Tech Broiler

Jason Perlow and Scott Raymond

Apple Jedi Mind Tricks Won't Placate iPhone 4 Owners

By | July 17, 2010, 9:31pm PDT

Summary: Was it really worth the media circus for Apple to avoid admitting a problem with the iPhone 4?

For months now I’ve been watching the train wreck that is the Apple iPhone 4. From the accidental loss of a prototype phone resulting in an early sneak peek from Gizmodo, to the current media circus surrounding the attenuation issues with the antenna, it has been a non-stop PR frenzy of damage-control, ridiculous claims and outright lies.

Let’s look at basic design flaws. When I first heard that Apple had put the antenna on the outside of the phone where people would normally hold it, I thought that was a tremendously bad idea. For years, analog and digital cellphones have kept the antenna away from direct physical contact with the user’s skin because it degrades the capability of the antenna to receive a signal. Also, most cellphones are made of plastic, because a metal body also interferes with an internal antenna.

According to Bloomberg, Apple was notified early in the design phase that the antenna design was a bad idea, and they chose to ignore it. Apple of course, has denied this in spite of all evidence to the contrary.

Skip ahead to the early leak of the prototype model by Brian Hogan, the guy that “found” the iPhone 4 in a bar and sold it to Gizmodo. Putting aside for a moment that Brian made no effort to return the phone, and that Gizmodo knowingly received stolen property, Apple went completely overboard in its response. They subverted normal legal channels and used their influence to violate the rights of journalists to obtain evidence.

Don’t get me wrong; Gizmodo is the same group of guys that pulled the TV-B-Gone prank at CES that resulted in their journalist getting banned from CES. I don’t agree with their tactics and think that they’re an embarrassment to the tech world at large. However, that doesn’t excuse the violation of their legal rights. Even the District Attorney on the case agreed and had the search warrant withdrawn, with orders to return all items confiscated.

Now let’s move ahead to the release of the iPhone 4. Within days of public release, it became obvious to many people that there was something wrong. Most people holding the phone in their left hand discovered that signal attenuation occurred. Eventually it was linked to the connection of the gap between two of the pieces of the metal antenna by the flesh of the palm of the hand.

Apple’s response was typical Steve Jobs Reality Distortion Field. First they claimed that there was no problem. Then they blamed it on reporting the signal strength from AT&T improperly — but by doing so they simply pointed out that their phones had been providing crappy reception for several years, using a cellular provider that was notorious for not shoring up its aging cell infrastructure until it was painfully obvious it could no longer handle the load of so many customers and so much data trying to pass through it.

In a fit of nearly-unbelievable foot-in-mouth syndrome, Steve Jobs actually told someone to Just avoid holding it in this way.

And the icing on the cake? Apple started recommending bumpers for the phone, the same exact bumper that was found on the prototype that Gizmodo got its hands on. Of course, they continued to deny that they knew about the problem even during the development stage. And they charged users for the privilege of buying that bumper.

It wasn’t until Consumer Reports posted their review of the iPhone 4 that Apple finally stopped claiming that it was anything but a design and engineering issue. They relented, and held an emergency press conference that admitted there was a problem and how they were dealing with it.

That wasn’t the end of it, of course. In a typical display of “Hey! Look over there!” while they sneak away from the press, Apple tried to blame competitors for the same exact design flaws. Those competitors fired back. Still, while most of the hardcore rabid fanboys are taking Apple to task, there are still a few holdouts (caution, strong language) that prove they are easily duped by the RDF.

Sorry, folks, Steve’s not pissed at the media. He’s pissed that Apple got caught in a PR nightmare, got caught lying about it, and got caught making things worse until they were forced to acknowledge the truth. Even then, the level of arrogance on the side of Apple during the press conference was unacceptable.

According to Apple, it’s going to cost them $45 million to give out free bumpers and refund the ones they charged to existing iPhone 4 customers. That’s a drop in the bucket to their cash reserves, and they probably wasted nearly as much trying to pretend that this issue wasn’t an issue.

Apple should take this as an object lesson for the future. For the most part, they make high quality devices that people love. If they make a mistake in design and fess up to it, their customers will forgive them. If they continue with this “Who are you going to believe, us or your lying eyes?” nonsense, they deserve to get taken to task for it and ridiculed incessantly for it, like this:

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Topics

Scott Raymond has been a technologist and system administrator for over 25 years.

Disclosure

Scott Raymond

I am the IT Manager for a high end audio and network systems integrator in northern Califronia. My wife works at Adobe Systems, Inc. Whenever I write an article that might involve Adobe or its products, I add a disclaimer at the top of the article to make sure she is not involved in any way. We have a small bit of stock with AT&T and no other major investments that would cause conflict.

Biography

Scott Raymond

Scott Raymond has been a technologist and system administrator for over 25 years. Starting as a hobbyist in his teens, Scott quickly learned that he could translate his passion and knowledge into a full-time career. He currently works as the IT Manager for a high end audio and network systems integrator in northern California. He has written technology articles for various publications in the past and began contributing to ZDnet as a guest blogger on Jason Perlow's Tech Broiler. Scott and Jason met in New York in the 1990s where they co-managed the New York City Palm Pilot Users' Group.

In his spare time, Scott is a trained chef and avid bicycling enthusiast, as well as a voracious reader of historical, science and horror fiction. He is a huge fan of pop culture, with a wide range of interest in TV shows, movies and games.

Related Discussions on TechRepublic

Did you know you can take part in these discussions with your ZDNet membership?
98
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

RE: Apple Jedi Mind Tricks Won't Placate iPhone 4 Owners
JACOBSONR 14th Oct
Good day to confirm this comment I would appreciate T h e b e s t o f Z D N e t d e l i v e r e d your website very nice to everyone Yes, Oracle is the only one with shared-disk architecture, but that is there advantage. It means you can add or remove nodes and the database lives on. In a shared nothing architecture, if you lose a node, you lose the system. I'm sure Oracle appreciates EMC highlighting their advantage.I also desire to signal in your RSS feeds. Thank you as soon as once again and maintain up the great operate Awesome post! Thank you very much || thanks for nice content this is really benefit to me.
0 Votes
+ -
The iPhone is already outdated
hmshapiro 17th Jul 2010
This is a minor problem for Apple, the way Android phones are evolving and morphing the iPhone will be outclassed by the end of 2011.
@hmshapiro It's already basically outclassed. The.iPhone is only better than the evo at capturing colors in pictures and videos. It's slightly higher resolution screen means nothing since no formats that it supports specifically support that resolution meaning things have to be converted to be watched in native resolution. Where I can just download hdtv xvid rips and watch them directly on my evo.
0 Votes
+ -
@Jimster480

It may be outclassed in your mind, to millions of others that could have bought the evo or any other Android phone they wanted, it's not...There is a lot more to a product than just the features list...
@GENESIS667

Perception is the reality of the individual....

along that line, I swapped to a Nexus One on froyo - have to say it is a step up from the i4.

my reality - android
Apple's reality - they lost a customer
0 Votes
+ -
@zenwalker
Well before the iPhone 4 came out it was so clear you were not a customer Apple could count on so you simply fall into the "You can't please em all" waistage category. Again based on your past posts on all things Apple I'm not thinking Apple is going to miss you:)

Pagan jim
@James Quinn waistage category

What is a Waistage Category? Do you mean he's a waste of a customer? I sure hope you don't work for Apple's PR dept. I suppose Apple makes enough profits on all the other customers, that it would be willing to let some go without caring. Odd for a company that was not so long ago, thought of as the one that put the customers first, 'eh?
0 Votes
+ -
You're wrong James
John Zern 19th Jul 2010
Apple will miss him, as he is a group of many. "One" is hard to notice, "many" does get Steve Jobs' attention.

If they didn't, he wouldn't have gone onstage with a special press conference to tell those unhappy customers how stupid they are for causing their own unhappiyness.
he wouldn't have had to do a thing.

But then again, Steve Jobs noticed. He was angry as heck, but he noticed.
0 Votes
+ -
Please provide your source
Falkirk 17th Jul 2010
"According to Bloomberg, Apple was notified early in the design phase that the antenna design was a bad idea, and they chose to ignore it. Apple of course, has denied this in spite of all evidence to the contrary.

So far as I know there is actually NO evidence to the contrary. Please provide your evidence and/or your support of that statement.
@Falkirk

chuckle
You really think a journalist will give up a source or provide evidence that can lead back to that source?
0 Votes
+ -
@zenwalker
"Journalists" more correctly would be bloggers and they make their money off of opinion, speculation, and the outrageous. I also assume based on your comment that you have no such evidence either and do not insist of seeing any before you are willing to swallow hook line and sinker anything that might have a negative Apple spin in it. Instead of doing the reasonable thing and insist on actual proof. Once again not thinking Apple is going to miss you as a customer:P

Pagan jim
0 Votes
+ -
Source
Badgered 19th Jul 2010
@Falkirk

Actually, I'd like to see that evidence as well.
"(Apple) subverted normal legal channels and used their influence to violate the rights of journalists to obtain evidence."

They did no such thing. Are you just making this up as you go along? Apple notified the police who then acted upon a warrant to obtain information and items from Gizmodo. How is going to the police "using influence". Isn't that what everyone does? How were the journalists right violated if their items were obtained with a legal warrant?
@Falkirk

Do you really think that the response from the authorities was norm?

Get real!
Apple used their influence to pressure the response.
Any other individual or company without the Apple power would have had to go through normal channels.
0 Votes
+ -
@zenwalker
than negative speculation? Lets start with this can you examine the steps the law took and compare it to the "normal" procedures that the law uses in other similar cases in the past? Or again are you pulling something from your backside and sharing it with us. Yup betting Apple is right now pining for you loss as an Apple customer... I'm certain of it...

Pagan jim
0 Votes
+ -
"the District Attorney on the case agreed and had the search warrant withdrawn, with orders to return all items confiscated."

After they'd struck a deal where the defendants voluntarily agreed to turn over the requested data. Geez, that's kind of an important thing to leave out of your statement.

What is this, just a hit piece? Are there any facts at all or are you just shooting from the hip?
0 Votes
+ -
It's zdnet...
zkiwi 19th Jul 2010
Of course it's a hatchet job.

No attention to facts, no story, just "opinion" expressed loud and long.

It's a long time since zdnet actually did journalism.
0 Votes
+ -
re: Apple was notified early in the design phase that the antenna design was a bad idea, Apple of course, has denied this in spite of all evidence to the contrary-


What evidence is there? Bloomberg cited an "unnamed source" Apple challenged them on it, no response from Bloomberg because they don't have anything credible to back up what they reported.

re: Even the District Attorney on the case agreed and had the search warrant withdrawn, with orders to return all items confiscated-

BS, Talk about being deceptive...Chens attorney offered to allow the police access to the computers, if they dropped their search warrant in exchange...The DA agreed and nothing has been returned to Chen as it is still in the possession of the special master, it will be returned to chen after copies are made...

re: They subverted normal legal channels and used their influence to violate the rights of journalists to obtain evidence.

Total and complete BS, They have no more control over the legal system than anyone else does...They reported it stolen and from there the cops called the shots...Spare us the poor victimization of chen routine, he got exactly what he deserved and the same thing would have happened to anyone else that involved themselves in criminal activity...This may come as a shock, but you bloggers are not above the law...The shield law applies to protecting notes regarding a crime committed, not to protect the one committing the crime...
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Apple Jedi Mind Tricks Won't Placate iPhone 4 Owners
Feldwebel Wolfenstool 18th Jul 2010
@GENESIS667@... No more control of the legal system than anyone else? Hmmm? Richard Nixon? Brian Mulroney? Jean "Jeancula" Chretien? murderin' MADMIKE Bryant? In Qannadda, justice is bought and sold, under the table, every day. Justice? Just for the Rich.
0 Votes
+ -
@Feldwebel Wolfenstool While I cannot debate that with some why is it you think Apple did the same thing?
0 Votes
+ -
So are you saying Apple got justice then?
James Quinn 18th Jul 2010
@Feldwebel Wolfenstool
You indicate only the rich and powerful can get justice in this nation? Even "IF" that is true and you know it may very well be if all Apple got was justice because it is a rich and powerful company then what is the harm for in the end all Apple got was in face JUSTICE! It maybe a crime that the rest of us can not get justice for we are poor but Apple actually getting justice is a good thing for the whole word "justice" is a positive result of a given conflict.

Pagan jim
0 Votes
+ -
I don't know about you, but I trust Apple and think they did a wonderful job at their presentation and talk with the press last Friday. If you still don't believe them up to now, that's your loss.
0 Votes
+ -
Contributr
@mayadanteamihan

gul?li?ble? ?[guhl-uh-buhl]
?adjective
easily deceived or cheated.
Use gullible in a Sentence
See images of gullible
Also, gul?la?ble.

Origin:
1815?25; gull + -ible

?Related forms
gul?li?bil?i?ty, noun
gul?li?bly, adverb

?Synonyms
credulous, trusting, naive, innocent, simple, green.
0 Votes
+ -
@Scott Raymond
wait for the "storms of bluster and speculation" to pass and stand ready for actual evidence to make itself known. You assumption as of now is just as incorrect in the other direction that the one you responded too.

Unless of course you can provide actual evidence to the contrary? No speculative articles or opinion pieces but real evidence that is.

Pagan jim
@mayadanteamihan

They did a wonderful job? Are you kidding?

Their shenanigans about how yes, the iPhone4 drops more calls than the 3GS, but by ?less than one additional call in a hundred? without providing data on the rates of other phones is such tripe; most phones don?t even drop 2 calls in a hundred, so 1 extra call is a huge, huge number. They are just playing on the fact that most buyers don?t know anything about statistics or analysis.

Based on claims from AT&T that say their call drop rate is 1.4-1.7%, the iPhone 4 would drop 70% more calls than all other AT&T phones.

70% more dropped calls. That's huge. Luckily for Apple, people have no clue about statistics.
0 Votes
+ -
Statistically speaking...
zkiwi 19th Jul 2010
I'd hazard that you know little of statistics :P
0 Votes
+ -
iPhone owners are happy
rvassar 18th Jul 2010
But maybe won't satisfy the sensationalist news organizations!

Time to move on!
It placated me as an iPhone 4 owner but it obviously hasn't placated the tech media and their need to milk the issue. Maybe if the mythical unhappy hordes of iPhone 4 owners were returning their phones in droves, the story would have more legitimacy.

The real Jedi Mind Tricks are being played by the tech media and their obsessive compulsion with Steve Jobs. It's not hard to understand - Jobs is an arrogant control freak who stirred the hornets nest but it's time to move on and stop giving all this free pub for Apple.
@markbyrn Maybe if the mythical unhappy hordes of iPhone 4 owners were returning their phones in droves, the story would have more legitimacy.

And give up their babe magnet/status symbol? Not hardly. While I have no doubt there are some folks having actual problems with their iPhone 4, most of those will put a bumper on it and go on with their lives. Heck most probably already paid $30 to fix their defective phones. What on earth makes you think they'd be willing to return it?
0 Votes
+ -
iPhone 4 Train Wreck?
gentryfunk 18th Jul 2010
To begin, I own an iPhone 4. To characterize the iPhone 4 as a "train wreck" makes about as much sense as declaring the movie Avatar a failure. The iPhone 4 is selling about as fast as anyone could have predicted, the rate of return is less than 1%, and sales continue to climb as evidenced by Apple's own numbers.

The antenna issue is a minor one as most of us with these phones have discovered.

Finally, the author stated that Apple's response, "has been a non-stop PR frenzy of damage-control, ridiculous claims and outright lies." Once making such a statement, it is customary to establish, clearly, what those "lies" were.

Interestingly, the author of this piece sounds a lot like Glenn Beck. Make crazy statements about government and then refuse to either provide evidence or support for the position. I would hope that a writer for ZDNet would be a bit more thoughtful in their analysis.
0 Votes
+ -
I know!
James Quinn 18th Jul 2010
@gentryfunk
Perhaps we are being unfair here? After all asking someone that states anyone has lied to prove it by presenting clearly where the lie is and what evidence can be found to show it to be a lie is a terrible burden. After all it's far easier just to say they lied and be done with it:P

Pagan jim
0 Votes
+ -
Bad analogy
MSFTWorshipper 18th Jul 2010
@gentryfunk Avatar is a terrible film, but it sold a lot of tickets. It has no functionality, it's just art work up on the screen. the iPhone 4 is a device that is broken.
0 Votes
+ -
@MSFTWorshipper
of Avatar as fact and that is foolish. You might be right as far as I'm concern but I am smart enough to realize my opinion is just that. As for your opinion about the iPhone 4 we disagree in all areas including reception the iPHone 4 is an improvement over past iPhones. That in my opinion can't mean broken. Not perfect mind you but what is?

Pagan jim
0 Votes
+ -
Their handling of the issue is the trainwreck
Cylon Centurion 18th Jul 2010
@gentryfunk

The iPhone 4 is faulty by design just as much as Modern Warfare 2 is faulty by design.
0 Votes
+ -
Apple's lies?
drphysx 18th Jul 2010
@gentryfunk

1) They lied about the nature of the issues. Yes, of course you can shield any phone's antenna with your hand.

But NO OTHER PHONE let's you bridge the antenna with other metal parts with just one finger.

And of course, other companies make sure that the antennas are at places where you don't shield them when holding the phone in a natural way.

The "deat grip", however, is the natural way of holding the phone.

So their claims about other phones haveing the same issues were outright LIES.

2) Their shenanigans about how yes, the iPhone4 drops more calls than the 3GS, but by less than one additional call in a hundred without providing data on the rates of other phones.

Most phones dont even drop 2 calls in a hundred, so 1 extra call is a huge, huge number. They are just playing on the fact that most buyers dont know anything about statistics or analysis.

Based on claims from AT&T that say their call drop rate is 1.4-1.7%, the iPhone 4 would drop 70% more calls than all other AT&T phones. That's huge. Luckily for Apple, people have no clue about statistics.
0 Votes
+ -
@drphysx
Does Apple even have access to said data? Or do they get a release from the company that makes said phones and have to take is a fact. Two different things you know. If I am to suspect Apple and I do then it only falls to reason that I must also suspect that other companies will try to spin their data when possible to get the best light out. The reason most people don't pay much head to statistics is how easily they can be manipulated. So why should I trust you again?

Pagan jim
0 Votes
+ -
@drphysx

The "dropped calls" is an average across *all* calls. As several engineers has already pointed out, the iPhone4 can lose a signal and still retain the call if it is in an area with strong signal.

Using an iPhone4 in an area with 4 bars or lower will see significantly more dropped calls because of this "death grip".
@James Quinn Why would Apple provide data on other phones?

Because Apple Claimed all other phones have this problem. Earlier in these talkbacks you demanded proof of claims... you don't hold Apple to the same standard?
@gentryfunk

Apple is mostly form over function. Sort of like the cardboard and foam TVs and computers you see in furniture stores. If you subscribe to the Steve Job's cool-aide, more power to you. I rather go elsewhere for functionality, quality, and lower cost.
@gentryfunk

How about "there is no antenna issue?" or "it's just a software problem with how signal is displayed." Those are pretty blatant lies.

The comparison to Avatar is really pretty apt. I though the last half of the plot was, indeed, a train wreck and the dialog was insipid, but I was still pleased with the overall result because it was spectacularly beautiful, and creatively so. The iphone4 will be that way for many people, one dunder-headed move attached to a device that people mostly like.

Where they have been really blowing it is in PR which is usually their strong suit. It's like they took a play from BP's handbook or something.
0 Votes
+ -
Do your job
s_souche 18th Jul 2010
I read you speaking about PR, rantling, distortion of facts.

Jobs list a few things as facts. Check if these are indeed facts, and prove him right or wrong. RIM and Nokia claim their good faith, but on general principals listing R&D efforts. But so does job. Do RIM and nokia, and HTC phone have the same reception issue as Jobs claim they have ?

Give us the dB figures. If Jobs lies, so be it, buit prove it. Otherwise just write about something else
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Do your job
drphysx 18th Jul 2010
@s_souche

They lied about the nature of the issues. They pretended that it's because you shield the antenna with your hand. But that's not true.

Yes, of course you can shield any phone's antenna with your hand.

But no other phone let's you bridge the antenna with other metal parts with just one finger (despite that HTC has actually invented and patented the design, but "somehow" HTC phones work).

And of course, other companies make sure that the antennas are at places where you don't shield them when holding the phone in a natural way.
The "deat grip", however, is the natural way of holding the phone.

So their claims about other phones haveing the same issues were outright lies.
0 Votes
+ -
@drphysx
that says "Don't touch here"? If they do then I would assume the shielding claim you made about other phones is a bit off. Seems to my way of things Nokia thinks there maybe a problem if you touch where the sticker indicates.

Pagan jim
@drphysx
Anandtech and consumer report ( cannot find a direct source from that one, quoting from memory ) reported a 20 to 24 dB signal weakening holding the phone.

Jobs says HTC, Nokia and Blackberry suffer a similar phenomenon, based on reception bars displayed.

That can be tested, and that is the only way to say who is right about this. Anyone claiming either part wrong without trying to test that is just not doing his job properly ( given the job is to inform, mere readers giving their opinions are not what I am talking about here ).
0 Votes
+ -
DIY iPhone4 recall!
Johnny Vegas 18th Jul 2010
Return your iPhone4 for free (no restocking fee) and wait for the fixed models to come before getting another one. The current models will have no resale value down the road...
0 Votes
+ -
Exactly what I'm doing today.
MSFTWorshipper 18th Jul 2010
@Johnny Vegas Apple really disappointed me. I really wanted to get on the iPhone bandwagon and they blew it.
0 Votes
+ -
I can see the commercial now.
James Quinn 18th Jul 2010
@MSFTWorshipper
Like the native american standing near road trash Steve Jobs has a single tear running down his cheek at the thought of loosing you as a customer:P

Pagan jim
0 Votes
+ -
@Johnny Vegas
for the first time in your life you are correct. This version will be a collectors edition down the road I'd purchase a few keep them in the box and wait for a period of time then sell them for huge green.

Pagan jim

Funny even though you can return the iPhone 4 with NO restocking fee fewer people are returning them than those who returned the iPhone 3gs or 3 and those people had to pay a restocking fee:P Hmmmmm?
0 Votes
+ -
Seriously?
trickytom2 19th Jul 2010
@James Quinn

You think that the iPhone4 is going to be a "collectors item" because its defective?

Be honest; you don't really believe that, do you?
@trickytom2

Actually, I think he does. I think he also believes he can make money at it.
0 Votes
+ -
What BS
johnelberling@... 18th Jul 2010
why won't the easy bumper fix "placate" the already 3 million iPhone 4 owners? because you say so, mr. Raymond? do you even own one yourself? or are you just one more professional whiner?
Good day to confirm this comment I would appreciate T h e b e s t o f Z D N e t d e l i v e r e d your website very nice to everyone Yes, Oracle is the only one with shared-disk architecture, but that is there advantage. It means you can add or remove nodes and the database lives on. In a shared nothing architecture, if you lose a node, you lose the system. I'm sure Oracle appreciates EMC highlighting their advantage.I also desire to signal in your RSS feeds. Thank you as soon as once again and maintain up the great operate Awesome post! Thank you very much || thanks for nice content this is really benefit to me.

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix