Who should buy Palm? Intel, of course.

Summary: With Intel clearly putting more and more resources into embedded systems development on Linux and device hypervisors, Palm would be a natural candidate for acquisition.My Editor-in-Chief and colleague Larry Dignan wrote a great synopsis this morning of the possible and most likely Palm buy-out suitors that could show their hands over the next few weeks and months.

With Intel clearly putting more and more resources into embedded systems development on Linux and device hypervisors, Palm would be a natural candidate for acquisition.

My Editor-in-Chief and colleague Larry Dignan wrote a great synopsis this morning of the possible and most likely Palm buy-out suitors that could show their hands over the next few weeks and months. He cites a purchase of Palm by HTC, RIM, Dell, Lenovo and the Chinese "Black Hole" as the most likely scenarios for the beleaguered and once great smartphone manufacturer.

However, I'm going to add another possibility which seems to me not necessarily the most likely scenario but probably the "Best" one: Intel.

Click on the "Read the rest of this entry" link below for more.

Why does Intel need a smartphone OS? The same reason why Google needs Android, so they can be a developer of platforms to license out.

It's no secret that Intel has been on a shopping spree when it comes to embedded device development on Linux and other operating systems. Last summer, the company spent almost $900M on the purchase of Wind River, which up until recently was an obscure vertical market vendor of embedded software development tools for Linux and VxWorks, a proven and solid embedded real-time proprietary OS that ships in many consumer and industrial devices.

With the Wind River acquisition Intel has been positioning itself as the go-to company for embedded systems development, and has also been pushing the idea of device hypervisors into the mainstream. Wind River also sells a commercial software and device development package for creating carrier-worthy Android devices.

However, in order to fill out that portfolio, Intel actually needs a device OS for smartphones, MIDs, set tops and automotives it can call its own or give away with its device hypervisor to potential licensees.

Ideally, I see Palm combined with the Wind River Hypervisor as a value-add platform that companies such as HTC, Motorola, Dell, LG, Samsung and Sony can license in order to make new compelling devices. With a purchase of Palm, Intel can simply drop the hardware aspect of the ailing company and Open Source the key components of WebOS, and give it away with their hypervisor for ARM and embedded x86 chips.

This has TONS of practical applications and interesting ramifications.

For starters, WebOS could be used as the "carrot" to increase adoption of device hypervisors. By giving it away with the hypervisor, It would be the default "demo" smartphone/MID OS that the hypervisor would ship with, and if it was Open Sourced, such as with the Apache license that Android ships with, would allow it to be used in combination with OTHER OSes running on that hypervisor in new and interesting ways.

As part of the Intel stable, Palm WebOS along with the Hypervisor would be a great "basic smartphone" OS for the manufacturers to offer carriers for the "Free" or completely subsidized devices that many consumers end up buying instead of higher-end smartphones which would run Android or Windows 7 Phone.

Essentially, Palm WebOS could be an application from the the consumer standpoint and would allow room for all that customization and could eliminate the fragmentation that Android is currently suffering.

There are some other possible uses for WebOS in high-end smartphones as well. The call dialer, the specialized UIs and carrier customizations -- such as HTC's "Sense" and Motorola's "Motoblur", all of this could run in a VM on the device hypervisor using WebOS, with the real application stuff happening in a pristine, standardized Android VM or the Windows Mobile VM. Or perhaps even MeeGo, which Intel has also been flirting with.

Frankly, WebOS may have the mojo to actually inject some real sex appeal into MeeGo if Intel were to purchase Palm and combine it with its Wind River hypervisor.

WebOS is a great platform in and of itself for basic PIM and smartphone functionality for the handset manufacturers and the carriers to heavily customize to their needs, but not as as a major development platform as it stands today. However, when used on a device with a hypervisor for functionality which would not otherwise be served by Android, Dalvik and Windows 7 Phone, in combination it has a great deal of potential.

Does an Intel purchase of Palm make sense? Talk Back and Let Me Know.

Topics: Mobility, Intel

About

Jason Perlow, Sr. Technology Editor at ZDNet, is a technologist with over two decades of experience integrating large heterogeneous multi-vendor computing environments in Fortune 500 companies. Jason is currently a Technology Solution Professional with Microsoft Corp. His expressed views do not necessarily represent those of his employer.

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Talkback

21 comments
Log in or register to join the discussion
  • another pundit spewing nonsense

    What does Intel have to do with smart phones?
    What customer cares about hypervisors?
    My 2 cents: Nobody should buy Palm.
    The only remote suitor is Google since Android is similar to Palm's OS.
    Linux Geek
  • RE: Who should buy Palm? Intel, of course.

    If Intel wants nothing to do with smartphones, why did they spend 900 million dollars on a company that ostensibly is for the development of smartphone devices?

    The customer doesn't care about hypervisors, this is true. But the customer isnt the one building the devices. The handset manufacturers want them.
    jperlow
  • Not really, the OS isn't all that

    and would cost far more than its worth.
    No_Ax_to_Grind
    • You obviously never used it

      As usual Rupert, launching attacks on things you know nothing about. WebOS is quite good, but Palm's marketing sucks and their first generation hardware was average.
      DonRupertBitByte
      • I don't think so

        Their marketing wasnt bad, they were just too late to the party; 5 years ago the same phone would have owned the market and their wouldn't be an iPhone.
        balsover
      • You obviously never used it

        WebOS is brilliant. You are also correct about the quality of the hardware build on the Pre . It is a shame that R & D and Marketing were not as "Synergistic" as the rest of their innovation. It took them too long. As AT&T was to Unix , Palm may become to WebOS .
        MaverickC5
  • RE: Who should buy Palm? Intel, of course.

    The hypervisor with an OS or 2 on top of it could be an interesting development platform if, as suggested, it helped eliminate fragmentation by providing a clean "hw" platform for the software developers building apps. To me the question is whether Palm would help someone like Intel sell more chips, Google get an app business off the ground, or someone else boost their smartphone market share. So, interesting as the premise of the article is, I'd wager on the latter, at this point.
    still fiddlin
  • RE: Who should buy Palm? Intel, of course.

    What about IBM. Linux-based, competition with Microsoft's WinCe platform, integration in the business environment with servers and desktops.
    Sodbuster41
    • I don't know if you noticed it or not

      but there isn't much of a WinCE market remaining. Microsoft pretty much ignored that part of their market almost into oblivion.
      balsover
  • RE: Who should buy Palm? Intel, of course.

    With Apple as a Major customer, I don't think it's likely that Intel will go into competition with them


    Rob
    rmoore5@...
  • No-one

    Look guys, let's be honest, this is a failed company. Back in 2001 Palm
    had the perfect opportunity to benefit from their very own 'Bond' moment
    when Jack Bauer in 24 used the Palm Pilot extensively. They didn't.

    Today, only 7 people have commented here. No-one cares about Palm
    anymore. Yes, it is sad, but business isn't a charity.

    I've owned a couple of their devices, and I think they were really well
    made. Some were even very well thought out - quite expensive for what
    they did, but nice. But even Nokia and RIM have got their business
    models closer to right, and they're both currently being killed by Apple.

    The fact is, the PDA - as a stand-alone device didn't happen. Period. End
    of.

    So no-one should buy Palm. It should be wound up and those turncoats
    lured away from Apple should go back with their tails between their legs.
    Then maybe the Mac OS X staff currently seconded to the iPhone OS 4
    team can get back to catching up with their work on 10.7.

    And no, I don't think Palm will return in 10 years time to kick Apple's ass.
    That kind of thing only happens once, and only to exceptionally dumb
    companies such as Dell, and by exceptionally brilliant companies like
    Apple.
    Graham Ellison
  • Why not VMware ???? -NT

    -NT
    Ben_rockwood
  • RE: Who should buy Palm? Intel, of course.

    That presents an interesting angle. That likely would depend on how complex the applications are and is there an ROI in rewriting and supporting the server based applications to run on WebOS based linix servers. WebOS could also find a home in someone else's "cloud" SaS based environment. I.E. Yahoo , Bing , CISCO , SDFC , MOTO, Voda, Deutche Telecom, Telmex... the imagine is the limitation. I would not place a bet on " No One. Sorry.
    MaverickC5
  • Novell of Mobile Era in making

    IMHO Palm will drift on the path what Novell has reached today in the desktop/server segment.
    rkcoral@...
  • Good grief, Jason....

    Intel has ALREADY made their decision, and your column even mentions it by name. What part of "MeeGo" didn't you understand?

    And it's not a mere "flirtation"; plenty of cellphone bloggers, and platform-development new sites say that it's strategic. And there's tons of other companies (besides Nokia and Intel) who have already announced intentions to use it-- "little guys" like ST-Ericsson, Asus, and ACER. Phone companies are already announcing support (e.g. Telecom Italia, Orange). Heck, even EA and Gameloft intend to port their games- so that the kiddies in the back of your BMW can play native games during the drive. (And yeah, BMW is a partner too.) To say nothing of you on the subway, bus or commuter train...

    So Intel appears to have absolutely no use for WebOS: They're working hard on a platform which is MORE scalable, MORE flexible, and doesn't leave their Moblin-using customer base stuck in a ditch. If you don't realize this already, Google is your friend -- start reading.
    Rick S._z
  • Palm brand is dead.

    No value. If I was a shareholder, I would get the heck out of there while it
    is still worth something.
    minardi
  • RE: Who should buy Palm? Intel, of course.

    I also desire to signal in your RSS feeds. Thank you as soon as once again and maintain up the great operate!<a href="http://nccma.com">nccma</a> <a href="http://coolerkings.com">cooler</a>
    MACKENZI
  • RE: Who should buy Palm? Intel, of course.

    I used to be more than happy to seek out this internet-site.I wanted to thanks in your time for this glorious read!! I positively enjoying each little bit of it and I have you bookmarked to check out new stuff you weblog post. this thread is amazing i like your work and i appreciate you that you have share a useful stuff thanks for sharing <a href="http://the-ishop.com">the i shop</a> <a href="http://abatwa.com">abatwa</a>
    MARAGARET
  • RE: Who should buy Palm? Intel, of course.

    I used to be more than happy to seek out this internet-site.I wanted to thanks in your time for this glorious read!! I positively enjoying each little bit of it and I have you bookmarked to check out new stuff you weblog post.Bookmarking now thanks please consider a follow up post.<a href="http://power28.com">power</a> <a href="http://sagesinc.com">sa</a> <a href="http://iloveshoping.net">shop</a>
    RHIANNONA
  • RE: Who should buy Palm? Intel, of course.

    I think the representation of this article is actually superb one. This is my first visit to your site. Thanks a lot and keep sharing the information. Keep updating the information for all of us. Thanks ZDNet Government was launched as the brand's first industry vertical, with a mission to cater to IT professionals in the public secto I agree with your post. However, do you have any sources I can cite for my paper <a href="http://easy-wheels.com/">wheel</a> <a href="http://pbcars.com/">car</a> <a href="http://com69.net">com</a> <a href="http://cadburry.com">bury</a>
    SATURNINA