Tech Broiler

Jason Perlow and Scott Raymond

Dragons in the Cloud: Apple, Google, Amazon and Microsoft

By | June 6, 2011, 10:30pm PDT

Summary: Four mighty “Dragons” will claim their territory in the Cloud. Will they interoperate, or will users of these services be imprisoned, and subjected to the terrors of their reign?

Four mighty “Dragons” will claim their territory in the Cloud. Will they interoperate, or will users of these services be imprisoned, and subjected to the terrors of their reign?

Today, at their World Wide Developer Conference (WWDC) Apple announced the upcoming availability of iCloud, a new free service that allows users to synchronize media content and other forms of personal data across all of their devices, be it their iPhones, iPads, iPod Touches, Macs, or even PCs running iTunes.

With iCloud and iOS 5, Apple has now “cut the cord” with its iTunes dependency on Mac and Windows for its various iOS-based consumer devices and will allow users to synchronize their music collection wirelessly with the iTunes Store over the Internet, as well as activate and update their devices without any other wired connection as well.

Similarly, apps, books, pictures and productivity documents created in iWork on the Mac and in iOS will also be synchronized in iCloud, allowing the service to also double as a personal business continuity mechanism for up to 5GB of data (music purchased on iTunes and 30-day caches of personal photo streams are exempted from this limitation).

Apple has not yet disclosed pricing for additional amounts of personal data beyond 5GB stored in iCloud, or if they will offer it at all.

However, it’s certainly possible that improvements to their Time Machine software in OS X Lion or an updated Time Capsule appliance may be able to act as a localized datastore which will enable “Private Clouds” with larger storage pools to run in your home but accessible from everywhere, a la PogoPlug.

Apple’s foray into the consumer Cloud follows similar efforts by Google with GMailGoogle Docs, Picasa Web AlbumsGoogle Books and Google Music, the last of of which went into private beta only recently.

The pending release of iCloud as part of iOS 5 and Mac OS X Lion also follows the recent introduction of Amazon’s Cloud Player and Cloud Drive, which supplants their streaming video service, and multi-platform Kindle bookstore as well as their existing and extremely comprehensive Amazon Web Services (AWS).

Last, and certainly not least, Microsoft has its own Online Services such as Windows Live, Office Web Apps and Zunepass which it will leverage on its existing Windows 7, Windows Phone, XBOX 360 and upcoming Windows 8 desktop, tablet and mobile platforms. Like Amazon with AWS, it also has Windows Azure, its enterprise Cloud service, as well as Office 365 (currently in beta) for small and medium-sized businesses.

Also Read: Windows Live, A Guide for the Perplexed

Each of these fearsome giants, or “Cloud Dragons” are in the process of setting up their fiefdoms, and it is us users who are to belong to each of these Cloud fiefdoms will either willingly or unwillingly become their vassals, feeding the Dragons with our cash when new Apps and content fancies us.

The Dragons must be appeased, or we’ll be sacrificing our virgins and giving them the right of prima nocta instead. We’ve all seen HUMANCENTiPAD, only the Gods know what the Dragons are truly capable of.

The Cloud, as it seems, especially as it pertains to mobile or “Post-PC” platforms of the future, is not optional. It will be an integrated part of our future computing experience, whether we like it or not.

While I for one welcome our new Cloud Dragon overlords, there is one particular issue that concerns me, and that’s whether or not that if I swear my oath of fealty to a particular fiefdom today, if I can ever actually leave at some unforeseen future date, and bring my cloud data with me to another Cloud fiefdom, ruled by a different Dragon.

Or more realistically, I may decide I want to actually be a Cloud multi-platformist and run say, a Mac OS X Lion desktop, an Amazon Android Tablet and a Windows 8 Phone. Will the Dragons of these Clouds actually allow data to interoperate and pass between them? Will other services exist that allow me to “Federate” my clouds?

I dunno. The politics of the Cloud Dragons could get quite complicated indeed.

Clearly, I do not expect Apple to be particularly flexible as it pertains to “Appifying” cloud services from Amazon, Google and Microsoft on iOS or even the Mac App Store. That much is a given — and I expect the App Store developer agreement’s “no duplication of OS functionality” clauses to extend to iCloud, selectively, as Apple sees fit to fortify its castle walls.

Of all the Dragons, I expect Apple to protect its fiefdom and the denizens (prisoners *cough*) of its walled gardens with exteme prejudice.

Amazon, Google and Microsoft at least appear that they will continue to employ emerging HTML5 Web standards for their Clouds. So in theory, I should still be able to use their Cloud services on Apple devices, even if it’s just in the browser.

Of course, that is assuming that each of these entities isn’t going to add extensions to existing web standards that might break someone else’s Web services.

And we don’t really know if Google is going to be nice to users of Amazon Android tablets with optimized Apps to leverage their Cloud, and vice-versa, or if Microsoft is going to allow Amazon and Google fully optimized Windows 8 Cloud apps to run on their platform.

Everyone is going to have some sort of App Store with all sorts of cockamamie rules, in order to protect their interests. I mean, this is capitalism on these Cloud fiefdoms we’re talking about, not a hippie commune.

In terms of Dragons, we’re talking more on the order of Glaurung, not Puff.

Certainly, one would expect that if you do own some type of “PC”, be it a Mac or a Windows, a Linux or Google-something, you should be able to transfer data. This is provided that you subscribe to the idea that something like our Blade Runner is going to exist in the future and that the majority of PCs aren’t going to be displaced with smart devices, that is.

But if Steve Jobs has his way, we will be in the “Post-PC” era. And that means virtually all of our personal data is going to reside in the Cloud, and the Dragons will rule us with an iron fist if we try to escape their fiefdom walls.

Data portability could very well end up being a serious problem, if the average Joe and Jane simply own smartphones and tablets in 2019, and PC’s go mostly extinct.

If the majority of us really end up living “Post-PC”, and you commit to a vendor like Apple, who’s to say you’ll be able to easily move your data to Google, Amazon, Microsoft, or someone else for that matter?

I’d really like to know the answer to that question, Mister Dragon.

Are you welcoming or fearing our new Cloud Dragon overlords? Talk Back and Let Me Know.

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Topics

Jason Perlow, Sr. Technology Editor at ZDNet, is a technologist with over two decades of experience integrating large heterogeneous multi-vendor computing environments in Fortune 500 companies.

Disclosure

Jason Perlow

My Full-Time Employer is IBM. I write as a freelancer for ZDNet.

Disclaimer: The postings and opinions on this blog are my own and don't necessarily represent IBM's positions, strategies or opinions.

I own no investments or direct financial instruments in the companies I write about.

Biography

Jason Perlow

Jason Perlow, Sr. Technology Editor at ZDNet is a technologist with over two decades of experience with integrating large heterogeneous multi-vendor computing environments in Fortune 500 companies. A long-time computer enthusiast starting the age of 13 with his first Apple ][ personal computer, he began his freelance writing career starting at ZD Sm@rt Reseller in 1996 and has since authored numerous guest columns for ZDNet Enterprise and Ziff-Davis Internet. Jason was previously Senior Technology Editor for Linux Magazine, where he wrote about Open Source issues from 1999 to 2008.

In his spare time, Jason is an avid amateur chef and food writer, where his work reviewing New Jersey restaurants has appeared in The New York Times. He is also the founder of the popular food web site eGullet and blogs about restaurants and cooking at OffTheBroiler.com.

51
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

RE: Dragons in the Cloud: Apple, Google, Amazon and Microsoft
FAULKNE 13th Oct
Good day to confirm this comment I would appreciate T h e b e s t o f Z D N e t d e l i v e r e d your website very nice to everyone Yes, Oracle is the only one with shared-disk architecture, but that is there advantage. It means you can add or remove nodes and the database lives on. In a shared nothing architecture, if you lose a node, you lose the system. I'm sure Oracle appreciates EMC highlighting their advantage.I also desire to signal in your RSS feeds. Thank you as soon as once again and maintain up the great operate Awesome post! Thank you very much || thanks for nice content this is really benefit to me.
0 Votes
+ -
Stingy...
wright_is 6th Jun
Given that Microsoft offer the contact, mail, calendar etc. syncing for free, along with 25GB on Skydrive, the 5GB seems a little stingy.

As a user of MS Live, Google, Yahoo and Apple's MobileMe, I'm not that worried about which will succeed. All 3 sync with Outlook and my Windows Phone7 and iPhone (well Live doesn't, but the others do), so I can just shove the data between the services.

I've used MobileMe mainly just for the syncing of contacts to my iPhone, the other services don't really bother me one way or the other. I don't know if I will renew, my iMac runs like a snail, my iPhone stutters and I'm getting a much better experience from Microsoft at the moment, so I'm waiting to see what Lion does, for $29 it is a no brainer, to see if it improves performance, before reformatting the drive and installing Linux or Windows on the iMac...
@wright_is

As Apple needs to see how well this will fly before filling up their entire datacenter.

Apple is not known (no real track record) for it's cloud infrastructure, so it doesn't make sense to buy and setup server after server if it sits unused.

If moving forward it look like it's worth teh investment, they'll add servers, and up the data limit.
@Will Pharaoh: ... the 5 GB count.

What common person has to fill up these 5 GB? Of Personal videos only -- lets see how Apple will negotiate about videos from iTunes.
0 Votes
+ -
$1B Farm
Ken_z 7th Jun
@Will Pharaoh

Apple invested $1B in that server farm so I believe they know it will be vigorously used. Especially since it will be available for the multiple AppStores, the Apple Store, etc.

Apple has a good understanding of how their current customers are using their servers today. And they know the growth they have had - even during the Great Recession.

I believe that Apple will somewhat limit their iCloud for a brief period as they don't know the demands that will be placed on the service on Day One, or even Week One.

The indicator I'm looking at is when they announce approval for another billion dollar investment.
0 Votes
+ -
Live doesn't sync to iPhone?
Joe_Raby 7th Jun
@wright_is

You know that Microsoft implemented ActiveSync support in Hotmail for mobile clients right? I have 3 Hotmail accounts, and calendars and contacts all sync up on my iPad.
0 Votes
+ -
@Joe_Raby I am not knocking anybody that uses Hotmail, Gmail, Yahoo or any of the others but have to ask. Why do people (especially tech savoy) use the services in this day and age? Why do people use email addresses from these services when having your own domain is so cheap? It amazes me these days when I get an email from somebody providing a service (either at work or something for home) and they use one of these services. It's even more shocking when I know they have a domain and website for their business but the email comes from Yahoo. I just don't get it and I am FAR from all that technical compared to most here and have used my own domains for email for more than a decade. Again, not knocking anybody for using these services but have always wondered.
0 Votes
+ -
The 5GBs is in actuality much more...
Snooki_smoosh_smoosh 7th Jun
@wright_is... Going by what Jobs said that Backup, Music Match, and Photo Stream do not count against that 5GB. So 1,000 Pics stored for up to 30 days, easily 2-3GB there.
@Snooki_smoosh_smoosh Photo Stream yes, but albums no.

BTW, 2-3GB is around 115 images . 1,000 images would be over 20GB. I'm guessing Photo Stream will castrate the photos, like the current albums on MobileMe do.
@Snooki_smoosh_smoosh and @non-biased.... Let's be very, very prudent and read the fine print from Apple. For about 12 years I've had accounts with both Hotmail and Yahoo (paid accounts when they became useful)... I always cc myself from one to the other, but I am no longer in the Real Estate business. Some old mail is still there and I delete stuff I don't need. I also have the Norton service with 32 GBs of space, only 2gbs left and will buy some more. This 4-way battle between Apple, Amazon, Google and Microsoft sounds worse than a world-war. I own both App and MSoft (3 Ipods, 1 Ipad plus 2 PC laptops and a 3rd one kept just in case). All I want for Christmas is peace between Apple, Microsoft, Google, Amazon. Thank you.
@wright_is Comparing Skydrive's 25GB to iCloud's 5GB is fairly deceiving. You could have 30GB of music, app, photo and iBook stored on iCloud before you even start to touch your 5GB limit.
contacts, mail & calendar - exchange active sync between server and droid so job done - don't feel a need at present to also sync this stuff to my mac.

Windows live mesh for file sync between pc and mac - works fine.

Music - I have 15G of music on my droid and a lot more in itunes (on mac - mostly ripped from my CDs) - I am struggling to find a need for any music streaming service??

Photos - would like to have photos auto sync'ed to Mac from droid - might check out some options
@RonanSail
to free up space on your device is one reason. the second reason would be to just load the music on one device then you have it across all devices.
thats all i can think of for now
I don't see why we couldn't move our own data from one cloud to another. If I'm on Amazon and Microsoft offers a better deal you bet I'm going to move all my data over. I don't see them wanting to interoperate though, at least not in the near future. Maybe 2 or 3 years down the road that may change.
You totally forgot about Microsoft Azure. That is way beyond Google and Apple to match and its only competitor out of these 4 is Amazon. You aslo forgot about SkyDrive, MSFT promised that it would make it programmable, and once that happens, you will see a lot of 3rd party apps around it and using its capabilities of Cloud, Storage as a Service.
It's amazing how supposedly intelligent people keep mixing up government and business. The only entity that can FORCE you into giving them money is a government. A business must PERSUADE you to spend money with them. Even when it involves contracts. You have to be PERSUADED to sign that contract.

Government loves it when you think the greatest threat to your freedom is a business.
@baggins_z What on earth are you talking about. Make sense or stop posting.
or company, and moving from their service to a competitor's service will not be free or problem-free. Thus, at the moment of signing, you might not be in the "free-market" per se. That's why people should not make too many App purchases from any one company, and they shouldn't be storing too many or too much of their files on the cloud.
0 Votes
+ -
Yes this IS capitalism
oncall 7th Jun
And it is capitalism at its finest and you should stop confusing how capitalism works with socialism or communism. Businesses in capitalism work to service the needs and wants of general consumers, and consumers have the FINAL say by voting their CHOICE with their dollars. As opposed to say socialism where the popular vote (not consumer dollars) decides who get to make decisions that you and businesses are "compelled by law" to obey. Apple makes a product that consumers can buy or not buy, supported by a service that consumers can but or not buy. Now the technorati may frown upon Apple's solutions. Too bad! The only votes that counts here is consumers money. Vote with your money and support a solution that fits your needs.

If Apple, Google or Microsoft makes decisions that run counter to the wants and needs of their paying customers, they will be rewarded appropriately.
@oncall Well put. But people seem to be happy letting wealthy politicians and corporate lobbyists decide for them!

Of course, when the stupid regulations harm the economy, the government blames capitalism.
0 Votes
+ -
@oncall,
Businesses in capitalism work to make a profit (as they should be). More often than not that is aligned with servicing the wants and needs of consumers, but not always. It is the government's responsibility to foster an environment that encourages innovation, and to intervene when a company has become powerful enough to dictate prices and product offerings to the consumer rather than respond to demand. Whether or not you think the government is actually doing that or not is another discussion.

I'm not saying that Apple fits that description. I am just clarifying what REALLY drives business, and what the government's role is supposed to be in protecting the consumer.
0 Votes
+ -
All true
oncall 7th Jun
@bmonsterman

Businesses that are aligned with the wants and needs of consumers are rewarded with profitability. People mistakenly think that a business exists to service its own wants, the whole "lord Jobs" mentality that pollute these forums. What a commercial business wants is to exist profitably, that is the central core of business, and that can only happen when it services the consumer. Those that fail to do this are ultimately doomed unless they gain the favor of becoming a government sponsored monopoly.

Governments role is to make sure the rules and regulations established by society are followed, those rules are not always conducive to good business. Of course, one of those functions (rules) is to decide when a company is doing something counter to what is considered good business and intervene, i.e. breaking up a monopoly.
@oncall That not correct about profit businesses. Some may operate on that factor, but most of the biggies are not worried about consumers. They are more concerned about their investors and boards! Most already have in their Balance Sheet assets which point to failures and illegalities. There are numerous large PC manufactures producing JUNK and LEMON products. They operate in "too big too fail" mode when consumers complain. Unless it catches the mass media or the proper enforcement agency, they suk in those profits and move on. You have an unreal view of how the big profit businesses really work.
0 Votes
+ -
"Most" eh?
oncall 7th Jun
@SpankyFrost

And you say I have an unrealistic view? I'm guessing your view is most businesses exist to screw the consumer and that the consumers place is to stupidly continue buying from a company that has repeatedly screwed them?

Businesses are not "too big to fail" forever without government protection. Yes businesses make mistakes and yes occasionally can do illegal things. As a business plan that is failure. They can only ignore their customers for so long, as long as their money holds out, but it catches up with them and they correct or go under. You cannot sell people junk and expect them to come back, they go elsewhere. Consumers are not the idiots people seem to think they are.

If you think you can make a long term profitable business off of defective products and illegal activities you go for it.
0 Votes
+ -
@oncall,

I don't really disagree with you because I don't see that anything you said was diametrically opposed to my statement. Different maybe in more in style than in substance. Perhaps the blind men and the elephant analogy would fit here. It's still an elephant.
in the "free-market", because, it won't be easy to move to another service, and it might not be "free" to change service providers. Once a company has you in its grip, it's going to make it difficult for you to roam around or bounce around between service providers.

Perhaps there needs to be a new phrase which will encourage "cloud freedom", and which says that, your data belongs to you and you are free to do with it what you want and when you want to, and the cost should be the same no matter who is servicing your data or account. If you don't like Company A's handling of your data, then it should be as simple as terminating Company A's handling of your service and requesting that Company B handle your data from then on. It should be a "seamless" termination/migration/integration procedure (integration meaning into the new service provider).
0 Votes
+ -
not necessarily
otaddy 7th Jun
you own the data and u move it out or keep you own backups. Company A wants you to stay so he gives you a better price if you will sign up for 5yrs instead of 1 year.

Why would the costs be the same? Different providers will have different cost structures and will charge what they can...perhaps offering discounts if you sign up for a longer term.
0 Votes
+ -
but, suppose a company knows it's got you by the hanging down things, and knows that it would be more costly to just move your data or too cumbersome and troublesome to do so, and essentially "dares" you to take your data and run. Then what?

Sure, a cloud provider could offer to give you a better price to stay, but, suppose that price is not the biggest or only reason you want to leave and go with someone else? What then?
@adornoe@... Your talking about "ifs" in otaddy's comments but your's is nothing more than hypothicals as well so what is the difference?
@oncall
Your knowledge of political systems is really rather wrong.
anything of value.

Why not explain yourself and retort with valid counterpoints if you think you actually have any?
@oncall
See Anthony Sutton's book Wallstreet and the Bolshevik Revolution. Communism is Bankers paradise. Capitalism is a phrase coined by Marx. American "Color of law" has adopted 8 of 10 planks of the Communist Manifesto. Go figure...
You forgot HP... they also promise not to look into your personal property due to their own self-imposed privacy policies.
0 Votes
+ -
Why would I submit to this BS. I do not have to worry about data issues since I alway have my stuff on email if I need to print a doc, or I have my music already loaded on my portable devices or I can simply wait until I get home to listen to music. Also the death of PCs where did you get that lame idea. Is it because of less PC sales, well bubby boy for someone who claims to be an IT expert you sure don't not your craft. PC last longer. I only upgraded because I wanted a new gaming PC. Hell, I still have 2 XP machines running I built 7 years ago and a laptop that is 5 years old.
0 Votes
+ -
Forgot Ubuntu
tkejlboom 7th Jun
At some point, the Chinese will probably realize that they could get everything they're stealing on XP better and faster for free on Ubuntu.
It's odd but no one wants to address the key question by the author. What happens if you are only "renting" you stuff in the cloud. Who owns the data and can you move to from Apple to Google etc. My feeling is that they would make it hard and costly to move which is what I would do if I had a huge gathering of cloud computing users. If you want to keep them in your stable, you have to make it expensive to move and cheap enough so you will keep using.
Always remember, that the value of your local data and the rights you have to them are going to be a thing in the past. If you happen to have any copyright infringing items, make sure you don't give the cloud service permission to look through your stuff.
I say, when they all compete we all win. Nothing breeds better innovation then competition. Now what this will mean to the mobile experience across several platforms.Who knows?

Follow my Mobile UX Blog at http://www.marlinmobile.com/blog
0 Votes
+ -
that are saying you know what, for the bulk of most users, a device that accesses the web is more than they will ever need, so let's build a slate device that gives users the ability to connect to the web, store docs, pics, vids, etc.

Consumers are not going to care about managing files in a files system, they just want to be able to blog, read, compose, etc from anywhere from a simple to use, lightweight device.

Meanwhile MSFT is still trying to find ways to spruce up their pig by putting lipstick on it, and attempt to re-market it to consumers, and they aren't buying.

The reality is Slate tablets are the future, simplicity of being able to connect to cloud for storage and sharing is where it is at. Now Microsoft is recognizing the importance of the cloud, but they still have this insistence that an Enterprise Desktop OS is what users want at home, when in reality most could care less about managing files.
0 Votes
+ -
IMHO
oncall 7th Jun
@Snooki_smoosh_smoosh

Microsoft's issue is it is trying to please two very different sets of customers: enterprise and general consumers, when it's main strength is playing to Enterprise. Apple never seems to make any bones about it, they make stuff for general consumers, and enterprise only sees love from Apple if doing so supports the general consumers needs.
iCloud is a bit of joke, centric to Apple apps only (iWork) and the lame APPL Calendar/Mail/Contacts.
0 Votes
+ -
Perhaps if you watched the Keynote
Snooki_smoosh_smoosh 7th Jun
@sbrehaut... you would have seen where the API's have been given to Dev's to utilize it. #Fail.
@sbrehaut So you don't like Apple's iCloud and don't want it. We get that but maybe you should get some facts before you post nonsense.
how can these company lie and get away with it and not go to jail microsoft lied about windows 7 and now windows 8 apple lied about being hacked so did sony so why are they not in jail
microsoft looks the strongest, its tablet will be automatically synced with skydrive and I guess a premium version will soon be on its way, the windows phone is built around cloud only. office 365 looks grea and is already getting moew popular than google docs, enterprise wise microosft is very strong, probably more strong than ever and I guess they are in for a long with services like azure cloud and other cloud infrastructure
Cloud services may indeed be the wave of the future, but I'm not paying all my data to the dragons' tax collectors without hiding a little something on a USB drive. Don't forget a little matter of the dragon slayers that manufacture laptops and desktops and hard drives. Intel and it's band of armored knights still patrol the dusty highways of commerce, and are still paid handsomely to defend the honor of the little people! (Or is that Robin Hood?) happy
Twits! Five or more years ago Alex Jones and others were trying to tell anybody that would listen about Internet 2.0 (search Wired) but the twit brigades brushed it off as "Conspiracy Theorists". Now, they didn't call it 'Cloud Computing" back then, but it is the same thing. This is about politicizing every aspect you your lives: save a document and it will be saved to a database 'somewhere out there'. Current applications will not interface with the new system, (the upgrades will "keep you safe" incentives to go alone with the new will be tantalizing!) The next generation of computers will not have hard drives. By law the Cloud will own all your data, and if the Stasi don't like your opinions, they will send 'Enhanced Interrogation' teams to dissuade you from your sinful ways. The Cloud is part of the Police State build-up. Don't believe it? Go to Infowars and get informed. All throughout these comments all of you are reminiscent of the opening scenes of 2012, (the 'dance' around the Monolith) Wake up. You are being duped.
0 Votes
+ -
History repeats itself!!
mainframe2011 22nd Sep
Haven't we all learned that "big brother" tried watching us in the past and we all revolted. Does anyone not remember the mainframe? Fast forward to today and now we have the fluffy, gentle cloud. Hello? Aren't we moving back to big brother and now big brother has names like Apple, Google, Yahoo. To me the cloud seems great in theory but has far too many issues. The cloud should go away - what we all want are "personal clouds" that we control, can touch, feel, see. That's the future! Not giving all your precious data to people you shouldn't trust.
Well welcome, hopefully you can become a vital member of the community and really help to push far ahead of google. Which Im sure the development team would love. This will of course earn you alot points too and get you on the leaders board. z d n e t t h a n k Im not sure i come to an agreement with you on every level, howevor it absolutely was a good posting, many thanks for taking the time to put up your ideas.
This is my first visit to z d n e t site. Thanks a lot and keep sharing the information. Keep updating the information for all of us.how can i clean up, because i don???t know why it seems my skeen has to fat i get the glasses dirty every day.i search y a h o o Very good quality indeed. I surely recommend it. The template used in their site is also great.
Fantastic news about the new release.I positively enjoying each little bit of it and I have you b o o k m a r k e d to check out new stuff you weblog post.Im not sure i come to an agreement with you on every level, howevor it absolutely was a good posting, many thanks for taking the time to put up your ideas
Good day to confirm this comment I would appreciate T h e b e s t o f Z D N e t d e l i v e r e d your website very nice to everyone Yes, Oracle is the only one with shared-disk architecture, but that is there advantage. It means you can add or remove nodes and the database lives on. In a shared nothing architecture, if you lose a node, you lose the system. I'm sure Oracle appreciates EMC highlighting their advantage.I also desire to signal in your RSS feeds. Thank you as soon as once again and maintain up the great operate Awesome post! Thank you very much || thanks for nice content this is really benefit to me.

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix