linux servers replace only Unix servers
Actually, the last study I saw showed that 44% of Linux replacement sales went to replacing Microsoft boxes. Most of the growth is in new units.
Microsoft server sales will surpass those for the combination of Linux and Unix soon enough.
Not according to the relative growth rates -- Linux growth in absolute numbers is greater than Microsoft's.
Microsoft has obtained the expertise and assistance of SuSE in creating the migration tools that will ease the Linux to Windows transition.
Microsoft was claiming to be POSIX compliant more than a decade ago. Do you mean that they fraudulently claimed that in order to qualify for Federal purchasing? In any case, SuSE has no special expertise there.
Yagotta B. Kidding11/10/2006 04:28 AM
Talkback - Tell Us What You Think
Get it the way you want it
ZDNet Newsletters
Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox
Blog Roll
- All About Microsoft
- The Apple Core
- Between the Lines
- BriefingsDirect
- Collaboration 2.0
- Dev Connection
- A Developer's View
- Digital Cameras & Camcorders
- Ed Bott's Microsoft Report
- Emerging Tech
- Enterprise Web 2.0
- Five Nines: The Next Gen Datacenter
- Forrester Research
- Googling Google
- GreenTech Pastures
- Hardware 2.0
- Home Theater
- iGeneration
- India IT
- Irregular Enterprise
- IT Project Failures
- Laptops & Desktops
- Lawgarithms
- Linux and Open Source
- Managing L'unix
- The Mobile Gadgeteer
- On Sustainability
- The Semantic Web
- Service Oriented
- Smartphones and Cell Phones
- Social Business
- Social CRM: The Conversation
- Software & Services Safari
- Software as Services
- Storage Bits
- Team Think
- Tech Broiler
- Tom Foremski: IMHO
- The ToyBox
- Virtually Speaking
- The Web Life
- ZDNet Education
- ZDNet Government
- ZDNet Healthcare
- Zero Day
Blog Archive
White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
- 10 Dying IT SkillsThere are some things in life, like good manners, which never go out of ... (Global Knowledge) Download Now
- 77 Features for Windows 7 that Every IT Professional Should Know AboutWindows 7 builds on Windows Vista's positives and eliminates many of the ... (Global Knowledge) Download Now
- 2010 IT Skills & Salary ReportAre you wondering how your salary compares to your colleagues? Or how ... (Global Knowledge) Download Now




