Tech Broiler

Jason Perlow and Scott Raymond

Limelight Networks: Why the Olympics didn't 'Melt' the Internet

By | August 17, 2008, 8:30am PDT

I admit it, even I was skeptical. When I received the first demonstration of the Silverlight plugin and the NBCOlympics.com web site back in March of this year at the 2008 Microsoft Technology Summit, where a group of Open Source experts gathered from around the world were asked for feedback on various aspects of Microsoft’s emerging technologies, I truly believed that when they finally rolled that website out, that NBC was going to be overwhelmed with traffic and the site would come to a screeching halt, resulting in a catastrophic embarrassment for Microsoft and NBC.

At the time, the content caching partner for the Olympics that was disclosed to us was Akamai, which is what Microsoft currently uses for hosting its own downloads from MSDN and Microsoft Update.  Akamai uses a centralized data hosting infrastructure with big Internet pipes that mirrors content that is hosted on a customer’s own servers. Usually with the aid of a special caching appliance installed at the customer’s ISP or edge network, the request to download that content is re-directed to Akamai’s own servers and fat Internet pipes. When you download big ISO CD and DVD images from MSDN, its going right to Akamai’s data centers over the public Internet. As fat as Akamai’s pipes are, I’ve seen MSDN’s downloads slow to a crawl during peak download periods, such as the days following Windows XP SP3 and Windows Vista SP1’s release. So like my colleagues here at ZDNet, I was expecting the worst.

As it turns out, Akamai is actually used for some, but not all of the cached content used on NBCOlympics.com — it hosts the “static” content such as the .JPG files and HTML. However, for all the heavy lifting, such as the streaming video, it’s all going through infrastructure hosted by Limelight Networks.

Limelight Networks Operations Center

Above: Limelight Networks’ Operations Center in Tempe, AZ.

Click on the “Read the rest of this entry” link below for more.

Who are these Limelight guys, anyway? They are a Tempe, Arizona-based company which operates a global network of fiber-optic interconnected datacenters. Their backbone is capable of 2 Terabits (Tbps)  per second of sustained data transfers and they globally replicate approximately 5 Petabytes  of data on their storage network, which utilize a mix of proprietary vendor SAN replication technology such as EMC SRDF and Open Source-based technology developed by Limelight itself. Surprise! There’s some Linux back-ending all that Windows Media.

Back in late July of this year, NBC finally announced that Limelight would be the primary supplier of content caching services for the Olympics. Where Limelight differs from Akamai and why the Internet didn’t “melt” is quite simple — they are completely “off the cloud”.  In other words, unlike Akamai and similar content caching providers, their system isn’t deployed over the public Internet.

Also See: Limelight Networks Operations Center Photo Gallery

Say what? Let me explain. When you download videos from NBCOlympics.com, your computer isn’t actually going to the Internet to get content. In fact, the content is usually no more than 2 router hops away from your ISP. Limelight has partnered with over 800 broadband Internet providers worldwide (such as Verizon, Comcast, Road Runner and Optimum Online/Cablevision) so that the content is either co-located in the same facility as your ISP’s main communications infrastructure, or it leases a dedicated Optical Carrier line so that it actually appears as part of your ISP’s internal network. In most cases, you’re never even leaving your Tier 1 provider to get the video. Slick, isn’t it?limelight-stacktrace.jpg

So how does all that content get there? Live HD video feeds from the Olympics venues are delivered via optical link to NBC’s International Broadcast Centre in Beijing. The Hi-Def signal is then transcoded/downgraded to 480i video resolution using a special CISCO Scientific Atlanta video encoding appliance solution and sent over trans-continental Optical Carrier to NBC Studios in Los Angeles, and then to NBC’s broadcast center in 30 Rockefeller Plaza (”30 Rock”) in New York City where the encoding to Windows Media Format (WMF) takes place. Via short haul Optical Carrier connection, the Windows Media files are then distributed to Limelight Networks’ primary East Coast replicated data center in New York, and then on to the operations center in Tempe, which replicates all 3000+ hours of Olympics video to its global network of ISP co-located data centers and is queued for media streaming at the very edge your local ISP’s network (see network trace screen shot above). To the end user, this is all transparent, and it just plain works.

Localized content caching is going to be the wave of the future, especially when we start seeing lots of “On Demand” content being offered from next-generation media delivery services. If we truly expect stuff like 3G/4G/5G video to be delivered without any hiccups to next generation cell phones and other wireless devices, services like Limelight are going to become increasingly important.

The near-flawless operation of the live video streaming from NBCOlympics.com over the last week is proof that localized content caching technology works.

Will you be implementing localized content caching for your own rich media based sites? Talk Back and let me know.

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Jason Perlow, Sr. Technology Editor at ZDNet, is a technologist with over two decades of experience integrating large heterogeneous multi-vendor computing environments in Fortune 500 companies.

Disclosure

Jason Perlow

My Full-Time Employer is IBM. I write as a freelancer for ZDNet.

Disclaimer: The postings and opinions on this blog are my own and don't necessarily represent IBM's positions, strategies or opinions.

I own no investments or direct financial instruments in the companies I write about.

Biography

Jason Perlow

Jason Perlow, Sr. Technology Editor at ZDNet is a technologist with over two decades of experience with integrating large heterogeneous multi-vendor computing environments in Fortune 500 companies. A long-time computer enthusiast starting the age of 13 with his first Apple ][ personal computer, he began his freelance writing career starting at ZD Sm@rt Reseller in 1996 and has since authored numerous guest columns for ZDNet Enterprise and Ziff-Davis Internet. Jason was previously Senior Technology Editor for Linux Magazine, where he wrote about Open Source issues from 1999 to 2008.

In his spare time, Jason is an avid amateur chef and food writer, where his work reviewing New Jersey restaurants has appeared in The New York Times. He is also the founder of the popular food web site eGullet and blogs about restaurants and cooking at OffTheBroiler.com.

72
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

RE: Limelight Networks: Why the Olympics didn't 'Melt' the Internet
JACOBSONR 14th Oct
Good day to confirm this comment I would appreciate T h e b e s t o f Z D N e t d e l i v e r e d your website very nice to everyone Yes, Oracle is the only one with shared-disk architecture, but that is there advantage. It means you can add or remove nodes and the database lives on. In a shared nothing architecture, if you lose a node, you lose the system. I'm sure Oracle appreciates EMC highlighting their advantage.I also desire to signal in your RSS feeds. Thank you as soon as once again and maintain up the great operate Awesome post! Thank you very much || thanks for nice content this is really benefit to me.
0 Votes
+ -
(nt)
Cali Lewis mentioned her disappointment with the coverage for two reasons on her video podcasts. First, Silverlight does not work on Linux, which is a bummer for the more geeky members of the audience. Second, if any event is popular, meaning ratings and Ad revenue, it is not shown on the web, it is heald for prime time coverage.

I would like to know if any limelight customers were impacted by all this. I guess it would be hard to find that out...

Thanks
0 Votes
+ -
I want to subscribe to a video service that has a giant TiVo that will store at least a weeks worth of programing from all the broadcast and cable networks. Then I want them to dish out a program to me on-demand over the net. I could sacrifice quality for convenience. Local and foreign programing would be a nice touch. I think it's doable but all the content providers would have to sign up.
0 Votes
+ -
Contributr
Could be achieved in distributed form
jperlow Updated - 17th Aug 2008
What I want more than what you describe is the ability for me to stream a "missed" recording from someone else's DVR in the middle of the night to my DVR when it is idle. Or download anything that is on someone else's DVR via a peer to peer content sharing network.

I use DIRECTV's HD DVR service. They all are also capable of "On Demand" video download. But the On Demand content is very limited. In theory, every DVR from DIRECTV or Cablevison or whatever should be all indexed and connected to a central or distributed database, where any customer can find a "missed" or already recorded program on someone else's machine or groups of machines and download that program to their DVR. Not unlike the way Bittorrent works. The problem is not technical, but licensing and rebroadcast rights and all that stuff. NBC in Los Angeles probably doesnt want people in New York viewing pre-recorded primetime material because it has localized commercials and stuff. And some programs such as sporting events are only be licensed to air for a very limited time, they will need expiration windows for the material if it is shareable. They'll also have to figure out how to have generic content feeds (like what you get in a network downlink at a local affiliate before you broadcast) that are cached and how to inject localized advertisements on the fly. Doable, but not that easy to figure out from a legal point of view.
0 Votes
+ -
We agree about content providers...
Mac Hosehead 17th Aug 2008
But in my fantasy world you would not necessarily need a DVR (you could pay extra for a download) and you could get a stream anywhere with net access.
0 Votes
+ -
Contributr
However, I think what I am proposing is doable with current technology. What you are proposing is doable with technology that will be broadly available within 5 years -- it would need fiber optics to the household. Not unlike what I describe in my Linux in 2016 piece where everything runs on the cloud.
0 Votes
+ -
it's coming
Al_nyc 19th Aug 2008
Don't worry. I'm sure in the next year or so you will be able to do that. Just not for free.
Jason,

Your work is looking better and better! Congrats!

George Ou
http://www.ForMortals.com
This busts the myth that the Internet works at the same speed for everyone. The idea that a small mom & pop shop should be able to deliver video just as fast as a major website is simply a nonstarter. Server capacity and caching capacity must be purchased as with anything of value. This is still a ???level playing field??? because the bandwidth and caching capability is available to anyone at the same price for anyone who could pay for it. A level playing field does not mean every content provider ends up with the same speed as some people would suggest and it???s never been that way.

Peer-to-peer is a partial exception because it allows anyone to distribute out-of-order data which can't be viewed or heard until after the entire file is finished. That works great for file distribution or video downloads where people don't care about immediate gratification, but it would never work for high quality in-order on demand content.

There are P2P streaming technologies like TVU but that's limited to the upstream capacity of the typical broadband network and the video streams are very low bit-rate and very low quality. Out-of-order high quality content or in-order low quality content is fine when it???s free (including mostly pirated content), but no commercial content has chosen this free method of distribution. The Olympics were paid for by those Lenovo commercials.
You're as bad as John McCain, George Ou - you're getting pummelled, but you insist that means you're "winning" for Big Telco, somehow....
Do you define neutrality in outcome or neutrality in treatment?

The deep philosophical debate over Net Neutrality is the meaning of the word ?Neutrality?. Everyone can agree that Neutrality means fairness and equality, but how do we define fairness and equality? Is it about fairness between packets or fairness between people using the network? Is it about ensuring equality in the outcome or ensuring equality in opportunity? Is every website and every consumer entitled to equal performance over the Internet regardless of what they pay, or are they simply entitled to equal opportunity to pay for the same kind of performance? Should one megabit broadband service cost the same as ten megabit broadband service or should everyone be able to buy ten megabit broadband service at the same price?

Some Net Neutrality advocates argue for an equal outcome in the service that each user or company gets on the Internet. Others like Tim Berners-Lee who is the father of the World Wide Web strongly advocates of Net Neutrality and argues for equal opportunity to pay for the kind of service he desires.

?We pay for connection to the Net as though it were a cloud which magically delivers our packets. We may pay for a higher or a lower quality of service. We may pay for a service which has the characteristics of being good for video, or quality audio. But we each pay to connect to the Net, but no one can pay for exclusive access to me.?1

?Net Neutrality is NOT asking for the internet for free. Net Neutrality is NOT saying that one shouldn?t pay more money for high quality of service. We always have, and we always will.?2

1. http://dig.csail.mit.edu/breadcrumbs/node/132
2. http://dig.csail.mit.edu/breadcrumbs/node/144

I completely agree with Tim Berners-Lee and his definition of Neutrality and equality being applied to the opportunity to purchase service and not equality in the outcome. However, his position is actually in opposition to many Net Neutrality advocates and many Net Neutrality bills that would ban the sale of QoS and ban exclusive QoS to those who pay.

If you fundamentally support this type of legislation, then your definition of Neutrality is equality in service regardless of payment or ownership. If that's the case, then you could just as easily argue that LimeLight must equally share its infrastructure to all customers whether they pay a little or a lot.

Are you prepared to defend this ridiculous notion of equality in outcome instead of the equality in opportunity?

George Ou
0 Votes
+ -
Well, not quite
ChristopherWoods 20th Aug 2008
progressive-download (i.e., watch as you stream) P2P TV is on its way... the P2P-Next project (p2p-next.org) project's Swarm Player, currently in development but available for public trials, is proof that realtime, distributed on-demand video is doable.

EZTV, a very large collective of people (and large bittorrent tracker) has just started experimenting with the swarm player and 'tstream' files - backwardly-compatible torrent files which also contain the Swarm Player information required to coordinate the pieces into a progressive download... In short, you can (with a little time to let the show start buffering) actually watch files as they stream over bittorrent. I gave it a go with a couple of TV episodes (Daily Show and Colbert Report) and it worked almost flawlessly.


TVAnts is another example of much smaller-scale bittorrent-based realtime TV streaming, but the P2P-Next's Swarm Player, and the underlying developments and upgrades to the bittorrent technology, finally prove that on-demand, realtime P2P IPTV is actually feasible. In high quality. Available to almost everybody. Of course, the more people who watch and seed after they're done, the more others can enjoy the same content... Share-alike embodied. happy


The technology is nearly there - given 18-24 months, I'd say it'll still be patiently waiting for the telecommunications industry to catch up! Raw bandwidth to consumers' homes is what we need now, and fewer limits on bandwidth consumption. The ISPs are going to have to rework their business models because this is a real double-edged sword for them, but it's only a good thing for the consumer in the long run.
0 Votes
+ -
Great article !! A bit worrying though
Obiwan421 18th Aug 2008
I've always wonder how limelight network competed against Akamai. Nice.

No wonder Akamai tries so bad to burry that company in law courts with patent violations claims (and apparently is wining most of time).

Most people don't realize how critical those type of companies are for the internet to survive... What worries me a little is that "completely out of the cloud" mixed with "internet provider parternship" solution doesn't sound really like the Internet spirit. What happens to people that don't have an internet provider which partenered with limelight ? Are they still able to see that video ?
0 Votes
+ -
Here is what everybody see when trying to view a video:

"We're sorry, NBC is required to restrict this video to viewers within the United States"

Maybe that explain why they didn't 'melt' the Internet?
0 Votes
+ -
NBC restricted to viewers in the US!
johngtimms 18th Aug 2008
NBC is the ONLY provider of olympic content in the US as part of the agreement with the IOC. If you are outside the US then NBC is not for you, annother network paid/agreed with the IOC to deliver the Olympics to you.
0 Votes
+ -
Locality, locality, locality.
CobraA1 18th Aug 2008
Yup, yup, yup!!!

It's all about locality - how big and how close the caches are to the endpoints, and how many/few hops there are in between.

This is why local computing power will never go away, and why we will never, ever move towards "pure cloud computing;" it will always be a hybrid. The closer the data is to the CPU, and the less data has to be sent over the network, the faster and more responsive your applications will be. That's just a fact, it will not go away. You will always get better performance if you use the local machine to crunch some of the data.
0 Votes
+ -
I cannot find a single person I know who looked at any of it. Including me.
0 Votes
+ -
Well I did!
BrewIT 18th Aug 2008
I was very happy to be able to watch a few events which were'nt available during my waking hours. It was great being able to watch a few table tennis and badminton matches even though it was after the fact. Give it a try. Even on a slower computer I was able to see the video with little pause occurring
Cheers
Bob
0 Votes
+ -
I did!
dkerber@... 18th Aug 2008
I did; I have watched several hours of events that didn't make the network broadcast.
0 Votes
+ -
I watched quite a bit of the archery coverage. It looks pretty good, but not great. I an see the digital artifacts from the compression process, but it's not much worse than what Time Warner does to some of it's less popular channels. I think it is great because without this I would have maybe seen a 10 minutes of total TV coverage. Now I can see as much of the competition as I want.
0 Votes
+ -
Wrong-- the real reason is...
kckn4fun Updated - 18th Aug 2008
...that there aren't really that many computer loving geeks in the world and some of us have better things to do with our time than watching the olympics over the net.
This article is very interesting to read. In fact I know a bunch of people watching the Olympics in Europe over the web. It is not easy to get a firm answer on the success of localized content that Limelight used without quantitative numbers from them! Overall, I think that this article is worth reading and discussion.
0 Votes
+ -
...because nobody uses Vista. Not that the internet is just in the USA, but the NBC site made it impractical and sometimes impossible to view any Olympic Video content without Vista and Silverlight.

Now, I know the MS in MSNBC doesn't stand for "Miss", but in this case it means "FAIL" for those using OS/X, Linux, and even older version of Windows (which are the majority of Windows users out there)

By making their videos inaccessible to other types of computer users, NBC has managed to completely bungle their internet video offering.

But hey, at least they didn't melt the Internet. Go NBC!
0 Votes
+ -
Contributr
Olympics requiring Vista is a total falsehood
jperlow Updated - 18th Aug 2008
As much as I would love to rag on Vista and Microsoft for shutting users out, this plain is just not the case in this situation. It is a myth perpetrated by Silverlight detractors. It installs on XP SP2 just fine, I have it running on my own XP machine itself, and it runs on x86-based Macs. The only people who can possibly complain are Linux users are legacy Windows platform users. It is also possible to watch the streams without the use of the Silverlight plugin. There is even a Linux workaround for this. The streams are just plain Windows Media encapsulated by the Silverlight plugin, nothing more.
0 Votes
+ -
A Linux workaround? Do tell.
jason0x21 18th Aug 2008
There are still plenty of PPC macs out there, and even Intel macs require a very recent version of OS/X. There's also plenty of non XP/SP2 Windows machines out there.

But, more to the point, this is the first I've heard about a workaround for Linux. Do share, since a cursory Google search only turns up folks complaining about not being able to watch.

Even _more_ to the point, OS and architecture specific requirements are antithetical to the whole point of the internet and WWW. There are technologies that would enable everyone, and a deliberate choice was made not to use them.
0 Votes
+ -
Another workaround note.
jason0x21 18th Aug 2008
As another note about the linux workaround. _They're_ the _provider_. If they want my eyballs, _they_ have to make it accessible to _me_. Last time I went there with a browser, they essentially said "Your kind isn't welcome here."

What kind of business plan is that?
0 Votes
+ -
A viable, economically driven one?
mdemuth 18th Aug 2008
Like just about every other business out there?

I work for a graphics arts company. Do people come around looking for cutting edge impressionist art from us? Yes. Some. But not enough to make it economically worth while to offer it, so we point them elsewhere.
It is a business plan that, well, keeps us in business.
0 Votes
+ -
Old saying...
dominigan 18th Aug 2008
"It is better to remain silent and appear to be wise, than to open your mouth and remove all doubt."

Silverlight doesn't require Vista. As much as you rant on these boards, you really don't know crap about Silverlight.
As for what may or may not be required to view these videos, that seems to be the subject of much debate (and not just here, and not just by me). I don't think I should have to know exactly what Silverlight is. That's nonsense.

As to whether or not it's a required thing to view the videos, I've yet to see a clear answer. I'll admit that from what I read, and what I tried, I came to the conclusion that it was a required component, available only on Vista.

Now I hear it can work on XP/SP2, and on Mac OS/X version 4.8 and above. I remain unimpressed, and unable to view the videos. Perhaps you can clear some of this up?
It's what all you open source murderers are about. Someone says something you don't like, and you slit their throat. Hopefully they will arrest you and all your NAMBLA buddies. It's is a proven FACT that using open source software drives people to murder. Save yourself and others, pay for your software!!!
I guess It didn't. First it didn't use the most Popular system Flash, but instead used Silverlight. And too, for Mac Users, only Intel Mac are invited to the party. Silverlight 1 only will download and install on OSX.4.8 or higher. So Folks so are stuck using X.3.9 are completely out of the Picture. Then to beat it all Even if you have it installed a Layer comes up and states the platforms available and states that only Intel Macs Qualify.

And even on Windows, many versions of Windows are disqualified, and same with UNIX and Linux.

So chances are all the platforms not qualified. Only about 40% of Internet Users are able to see the images

Of Course MS got their foot in the door because of Adobe's complacency. Their I don't give a toot attitude.
0 Votes
+ -
Maybe...
Qbt 18th Aug 2008
Only 40% can see the images? I don't know, maybe redo your math...? And people talk about the FUD coming out of Redmond, lol.

http://marketshare.hitslink.com/report.aspx?qprid=11&qptimeframe=M&qpsp=104&qpnp=11&qpdt=1&qpct=2

BTW, if you insist on using an OS that has less that 1% marketshare, or an OS that is many many years out of date (XP was released almost 8 years ago), you really can't complain. When you did your research on which OS to use, you didn't add the fact that there will be many things you can't do on an OS that has less that 1% marketshare into your equation? Then you have no-one else to blame but yourself.

You people make me laugh...
0 Votes
+ -
Closer to 10%
jason0x21 18th Aug 2008
They don't say what OS the Mac Intel folks are using, but lets be generous and say half have upgraded to a version that lets them view the Olympics.

I don't know a single business person comfortable with the idea of telling 10% of their customers to take a hike.
0 Votes
+ -
Business decisions
dominigan 18th Aug 2008
Depends. If 10% of your customers are causing 90% of your support issues, it would be a smart business decision.
0 Votes
+ -
Once again...
Qbt 18th Aug 2008
Go redo your math.

http://marketshare.hitslink.com/report.aspx?qprid=11&qptimeframe=M&qpsp=104&qpnp=11&qpdt=1&qpct=2

Clue: Almost 95% can watch the Olympics online (in the US at least, it is purely a licensing issue from NBC to limit to USA, not a technical limitation of the technology).

I am not sure where you get your 10% from. Maybe you hang out too much on www.MacsAreTehBestest.com?
0 Votes
+ -
Did you do the math?
jason0x21 18th Aug 2008
July 2008 browser figures from the graph. Let's assume that all the XP, Vista, and half the Mac Intel users can view the video (I say half, being generous, since clearly not all XP users have upgraded to Vista, the same should probably hold true for Mac users)

70.64 + 16.92 + (5.23 / 2) = 90.17% Leaving almost 10% of browser using people out in the cold.

So, what's math like on your world?
Get a clue. Silverlight is NOT just for Vista. It works on XP, it also works on Windows 2000. It doesn't work on 9x or ME - but those have been pretty much relegated into the realm of history.

So how far back on the OSX line should Microsoft actually go? For that matter why not support those poor schmucks stuck with OS 9..? How about System 7..?

Let's get real here. 9.83% can't view the Olympics on their computers. Mainly because they haven't got a halfway modern computer. Boo Hoo. Life happens. Get over it.
The original post was complete drivel. Total sensationalist crap. Really...
Re:"...because nobody uses Vista. Not that the internet is just in the USA, but the NBC site made it impractical and sometimes impossible to view any Olympic Video content without Vista and Silverlight."

I'm not sure why you state they made it "impractical or sometimes impossible". We're you using some WOS prior to XP or 2000?Completely inaccurate information as far as I know! You don't need Vista or Silverlight to view the video on a Windows. All my viewing occurred with Windows XP Pro and when prompted I chose to view it without Silverlight.
0 Votes
+ -
Tried it on 2000, tried it on XP, perhaps not SP2, though (since the XP computer is a work computer managed by someone else). No dice anywhere for those that don't have the latest and greatest Windows Operating System.
0 Votes
+ -
That's the cost...
crenstrom 18th Aug 2008
...of not staying current. My grandma just upgraded to Vista last weekend. Though she hasn't streamed any Olypics since she lives close enough to the Canada/US border to pick up both NBC & CBC in HD on an antenna.
I wasn't able to view anything and I was on a T1.....? Did I miss something besides the Olympics?
I participate competitively (at the state level) in a sport that is never going to be shown on TV at prime time or any time - it has been compared to watching paint dry for spectators that don't understand the fine details although the Olympic format has been changed a lot to make it more tvgenic. The availability online of all that quality footage of top competitors showing details of form has been a considerable hit within the community.

My primary computer is a Linux machine and I had to use the XP based computer my kids have. As an older machine the overhead Silverlight incurred was about all it could manage and this could be a bigger issue for the majority of homes which will typically have a computer that is more than a couple of years old.
0 Votes
+ -
Transmitting data isn't what used to be like years ago, today is totally different thanks to high efficiency codecs like h.264. So few years ago, it would be considered impossible, but now is pretty viable and it was demonstrated here.
Is this the same technology that is used for WIMBLEDON LIVE, available for about $20 for two weeks of tennis where you can watch any court you want and not be subject to the whims of TV....

It seems that this great NBC Olympic feed on the Internet was available only to USA.... Why not the whole world?? Perhaps ''politics''... Does anyone know?? I'm hoping that I can get the US OPEN TENNIS LIVE, same as Wimbledon which was great.
0 Votes
+ -
NBC is licensed by the IOC for only USA
BBC -> UK, etc.
CBC -> Canada
etc.

NBC is not a "world broadcast provider"
0 Votes
+ -
The Olympics? (Yawn)
Master Dave Updated - 18th Aug 2008
I did not bother to even try to watch it. As stated above, the computer choices suck---they almost always do! If there were reports of " This is really cool! ", then I would have checked it out.
Besides, "the Olympics" seems more about commercials than competition and competitors. So.... Who cares? Certainly not I.
0 Votes
+ -
It is funny...
Qbt 18th Aug 2008
It is funny that Limelight is getting all the credit for this, but in fact this was a well planned and executed operation that involved Microsoft in a major way. We can be 100% sure that if things did not go well, all the blame would have been placed on Microsoft, because you know, it is a "fact" that they can never do anything right (despite their major successes throughout the years).

Is it too much to ask to give credit where credit is due? I guess so. No wonder they can never "do anything right" - They never get the credit when they do get something right.
I had guessed that NBC/Microsoft are going to use Limelight Networks for Olympics when the announcement was made in March... I have a little bit of experience with Limelight and loads of experience with Silverlight and I didn't doubt its capabilities for even a sec. But I am afraid for wider range of Media options for Silverlight, Microsoft have to sooner/later have to adopt many technologies like Wallclock(WSP)/Live streams etc.
A large reason for the Silverlight decision was because of its intelligent streaming. It can throttle the download stream so that the cache doesn't exceed a certain size. This ends up saving on wasted bandwidth if people switch pages or pause the video. Yet it didn't even get a mention in this article on Olympic video bandwidth... go figure...
Good day to confirm this comment I would appreciate T h e b e s t o f Z D N e t d e l i v e r e d your website very nice to everyone Yes, Oracle is the only one with shared-disk architecture, but that is there advantage. It means you can add or remove nodes and the database lives on. In a shared nothing architecture, if you lose a node, you lose the system. I'm sure Oracle appreciates EMC highlighting their advantage.I also desire to signal in your RSS feeds. Thank you as soon as once again and maintain up the great operate Awesome post! Thank you very much || thanks for nice content this is really benefit to me.

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix