ie8 fix
madison

Infor's misguided, anonymous referral program

By | December 23, 2010, 1:20pm PST

Summary: Infor’s anonymous referral program appears to undermine the foundation of trust between advisors and their clients.

Update 12/24/10: Infor canceled this program effective immediately. Details here.

Related: Infor cancels referral program

ERP vendor, Infor, announced a referral program encouraging consultants and other industry influencers to bring the company anonymous referrals in exchange for a 15 percent fee. This program appears to undermine the foundation of trust between advisors and their clients.

Here is the relevant section from Infor’s email annoucement (emphasis added):

This program creates new opportunities for industry influencers, independent sales professionals, and professional services firms, by letting you anonymously refer your clients to Infor for world class business software. In addition to getting up to a 15% referral fee for any company you refer to Infor that becomes an Infor customer, our referral partner program will allow you to offer more services and establish a long-term relationship with your clients and business associates.

The terms of use (core and supplementary) do specifically state that conflicts of interest are not acceptable:

Referring Company and you represent that submission of the Lead Registration Form does not violate any legal obligations to which Referring Company or you are subject, and that neither Referring Company nor you has any relationship with the Prospect or Infor, or any of their personnel, that creates or could create a conflict of interest.

However, in my view, these terms are disingenuous for two reasons:

  1. Since anonymous referrals are acceptable, the prospect has no opportunity to decide whether the referral violates a conflict of interest.
  2. The anonymous aspect obviously is intended to keep the referral hidden. If there is no real or perceived conflict, then secrecy is unnecessary. In other words, if everything is above board, then why hide?

Although I am sure Infor would disagree, this program seems designed to encourage influencers to take unfair advantage of their trusted position. The program may backfire, if some influencers seek to distance themselves from the company.

One research analyst, Hyoun Park, said he can no longer refer Infor and remain a “credible analyst:”

Top analyst, Naomi Bloom, called the program “creepy:”

Consultant and author, Vinnie Mirchandani, wrote:

This offer from Infor to earn referral fees for anonymously introducing them to potential customers has many industry analysts and influencers agape. It offends their sense of independence and the “anonymous” part goes against their desire for more transparency in technology markets.

ZDNet’s Editor-in-Chief, Larry Dignan, summarized the issue:

The key item there is the anonymous part. How is an influencer or consultant supposed to keep the best interest of his or her audience/customer if he’s collecting referral fees without disclosure?

Advice to Infor: This program represents poor judgment in the extreme; kill off the promise of anonymity now.

Advice for enterprise buyers: If a trusted advisor pushes you toward Infor, ask whether he or she is part of the anonymous referral program; if so, that person’s referral is suspect. Buyers should demand full disclosure from all trusted advisors.

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Topics

Michael Krigsman is a recognized authority on the causes and prevention of IT failures.

Disclosure

Michael Krigsman

Michael Krigsman writes and speaks about technology in a manner that most observers consider to be fair and balanced. Michael believes that writing about IT failures, which often have complex causes, creates a unique obligation to be reasonable and accurate in both reporting and analysis.

Michael maintains active personal and professional relationships with enterprise technology buyers, vendors, analyst firms (or individual analysts), consultants, and system integrators. As CEO of Asuret, Michael sells and delivers paid services to members of these same groups.

Vendors regularly reimburse Michael's out-of-pocket travel expenses to attend industry conferences and events. Conference organizers frequently waive entry fees when Michael attends industry events. Michael often speaks at industry conferences and events.

He is a member of the Enterprise Irregulars, a loose association of consultants, investors, industry representatives, analysts, and users of enterprise software.

For daily updates on Michael's activities, follow him on Twitter.

Biography

Michael Krigsman

Michael Krigsman is CEO of Asuret, Inc., a consulting company dedicated to reducing technology implementation failures. Asuret's suite of software tools improve the success rate of enterprise software deployments by quantifying and measuring governance issues that cause most project failures. Michael led the research effort underlying Asuret's model of collective intelligence and its practical application to reducing IT failures in consulting environments. He is a recognized authority on the causes and prevention of IT failures and is frequently quoted in the press on IT project and related CIO issues. He is considered an enterprise software industry "influencer" and provides advice to technology buyers, vendors, and services firms.

Previously, Michael served as CEO of Cambridge Publications, which develops tools and processes for software implementations and related business practice automation projects. Michael has been involved with hundreds of software development projects, for companies ranging from small startups to Fortune 500 organizations. Michael graduated with an M.B.A. from Boston University and a B.A. from Bard College. He is a Board member of the America's Cup Hall of Fame and the Herreshoff Marine Museum in Bristol, RI.

9
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

Contributr
RE: Infor's misguided, anonymous referral program
mkrigsman@... 25th Dec 2010
@elizab You are absolutely right, however, we should also give Infor credit for recognizing the problem and terminating the program so quickly.
0 Votes
+ -
Well, one way of reading this would be that anybody does it anyway, and Infor just wanted to advertise this kind of business happy
0 Votes
+ -
"trusted advisor" is redundant
josephmartins 23rd Dec 2010
Who in their right mind would keep as an advisor someone whom s/he doesn't trust? If you don't trust them, then you should probably ask yourself why you're soliciting their advice at all.

Regarding Infor, no credible analyst would take them up on that offer.
0 Votes
+ -
Infor's move imaginative, but Analysts beware!
REastman - SMB Research 23rd Dec 2010
This is an imaginative move on Infor's part. But I would be surprised if many influencers fall for this. Aside from the obvious fact that an influencer is risking their client's trust, and passing on/up a priceless opportunity to provide more value and service, the cloak of anonymity is a thin cloak indeed, and increasingly unfashionable in an industry where transparency seems a much better fit.
0 Votes
+ -
Another option of course, is for a Customer to approach Infor directly, and suggest that they include the 15% (and more !!) as a discount in any bids.
0 Votes
+ -
Contributr
@martin.english Hey that's a great idea!
0 Votes
+ -
from ERP implementations to software modifications. So have Epicor, SAP and Microsoft (Dynamics). Each of these has similar programs, but lacking the shady secretive nature of this one. I'm glad I don't do software sales, because this could wind up having a major negative impact in the marketplace.
0 Votes
+ -
Contributr
@jasonp@... Nothing wrong with reselling and referrals. As you said, the issue is the secretive nature of this one.
Having a hidden referral partner program is bad enough for the unwary buyer. It leaves the disclosure of such a relationship up to the ethics of the influencer.

By publicizing the anonymous referral program, Infor instantly made any recommendation by a third party to consider an Infor product suspect. Buyers wouldn't know whether a recommendation was motivated by the secret 15% referral fee or the product really being an appropriate fit.

Hopefully, any influencer who recommends a product or solution is upfront regarding any potential compensation or quid pro quo by a vendor.
0 Votes
+ -
Contributr
@elizab You are absolutely right, however, we should also give Infor credit for recognizing the problem and terminating the program so quickly.

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix
Click Here
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix
ie8 fix