Tech Broiler

Jason Perlow and Scott Raymond

iPad iSolationism

By | February 14, 2010, 8:48am PST

Summary: Apple seems to be formulating its current business strategy based on the guiding philosophy of the most isolationist nation in the world.


Apple, a company that is the most envied of the consumer electronics industry for its brand loyalty, seems to be formulating its current business strategy based on the guiding philosophy of the most isolationist nation in the world.

Kim Il-Sung, the late leader of North Korea called it Juche (pronounced Ju-Che). In English, the term is loosely translated as “spirit of self-Reliance”.

Since its beginnings in the 1950s, Juche Sasang (The Juche Idea) is the foundation that has provided the base ideology and tenets by which the rogue and isolationist nation has behaved, conducted itself on the international stage and controlled its own people in a never to be questioned iron grip dominated by a culture of leader worship that has continued to this very day.

Click on the “Read the rest of this entry” link below for more.

Kim Il-Sung, “The Great Leader” and founder of Juche Sasang may have died in 1994, but he is still revered as a god and considered the de-facto “Eternal President” of that country, even though his son, “Dear Leader” Kim Jong-Il is now the current head of state.

There is virtually nowhere in the populated parts of North Korea where you can go and not be surrounded by Kimilsungism and Juche Sasang, which is widely depicted in propaganda and giant monuments erected to eternally memorialize their Great Leader and his guiding philosophy.

For those of you not familiar with Juche Sasang I’ll summarize the core philosophy here.

  1. The people must have independence in thought and politics, economic self-sufficiency and self-reliance in defense.
  2. Policy must reflect the will and aspirations of the masses and employ them fully in revolution and construction.
  3. Methods of revolution and construction must be suitable to the situation of the country.
  4. The most important work of revolution and construction is molding people ideologically as communists and mobilizing them to constructive action.

The more I think about how Apple and Steve Jobs have been guiding the company in recent days, the more I  believe that many of the components of Juche Sasang are starting to influence their actions, whether it was intended or not. The result? iJuche.

Clearly, Apple is one of the most if not the most successful consumer electronics company in the world, and represents the epitome of the capitalist ideal. Let’s not forget for one moment that Apple must live within the capitalist system, and as a corporation its sole purpose is to make money.

However, as a company or a pseudo-nation state within our capitalist system, what Apple is doing is downright isolationist. If Kim Il-Sung were alive today, I have no doubt he would be very proud of what Apple and Steve Jobs — a known practitioner of Zen and one who has frequently embraced Eastern philosophies in his personal life — have achieved according to Juche Sasang.

Lets get to the first and most important tenet — Independence in thought and politics“Think Different” has always been part of the Apple philosophy, but it was eventually put down into words during a well-publicized advertising campaign in 1997.

Here’s to the crazy ones. The misfits. The rebels. The troublemakers. The round pegs in the square holes. The ones who see things differently. They’re not fond of rules. And they have no respect for the status quo. You can quote them, disagree with them, glorify or vilify them. About the only thing you can’t do is ignore them. Because they change things. They push the human race forward. And while some may see them as the crazy ones, we see genius. Because the people who are crazy enough to think they can change the world, are the ones who do.

Since 1984 this Thinking Different/Macintoshism has morphed itself into independence from the mores of the personal computing industry — the IBM-Intel PC/Microsoft Windows ecosystem of business and productivity software — and becoming the primary tool of creative content types which built its own ecosystem with little or no participation from the rest of the industry key players.

Case in point, the iPhone, which has its own self-enclosed isolationist App Store which has its own bizarre and often contradictory set of rules which governs acceptance of applications into that system.

[Update: Apple's App Store isolationism and exclusionary practices appears to have prompted two dozen large wireless carriers to unite and form the Wholesale Applications Community, their own Open Applications Platform at Mobile World Congress 2010]

Any perceived duplication of functionality is summarily rejected, and no other programmatic model besides iPhone OS’s Objective C or iPhone Web Applications on that device and in that App Store is permitted, hence the lack of Adobe Flash/Adobe Air as well as Adobe Digital Editions on the iPhone and now the iPad. Java? Forget about it.

Adobe Systems, which was once the primary supplier of creative content “Killer Apps” for Macintosh, and historically the banner bearer and poster child of iJuche, is now being shunned away from Apple’s independent iEcosystem for its “laziness”. Conform to our rules, or be exiled and punished.

[Update: Adobe has now demonstrated Adobe Flash Player and Adobe Air on Google's Android OS, with apps forthcoming in late Q1/early Q2 2010.]

Adobe is not the only company Apple is isolating itself from. While some might say Apple had no choice in the matter once Google launched its own competing Android OS, it no longer permits “Native” Google applications on the iPhone and the iPad.

One could certainly argue that Google may be trying to standardize a HTML5 web-based application model for all mobile devices, but the bottom line is Android has much better Google services functionality than the iPhone and iPad does today because interaction with the Google application cloud is limited to what the Safari browser is capable of on those devices.

While the same HTML5 web apps can run on Android as they do on iPhone, Google’s services on Android also have the benefit of having native applications for GMail, Google Maps/Buzz, Google Voice and Google Chat, whereas on iPhone they are strictly web apps. This is by Apple’s design and desire.

There is also the issue that Microsoft is also glaringly absent from the iPhone and iPad equation. Microsoft, which has provided the key productivity suite for Macintosh since its very inception, has only released two iPhone applications, Tag and Seadragon.

Notably absent from the iPad during launch was a native Microsoft Office port for the new device. Instead, Apple has gone the “Self-Reliance” route of iJuche and released its own office suite in the form of Keynote (presentation), Pages (document processing) and Numbers (spreadsheet), a port of the iWork applications from Macintosh.

Based on the exclusionary self-reliance that we have seen with iPhone and the App Store, It is unclear whether Microsoft’s future offerings or even the Open Source community’s offerings such as an OpenOffice.org port — arguably the best free productivity suite for Macintosh today — will even be allowed into this new iPhone/iPad ecosystem.

Opera, arguably one of the best mobile web browsers on the market, was recently ported to iPhone and submitted to the App Store. Whether Apple will accept it or invoke its “Duplication of functionality” clause remains to be seen.

The second and third tenets of Juche Sasang are also apparent in Apple’s core ethos. Apple has always been perceived as giving customers what they want, but in reality Apple only does what is good for Apple. It knows what its customers want, and what is good for Apple is good and is best for its users. Why else would it abandon the leading independent trade show dedicated to their products?

Finally, there is the fourth tenet — molding people ideologically as communists and mobilizing them to constructive action. While I would never accuse anyone who subscribes to the Apple ideology as a communist, they certainly have been effectively mobilized and suit the whims of iJuche.

All challengers to the “system” are to be thwarted and discredited. There is no room for rational discourse when Apple’s decisions or philosophy is challenged, as far as the iJuche faithful are concerned.

[Update: Apple has now banned developers who have discovered iPhone security exploits from its App Store.]

North Korea had its “Great Leader”, and his philosophy didn’t take them very far. Apple and Steve Jobs has Insane Greatness and now iJuche. Whether Apple’s embrace of increased isolationism will pan out for the best for the company remains to be seen.

Can Apple’s current philosophy be easily compartmentalized into “iJuche Sasang” or have I been drinking too much Soju? Talk Back and Let Me Know.

Disclaimer: The postings and opinions on this blog are my own and don’t necessarily represent IBM’s positions, strategies or opinions.

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Topics

Jason Perlow, Sr. Technology Editor at ZDNet, is a technologist with over two decades of experience integrating large heterogeneous multi-vendor computing environments in Fortune 500 companies.

Disclosure

Jason Perlow

My Full-Time Employer is IBM. I write as a freelancer for ZDNet.

Disclaimer: The postings and opinions on this blog are my own and don't necessarily represent IBM's positions, strategies or opinions.

I own no investments or direct financial instruments in the companies I write about.

Biography

Jason Perlow

Jason Perlow, Sr. Technology Editor at ZDNet is a technologist with over two decades of experience with integrating large heterogeneous multi-vendor computing environments in Fortune 500 companies. A long-time computer enthusiast starting the age of 13 with his first Apple ][ personal computer, he began his freelance writing career starting at ZD Sm@rt Reseller in 1996 and has since authored numerous guest columns for ZDNet Enterprise and Ziff-Davis Internet. Jason was previously Senior Technology Editor for Linux Magazine, where he wrote about Open Source issues from 1999 to 2008.

In his spare time, Jason is an avid amateur chef and food writer, where his work reviewing New Jersey restaurants has appeared in The New York Times. He is also the founder of the popular food web site eGullet and blogs about restaurants and cooking at OffTheBroiler.com.

100
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

RE: iPad iSolationism
JACOBSONR 14th Oct
Good day to confirm this comment I would appreciate T h e b e s t o f Z D N e t d e l i v e r e d your website very nice to everyone Yes, Oracle is the only one with shared-disk architecture, but that is there advantage. It means you can add or remove nodes and the database lives on. In a shared nothing architecture, if you lose a node, you lose the system. I'm sure Oracle appreciates EMC highlighting their advantage.I also desire to signal in your RSS feeds. Thank you as soon as once again and maintain up the great operate Awesome post! Thank you very much || thanks for nice content this is really benefit to me.
0 Votes
+ -
This is a Classic, Jason
honeymonster Updated - 14th Feb 2010
Just made my favorites bookmarks list

iSolationism - love it! And damn descriptive of
the current state of affairs as well.

It is indeed surprising how many iJuche
faithfuls hit the blogs and defended Apple's
stance on iPad. They all seem prepared to leave
the free Internet behind and seclude themselves
in the iWalled Garden.

"Those, who would give up essential liberty
to purchase a little temporary safety, deserve
neither liberty nor safety."
-- Benjamin Franklin
0 Votes
+ -
He nailed it
T1Oracle 14th Feb 2010
This is exactly what Apple is.
0 Votes
+ -
Flash To The Rescue?
jfiser 14th Feb 2010
In a matter of weeks, Flash 10.1 will be on every
smart phone and tablet except Apple's. So we'll
see if The People want what Flash brings to a
browser - or not.

I think Jobs has backed himself into a paranoid
corner.
0 Votes
+ -
And what if
Ken_z 14th Feb 2010
It had been a blog on MS?

How much different would be?

Excluding monopoly abuse, of course.
0 Votes
+ -
Much Different..
Techdelirios 17th Feb 2010
Microsoft doesn't force everyone into using only "APPROVED" applications on Windows. I think the whole app store concept is kinda weird...

Why would you want a device which offers only one place to buy applications? All other devices have multiple "app stores" available and you can install software from any of them. Choice is good.
0 Votes
+ -
Open system vs. closed?

Apple has always designed the whole widget. That is their business
model and it is what made them so successful.

Pick what you want and be happy.

And if you can't be happy without dancing chickens in your
advertisements then embrace the freedom to see all advertisements you
want on any other device of your choice.
..so if you're quoting him, you must be a terrorist!
0 Votes
+ -
What a load of BS
wackoae 14th Feb 2010
Seriously, even people who aren't Apple's biggest fan will find this piece of crap of self serving blog the biggest load of sudo-journalism excrement ZDNet has ever published.

This article is not even good enough to meet the quality of the National Esquire.
0 Votes
+ -
Seriously...
Wolfie2K3 14th Feb 2010
If you're gonna lambaste Jason, at least use the right words.

First off - it's PSEUDO - not SUDO. PSEUDO = fake while SUDO = a *nix Super User DO for elevating privilege levels..

Secondly, this is a blog - an OPINION piece. Not hard journalism. It's Jason's 2 cents worth. You don't have to agree with it.

Third, what's this "National Esquire" publication? There is indeed a magazine called Esquire - It's a men's magazine that's been around since the 1930s. There's also the National ENQUIRER - the tabloid and it's been around since 1926. So which is it?
0 Votes
+ -
Oh man!
wackoae 14th Feb 2010
First off, this is a tech forum. sudo is exactly the word I wanted to use. I feel so sorry that you are such an idiot that don't have the intelligence to understand when someone purposely uses tech words as part of a tech post.

Secondly, nobody is claiming that this BS is a serious news article. There is nothing wrong with slamming stupid/uneducated opinions.

Third, I neither buy or read junk magazines. Only people dumb enough to spend money on garbage/fake news mags know the actual name. I'm also enough of a man that I don't need to read a stupid magazine to tell me how to be a man or what to buy. No wonder I don't know the difference between trash and garbage.
  • Flagged
0 Votes
+ -
You're only slamming yourself
T1Oracle 14th Feb 2010
By claiming something is "stupid" without structuring a proper logical argument supported by facts.

Jason's article is full of fact. You on the other hand are full of something far less fragrant...
0 Votes
+ -
Since when is an opinion a fact??
wackoae 14th Feb 2010
Talk about stupid, and you came out to post.
0 Votes
+ -
Reading is fundamental
T1Oracle 14th Feb 2010
"the lack of Adobe Flash/Adobe Air as well as Adobe Digital Editions on the iPhone"

I suggest you try some of it. When you get to be an adult like the rest of us, then you can try *critical* reading. That's when things like facts become apparent.
0 Votes
+ -
So the opinion is not stupid because the iPhone does not approve Adobe products.

Keep up the good work. Dude.
  • Flagged
0 Votes
+ -
When you become an adult we can discuss this.
0 Votes
+ -
You made my day!
hretic 15th Feb 2010
ZDNet should start advertising abt people like
you, Fanboi's on a Rampage!

You call this article BS and go on dissing
anyone who replies to whatever you had to say.
One fellow asked for a constructive argument as
to why you're being all abusive and you diss
him too.

Anyways, it was fun to read your comments!

:-D
0 Votes
+ -
Opinion? Sure. Thought provoking? Definitely
John Zern Updated - 16th Feb 2010
Come on, he brings up some values avenues of thought, which is what it's all about, isn't it?

An opinion from a different perspective. One that fits pretty glove in hand from my point of view after reading it.

Disprove him if you want[can], or don't.

But don't dismiss him because he dare spoke ill of Apple.
0 Votes
+ -
...toiling for Amerikan Capitalist. Who would have ever thought...
0 Votes
+ -
More Alarmist Claptrap from Jason
CowLauncher 14th Feb 2010
I know you are trying to be controversial but really. You paint
a successful capitalist American company with a socialist
brush just to promote your anti-Apple agenda.

I wouldn't let my cat poop-on this tripe.
0 Votes
+ -
RE: iPad iSolationism
nothingness 14th Feb 2010
Stop writing this sort of drivel, the larger world already sees us U.S. as a self congratulatory smug opportunistic predictory country as it is, we don't need any more encouragement on your part.
0 Votes
+ -
RE: iPad iSolationism
tburzio 14th Feb 2010
The intense misery suffered by the millions who have died under that hellish regime cry out in agony over this infantile comparison.
0 Votes
+ -
Internet = Freedom
jfiser Updated - 14th Feb 2010
The comparison seems exactly right to me.

Internet = Freedom

Jobs is about to learn this.
0 Votes
+ -
Oh, man!
Userama 14th Feb 2010
Over the top, Jason. Over the top.
Comparing a well-run, profitable company in a free market
economy with a totalitarian regime is nuts.
0 Votes
+ -
RE: iPad iSolationism
delos eisenhorn 14th Feb 2010
It's funny how angry some of the responses are--undoubtedly from Apple faithful. Kinda enforces the author's point. Someone may not agree with this article, but there is no reason to get angry (free thought people). Interesting post.
0 Votes
+ -
Or, more likely
frgough 16th Feb 2010
people are understandably offended at the trivializing of a truly horrible,
murderous regime by comparing it to a company that makes a
commercial product millions of people enjoy buying.
0 Votes
+ -
A new low for journalism. Well done CBS!
Arthur Browning 14th Feb 2010
Amazing. Not only did someone write this, but other people presumably subbed it and uploaded it. Absolutely fascinating. Well done everyone, really, well done.
0 Votes
+ -
Agree or not is was amusing and it takes a cold person not to admit that.
0 Votes
+ -
RE: iPad iSolationism
dynaxis Updated - 14th Feb 2010
Jason, this article is just reckless of the people suffering
under the tyranny of the dictator you mentioned. How can you
treat JuChe just as an ideology? How much do you know
about the current infringement upon human rights in North
Korea? JuChe reads as it spells not "YuChe." Judging from
this simple mistake, it seems that what you know about it is
just from your reading of a Wikipedia entry on JuChe. Just
don't write on what you don't know enough.
0 Votes
+ -
Contributr
What do I know about it?
jperlow Updated - 14th Feb 2010
I am the godparent to a child in a mixed Korean/Chinese family, I have attended traditional Korean wedding rituals and I live in close proximity to probably the second largest Korean-American community in the United States. I have numerous Korean friends. I know far more about it than a typical American.

I'm not comparing Apple to the human rights violations of North Korea. Juche is an ideology just as the various forms of Fascism that were practiced during the 1930's and 1940s or other forms of Communism and Marxism are ideologies. That those governments which have adopted those ideologies have done abominable things to human beings needs to be treated separately.
0 Votes
+ -
Ok... read on...
dynaxis Updated - 14th Feb 2010
First, separate from what I disagree with your point, I really appreciate
you as a generous people who is willing to embrace different cultures.

And I got your point, but think your effort to understand our history
and culture is not enough.

Maybe even some Koreans have different thoughts on the
ideology than me. But, to my knowledge, the ideology was created by
the command of the dictator to back his reign. The formation of North
Korea is quite unique compared to other communist countries. The
ideology didn't proceed the formation of the national system. I think
this is a big difference from other countries, regardless of what I
believe.

That's why I don't agree with you on your point. Reading your article, I
just feel like the ideology was created in a good will. I think it is
wrong.

I didn't want to offend you on this matter though I should admit that I
was a little bit upset reading it.
0 Votes
+ -
Contributr
Clarification
jperlow 14th Feb 2010
"Reading your article, I just feel like the ideology was created in a good will."

I am sure all of the architects of these various political ideologies created them in what they thought was good faith and good will.

I have no doubt Kim Il-Sung believed it, or Kim Jong-Il believes it at least on some level. That doesn't mean it was or is or what they did to human beings in that name of that ideology is justifiable.
0 Votes
+ -
Maybe I'm overacting... But...
dynaxis 14th Feb 2010
Dear Jason, maybe I'm overacting to your post since you used the
ideology to criticize the dark (at least as you think) side of Apple.

But what I'm saying is that the ideology was not created at all in a
good will from the start, different from what you think. That's what
the history of Korea states at least to my belief. The closed national
system of N. Korea first, and then came the fake ideology to cover it
up. The formation of N. Korea has been resulted from the subtle
situation surrounding the end of World War II, and the tension between
the U.S. and the USSR. Far different from other communist countries.
The theorist having worked quite much on the creation of the
ideology has come across to S. Korea stating how it was created.

I don't want to expand more on my opinion. But if you have any
Korean friend who came across to the States from Korea when she/he
was adult (I'm sure you do), just try to let them read this article. I
think it is worth trying.

Anyway, I found myself not to agree with you on your point on Apple,
too. happy I don't worship Jobs, but think it is a way of how a company
operates a good biz at the same time as providing quality services to
their customers. I'm at this time using my oldest Mac and Adobe Flash
drives its fan crazy. wink
0 Votes
+ -
While Apple has done many isolationist things, it does not mean they have terrorized people like the leaders of N. Korea.

It's like comparisons with Hitler, you just don't do it.

The isolationist parts I agree with however.
0 Votes
+ -
It's way beyond tasteless
frgough 16th Feb 2010
it's disgusting and can only have been written by someone so detached
from human compassion that he can compare a genocidal regime to a
company that makes freaking computers. There isn't profanity sufficient
to properly label this kind of waste of DNA.
0 Votes
+ -
I call BS. You're way beyond tasteless.
John Zern Updated - 16th Feb 2010
because now you're using their plight for your own compassionless reasons.

Are you really that upset that he is using the idiology of North Korea, with the thought of how the people are treated?

Or is it the fact that he dares speak out against Apple, something that has riled you up many times in the past, whenever a negative blog on Apple is written?

Would you happily agree with everything he wrote where it pertaining to MS, or would you reply with feigned indignation?

gam sah hahm ni da
The first principle:

"The people must have independence in thought and politics, economic self-sufficiency and self-reliance in defense."

Sounds a lot like oh... the Declaration of Independence and US Constitution and it's 2nd amendment.

The 2nd Principle:

"Policy must reflect the will and aspirations of the masses..."

Sounds a lot like a representative democracy. You know, the bit about we elect representatives to do their job in congress as well as that of the president.

The 3rd and 4th principles don't directly apply to the US - though, someone could make the argument that public schools do their job to indoctrinate our youth.
0 Votes
+ -
....
dynaxis 14th Feb 2010
I think someone coming out with a set of well-written sentences alone
doesn't make an ideology. Its context and intention must be considered
together.

And in the regard, and due to the fact that there are people positive to
what Apple does, I'm afraid that even to some degree, people may
misunderstand the context and background of the ideology in question.

That is my concern. It is fairly easy to see plenty of misunderstandings on
someone's history and culture, despite good wills and intellects of the
people trying to understand them.
0 Votes
+ -
What about my other comment? You don't know how Koreans feel
reading your article.
0 Votes
+ -
Contributr
Again
jperlow 14th Feb 2010
This opinion piece is not about human rights violations. It's about business isolationism.

The United States an as a nation and the previous presidential administration has frequently been compared to as "Fascist" inside and outside this country by the left-wing critics. But I'm not going to go ballistic as a Jewish American screaming that we've diminished what the Nazis did just because some people make those comparisons.
0 Votes
+ -
This kind of defamation has no place
HollywoodDog 16th Feb 2010
Calling people Nazis does diminish the serious
understanding of the evil of the actual Nazis,
and has no place in our discourse. Calling the
Apple Computer company of Cupertino California
a North Korean dictatorship, complete with the
words and imagery, is about as offensive.

Not only is it just ridiculous on its face -
anyone who wants something other than Apple has
a million other choices while North Koreans are
stuck there - it's a horribly insensitive thing
to even bring this stuff up in such a flippant
and irreverant manner. This isn't an episode of
South Park.

You know what's going on in North Korea. How
dare you do this? Shame on you.
0 Votes
+ -
Quick. Write another article and bury this one.

Except make it about Jobs' Elitism. That would focus in on how Apple operates with reasonable accuracy.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elitism
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/31/weekinreview/31lohr.html
0 Votes
+ -
(delete this)
markbn Updated - 14th Feb 2010
n/t
0 Votes
+ -
Nobel Peace Prize for one article?
WinTard 14th Feb 2010
Apple won't accomplish anything either for 34+ years of attempting to brainwash feeble minds. Except perhaps to convince a minuscule portion (5%) of the market they are the light, the proud, the only...

~~~~~~~
Believe those who are seeking the truth. Doubt those who find it.
~ Andre Gide (1869 - 1951)
Someone needs to give you feedback before they air.
0 Votes
+ -
Obama won one for doing nothing .....
wackoae Updated - 14th Feb 2010
... at least Jason suckered ZDNet into publishing his garbage.

The threshold for a Nobel Peace Prize is obviously very low. Jason has a very good chance to win.
0 Votes
+ -
AND its shareholders. What's the fuzz about it? At this point you should know that Apple gives a damn about
anything except its bottom line. Is that bad? I don't think so.

The bad thing is when foolish bloggers hail Apple or its products as a model of perfection (no multitasking
anyone?), hype them (Andrew Nusca, Adrian), or stupidly believe Apple is committed to advancement of
technology or users' quality of life for the sake of doing it. Perlow is guilty of the latter foolishness
with respect to the iPad (or maybe he is smarter than one thinks and has collected money for that). Jason
now seems to be pissed off because Apple is not the good Samaritan.

One more time, Apple only cares about its bottom line and there is nothing wrong with that, no matter what
Stallman or his rabid followers think or say, or what Google does, for that matter. The latter also cares
about Open Source to the extent it helps its bottom line as well.
0 Votes
+ -
Contributr
Shareholder Obligations
jperlow 14th Feb 2010
I never said that Apple wasn't good to its
shareholders. And yes, they've been extremely
good to them, if you track the price of their
stock and their record earnings.

However, isolating themselves from potential
partners or developer/contributors to their
ecosystem is not a good idea if the company is
to move into a model which is more of a
electronics vendor/video game console developer
than a computer hardware company.
0 Votes
+ -
You arrived late to the party as usual
markbn Updated - 14th Feb 2010
Apple has been practicing this isolationism for a
while, and there is no sign that it's hurting them
in any way. You arrive late to say this.

At the time it starts hurting Apple, they will blame
someone else (like in the case of AT&T, and also
like in the Google Voice fiasco), and then will
change their stance (if necessary).
And it's one of the reasons Steve Jobs got fired in the first place.
0 Votes
+ -
History repeates itself... nt
T1Oracle 15th Feb 2010
nt
0 Votes
+ -
RE: iPad iSolationism
JACOBSONR 14th Oct
Good day to confirm this comment I would appreciate T h e b e s t o f Z D N e t d e l i v e r e d your website very nice to everyone Yes, Oracle is the only one with shared-disk architecture, but that is there advantage. It means you can add or remove nodes and the database lives on. In a shared nothing architecture, if you lose a node, you lose the system. I'm sure Oracle appreciates EMC highlighting their advantage.I also desire to signal in your RSS feeds. Thank you as soon as once again and maintain up the great operate Awesome post! Thank you very much || thanks for nice content this is really benefit to me.

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix