ie8 fix
madison

Transparency, accountability, and IT success

By | September 14, 2010, 4:38am PDT

There is a clear link between transparency and accountability in preventing mismanagement, inefficiency, and waste. The bright light of day can have remarkable impact solving problems that lead to IT failure.

Lack of transparency is particularly acute on IT failures, many of which involve inefficiency and waste hidden behind closed doors.

Recognizing the importance of transparency, U.S. federal CIO, Vivek Kundra, introduced an IT dashboard to shine light on government projects.

Related: Federal gov’t gets serious about IT failures

In this video clip, Kundra describes the importance of transparency in reducing IT mismanagement and waste in the federal government. He discusses the dashboard’s role in stopping or terminating a variety of late and over-budget projects.

You must jump to point 13m 50sec to see the relevant section in this video.

Strategic Analysis

Preventing IT failure is difficult for many reasons. To start, business people sometimes do not fully apprehend the technology consequences of their strategic decisions. As a consequence, they make decisions divorced from practical realities of execution and delivery.

I discussed this point with prolific author and project guru, Ed Yourdon, who said:

In many cases you find projects that are doomed from day one, not because of poor technical capabilities in the IT department, but because of strategic misunderstandings or misalignments. Senior management never really understood what the true cost was going to be, or the IT department never told them what the true cost was going to be, and senior management never really provided the organizational support that was going to be necessary to make it all work.

Making matters worse, keen observer J.P. Rangaswami, describes an enterprise ecosystem where important participants thrive on inefficiency and waste:

Over the years I’ve carried this learning into somewhat different contexts, particularly when it comes to project management and delivery. You see, I felt it was reasonable to consider all inefficiency as waste. As a consequence, when I observed an inefficient practice at work, I tried to identify the ecosystem participants for that waste, the people whose livelihoods depend on that waste. Because they were the ones most likely to push back against any change in work practices and processes. All projects are fundamentally about change, and unless such immune-system agents are identified and taken into account, project failure is likely.

Transparency is one of the most effective methods for reducing waste and bringing success to initiatives or programs. Neither mismanagement nor conflicts of interest can long survive in open environments that combine clarity and accountability.

Achieving these goals is difficult for many organizations. However, mere awareness of the goal is a great starting point for discussions that may eventually result in positive change.

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Topics

Michael Krigsman is a recognized authority on the causes and prevention of IT failures.

Disclosure

Michael Krigsman

Michael Krigsman writes and speaks about technology in a manner that most observers consider to be fair and balanced. Michael believes that writing about IT failures, which often have complex causes, creates a unique obligation to be reasonable and accurate in both reporting and analysis.

Michael maintains active personal and professional relationships with enterprise technology buyers, vendors, analyst firms (or individual analysts), consultants, and system integrators. As CEO of Asuret, Michael sells and delivers paid services to members of these same groups.

Vendors regularly reimburse Michael's out-of-pocket travel expenses to attend industry conferences and events. Conference organizers frequently waive entry fees when Michael attends industry events. Michael often speaks at industry conferences and events.

He is a member of the Enterprise Irregulars, a loose association of consultants, investors, industry representatives, analysts, and users of enterprise software.

For daily updates on Michael's activities, follow him on Twitter.

Biography

Michael Krigsman

Michael Krigsman is CEO of Asuret, Inc., a consulting company dedicated to reducing technology implementation failures. Asuret's suite of software tools improve the success rate of enterprise software deployments by quantifying and measuring governance issues that cause most project failures. Michael led the research effort underlying Asuret's model of collective intelligence and its practical application to reducing IT failures in consulting environments. He is a recognized authority on the causes and prevention of IT failures and is frequently quoted in the press on IT project and related CIO issues. He is considered an enterprise software industry "influencer" and provides advice to technology buyers, vendors, and services firms.

Previously, Michael served as CEO of Cambridge Publications, which develops tools and processes for software implementations and related business practice automation projects. Michael has been involved with hundreds of software development projects, for companies ranging from small startups to Fortune 500 organizations. Michael graduated with an M.B.A. from Boston University and a B.A. from Bard College. He is a Board member of the America's Cup Hall of Fame and the Herreshoff Marine Museum in Bristol, RI.

2
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

RE: Transparency, accountability, and IT success
dougmelville@... 11th Oct 2010
Actually - there were plenty of IT failures 12 years ago, and 20 years ago. The type of failure just changes. Engineers tend to think that if the button works then it's a success without taking into account all the other stuff that actually goes to make a project work. Training, transition, change management, process re-engineering, stakeholder engagement etc.
0 Votes
+ -
Funny
soundcore 6th Oct 2010
But 12 years ago there were almost NO IT failures. What has changed is that businesspeople now run IT projects instead of engineers. And it's been a total disaster. Why do these MBAs and politicians with NO IT experience think they know what they are doing? Has Kundra ever even written code in his life? No, he hasn't. Get the morons out of the way and let the engineers run things again.
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Transparency, accountability, and IT success
dougmelville@... 11th Oct 2010
Actually - there were plenty of IT failures 12 years ago, and 20 years ago. The type of failure just changes. Engineers tend to think that if the button works then it's a success without taking into account all the other stuff that actually goes to make a project work. Training, transition, change management, process re-engineering, stakeholder engagement etc.

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix
Click Here
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix
ie8 fix