Tech Broiler

Jason Perlow and Scott Raymond

Microsoft: Your Next Mission is the iPad

By | July 21, 2010, 8:57am PDT

Summary: Microsoft has a stable of experienced Mac developers which could be given a new mission to create compelling applications for the iPad.

Microsoft has a stable of experienced Mac developers which could be given a new mission to create compelling applications for the iPad.

A lot of things can change in a year.

Back in February of 2009, I had advocated that Microsoft should shutter its Mac Business Unit and concentrate on an aggressive campaign towards hurting Apple. I was wrong.

Also Read: Why Microsoft’s Killer Instinct Must Return
(Feb 2009)

Well, maybe not entirely “wrong” per se — as the Mac itself is losing emphasis in favor of Apple’s other endeavors with the App Store. But it was an analysis based on Apple’s current anti-Windows and anti-Microsoft advertising campaigns and marketing strategy at the time, and I was examining ways in which Microsoft could regain some footing and retaliate.

What nobody could anticipate was the launch of the iPad a year later and how much impact it would quickly make on the industry. With over 3 million unit sales in three months, the iPad has become a huge success for Apple and has created a new software ecosystem for a new class of devices — the Slate.

And the Mac Business Unit? In May of 2010 it was folded into the Microsoft Office group, as part of the reorganization which transpired when President Robbie Bach and Chief Experience Officer J Allard departed the company and created a power vacuum.

Also Read: Beyond Bach’s departure: What else changed today at Microsoft? (May 2010)

Where has Microsoft been during all of this iPad frenzy? It’s been in bunker mode. Their partnerships on Windows 7 tablets have fallen apart — HP put their Windows 7-powered Slate on hold, in favor of purchasing Palm and going the WebOS route for their consumer tablet devices.

While there are some new signs of life for the HP Slate, it’s difficult to say whether or not Windows 7-based tablets will succeed in the marketplace based upon what seems to be a cool reception to full-blown PC OSes on slate form factors.

Microsoft itself has also abandoned one of their most exciting tablet projects, the Courier, and has begun to regroup its mobile strategy for Slates. Currently, Microsoft has two Slate technologies that seem to be in conflict with each other — Windows 7, to be used on Intel Atom based systems, and Windows Compact Embedded 7, a technology refresh of the old Windows CE.

Also Read: Demystifying Microsoft’s Mobile Operating System Roadmap

This is in direct conflict to their Windows Phone 7 OS, which would seem to be the logical system to use for Slate technology, but Microsoft is not encouraging their partners to use their new mobile OS for this purpose.

Microsoft’s partners, such as Asus, have seemingly gotten the message and reacted in kind to this confusing state of affairs,  and recently abandoned their Windows 7 Compact Embedded tablet efforts in favor of Google’s Android.

Also Read: Microsoft, Your Mobile Focus Needs More Focus

So what should Microsoft do? Well for starters, I think they should ditch Compact Embedded in favor of a tabletized version of Windows 7 Phone OS, and unify the platform in the same way Apple has unified iPad and iPhone with iOS.

But in addition to that, I think they need to think about cranking out some iPad applications.

Yes, you heard me, Microsoft should start making iPad apps. And why not? They’ve already got a stable of people from the former Mac Business Unit within the Office group that already know how to develop in XCode.

They can create a native version of Entourage with no-nonsense enterprise Exchange integration, as well as Word, Excel and PowerPoint for the iPad so we don’t have to continue to suffer through iWork or go through other 3rd parties for Office file viewing and editing like QuickOffice.  They also can create apps that allow for better tie-in of corporate Intranet applications which use Microsoft technologies, such as Sharepoint.

Make them beef up the Bing app for iOS so that it becomes a totally juiced portal into all of Microsoft’s web properties with MSN, and perform optimization on Microsoft mobile sites for Safari such as Windows Live Hotmail. And perhaps, even a full-blown Internet Explorer port for iOS. It sounds crazy, but Opera AG’s browser is running on iOS now, and it would be nice to see some other alternatives.

As the great 20th-century prophet Yosemite Sam once said, If you can’t beat ‘em, join ‘em. Should Microsoft start cranking out the iPad apps? Talk Back and Let me Know.

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Topics

Jason Perlow, Sr. Technology Editor at ZDNet, is a technologist with over two decades of experience integrating large heterogeneous multi-vendor computing environments in Fortune 500 companies.

Disclosure

Jason Perlow

My Full-Time Employer is IBM. I write as a freelancer for ZDNet.

Disclaimer: The postings and opinions on this blog are my own and don't necessarily represent IBM's positions, strategies or opinions.

I own no investments or direct financial instruments in the companies I write about.

Biography

Jason Perlow

Jason Perlow, Sr. Technology Editor at ZDNet is a technologist with over two decades of experience with integrating large heterogeneous multi-vendor computing environments in Fortune 500 companies. A long-time computer enthusiast starting the age of 13 with his first Apple ][ personal computer, he began his freelance writing career starting at ZD Sm@rt Reseller in 1996 and has since authored numerous guest columns for ZDNet Enterprise and Ziff-Davis Internet. Jason was previously Senior Technology Editor for Linux Magazine, where he wrote about Open Source issues from 1999 to 2008.

In his spare time, Jason is an avid amateur chef and food writer, where his work reviewing New Jersey restaurants has appeared in The New York Times. He is also the founder of the popular food web site eGullet and blogs about restaurants and cooking at OffTheBroiler.com.

73
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

RE: Microsoft: Your Next Mission is the iPad
JACOBSONR 14th Oct
Good day to confirm this comment I would appreciate T h e b e s t o f Z D N e t d e l i v e r e d your website very nice to everyone Yes, Oracle is the only one with shared-disk architecture, but that is there advantage. It means you can add or remove nodes and the database lives on. In a shared nothing architecture, if you lose a node, you lose the system. I'm sure Oracle appreciates EMC highlighting their advantage.I also desire to signal in your RSS feeds. Thank you as soon as once again and maintain up the great operate Awesome post! Thank you very much || thanks for nice content this is really benefit to me.
0 Votes
+ -
I'll stick with WPF apps...
rmac_z 21st Jul 2010
if Toshiba can roll out their 'Smart Pad' with Windows 7 this September.
Those Tablet PCs (such as Toshiba's) won't work. Microsoft is trying to shoe-horn its desktop Windows 7 into a slate form factor. Windows 7 apps weren't designed for that interface.

Apple's iOS and Google's Android OS are winning because they were designed for touch. They were designed for the energy-efficient ARM processor. Full Windows 7 was not.

Microsoft tried the Tablet PC years ago. It failed. Squeezing it into a slate form-factor will not work. Meanwhile, Microsoft's hapless Windows Phone 7 OS is missing in action.

Android is the future.
0 Votes
+ -
MIA huh?
Cylon Centurion 21st Jul 2010
Come October it won't be.
0 Votes
+ -
Microsoft's flock up
Get-Smart 21st Jul 2010
@Market Analyst Microsoft's tablet only "failed" to produce many sales for Microsoft. They "succeeded" in creating a new market for others to take advantage of. It took ten years, but Apple is doing what Microsoft abandoned. Here are the things they did wrong, in no particular order:

1. Failed to impress software developers. They gave us a Tablet SDK and basically said, "we built it, you're on your own to make it work". In other words, no support for the people who create the solutions.

2. Tried to stuff a desktop into a slate format. Apple's perspective is to ignore the tablet as a general-purpose device. They focused on picking a couple apps and making them usable on their device instead of trying to cram in as much desktop functionality as possible.

3. Not marketing to consumers. Microsoft had the advantage of being the first out of the gate, but didn't keep running. That's why they are losing the race.

4. Microsoft didn't make a high-tech glossy toy with lots of eye candy. Sexy sells and Apple is riding that wave to the bank, big time. Who cares if the product is only half a computer. It looks great!

The touch interface in actuality is just a refinement of the click-n-scroll interface and it really is not any leap in functionality or code. Multi-touch will be the next frontier.

Microsoft is definitely behind the curve in a lot of areas. I'm not a great fan of either Microsoft or Apple, but they both have contributed (and simultaneously screwed us) in different ways as is fitting for paranoid megalomaniacs.

But just remember, Microsoft nearly missed the Internet boat. Then it came from behind and sunk us all!
0 Votes
+ -
Not true
DonBurnett 21st Jul 2010
@Market Analyst

If you were a good analyst you'd investigate multi-touch in WPF and Silverlight out of browser apps before you would say this.. Windows 7 doesn't need an ARM processor as most Windows laptops that are new have 6-10 hours of battery life anyway that are midrange..

Windows Phone might end up being a big suprise to you.. Plus the fact that I can develop a Windows Phone app, a Silverligh Web App (in or out of browser), a Desktop App and not to mention something entertainment related for x-box 360, Desktops, and phones all at the same time..
0 Votes
+ -
Yawn. Again, MA?
John Zern 21st Jul 2010
You should change your name to Predictable Analyst. wink
  • Flagged
0 Votes
+ -
@Market Analyst - Why is it every post I see from you is negative? Not that I go looking for your posts, but it surely seems like every post is anti-something.

It makes me wonder, first, what markets you analyze, and second, who you work for that keeps someone like you around.

Side note, ever notice that the first syllable of "analyst" and "analyze" is "anal"? Wonder if there's some kind of freudian thing going on there...
0 Votes
+ -
@rmac_z Have fun waiting my friend. I'll enjoy the internet, email, reading yer dumb posts and thousands of apps on my iPad while you wait. Then when you have a couple of MS made apps and a few hundred Windoze-style apps and get your first viruses ... I'll sell you my one-year old iPad.

You should read this before replying ...
http://www.infoworld.com/d/mobilize/windows-phone-7-dont-bother-disaster-211

cheers
0 Votes
+ -
it's no fun
rmac_z 22nd Jul 2010
@mrmacGregor You have to understand this was a 'late call' to Microsoft from someone who is tired of living with a fragmented UI (aka WPF and Silverlight) which should have been converged and which will never be allowed by its competitors to run cross browser. For me it is nigh impossible to convert a WinForm/ASP.NET app to SL and WPF is the only route open. I have for some while been contemplating a switch 'on the front end' as a developer from .NET to Android or iPhone/iPad. It looks like WEC7 might never run WPF hence a last hope that Toshiba can come up with a device the size of an iPad that runs W7. Is that such a dumb post? I agree with you about the wait, it is probably dangerously too late for Microsoft to do anything in this 'mobile' space and ultimately that is a survival threat to all .NET developers. Your comment about viruses is superfluous to the topic - I suggest dealing with that argument some other time, but otherwise I absolutely agree.
0 Votes
+ -
Jason began his piece with "as the Mac itself is losing emphasis in favor of Apple?s other endeavors with the App Store" and I wonder if he would care to modify his analysis with Apple's quarterly announcement this week of record Mac sales--up 33% over last year? It seems to me Apple is perfectly capable of creating desirable products for the desktop, portable and mobile markets all at the same time.
0 Votes
+ -
@rmac_z

Before then the expensive but cool Libretto W100. Got mine on pre-order!
0 Votes
+ -
This should be done
kenosha77a 21st Jul 2010
I, for one, would greatly appreciate and use MS Apps written for the iPad platform. However, MS has cancelled plans so often for a tablet or slate port of their Office Suite products that I am not sure if MS has the will or intention to do this.

At any rate, an MS Office Port would need to wait until Apple upgrades the hardware capabilities of its existing iPad model before a full fledged Office Port could work efficiently. (I suggest doubling the internal RAM or increasing it to 1gig and inserting the next generation A4 SOC chip design into the iPad platform before MS Office would be able to run effectively. Importing a large Excel file into Numbers was not a pleasant experience for me.)

These hardware modifications to the iPad platform will surely arrive in time .. time that MS programers could use to create iPad Office Suite Apps .. if MS has the will or desire to do this.

I will suggest that MS could adopt a recent Apple App development and use it as a model to their own MS apps for the iPad platform. FileMake recently introduced an iPad app that allows viewing, updating, data input and synching of a FileMaker database file on the iPad platform. The only restriction is that the FileMaker database file can not be created using the iPad app. That's OK. In like manner, MS could introduce an iPad Access app that would allow similar actions. I could use that app as I'm sure millions of other users could in time.

As Jason stated, MS is missing out on a fantastic business opportunity by ignoring the iPad platform. MS is, after all, a world leading premier software company. Let them "do what they do best"!
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Microsoft: Your Next Mission is the iPad
mrgoodall Updated - 21st Jul 2010
I keep reading comments with people saying that the iPad needs more memory, needs more this and that, the truth of the matter is that developers that are developing now have had no problem doing some pretty darned amazing things in the three months the thing has been on the market. If you hear people complaining about memory on an iPad, either they are lazy or just spreading FUD. Kinda like "dev's" complaining about the PS3 at launch saying it was so hard to code to for, what they were really saying was I dont want to learn how to code for the PS3, cant I just write for the XBOX and pick my check up?

If MS is smart, they will develop Apps for the iPad, and see them sell like hotcakes, but what it also will do is legitimize the iPad as a serious computing platform for business.
iPad and Android pads are a category known as "slates".

The slate doesn't need much memory. It is a web-centric thin client.

A slate is a different category to the Microsoft Tablet PC of yesteryear. The Tablet PC is a fat bloated dinosaur. A failed product from a past era.
0 Votes
+ -
A "Slate" can be much more
Cylon Centurion 22nd Jul 2010
@Market Analyst

Than a thin client. They said the same exact things with netbooks too, but look what happened. Technology advanced to the point where netbooks became capable machines in their own right. The same will happen with Slates.

Users wishing to run Windows on them will push the limits of the tech to the point where running Windows on them will be a walk in the park.


I want a tablet where I can use it to take notes with my own handwriting, store my books for school, store my notes for school, connect to my network drives, MULTITASK, something I could come home with, throw onto a dock and begin typing away at a homework assignment. So far, Windows is the only OS that will do all of that, plus some. But for those of us that want to work hard and play harder, Windows is the choice.
0 Votes
+ -
Another underpowered swivel laptop circa 2005 only with a Win7 OS stuck on it instead of XP...

blah..blah..blah...
things pretty much all slate/os combos will be very good at very soon. I agree with you on the ipad'ized version of the Bing ios app. The rest they should probably slate-itize for windows slates first. By that I mean optimize for multitouch, ARM support, put in the windows market place, etc.

I'm sure next year there will be many slate choices that are as nicely or better hw design than ipad with ipad trouncing hw specs at much lower prices ($199ish) that will be just as good at web/book/email/video consuming. MS needs to work on its software more broadly, ie Silverlight client versions that can run on windows/android/meego that go beyond those givens. you mention one note, sharepoint, etc. Being able to manage all your windows desktops, laptops, slates, and phones via the familiar corporate policy management settings/tools is also attractive. They definately have they're work cut out for them but they've really shown signs of renewed life beyond W7 lately. (silverlight, bing, wp7, ie9, edu). There's no reason not to think they can do with phones and slates what they did with netbooks once they got focused. They could still be very foolish to underestimate...
0 Votes
+ -
@Johnny Vegas

Keep smoking your weed Johnny. Name one time in the last 5 years that any of the copiers have come within a mile of matching Apple's incredible talent for new products.

So, MS "started" the slate/tablet craze what?, ten years ago. Where are they? Tick, Tick. Ok, I accept your admission that you have no idea what you are talking about.
@zdnetbtg
If you notice, JV mention many benefits that apply to business and enterprises, like centralized management for desktop, laptops, slates and phones. Care to explain how do you manage in a centralized way 100's or 1000's of iPhones or iPads? This is an example of an advantage a Windows slated would have compared to an iPad. Apple is doing an excellent job in the consumer market, but is behind in the enterprise market compared to MS. So both companies are great in their respective markets.
BTW, you mention copiers. Are you saying that Apple never copied other companies ideas? You should check before posting.
0 Votes
+ -
And Johnny does a good shill job @zdnetbtg, but you gotta understand, these vaporware addicted fanboys gotta keep the dream alive somehow.
0 Votes
+ -
MS could never.....
Economister 21st Jul 2010
get the prices and therefor the margins they need to survive. MS SW is hugely expensive to develop. Getting the power to run Office on ARM may eventually happen, but there will ALWAYS be a price/power and battery life penalty.

Personally, I don't see it, until after a chapter 11 reorganization. wink
0 Votes
+ -
Xbox games
davebarnes 21st Jul 2010
MS should put some games on the iPad.
0 Votes
+ -
What?
Cylon Centurion 21st Jul 2010
@davebarnes

I'm pretty sure the iPad couldn't handle that....
0 Votes
+ -
@NStalnecker yer dumb.
0 Votes
+ -
No what
ahh so 22nd Jul 2010
@NStalnecker

I'm pretty sure the iPad wouldn't want it.
0 Votes
+ -
Yet another stupid article from Jason. Has this anything to do with journalism? I don't want to say you are uneducated, but well... your postings does not provide any technicel in depth, but it's just stupid fanboy talk.
0 Votes
+ -
So until he's gone, it couldn't happen-although you're absolutely right, it should. The iPad is nowhere near as gimped for business productivity tasks as people would like to say. A great example is the new Filemaker Go app for iOS, http://www.filemakertrial.com/go/, it's a pretty impressive example of real "work" that can be done on an iPad. What the MS Mac BU guys could do for the Office system should be at least as impressive. The obstacle is that Monkey Boy can't think outside the box. He'd say it would hurt MS Windows and Office sales in the tablet space. Of course someone less stuck in the past would say, "Uhm-how are those sales now? How many copies of Office are being run on Windows tablets today?" I'm willing to bet that a big chunk of those 3 million iPad owners would pickup a copy of Office for iPad at a $79-$99 price point. Or better yet, offer the apps ala carte at $29 each. A lot of iPad owners may not be creating a ton of Word documents, but you can be damn sure that there are many who have to review/approve/edit Word docs before sending them back to someone else.

The fact is that Office is one of Microsoft's cash cows, they need to be "embracing" the iPad rather than focused on extending or extinguishing. They've lost that fight, and it's only getting more expensive for them.
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Microsoft: Your Next Mission is the iPad
MSFTWorshipper 21st Jul 2010
@matthew_maurice MSFT is dead, baby dead.
0 Votes
+ -
Maybe so,
matthew_maurice 21st Jul 2010
@MSFTWorshipper but it's a $60 billion a year zombie.
0 Votes
+ -
LOL!
John Zern 21st Jul 2010
I'd hate to have you as MY finacial adviser!
0 Votes
+ -
More Wrong Than You Know
norgate 21st Jul 2010
The iPad and iPhone are most certainly not distractions from the Mac desktop platform. They are roads that lead to it. Talk of how Apple is neglecting the computer is flamboyantly wrong. It is exactly because the mobile gear inherits from OSX and makes full computing mobile that it succeeds.

Microsoft meanwhile has shown itself to be trapped in a loop. Their model is built on one-upsmanship. They are still trying to embrace, extend and extinguish in mid 2010. Like anyone is falling for it anymore? If a good chunk of your device is based on the parroting of someone else's gear, exactly where does the "tribute" end and self criticism kick in? This is a fundamental problem. At it's core, it is a motivation issue.

So what would Mac BU have to offer. Word for iPad? exactly how much of the Office bloat has to be cut away for it to be a viable portable option? Games? Bungie left, Flight Sim is axed. So farm it out, sure, but what's the difference. The independents don't suffer the baggage. Does MS do software, or are they just a bank? How about something new? Sorry, they don't do that. They never have done it, and they never will. If the standard is to be set by "Courier" or what... Surface?
0 Votes
+ -
Precedence: Excel
Roque Mocan 21st Jul 2010
Excel was developed for the Mac first
0 Votes
+ -
Let's go out on a limb here:

Microsoft's mobile strategy is, at best, a confusing mess. I've seen it "explained" on other blogs here and it makes no sense to me.
Windows Phone 7 looks like nothing special. It makes sense that the hardware manufacturers are heading to Android - an already well-established touch-based OS.
Windows CE or whatever it is? Non-existent.
Windows 7 on a mobile device? I don't think so. Not without drastically changing the interface.
Windows itself? Server still has some life, but desktop? In 10 years, I don't think the desktop will resemble the "personal computer" of old. Forms of cloud computing will be the norm, with a web front-end. Windows GUI doesn't matter. An interface-less server is the key backend support for the cloud. At that point, Windows vs. Linux becomes less important and a more flexible decision.
File formats are becoming more open and documents will be editable in multiple application environments. People will demand it.

Maybe MS can survive on XBox360+Kinect alone?

There's my hopes for 2010->2020. wink
0 Votes
+ -
Heard it all before
mstrsfty 21st Jul 2010
@rossdav@...

Yeah, yeah, yeah, the PC is dead. What happened to those net appliances that were going to kill the PC several years ago? Basically they are trash in a junkyard. People want power at their desk. Otherwise, businesses would all be using dumb terminals attached to a mainframe. Cloud computing is similar.
0 Votes
+ -
Why?
Cylon Centurion 21st Jul 2010
If anything the iPhone, more people have an iPhone than an iPad. I'm pretty sure it will stay that way too.
0 Votes
+ -
@NStalnecker so far. Just stay in your bunker.
0 Votes
+ -
I thought he was in a dorm room
ahh so 22nd Jul 2010
Or maybe an M$ boiler room.
0 Votes
+ -
MS Making iPad apps?
Jimster480 21st Jul 2010
Why on earth would thye want to make iPad apps? So they can sell them for a few dollars a piece and let Apple's marketshare get bigger? Apple is missing all the things that allow it to integrate with technology outside of the Apple Ecosystem.
If Microsoft started making iPad apps they would be putting the nail in their own coffin. The integration with all things MS would mean that MS has abandoned their own platforms and just decided to make app's for other peoples platforms. Which would be beyond a total fail.
0 Votes
+ -
@Jimster480 like standardizing on pdf's and making every Apple app open, edit and export to the analogous MS app? MS has ridden on the back of 1980's contracts and alot of inertia. Maybe they can get enough background behind the iOS to steal its ideas the way they did to the Mac. ; )
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Microsoft: Your Next Mission is the iPad
SkepticalSteve 23rd Jul 2010
@Jimster480: That Microsoft is not already pumping out apps for the iPad is symptomatic of the malaise that has gripped the company since it became a flabby, factionalized megacorp.

I'm old enough to remember the early days, when Microsoft turned out applications (especially MS BASIC) for every platform in sight and sunk its hooks so deeply into the computer industry in general that it became the one indispensable software company.

And even though the rivalry between Apple and Microsoft was already becoming visible, Microsoft had no hesitation about developing products like Word, Excel and MS BASIC for the Mac, without which the Mac might well have been stillborn.

Why should Microsoft develop for the iPad? How about because Apple has already paid out over a billion dollars to iOS developers? Because there's money in it? What more reason could they need?
0 Votes
+ -
A generational thing now!
Dr. Figgnuttan 21st Jul 2010
From the hue of the replies, I would say Microsoft is headed toward irrelevancy! I'm 70, I don't use windows any more, I use mac. So do my three children. Their spouses, my six grandchildren; all the grandkids friends that I can see, have ihpones (so do I) iPods, macbooks or those touch devices like the iPhone. I'm sending this via iPad! I am going to buy one for each of my grandkids.
Us older people are more on top of things as one may suspect. This is part and parcel to microsofts impending irrelevance!
@Dr. Figgnuttan
So MS is headed toward irrelevancy because everyone in your family use a Mac/iPhone. Maybe this link will help you have a more wide POV,

http://news.softpedia.com/news/Windows-7-Thrives-as-Mac-OS-X-and-Linux-Are-Weak-Competitors-140551.shtml
0 Votes
+ -
@dvm

With all the people who had waited to upgrade from Windows XP to a new Windows OS that would work and have skipped Vista!, that's roughly seven years of waiting.

That cycle is about to end. Noy yet, but soon.

A lot of people feel it. Microsoft is going down into irrelevance.

If they fail with Windows Phone 7, their future is quite bleak.
0 Votes
+ -
What a ridiculous assessment..

I would point out several things that the author aren't taking into account..

"This is in direct conflict to their Windows Phone 7 OS, which would seem to be the logical system to use for Slate technology, but Microsoft is not encouraging their partners to use their new mobile OS for this purpose."

If you were a programmer you'd realize that the same UI technology exists between Windows Phone 7 (Silverlight & WPF) and Windows Desktop Applications, it's called XAML..

For that matter XNA has the same capabilities both places..
Microsoft calls this "Connected Experiences" that means I can write the same app on Windows Phone 7 (Silverlight via XAML, Windows Desktop (via XAML), Web (Silverlight via XAML) and the very scalable .NET framework works all places. In fact it's based on Silverlight 3 with extensions..

With XNA I can make a Windows Desktop Game, One for Windows Phone 7, and the X-box 360..

The look and feel of the UI with XAML and resources are completely customizable (unlike the iPhone/iPad/Mac) so while they may look a bit different it's just "Window dressing so to speak"..
It's not like if you are creating an app for that other platform that you wouldn't have to customize it for the form factor.. One size doesn't fit all..

So your points about developing for Desktop versus Phone and Web and anything else is focused on a MISNOMER..

Also programming with Microsoft's tools like C# versus objective C are huge cost and time savings. Plus for device and UI design, Apple has nothing like Microsoft's Expression Blend since they have effectively "booted" Adobe..

It's obvious you are biased towards the Apple platform. With my own iPad and pages, I find that about as capable as "Microsoft Write".. And while you hope that Microsoft won't probably be competitive against the iPhone and iPad, I think time will tell here and myself I am betting on Windows Phone 7.

Another comment that's really and should be obvious here, don't you realize the "father" of multi-touch works for Microsoft Research *NOT* Apple.. My HP touchsmart PC under windows 7 can do all the same multi-touch gestures as I can do on my iPhone and it's a lot easier to program for than Cocoa Touch is.. Whether it's the pinch gesture in the web browser on you are proliferating a HUGE myth about Microsoft and multi-touch..

As far as Windows 7 slates go, it would be nice to see the HP Slate, it had some great "Apple style" marketing behind it, however your own Mary Jo Foley even mentioned that there are several due before the end of the year..

http://www.zdnet.com/blog/microsoft/microsofts-ballmer-windows-7-slates-are-coming-this-year/6791
0 Votes
+ -
Contributr
@DonBurnett

"It's obvious you are biased towards the Apple platform."

I'd say it's obvious that you are extremely unfamiliar with my work. happy
0 Votes
+ -
@jperlow
I've only become acquainted with your point of views since last August or so. And yup, DonBurnett is EXTREMELY unfamiliar with your work. Still, you are starting to "mellow" just a tad. Perhaps DonBurnett caught your blog on one of your more "mellow" days.
0 Votes
+ -
M$ Should Shutter Its windows unit!
wjgrimm 21st Jul 2010
Windows is a really crappy operating system. Ever wonder why many people are moving to the macs? Because os x is a first class operating system. Because I work with different operating systems on a daily basis, I know what crap windows is. When people have taken my advice, usually after they are very dissatisfied with their windows pc, and buy a Mac, they think it's wonderful, and works so well. Out of 20 or so people that I have convinced to buy macs in the past couple of years, not a single one has expressed a desire to return to windows.
I hope the Android tablets are released soon too, so people can see how superior they will be to a windows based tablet. M$ needs to be kicked around some more, not because they are a monopoly or anything, but because windows is so crappy....
0 Votes
+ -
Really?
mstrsfty 21st Jul 2010
@wjgrimm, while I will not dispute the fact that Mac sales are currently rising, Windows has a lot of legs. Most PC purchases are STILL Windows OS. The argument that MacOs is superior didn't seem to do much for Apple from, say 1990 to 2003, when their market share basically stagnated. Its still under 10% despite all that superiority. The alleged superiority of MacOS and IOS is mostly marketing. Macs, like Windows, does crash. iPhones also crash.
0 Votes
+ -
I'd buy some good MS Apps on the iPad
timothyt@... 21st Jul 2010
Give me a great iPad OneNote over any of the stuff that's out today, and let me sync everything to Live. The work Microsoft did with Seadragon on the iPhone was truly excellent, and has even more potential on the iPad with its bigger screen real estate. A few ideas:

* Outlook
* Excel
* PowerPoint
* Remote Desktop
* Everything currently shown on MS Surface
* Web based storage with an iPad front end for the whole .Live suite - like Google should have already done for Google Docs.

Just please, MS, if you go this route, don't try to port Word (too Bulky), Zune (not needed), IE (not needed), Windows Media (not needed) and focus on new ideas like SeaDragon!
@timothyt@...
You forgot to add OneNote. It would be excellent to have it on an iPad.
0 Votes
+ -
Good day to confirm this comment I would appreciate T h e b e s t o f Z D N e t d e l i v e r e d your website very nice to everyone Yes, Oracle is the only one with shared-disk architecture, but that is there advantage. It means you can add or remove nodes and the database lives on. In a shared nothing architecture, if you lose a node, you lose the system. I'm sure Oracle appreciates EMC highlighting their advantage.I also desire to signal in your RSS feeds. Thank you as soon as once again and maintain up the great operate Awesome post! Thank you very much || thanks for nice content this is really benefit to me.

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix