Linux and Open Source

Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols & Paula Rooney

Who will pay to fix the Internet's Interstates?

By | May 15, 2009, 8:23am PDT

Summary: Everything we do online — downloading open source, running SaaS services, clouds, or simply reading this page — depends on core services, which have become an essential utility. Those services need to be redundant, they need to keep scaling, and they thus will need continuing investment. Just like the Interstate system.

Google has taken the hit for yesterday’s Googlesplat. (Picture from the National Institutes of Standards and Technology.)

“Sherlock” Dignan had earlier fingered AT&T, which along with Verizon’s MCI carries most of the Internet core’s traffic. AT&T insists it’s entirely a Googlefail.

Sources are telling our Sam Diaz that this has a lot of people rethinking their cloud strategies. SaaS planning will also take a hit.

Google planned for its growth carefully, and probably has more inter-city fiber capacity than any other IP service out there, more than some big ISPs.

Most of us are not so independent of the core. Google’s problems are also proof that, even if you build independence into your business strategy, you can still run into problems.

Core Internet services, most delivered over fiber cable and optical switches, are the Interstate highway of today’s Internet. Thanks to what I call Moore’s Law of Fiber (and technical types call wavelength division multiplexing), the cost to move these bits keeps declining.  

But this transport remains an essential service, and with prices continually dropping this service is in fewer-and-fewer hands. Profitability is also low, especially compared to licensed cellular, where service providers gain control of the content they transfer.

Right now core services are at the heart of their useful life. Costs of current deployments are bound to rise as systems age — that’s why the old bathtub curve tops this post.

We are heading for a crisis, and if this little outage wakes us up to that fact it’s a very good thing.

Everything we do online — downloading open source, running SaaS services, clouds, or simply reading this page — depends on core services, which have become an essential utility.

Those services need to be redundant, they need to keep scaling, and they thus will need continuing investment. Just like the Interstate system.

Now there are two ways to fix the Interstates. We can share the cost and treat them as public utilities. Or we can sell them off as toll roads and pay for them as they’re used, along with ample profit to the operator.

There is a lot of debate right now over whether the Interstates should become toll roads, but it’s important to note that core Internet services already are. That model generally works well, today.

But for how long?

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Topics

Dana Blankenhorn has been a business journalist for 30 years, a tech freelancer since 1983.

Disclosure

Dana Blankenhorn

Dana Blankenhorn has been a journalist, writer and part-time futurist for over 30 years.

At the present moment I run only a personal blog in addition to my ZDNet open source blog.

DanaBlankenhorn.Com has the subtitle The War Against Oil. In the past I have used it to write about political history, e-commerce, personal matters, some ideas related to open source, and The World of Always On, which is the idea of using sensors, motes and RFID to turn WiFi links into platforms for applications which live in the air.

My IRA account at Schwab holds a few tech shares, most notably some Intel and Applied Materials, but there are no open source companies in it. I don’t even own any CBS stock.

Biography

Dana Blankenhorn

Dana Blankenhorn has been a business journalist for nearly 25 years and has covered the online world professionally since 1985. He founded the Interactive Age Daily for CMP Media, and has written for the Chicago Tribune, Advertising Age's "NetMarketing" supplement, and dozens of other publications over the years.

13
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

RE: Who will pay to fix the Internet's Interstates?
twaynesdomain 21st May 2009
Let new infrastructures grow; leave the "information highway" alone to grow and prosper on its own purposes and for which it was designed. In other words, let them build their own "internet". Leave mine alone.
0 Votes
+ -
Obama will print more money....
Christian_<>< 15th May 2009
nt
0 Votes
+ -
Now, Now ...
MisterMiester 15th May 2009
Bernanke is the one that has control of the printing presses since the Federal Reserve is a separate entity from the Federal Government, sort of like Federal Express is not part of the United States Postal Services.

Like his predecessor, Alan Greenspan, Bernanke has a tendency to "fire up" the printing presses for all sorts of nasty stuff that the United States Government tends to finance regardless of political party.
0 Votes
+ -
You're fooling yourself, or perhaps you just drank the Obama kool aid, if you think King Obama isn't controlling everything that is going on right now.
Obama = USSA
0 Votes
+ -
You're in the wrong thread, bucko
DanaBlankenhorn 15th May 2009
Anyway, your side lost, and as Jon Stewart says,
defeat is supposed to taste like a s%*@#
sandwich.

If a majority are convinced to go another way,
then policy will go that way. Try to convince
people that you're right rather than call a
popular President by vile names. It does your
cause no good.
0 Votes
+ -
Now wait a minute.
wolf_z 16th May 2009
"Try to convince people that you're right rather than call a popular President by vile names

I'm not fond of President Obama, but from what I read of the post you responded to, the only "names" the poster called the President were "King Obama" and "Obama" (omitting the title).

Which of these is vile? happy

If you say "King" then King Hussein of Jordan would be *really* surprized to hear that. happy If simply omitting a title is vile then you have a seriously overblown sense of the importance of titles.

On the other hand, the poster pretty strongly implied the President is a socialist, and I can't say I disagree. But unless you think socialism is vile (perhaps thinking Nazis were really socialists (they weren't)) this doesn't qualify either.

So which is it?
0 Votes
+ -
My side did lose...
bricar2 17th May 2009
...and that side includes people who actually revere and respect the Constitution and the Founding Fathers. You anti-American Liberals have no business being called Americans.

I only hope King Barack The Obama grants us the "right" to vote in the future.
Some of which are still in effect to this day.

President Obama also authorized bailouts. The differences were made clear and why.

Reagan+Bush+Bush=USSA

They are the only Presidents of the last 40 years to rack up trillions in debt. (At least Clinton balanced everything, only for Bush II to muck it up because that's what he's good at doing, as history has clearly shown...)
0 Votes
+ -
The President has a unique function called "veto power". When did Reagan, Bush, or Bush II use theirs?

Obama has also put the war spending back into the main budget - fixing the FUZZY MATH Bush used to help hide the war costs from the general budget.

Bush acted like a little boy. Obama is an adult.

It's nice to have some adults running this country again.
0 Votes
+ -
Hey now! Don't forget:
HypnoToad72 15th May 2009
"Facts are useless things".

(okay, they are useless but only idiots would try to sell the notion that they aren't.)
0 Votes
+ -
simple solution
Linux Geek 15th May 2009
Just make proprietary software vendors pay a percentage of the sales on their products to an Internet fund.
It's their software that benefits from the internet and also is hogging the bandwidth.
0 Votes
+ -
Note that the cost is small
DanaBlankenhorn 15th May 2009
I would rather have market forces dictate the
price of core bandwidth than run it as a public
utility.

The problem is that, due to the deflationary
aspects of Moore's Law, competition is currently
being driven out of the market, leaving us with,
potentially, an unregulated duopoly run by
companies that would rather put their investment
elsewhere and let the core rot.
0 Votes
+ -
I think I see the problem.
kozmcrae 15th May 2009
They never should have let Steve Ballmer take backhoe lessons.
0 Votes
+ -
Let new infrastructures grow; leave the "information highway" alone to grow and prosper on its own purposes and for which it was designed. In other words, let them build their own "internet". Leave mine alone.

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix