ie8 fix
madison

HSBC loses data on 370,000 customers; violates security standards

By | April 8, 2008, 1:39pm PDT

Summary: HSBC, the UK’s largest bank, lost an unencrypted data disc containing the names and insurance information of 370,000 customers. HSBC sent the disc via unregistered postal mail because its usual method of secure electronic data transmission “wasn’t working.”

HSBC loses data on 370,000 customers; violates security standards

HSBC, the UK’s largest bank, lost an unencrypted data disc containing the names and insurance information of 370,000 customers. HSBC sent the disc via unregistered postal mail because its usual method of secure electronic data transmission “wasn’t working.”

Network World reports the bank’s response:

“The data, which was password-protected, includes names, life insurance cover levels, dates of birth and whether or not a customer smokes. There is nothing else that could in any way compromise a customer and there is no reason to suppose that the disc has fallen into the wrong hands,” the bank said in a statement.

“We don’t normally send information on hard copy, but usually send electronically through this secure network. But the system wasn’t working the day this information needed to be sent to the reinsurer.”

THE PROJECT FAILURES ANALYSIS

According to Forbes, HSBC is the world’s largest company, meaning it has the resources needed to properly secure customer data. As an axiom, unencrypted confidential data should never be sent through the mail.

The situation is particularly disturbing in light of a similar, and extremely well-publicized, incident at the UK Revenue & Customs (HMRC). In that case, 25 million names were lost when discs were also sent through the mail.

HSBC has demonstrated complete lack of regard for handling secure, confidential, and private customer data. I urge the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) to take swift and appropriate action against HSBC.

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Topics

Michael Krigsman is a recognized authority on the causes and prevention of IT failures.

Disclosure

Michael Krigsman

Michael Krigsman writes and speaks about technology in a manner that most observers consider to be fair and balanced. Michael believes that writing about IT failures, which often have complex causes, creates a unique obligation to be reasonable and accurate in both reporting and analysis.

Michael maintains active personal and professional relationships with enterprise technology buyers, vendors, analyst firms (or individual analysts), consultants, and system integrators. As CEO of Asuret, Michael sells and delivers paid services to members of these same groups.

Vendors regularly reimburse Michael's out-of-pocket travel expenses to attend industry conferences and events. Conference organizers frequently waive entry fees when Michael attends industry events. Michael often speaks at industry conferences and events.

He is a member of the Enterprise Irregulars, a loose association of consultants, investors, industry representatives, analysts, and users of enterprise software.

For daily updates on Michael's activities, follow him on Twitter.

Biography

Michael Krigsman

Michael Krigsman is CEO of Asuret, Inc., a consulting company dedicated to reducing technology implementation failures. Asuret's suite of software tools improve the success rate of enterprise software deployments by quantifying and measuring governance issues that cause most project failures. Michael led the research effort underlying Asuret's model of collective intelligence and its practical application to reducing IT failures in consulting environments. He is a recognized authority on the causes and prevention of IT failures and is frequently quoted in the press on IT project and related CIO issues. He is considered an enterprise software industry "influencer" and provides advice to technology buyers, vendors, and services firms.

Previously, Michael served as CEO of Cambridge Publications, which develops tools and processes for software implementations and related business practice automation projects. Michael has been involved with hundreds of software development projects, for companies ranging from small startups to Fortune 500 organizations. Michael graduated with an M.B.A. from Boston University and a B.A. from Bard College. He is a Board member of the America's Cup Hall of Fame and the Herreshoff Marine Museum in Bristol, RI.

Related Discussions on TechRepublic

Did you know you can take part in these discussions with your ZDNet membership?
20
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

RE: HSBC loses data on 370,000 customers; violates security standards
FDERIGGE@... 13th Apr 2008
I'm a customer and was never informed!
0 Votes
+ -
HSBC Has A Lot To Learn
Kromaethius 8th Apr 2008
Cripes, what a pack of idiots!

Some folks really should loose their jobs over this one not to mention maybe some civil action along with the company being held totally responcible and held accountable. Also I would recommend some serious security training on data and information. For HSBC, they need to start with the basics.

Evidently, it sounds like a secretary thought of this idea, or maybe someone in the mail room.
0 Votes
+ -
I suppose?

*Sigh*
0 Votes
+ -
More likely
Larry the Security Guy 9th Apr 2008
"Evidently, it sounds like a secretary thought of this idea, or maybe someone in the mail room."

More likely this was a decision made by someone in upper management (or an entire committee of non-technical dweebs) who grossly underestimated the value of the data.
Not sure about this. The facts don't square with what was reported yesterday where it was said an 'external courier' was involved.

ICO isn't in a position to take action. The FSA, to which the incident has been reported can take action.

Isn't it an exaggeration to say that HSBC has 'demonstrated a complete lack of regard for handling source information' when the facts have yet to be established and responsibility assigned?
0 Votes
+ -
be anything but "a complete lack of regard for handling source information"?
0 Votes
+ -
Contributr
HSBC acknowledged responsibility
mkrigsman@... 8th Apr 2008
They lost 370,000 names by sending an unencrypted disk through the mail. That defines irresponsible behavior in my view. It's absolutely not an exaggeration to call them to task in a serious way. Such behavior should be illegal.

The ICO establishes UK data information policy and should take steps.
0 Votes
+ -
Not quite right
dahowlett@... 8th Apr 2008
@Mike: The facts in this case are not clear. Therefore any conclusion at this stage has to be speculative.

You are not in a position to arbitrate what should or should not be legal in a foreign state, the laws of which you are not familiar, so to assert such is a stretch.

Unencrypted? Who knows - I've not seen any report that asserts that but I have seen reports that assert the disk was 'password protected.'

What you don't say but which is stated in other reports is that HSBC does not consider this loss as representing a significant risk for its customers based on the quantum of the information lost. I don't necessarily agree. Even so, HSBC has taken steps to protect customers. Another reported fact you have not acknowledged.

Surely the more pertinent topic is what constitutes risk in these circumstances and what should companies do to protect their customers in the event that a 3rd party acting on their behalf fails to deliver. On the basis of what I have read so far, HSBC has done everything it thinks it could. Whether that represents the best it *could* have done is another matter not touched upon in your discussion.

To the point about illegality etc, ICO recommends but has no powers to enforce in these circumstances. HSBC has reported to the FSA, as they are required to do. The FSA can levy sanctions. We should await their findings before pronouncing don't you think?
0 Votes
+ -
.
0 Votes
+ -
I encrypt data on 200 people
croberts 8th Apr 2008
Wow, I work for a small company and encrypt data on 200 people when dealing with outside consultants.

With readily available tools like even the basic AXCrypt there is absolutely no excuse to send any files plaintext.
0 Votes
+ -
Why HSBC would send a disc full of customers??? data unencrypted by post is anyone???s guess. What is certain is that HSBC will be fined for their negligence.

Here is my full analysis on the matter:
http://riskyops.blogspot.com/
0 Votes
+ -
Contributr
Great post!
mkrigsman@... 9th Apr 2008
Thanks for the write-up and analysis on your blog. I suggest anyone interested in this subject read it.
The cartoon has the stress lines in the shirt drawn incorrectly. It makes it look like the screw is being unscrewed as opposed to being screwed in. This is clearly a case of customers being screwed worse.
0 Votes
+ -
Any loss in not acceptable
dave@... 9th Apr 2008
Some years ago I designed some code to protect personal information of employees in foreign offices. Companies wanted to send specific employee information to cover most situations that could arise in remote locations.

The data was placed on CD and had multi levels of security. A generic password could get you to an employee picture, height, weight, blood type and specific health concerns. The password was common for all staff and could be easily accessed by any manager on site. The simple password, a 10 character alphanumeric password provided 7.3e18 combinations.

The more secure information such as home address, phone numbers, credit card information, finger prints, family names, alternate contacts, pass phrase in case of abduction was encrypted and required 2 people to come together to each provide one half of the password. However passwords at this level were unique to each employee. If head office provided their half it only allowed the remote office to open one employee's information. The rest were still secure. This provided 1.4e37 combinations. It would be easier to try to crack the RSA encryption at that point.

The point is, this was done for small offices with anywhere from 10 to 200 people. If the offices were ever compromised by a foreign government, like that's never happened, at least everything had been done to protect their employees and their families back home.

The point is is that we treated everything about the person, even just their picture, as confidential information. Companies such as TJX, HSBC, governments and many others need to stop treating this data like its just a commodity. Through one senseless act of cutting a corner, saving a couple of hours of computer time or whatever excuse to not encrypt some data you cause the waste of tens of thousands of hours of affected people. People who, on no fault of theirs, could be put through the stress of trying to get their life back if the information is used against them. Or just the worrying that their information was lost out there.

Now before anyone gets on their soap box and states that this case was unimportant information and that no one should be affected let me ask this. If the infomation lost contained anything about you, your spouse, your kids, would you feel the same way?? Considering how many companies have lost data through hacking, sending stuff through common mail or laptops stolen from cars you'd think companies would do everything to prevent this. They probably won't until they view our personal information as a priviledge to hold and take every precaution to protect.

Maybe ZDNET needs to have a web page of shame stating each company, how much and what type of data was lost and what they did to lose it. Also posting whatever fines they received would be good to know. That way people can go after the polticians if the fines are nothing more than a slap on the wrist.

Its time that companies were fined so much that it would be cheaper for them to implement some sort of encryption and protection.

Any bank can be broken into, any encryption can be broken IF you have enough time. We're not worrying about the NSA here but common crooks. Companies should be doing their best to make it as hard as possible.
People are living in a fantasy world if they think this is unusual. And if it only contains these four pieces of info then this loss is truly minor.

This is a big international bank. A crappy bank--I know this is my bank in the US.

Imagine how sloppy the 100,000 corporations are who aren't regulated by SEC and other government agencies.

I've worked for companies who the high end Financial officers thought it would be good to put their entire database of 30million customers (current and former) and all their financial knowledge about them on CDs and mailed them cross county once a month to 6 remote workers. The 6 remote workers were recently acquired from their primary competitor. There are so many things wrong with that... but if one of the highest ranking financial people in a company worth $400Million doesn't see anything wrong with that... how many other practices are already in place that are constantly risking exposure to customers.

Simple fact, most data is secure, because no one is actually trying to steal it.
1. Purchase a 4-8 GB USB memory stick.

2. Or, you can purchase a 300 GB SATA HDD with a USB
adaptor and power supply about $150.00 for both.

3. Download and install TrucCrypt (free).

4. Use TrueCrypt to encrypt and format the USB memory stick or the Hard Drive.

5. Once that is done, Your drive comes up as a regular volume in Windows Explorer. You can only access the volume if you use the password. Move files over to this protected volume and it will be impossible for anyone to identify the information. If you send other people the memory stick or hard drive, all they need to do is install the program and they have to get the proper password from you. It uses 128 bit encryption.
0 Votes
+ -
Message has been deleted.
pablo Dante Updated - 10th Apr 2008
What it's going on in the brain of HSBC people? Really. Securing information is now easier than ever. There are lot of ways to send large datasets encrypted, via physical medial or the internet, using Windows, Linux, Mac or your AS/400.

I really would like to know who decided to send the data unprotected... somebody find out and do an interview with the moron(s).

I still can't believe the lame excuse they gave.


Regards,

MV
0 Votes
+ -
THIS UK,CHINESE OR WHATEVER INSTITUTION THIS HSBC WANTS TO CALL THEMSELVES IS NOT LEARNING THE CURRENT LESSONS THAT THE U.S FINANCIAL CORPS ARE CURRENTLY UNDERGOING. JUST BECAUSE THEY THINK THEY CAN BUY OUT AS MANY U.S DOLLARS FOR AS LOW AS THEY CAN DOES NOT MEAN THEY CAN BE BE GREEDY WOLVES THEY THEY ARE TURNING OUT TO BE. I AM NOT SURPRISED THEY ARE FALTERING ON SECURITY MEASURES AS WELL. PERHAPS THEY SHOULD TRY TO GET THEIR CUSTOMER RELATIONS WORKING BY ACTUALLY STARTING TO LISTEN TO THEIR CUSTOMERS CONCERNS FIRST, THEN MAYBE THEY CAN FOCUS ON SECURING THE PEOPLE WHO TRUST THEM WITH THEIR "DOLLARS". DUNNO BOUT YOU BOUT " I'M PULLING OUT" ALL MY ACCOUNTS OF THIS SHEISTY WANNA BE BANK.
In my opinion that is a criminal offense and should be dealt with accordingly!
I'm a customer and was never informed!

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix
Click Here
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix
ie8 fix