Tech Broiler

Jason Perlow and Scott Raymond

Why I prefer dinosaur poop to Terra Nova

By | November 8, 2011, 4:37pm PST

Summary: I expected so much more from Steven Spielberg in a Science Fiction TV series.

To be a devoted fan of Science Fiction on television, you have to expect that you’re going to have to wade through a lot of crap before you get to the good stuff.

In the case of FOX’s Terra Nova, it’s metric flipping tons of it, pooped straight out of an Apatosaurus cloaca.

(EDIT: Yes, I am blissfully aware that large sauropods such as Apatosaurus, Brachiosaurus and Diplodocus died out towards the end of the Jurassic Period. However, apparently the show’s producers aren’t. There were Titanosaurs, though.)

I’ve discussed my dissatisfaction with Science Fiction on TV before. The previous show which incurred my wrath on this column was Caprica, the dud of a prequel to the most excellent Battlestar Galactica re-imagining.

Caprica was a bad show because it took all of the worst minutiae that was in Galactica and made it the focus of the entire series.

The main characters weren’t compelling enough to keep my ADD-addled attention span and too many things made no sense at all which battled with the willing suspension of disbelief that is necessary in order to actually enjoy any Sci-Fi show.

As I said before, provided the characters and the story is engaging enough, you can forgive a show for scientific shortcomings or technology that defies explanation. This is why Battlestar Galactica succeeded and Caprica tanked after one season.

This is why Star Trek and Doctor Who are such loved TV shows.

However, like Caprica, I’m having a lot of the same problems with Terra Nova and I find myself screaming at the TV set with a resounding “What the hell?” multiple times per episode.

What really makes me mad about the whole thing is that we’re not dealing with hacks. Steven Spielberg is the executive producer of the show.

The eye candy of Terra Nova is incredible. The dinosaurs and the sets are amazing, and it really does have a huge sense of realism, at least visually.

The amount of money that is being spent to produce this show is obviously obscene. It’s estimated that it took approximately $10M-$20M to produce the pilot and an estimated $4M per episode. Wowza.

But then the show does whacked out stupid stuff that makes you wonder if Spielberg or FOX even bothered to hire science or military consultants at all.

What, Steven so completely blew his budget on CGI, set design and actors that he couldn’t hire someone like Michio Kaku or Neil DeGrasse Tyson or someone at the National Science Foundation to proofread the friggin’ scripts? Seriously? Not even their interns?

Let’s begin with the opening sequence and the show’s logo. The show is supposed to take place towards the end of the Cretaceous period, which is 85 million years in the past. We’re treated with an eye-candy view of the planet earth, complete with the mega-continent of Pangaea.

It looks cool, but there’s just one itty bitty problem with that.

85 million years ago, during the late Cretaceous, Pangaea didn’t exist. Pangaea existed 250 million years ago and broke up over the course of 165 million years, up until the time the show is supposed to take place. Oops.

If that was the only technical nit in the show, I’d just say “eh”. But unfortunately it doesn’t end there.

One of the things that drives me absolutely nuts is the Terra Nova colony’s lack of situational awareness.

The colony is run by a commander in the Earth’s military forces, but apparently he and his soldiers have no way to figure out where the “Sixers” are, who are the rogue undesirables that went off into the jungle and are a thorn in the colony’s side.

In recent episodes, we’ve learned that the Sixers live in the tree canopies, and are nomadic, moving from place to place to avoid detection.

The Sixers, by the way, apparently feel like they need to go totally Survivor: Cretaceous meets Mad Max Beyond Jurassic Park in their attire, complete with war paint, animal skins and badass tattoos.

But I digress.

So, let me get this straight. The Terra Nova colonists come from 138 years in the future and have incredible technology they’ve brought with them (single chip supercomputers, holographic projectors, sonic and energy weapons, portable nuclear fusion devices, advanced fabrication and construction systems, et cetera) but they can’t triangulate a radio signal?

Or better yet, they don’t have miniature UAVs or mid-22nd century equivalents to Predator drones? You mean that Amazon.com isn’t selling remote control micro-copters or mini-zeppelins with advanced thermographic imaging sensors and sophisticated optics for $50 in the year 2149?

Hell, if I was the military commander on Terra Nova, I would have surveillance UAVs patrolling the skies around the damn colony 24×7.

Monday night’s program was a real winner. A huge meteor streaks out of the sky, explodes in mid-air, causes a “Sonic wave” that shatters everything for miles around and creates an electromagnetic pulse (EMP) which fries anything powered with a computer chip in it.

Yeah, sure. Never mind the fact that such a meteorite explosion would be the equivalent of a nuclear weapon going off and if the colony was anywhere near it, the show would have ended right then and there.

Anyone recall the 1908 explosion in Tunguska, Siberia? Anyone? Bueller? Bueller? No?

Okay, so I did some research on this one and I found out that ferrite core metorites can cause electromagnetic pulses. However, ferrite core meteorites are extremely rare, representing only 10 percent of all of the meteors that enter our atmosphere.

Still, one that is big enough to cause a huge EMP would almost certainly be detectable some time before it hits the earth, especially one that would be a near direct hit for the colony.

I would expect that 138 years in the future, we’d have some way of observing objects in space, just as we do now, using spectroscopy to determine the composition of near earth objects (NEOs).

With that data, the colony would know which ones had the potential to create an electromagnetic burst, even with portable observation equipment brought back into the distant past.

Hell, by then, I’d expect that you could compact the equivalent imaging and sensor capability (and then some) of the Keck Observatory into the size of an SUV or my backyard grill. 100,000 megapixels? No problem. I mean, they’ve demonstrated they have friggin’ supercomputing SoCs on that episode that would make Steve Jobs’ head spin.

So I would think that the Terra Nova colony would have adequate time to prepare against such a meteoroid, and if the colony was so dependent on their technology to function, they would have electromagnetically shielded vaults (like the “Eye” supercomputer room that contains the sum of all human knowledge shown in that episode) filled with backup chips for every mission-critical piece of equipment including extra chip fabricators.

Like, the colony is the entire future of humanity, right?

I can’t believe they only had one chip fabricator, and the chip that ran it was fried. What freaking idiot IT director at the Terra Nova colony came up with that disaster recovery plan? Fire his ass.

They can give every family on Terra Nova a condominium but they can’t stock up on spare parts? What the hell?

Let me go on.

They have the technology to synthesize 50 gallons of reptilian pheromones in five minutes, but they don’t have the ability to protect the airspace over the colony from tens of thousands of angry bird-sized dactyls using millimeter waves or even utilize their existing sonic weapons technology to shatter the eardrums or scramble the brains of everything coming in from the air?

If you have a colony in the late Cretaceous, wouldn’t pterodactyl attacks be something they would want to plan for? Hell, I live in suburban New Jersey and I plan for friggin’ pterodactyl attacks. Seriously.

And why the heck is the fencing of this colony made out of wood beams? Cause it’s green tech and we don’t want to pollute the environment?

Wouldn’t reinforced concrete make more sense? These people have seemingly unlimited energy, can synthesize just about anything, but they can’t make carbon fiber? Hell, with technology this far in the future, I’d expect them to be able to make barriers or netting out of carbon nanotubes.

But then you wouldn’t necessarily be able to see the cool dinosaurs through the barrier, I know.

And, seriously, why the hell are these people leaving the compound at night? You don’t flipping go into the damn pitch black jungle where there are all sorts of dangerous animals about, especially without any night vision.

Yeah, like why don’t they have night vision? Every single damn person should be issued night vision goggles. YOU LIVE IN THE FREAKING JUNGLE.

And why do people go missing all the time? Wouldn’t you chip every single adult with the future equivalent of an RFID tag or homing implant to keep track of them and keep them from falling into harm’s way?

I know. Just sit back and enjoy the pretty dinos and cool sets, Jason. Sci-Fi TV sucks.

Does Terra Nova piss you off too? Talk Back and Let Me Know.

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Topics

Jason Perlow, Sr. Technology Editor at ZDNet, is a technologist with over two decades of experience integrating large heterogeneous multi-vendor computing environments in Fortune 500 companies.

Disclosure

Jason Perlow

My Full-Time Employer is IBM. I write as a freelancer for ZDNet.

Disclaimer: The postings and opinions on this blog are my own and don't necessarily represent IBM's positions, strategies or opinions.

I own no investments or direct financial instruments in the companies I write about.

Biography

Jason Perlow

Jason Perlow, Sr. Technology Editor at ZDNet is a technologist with over two decades of experience with integrating large heterogeneous multi-vendor computing environments in Fortune 500 companies. A long-time computer enthusiast starting the age of 13 with his first Apple ][ personal computer, he began his freelance writing career starting at ZD Sm@rt Reseller in 1996 and has since authored numerous guest columns for ZDNet Enterprise and Ziff-Davis Internet. Jason was previously Senior Technology Editor for Linux Magazine, where he wrote about Open Source issues from 1999 to 2008.

In his spare time, Jason is an avid amateur chef and food writer, where his work reviewing New Jersey restaurants has appeared in The New York Times. He is also the founder of the popular food web site eGullet and blogs about restaurants and cooking at OffTheBroiler.com.

Related Discussions on TechRepublic

Did you know you can take part in these discussions with your ZDNet membership?
55
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

Pantheon of the Greats....
Manatee7474 8th Mar
Westworld
Rollerball
2001
Soylent Green
Planet of the Apes
Forbiden Planet
Omega Man


Because they concentrated on Sci-fi not not chasing a "broader" audience...
Seriously lmao at this post! You are too mucking fuch!
@chefdaiz

It is a humour article, but I think that JP misses an important point.

"Twilight", "Terra Nova", "Caprica" and so forth - these are not Sci-Fi or horror. They are dramas about relationships - made for women under the guise of being made for men. A person might as well be watching "Neighbours" or "Days of our lives". I find all of those utterly unwatchable. It is little more than sissy-tv.

Certainly, our most loved Sci-Fi and horror shows included a minor amount of relationship drama, but it was a minor amount that very much played second fiddle to the show's emphasis on Sci-Fi or drama.

I want a return to "proper" Sci-Fi and horror that is about Sci-Fi and horror!
0 Votes
+ -
Contributr
@Habiloso Dr. Who and Star Trek and Galactica had a TON of relationship drama. As did Babylon 5.
@jperlow
+1. Lol.
0 Votes
+ -
@Habiloso

So where did Firefly fit in your very small world?

All SF is soap and about relationships - even Enemy Mine that Steve was laughing about in Hawaii 50 is about relationships, as were all the Star Treks , Bab 5, Dr Who etc etc.

Perhaps you could offer examples of what you think is proper SF?
0 Votes
+ -
@tonymcs

Please read this from you OP . . . "Certainly, our most loved Sci-Fi and horror shows included a minor amount of relationship drama, but it was a minor amount that very much played second fiddle to the show's emphasis on Sci-Fi or drama. "

I did not say that Sci-Fi was not about relationships. What I said is that it played a minor role to the Sci-Fi itself. One needs only to consider shows such as Star-Trek to see that many involved relationship issues, such as a love interest or a dilemma. Now compare that to, for example, "Twilight", which is little more than a penny Mills and Boon love novel (poorly) disguised as horror (or whichever genre you want to apply to it). The whole point of those shows is about the love-relationship rather than the Sci-Fi/horror. They are a love story that just happen to involve vampire or whatever.

In using the word "relationships", I do not mean the broad context of relationships; rather, I meant love relationships and the like. On reflection, I should have said "love relationships" rather than "relationships". I do not mean the interrelationships between, say, Dr Rush in Stargate:Universe and the rest of the crew, which are a necessary and important part of the "drama" of the Sci-Fi. As I said, shows such a "Twilight" are little more than penny love novels. If a person thinks that is Sci-Fi/horror, well and good, but I've no idea how they could come to such a conclusion.
0 Votes
+ -
@Habiloso
Sadly, your argument here is based on the idea that anything made for women (as if all women are the same) must be awful. I for one am a woman who thinks Terra Nova is a sad excuse for a tv show because of its lack of attention to detail and cliche interactions. I also appreciate development of romantic character relationships when it contributes to a storyline. I assume many people would agree with me, regardless of their gender or sexuality.
0 Votes
+ -
@Habiloso

Caprica was about the development of artificial consciousness adn what implications that had for humanity and society. How is that not sci-fi? I can understand if the show wasn't to your liking, but it was much more science and speculation oriented than the vast majority of sci-fi on TV.

It's a shame that the people who only want explosions and robot fights are the ones that make up the ratings.
0 Votes
+ -
@Habiloso
Manatee7474 8th Mar
Totally agree with you!!!
0 Votes
+ -
@chefdaiz Hah...... can ever earn like this: http://www.technologyfazer.com/modern-warfare-3-smashes-records.html
If you won't beleave me check by yourself...
Completely agree, the latest episode in particular was the worst so far.

-No shielding from EMP?
-A magic chip fabricator that is also not protected and then no one but the bar tender knows how to fix it.

Also strikes me as odd, that there also seems to always be someone trapped outside in the jungle, children as well. If this was remotely real i would expect a lot more regulations.

This is supposed to be the final hope for man kind, with the best resources and people.
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Why I prefer dinosaur poop to Terra Nova
kenosha77a Updated - 8th Nov
Now that you mentioned that show.

What Sci-Fi shows in my past rate a place in the Pantheon of the Greats and why.

The why is easy to answer - any show that makes me, nah compels me to drop whatever I'm doing and watch the next installment of it's story arc. And those joys were: the original ST and Babylon 5 and Doctor Who.

Although I've watched the Doctor from the third Doctor on, I must admit the best Sci-Fi series was and will remain for me Babylon 5.

However, from the very first ads I knew that I would never watch a single minute of Tera Nova. Jason's review only confirms how correct my initial judgement call was.
0 Votes
+ -
Pantheon of the Greats....
Manatee7474 8th Mar
Westworld
Rollerball
2001
Soylent Green
Planet of the Apes
Forbiden Planet
Omega Man


Because they concentrated on Sci-fi not not chasing a "broader" audience...
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Why I prefer dinosaur poop to Terra Nova
tonymcs@... Updated - 8th Nov
The problem with your complaints is that there is always an explanation and the biggest one you left out.

This is a different timeline. That single premise answers virtually all your gripes. Pangaea didn't exist then - well it did in this timeline - same for the dinos etc.

I agree Caprica was incredibly boring and Terra Nova is a little too American middle class and family oriented (yes I know there are other accents), but it's serviceable.

It's easy to complain about the tech, but remember it's tech they have to bring back, so its presumably expensive and doesn't cover all the range of available tech from the future. You also assume tech is going to improve enormously, but the shattered world they are coming from may have all kinds of shortages and banned tech.
As to your desire to decimate the local fauna with all sorts of weapons - I think that's one of the things they're trying to leave behind as that attitude got them into this mess in the first place.
It's also refreshing to see some SF without all the dark, edgy stuff that sometimes even made BG unwatchable.

So its light SF with some good CGI and I'd rate it around the same as SG-1 or Stargate Atlantis (and I had some real trouble with some of their tech - even with Amanda Tapping doing the technobabble)

However, the real suspension of disbelief for Aussies is why Terra Nova looks remarkably like tropical Queensland
0 Votes
+ -
@tonymcs@...
Completely agree re downtown US ville focus. I expect 2kg steaks (dino of course) & bottomless coffee crap to appear any time. If the future looks like US Today, we are all in for a rough ride!!
Re SG-1 -> pls never bring back that Colonel with the bad jokes & no idea of tactics/man management. It made a potentailly good show rubbish. There's got to be humour but not the American Guy type of show perhaps a bit of South Park goes Paleolithic??
0 Votes
+ -
Contributr
@tonymcs This is a different timeline. That single premise answers virtually all your gripes. Pangaea didn't exist then - well it did in this timeline - same for the dinos etc.

Nope. Doesn't work that way.

They are going from the post-Einsteinian theories on multiverses (M-theory and brane theory). The premise is if you were to travel in time to the past, you would create an alternate timeline in a new universe. So it's still 85 million years in our Earth's past, but in a newly created alternate universe as of that point in time.
@jperlow I agree. It irks me when the writers are lazy and can't make events in the storyline consistent with their own construct.

This show has many more problems than that, though. The plot lines are simplistic and obvious. The characters have little depth. And the action situations play out like a big cliche.

This has often been the case with Speilberg. He has always been much more focused on the visuals than anything else. It's cool to watch Indiana Jones fly through the air five miles while inside a refrigerator propelled from a nuclear explosion. Meanwhile his hope is that the audience will be so distracted that no one will question why Indiana Jones and the refrigerator he was in were not instantly annihilated from the explosion.
@jperlow Exactly. Not to mention two impending extinction events. One minor one at 82 mya and one at the Cretaceous-Tertiary boundary (about 65 mya)where about half of all life forms died out, including pretty much ALL animals over 55lbs, many families of fishes, clams, snails, sponges, sea urchins and many others. Why would you choose this time to go back to in order to save humanity when a major extinction event is right around the corner? Presumably they have some kind of plan for surviving the event but the prevailing theory is that this major extinction was caused by an asteroid. If they can't even deal with a piddley little one that generates an EMP how are they supposed to survive one between 4 and 9 miles in diameter. The whole premise of the show is flawed.
You assume a lot about technology... you also assume they can even get it back there or ever did.. or that they'd have astronomers looking at the sky all the time. This isn't some big city, they've only been there a few years.

I think you also missed the part in the first episode where... yes its back in time, but its also an alternate time line Earth, not the one the come from in the future, so how do you know when what happened in that time line was the same as our time line... how do you know the time line or reality they are even from was ours at all. You are assuming a lot about the show...

Are there some issues that don't make sense... for sure. Is it as bad as your trying to make it... not even close.
0 Votes
+ -
The scientific inaccuracies aside, the show simply lacks drama, both in terms of the situations the characters find themselves in and their relationships.

Dr. Who, for one, manages to be compelling in spite of suspect science because it's internally consistent and has characters you care about.
0 Votes
+ -
... it's a fun family show. The target audience of the show, similar to most Steven Spielberg movies, is the family - not sci-fi buffs. This target audience is not going to sweat the technical details of the show that are not obvious.

I think most sci-fi shows are silly anyway, because they try to look at the world and envision the future, though a scientific perspective which is inherently limited and deficient. I believe that all things that exist are ultimately an assembly of beings which govern and maintain all things. This point of view is ancient, and seems to me to be the most accurate. Just as we are directly unaware of the millions of microbiological entities that interact with each of our bodies, there are countless beings around us which do not directly impress on our senses (because our senses are so weak) but whose presence can be deduced from the things around us we perceive.

It really grates me, the simpleton view purveyed by many in science, that if we can't see / directly perceive something, it doesn't exist - or we should assume it doesn't exist. Have these people not stopped to look at the inherent deficiencies of the ultimate instruments used to examine our world - our senses? If we are able to detect through vision and hearing, only a narrow band of electromagnetic radiation and sound waves - in addition to our base capacities to taste, touch, and smell - how on earth do we make the leap to the belief that we can sense everything, or even most things? We would be far wiser to assume that our senses are hopelessly weak and fragile, our intelligence is the same, and that like everything we can observe in the world around us, there are limits to how far we can extend them. Therefore the notion that science can one day save us from our imperfection is simply a pipe dream! We don't have the senses or brains to do so. We are but blind people roaming around the wilderness of our existence. Also, how can imperfection beget perfection? Things can only produce other things consistent with the first things' nature, Therefore us becoming perfect or producing perfect things (like an explanation about our own existence) from our own effort is an impossibility.

Therefore I don't think we should sweat the technical details of the show Terra Nova. It is a fun, family, action / adventure show, set in the back drop of dinosaurs and dangerous settings. Yes it contains inaccuracies - but so does science anyway - and I think we should just try to get as much enjoyment out of it, as we can.
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Why I prefer dinosaur poop to Terra Nova
Xenia Onatopp Updated - 13th Nov
@P. Douglas "a scientific perspective which is inherently limited and deficient."

"It really grates me, the simpleton view purveyed by many in science, that if we can't see / directly perceive something, it doesn't exist - or we should assume it doesn't exist."

"it contains inaccuracies - but so does science anyway "

Your attitude to science is crazy. Who in science thinks that if you can't see it, it doesn't exist? Can you see gravity, viruses, radio waves, or atoms?

No wonder you like a show that traduces science, but if you really hate science so much, why don't you stop using electricity?
0 Votes
+ -
I agree with Jason about the low SiFi content & lov programs that utilise a very wide canvas it potentially opens up to writers/producers.
In the main there are 2x serious defects as I see it:-
Tooo much relationship stuff, the plot like Dr wHO etc integrate the main theme with sub plots and weaves it around the characters. This show trowels on the touchy feely stuff.
Why Why do US programs always take downtown US attitudes eg 5kg steaks & bottomless coffee rubbish into the future? If the world is to develop there are more sustainable approaches to living than this downtown LA Hoolywood "Days of our Lives" soapie portrays. In Australia today we can see the impact of "changing the environment" to reflect ealier british agricultural practices. eg battling nature to win etc. All crap doesn't work. So why do the novan's run around with weapons all the time? The US firearm"s industry would be proud of the producers. I'm not anti US but the show can be made with a more global outlook. Hence one aspect of SiFi appeal all around the world.
I thought Terra Nova was a way to reuse leftover Jurassic Park dinosaurs. Was I wrong?
A very interesting rant. I too was wondering about why Terra Nova did not have UAVs available for use in finding the Sixers.

Mondays show, I thought it was a laugh. The Eye chamber had an electronic lock with a manual override on the outside (which made the lock pointless if it was to protect the most valuable computer and memory storage) but the door had no manual override on the inside meaning anyone inside during an emergency would be locked in. How dumb is that?

Next was that stupid EMP. Our government (IRL) has already done tests and found that in the case of an nuclear war an EMP will not fry most electronic radio gear with an antenna shorter than about 4 feet. It was also determined that automobiles would generally survive an EMP though the radios would probably not. But most vehicles would be operational after an EMP.

Also, there is something called a Faraday cage. It can be as simple as a metal storage box of any size where the electronics that are stored inside are insulated from, not touching, the outside of the box. This Faraday Cage would protect any electronics that were stored inside. A metal file cabinet or metal storage locker would work. The metal cabinet protects anything inside from the EMP.

If they stored their backup chips or backup gear in a metal locker or metal box, the EMP would not have fried any of their stored electronics.

Then there was that stupidity about repairing a toasted IC chip. The writers, directors, etc. . .must have no clue how tiny those components on a chip are. Did that Terra Nova bar owner repair the chip with tweezers and a magnifying glass?

I loved ST, Babylon 5, Doctor Who, and FireFly/Serenity. Star Cops (from the 1987) while very low budget, was actually a good show. Siri seems like a precursor to Box from Star Cops.

I was really hoping for more from Terra Nova.
0 Votes
+ -
Contributr
@John238 Yeah, Faraday cage would be no brainer.
0 Votes
+ -
Yeah, it has some issues...
SlithyTove 8th Nov
There is at least two to three major groaners per episode either to relationship cliches, brain dead "best the human race has to offer", or technical silliness.

I mean I could see them with limited access to big tech as a reasonable plot device if the weren't shipping freaking prefab housing in. If it is so easy to move things across they should have the best tech around. Major plot problem IMO. Should have made things expensive to ship through the portal and limited tech in the show to mission critical and portable items.

And the tech is just so maladapted. Drive through a jungle infested with man-eaters in a car with no doors? Awesome! Shoot feebly with some kind of crap "pulse rifle" which generates much noise and no fury? The future forgot how to make elephant guns, ak47s and shotguns? Their armor appears to be about as useful at stopping dinosaurs as storm trooper armor was against blasters.

But even that I could forgive except that some of the plot points are so bad..... that vault door that can only be opened from the outside... Come on.... seriously?
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Why I prefer dinosaur poop to Terra Nova
Sensible Discussion 8th Nov
Ah, lighten up geek and enjoy the show. It's a lot better than reality tv and re-runs.
0 Votes
+ -
You're talking about FOX here. One of the most least likely channels to ever consider real science. wink
0 Votes
+ -
Yup and...
ConcernedIT 9th Nov
Scientists also think the oxygen content in the air was different back 85 million years ago as well. No account for that either. Earth was most likely more naturally radioactive at that time. No account for that. And if they went back in time to save the earth's future, why isn't there more men and women reproducing to increase humanity's chances? lol.
0 Votes
+ -
1970s kiddie show "Land of the Lost" was more compelling than this.
0 Votes
+ -
Contributr
@R.L. Parson Sleestacks!
@jperlow Land of the lost was better.
0 Votes
+ -
@jperlow
"Land of the Lost" was a classic.
I bet the Hollywood executives are still scratching their heads, trying to figure out why the recent movie was a dud.

The problem is that most people (even some people commenting on this article) have no conception of how science and technology actually works.

Shows like these only make people even more ill-informed.
0 Votes
+ -
Thanks for a mid-morning smile!
JonathonDoe 9th Nov
Nice rant. I agree with you on most of the points... OK, heck, on all of them.

Yes. Too much of TV's SF is outright bad, but then again ... isn't most TV outright bad?

Regards,
Jon
Eh, I kinda enjoy the show. Campy? yes. Unrealistic? Duh. Better than most things that are on at the same time? Yes. It's a tv show. If it were a movie, then some of this stuff might hold water. But maybe I'm just weird in that I can separate my reality from a fake one, and not get too stressed out. I bet you also spewed venom at the Harry Potter flicks b/c they didn't follow the books verbatim
0 Votes
+ -
Weapons
jmaximus9 9th Nov
Why is that they have nothing to waste those dinosaurs? Their weapons seem useless, even resorted to cross bow on last show. Also why the stupid Walmart walkie talkies?
0 Votes
+ -
Contributr
@jmaximus9 Right, you'd figure they'd have something such as Hellfire missiles. Any explosive or incendiary weaponry. Good old Phalanx guns even.
0 Votes
+ -
While I agree with what you say (as I have had my share of problems with the show itself) I have to wonder what people of the 1960's would say of us today. Didn't they expect us to have jetsons backpacks by now? And we went to the moon in 1969, and we still don't have a moon base yet? A lot of what you said doesn't only take technological know how - it takes a lot of money. What makes you think people 130 years from now should have all that fancy stuff if they are on a limited budget?
0 Votes
+ -
Contributr
@veggiedude They clearly demonstrated in the first episode in their future society what technology they have. It's pretty easy to extrapolate what supporting and related technologies have to exist or have existed to get them there. For example, single chip supercomputing is dependent on semiconductor manufacturing which is the same technology used to produced CMOS sensors that are used in digital cameras. If you can make a single chip supercomputer, you can make a 100,000 megapixel camera sensor that would be used for tracking of meterors or asteroids.
0 Votes
+ -
Come on. Do you have any idea how valuable dinosaur poop would be? A real title would be: "Why I prefer cat poop to Terra Nova"... not very optimized though is it? Hmm... maybe: "Why dinosaur poop can't possibly stink as badly as Terra Nova".
0 Votes
+ -
Contributr
@tristram42 Dinosaur poop is actually very valuable, it's called coprolite. The most fossilized ones can be turned into precious stones.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coprolite
0 Votes
+ -
For Kids. Pure family-friendly fantasy adventure.

I watch it because of the special effects. Kids can watch it because there is no overt stuff that parents wouldn't want them to, and maybe it will interest them in science. Consider the hour that it is broadcast. Watch this on a VCR so you can skip the commercials.

The first thing that I was concerned with was that if they went back 85 million years, they have 20 million years to get their act together and get back to earth in a hopefully brighter future before the meteor wipes them and the dinosaurs out. I suppose that is what Taylor's son Scott is trying to work out with his "magic box".
It's really a pretty hoky show. Ray Bradbury's "Sound of Thunder" captures the possible consequences of a mistep in the past.

The best recent Sci Fi fantasy shows I recall on Network TV (I don't watch the SCI FI channel) all of which were ultra violent (not for kids), and most never came to a satisfying conclusion were:
??? The Event: Good long-lived aliens among us.
??? V: Good and bad lizard aliens among us; a remake of earlier "golden age of sci fi" show.
??? Kings: Alternate reality or post apocalyptic future civilization that reinvents the biblical story of David and Saul with 21st century technology. Killed by insane scheduling.
??? Jericho: Post apocalyptic, family values, and the only series that was continued another season by viewer reaction to first season end. The only sequel could have been Civil War II.

IMHO the "golden age" of SCI FI shows (before cable) included Star Trek, Battlestar Galactica, Deep Space Nine, Babylon 5, The Starlost (a colony ship going to ????), Space 2001 (moon goes wandering due to nuclear waste explosion).
And those shows didn't have nearly the technical capabilities of today. Somewhere we have lost our way.
0 Votes
+ -
This is common for close to 100% of US science fiction - the military is running everything. One would believe that the military takes orders from the civilian authorities in the future (as in most democratic places today).

That top-down ruling with too-little-information-to-underlings (to make suspense) is killing lots of S/F shows; it doesn't feel natural. And don't get med started about the captain of a starship going on ground assault...
If they good guys in the show were realistically equipped and has realistic skills the show writers would have to think much harder to create difficulty for them every episode. Much easier this way. Remember you are watching TV you are not supposed to keep your brain on while doing it happy
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Why I prefer dinosaur poop to Terra Nova
1019902735 Updated - 11th Nov
Well, Jason, at least you continued to watch...I couldn't watch any more past the 46 minute mark of the pilot episode!

Oh well, at least I can still get sci-fi lite, ala Fringe, Warehouse 13, and Eureka (for now).
0 Votes
+ -
It wouldn't surprise me at all to find out that too much accuracy (especially in Science Fiction) was against the by-laws of the guilds that run Hollywood. Also, Terra Nova is one of those series that would have been better if they had just been given a fixed number of episodes to tell their tale. You can see that there are some good story ideas rattling around with too much filler and boilerplate. I am sure they felt that if the colony was too well thought out then the Screenwriting 101 style filler would be even more annoying. Since they want the series to run as long as possible they feel they can't have too much actual story happen because: 1.) they might not have it all thought out. 2.) If it gets renewed, then they would have to come up with something else, and 3.) If it gets as far as reruns or (ideally) syndication, they want to be able to show the episodes in any order they feel like.
0 Votes
+ -
This is ZDNet, not IMDB
Sun-W 12th Nov
Take your movie review somewhere. Not here.
@Sun-W: Nonsense. Where better to discuss the technical failings of the show than in a technical blog?
There are so few sic-fi shows on TV I'm ready to go brain numb and just watch them. As long as it rolls...

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix