ie8 fix

Linux and Open Source

Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols & Paula Rooney

Where Microsoft is gaining in open source

By | November 18, 2009, 6:52am PST

Summary: Microsoft licenses are now used on 1 in every 40 open source projects. That’s more than Mozilla. More than Eclipse. More than even the Lesser GPL.

The latest Black Duck Software figures on open source license popularity make it clear.

Microsoft is gaining.

(The little black duck shown is copyrighted, trademarked, and has always been protected by Warner Bros., part of the Time-Warner media empire. He’s 72 but carries his age well. And Wikipedia knows his middle name.)

Microsoft licenses are now used on 1 in every 40 open source projects. That’s more than Mozilla. More than Eclipse. More than even the Lesser GPL.

Of course in the greater scheme of things 1 in 40 isn’t all that many. Nearly half of all open source projects are still licensed under the GPL v.2. Microsoft’s open source license market share is still less than half that of GPL v.3. (That’s why the cartoon duck is here rather than Black Duck’s little quacker. Think of GPL v.2 as being Bugs Bunny.)

But we’re talking about growing from a standing start. I’m impressed.

Much credit needs to go here to CodePlex, the Microsoft-sponsored open source site whose Foundation is headed by former Microsoft executive Sam Ramji.

NOTE: Ramji runs the Codeplex Foundation at codeplex.org, which is separate from Microsoft. The main Codeplex site is at codeplex.com.

In our recent interview, Ramji held out the possibility that the Microsoft licenses, and process, could tease a lot more code out of corporate repositories outside the software industry.

So there is room for growth there.

The Black Duck report also indicates there is room for growth in GPL v.3. There are now over 10,000 projects on GPL v.3, with many projects on Sourceforge continuing to switch over.

It’s this competition, between the Microsoft licenses and GPL v.3, that I will enjoy tracking most over the next year. What will you be looking at?

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Topics

Dana Blankenhorn has been a business journalist for 30 years, a tech freelancer since 1983.

Disclosure

Dana Blankenhorn

Dana Blankenhorn has been a journalist, writer and part-time futurist for over 30 years.

At the present moment I run only a personal blog in addition to my ZDNet open source blog.

DanaBlankenhorn.Com has the subtitle The War Against Oil. In the past I have used it to write about political history, e-commerce, personal matters, some ideas related to open source, and The World of Always On, which is the idea of using sensors, motes and RFID to turn WiFi links into platforms for applications which live in the air.

My IRA account at Schwab holds a few tech shares, most notably some Intel and Applied Materials, but there are no open source companies in it. I don’t even own any CBS stock.

Biography

Dana Blankenhorn

Dana Blankenhorn has been a business journalist for nearly 25 years and has covered the online world professionally since 1985. He founded the Interactive Age Daily for CMP Media, and has written for the Chicago Tribune, Advertising Age's "NetMarketing" supplement, and dozens of other publications over the years.

4
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

Yes MS strength is ...
CrashPad 18th Nov 2009
the people recruited and allowed to expand their own skills. Remember MS was not versed in the software patent early in their developement. Software patent came to prevalence after folks started to sue MS for infringing on their propeties. You freelancer might not like it, but the majority of folks dont even care that protection is there.
0 Votes
+ -
Grasping at Petents & Scare tactics
linux_kernel 18th Nov 2009
MS has one leg = Patents without them they are history.
0 Votes
+ -
I must respectfully disagree
DanaBlankenhorn 18th Nov 2009
Don't forget the CEO's mantra -- developers, developers, developers (repeat).
0 Votes
+ -
Yes MS strength is ...
CrashPad 18th Nov 2009
the people recruited and allowed to expand their own skills. Remember MS was not versed in the software patent early in their developement. Software patent came to prevalence after folks started to sue MS for infringing on their propeties. You freelancer might not like it, but the majority of folks dont even care that protection is there.
0 Votes
+ -
gaining???
Linux Geek 18th Nov 2009
Who else beside M$ uses a M$ license?
Opening up failed useless M$ projects is not going to dent real OSS projects.

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix