ie8 fix
madison

Cloud computing, so much more than multi-tenancy

By | December 9, 2009, 12:56pm PST

Summary: Who cares whether it’s multi-tenant, so long as it plugs your business into the global, real-time Web? Vendors should focus on what the cloud delivers that matters to business people, rather than lecturing them about the underlying technology.

I settled in for one of Marc Benioff’s legendary two-hour-long CloudForce keynotes in London yesterday morning (an abridged, snappier version of the nigh-on-three hour marathon delegates sat through at last month’s DreamForce, Benioff had assured me beforehand). As I listened, I thought about the role of multi-tenancy in cloud computing. The keynote hall was full of customers and prospects — a thousand or more altogether — and I’m guessing that, even though Salesforce.com always makes a big deal of multi-tenancy and how fundamental it is to cloud computing, very few of these business people really care what technology the platform is built on, so long as it delivers the goods.

I believe SaaS and cloud vendors have got to move beyond talking just about the technology and instead talk about what cloud computing delivers — which in any case will shift the conversation onto ground where the pureplay, multi-tenant cloud solutions are better placed to win the argument, for reasons I’ll come back to later in this post. The trouble with talking about multi-tenancy itself is that it draws you into an abstract debate with conventional software vendors over the relative merits of alternative deployment platforms for a given application. This immediately brings the debate onto their home ground — a place where applications are discrete, deployments happen as a batch process and you have to get the system up-and-running before you even start thinking about meeting the business requirement. That’s not where the cloud is at.

Right after saying the cloud is founded on multi-tenancy, Benioff adds, “Cloud computing is also a shift to real-time.” Rhetorically speaking, surely this is to put the technology cart in front of the horse? The driving, motive force behind customer adoption of cloud computing is the business need to be out there on the Web, interacting with their customers in real-time, having their fingers on the 24×7 global pulse of the market, able to react and respond instantly to changing competitive threats and opportunities. And how are they to do that if their business systems are cloistered somewhere off the Web, safely tucked away behind an enterprise firewall whose main purpose in life is to keep the Web at bay?

Cloud computing is far more than just multi-tenancy. The technology is core and it’s essential, but it’s not the whole story. What matters is a raft of capabilities and concepts that I prefer to group together under the umbrella term of ‘platform bandwidth’, all of them concerned with a cloud platform’s capacity for unremitting, uncapped and continuously improving web connectivity.

When evaluating a cloud platform, rather than starting with multi-tenancy, I’d suggest buyers check through the following list of questions:

  • Will it remain capable of sustaining high-bandwidth connectivity with all of your customers, suppliers, employees and other stakeholders, even at times of unexpected peak load?
  • Will it stay up-to-date with every new technology development (opportunity or threat) that emerges in the global Web ecosystem over the next days, weeks, months and years — without ever making you wait for your own implementation to catch up with the state-of-the-art?
  • Can you choose to participate in a community of other platform users, exchanging information and perhaps extensions and add-ons, all referencing — and ready to run on — the same shared infrastructure?
  • Will it give you freedom to connect to the widest potential range of third-party services available in the global Web, and to connect to the most popular of them over a shared integration infrastructure instead of having to custom-build your own?
  • Will you be able to access limitless capacity on-demand to meet all your computing needs and still only pay for what you use?
  • Will your provider monitor usage in real-time and continuously tune platform performance to ensure the infrastructure remains as secure, responsive and cost-effective as possible?

I defy anyone to build a cloud platform that can deliver all of the above without making it multi-tenant at every layer of the stack. But multi-tenancy is not enough on its own. Just as important are components such as: massive Web-facing bandwidth: an API that’s architected to interact with the widest possible spectrum of web resources; and an integrated operations and development team that’s committed to continuous enhancement of the platform to meet the constantly-evolving needs of its customer base. By focusing the debate on multi-tenancy rather than these wider considerations of platform bandwidth, we risk misleading our audience. This year, I’ve seen some vendors building multi-tenant architecture for deployment on-premise. I’ve seen others build single-tenant applications and deploy them to a multi-tenant infrastructure. Neither approach will equip their customers with business systems that allow them to compete and thrive in the real-time, always-on, fully connected, constantly evolving environment of the connected Web. Multi-tenancy is the foundation, but it can only deliver what customers today are looking for when it’s deployed in the full context of the Web itself.

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Topics

Since 1998, Phil Wainewright has been a thought leader in cloud computing as a blogger, analyst and consultant.

Disclosure

Phil Wainewright

Phil Wainewright's work as an independent consultant brings him into direct or indirect business relationships with several of the companies that he writes about, or their competitors. Phil is committed to maintaining the independent and opinionated stance that his writings are well known for and does not enter into contracts that would limit his freedom of expression in any way. However it is important in the interests of full disclosure to inform readers of those relationships so they can form their own judgement.

Read the complete list of Phil's relationships.

Biography

Phil Wainewright

Since 1998, Phil Wainewright has been a thought leader in cloud computing as a blogger, analyst and consultant. He founded pioneering website ASPnews.com, and later Loosely Coupled, which covered enterprise adoption of web services and SOA. As CEO of strategic consulting group Procullux Ventures, he has developed an evaluation framework to help ISVs and enterprises select cloud platforms, and advises US and European vendors on messaging, positioning and go-to-market. His newest role as an industry advocate is vice-president of EuroCloud.

18
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

RE: Cloud computing, so much more than multi-tenancy
JACOBSONR 14th Oct
Good day to confirm this comment I would appreciate T h e b e s t o f Z D N e t d e l i v e r e d your website very nice to everyone Yes, Oracle is the only one with shared-disk architecture, but that is there advantage. It means you can add or remove nodes and the database lives on. In a shared nothing architecture, if you lose a node, you lose the system. I'm sure Oracle appreciates EMC highlighting their advantage.I also desire to signal in your RSS feeds. Thank you as soon as once again and maintain up the great operate Awesome post! Thank you very much || thanks for nice content this is really benefit to me.
0 Votes
+ -
Wow
happyharry_z 9th Dec 2009
Can anyone else smell that? If I was playing BS bingo, this article would have
been a winner!
0 Votes
+ -
NT
0 Votes
+ -
My belief is that if it's it not multitenant, it's not
really SaaS:

http://cloudintegration.wordpress.com/2009/11/06/if-
its-not-multitenant-its-not-really-saas/

Simply hosting software that was built to run on
premise on Amazon is a useful IT infrastructure
deployment option, but it's not true SaaS.

Having worked for a vendor that was single tenant, I
saw first hand the challenges of managing,
maintaining, and upgrading hundreds of trial and
production servers. While much of this was transparent
to customers and prospects, ultimately the costs were
passed down to customers.

With every vendor now trying to jump on the Cloud
bandwagon, it's never been more important to highlight
the importance of mulitenancy and to zero in on the
customer benefits in terms of online trials with zero
sales intervention, rapid implementation, ease of use,
automatic upgrades, frequent releases, community
sharing, etc., etc.

The challenge is to help customers choose the right
solution (that is multitenant) without having to get
into the architecture weeds with a business audience
that is looking for a vendor who can solve their
problem.
0 Votes
+ -
Agreed - dated "controversy".
Jasonlk 10th Dec 2009
Agreed 100%. While it's a valid point if you are just
talking about competing with Oracle, as you noted,
there's a huge and entire category of apps that can ONLY
be multitenant to work. E.g., Google. Salesforce (for
AppExchange and Force.com to really work). Just for
starters. So this concept, like "no software", is a bit
dated b/c the argument has been "won" wink
0 Votes
+ -
I agree with Phil. I've been guilty in the past of getting my customers mired down in the characteristics of multi- tenancy primarily in an effort to help them understand why hosted services weren't the same.

But discussing multi-tenancy plays into the hands of the cloud pundits who want to drive the discussion back to the technical considerations for cloud in the first place as opposed to the clear and obvious business advantages that are available for those who would redeploy their IT systems today.

Dave Rice, CEO
TrueCloud
0 Votes
+ -
I don't think it's so much that "multi-tenancy" is too
abstract a point for people to grasp....it's just that to the
user it's irrelevant in the main. Where multi-tenancy may
become relevant is when we move to the core of a
corporation's business (away from fringe operations like
CRM and ERP). Some companies will be averse to multi-
tenancy because of *perceived* potential security concerns.
("Platform bandwidth" is too vague and even more abstract.
I don't think the term would help as it has too many
connotations, in IMHO.
0 Votes
+ -
Fringe Ops
michaelperla@... 12th Dec 2009
I wonder if you can expand on CRM and ERP being "fringe operations." ... hard to believe that the front-offce and back-office stacks are fringe ... sales, finance, marketing, talent, etc. I might be missing something.

Thanks.
Phil

One of the key innovations in Salesforce.com and most other SaaS vendors was the concept of "Configuration - not - customization". As a certified Siebel Administrator and a user of Salesforce.com Admin, I can't even begin to describe this innovation. It is amazing to see Sales Operations managers - even sales managers administer salesforce.com through simple point and click configurations and do amazing things.

Of course multi-tenancy is a big part. During Dreamforce, I attended Craig Weisman's talk (CTO @ SFDC) who described the multi-tenant kernel and the very interesting computing challenges that they overcame. He mentioned that all of SFDC customers run up about 235 million transactions every day.

Multi-tenancy and running on a single version of the code makes it possible to make the software easy to use by adding point and click configuration.

Unless both multi-tenancy and configuration capabilities are delivered, it is hard to create a SaaS offering that drive adoption.

--Ajay D.
0 Votes
+ -
What is Value?
dtyler99 15th Dec 2009
Deriving value from expanded platform capabilities is a McGuffin, multi-tenancy or not. The how is totally irrelevant. Value is derived from a) being able to do something you haven't been able to do before at acceptable cost or b) doing something that you do today better and/or at a lower cost. That is what customers care about. If you can do that with Cloud or SaaS (easier), Open Source or On Premise (much harder) then customers will vote with their wallets.
Phil, You are right and I like your argument. But to stop
speaking about MT is to concede that all solutions are equal.
Single tenant is making an attempt to blur the distinction and
therefore lock in customers for an extended time. Only a
vigorous debate about the merits of MT/ST, along with your
suggestions, win the day.
Denis Pombriant
I also desire to signal in your RSS feeds. Thank you as soon as once again and maintain up the great operate! nccma cooler
I used to be more than happy to seek out this internet-site.I wanted to thanks in your time for this glorious read!! I positively enjoying each little bit of it and I have you bookmarked to check out new stuff you weblog post. this thread is amazing i like your work and i appreciate you that you have share a useful stuff thanks for sharing the i shop abatwa
I used to be more than happy to seek out this internet-site.I wanted to thanks in your time for this glorious read!! I positively enjoying each little bit of it and I have you bookmarked to check out new stuff you weblog post.Bookmarking now thanks please consider a follow up post. power sa shop
I think the representation of this article is actually superb one. This is my first visit to your site. Thanks a lot and keep sharing the information. Keep updating the information for all of us. Thanks ZDNet Government was launched as the brand's first industry vertical, with a mission to cater to IT professionals in the public secto I agree with your post. However, do you have any sources I can cite for my paper wheel car com bury
Well welcome, hopefully you can become a vital member of the community and really help to push far ahead of google. Which Im sure the development team would love. This will of course earn you alot points too and get you on the leaders board. z d n e t t h a n k Im not sure i come to an agreement with you on every level, howevor it absolutely was a good posting, many thanks for taking the time to put up your ideas.
Thanks nice info z d n e t I really liked your current article write more..let me add you to its favorite The articles you have on zdnet s i t e are always so enjoyable to read. Good work and I bookmarked it.
Fantastic news about the new release.I positively enjoying each little bit of it and I have you b o o k m a r k e d to check out new stuff you weblog post.Im not sure i come to an agreement with you on every level, howevor it absolutely was a good posting, many thanks for taking the time to put up your ideas
Good day to confirm this comment I would appreciate T h e b e s t o f Z D N e t d e l i v e r e d your website very nice to everyone Yes, Oracle is the only one with shared-disk architecture, but that is there advantage. It means you can add or remove nodes and the database lives on. In a shared nothing architecture, if you lose a node, you lose the system. I'm sure Oracle appreciates EMC highlighting their advantage.I also desire to signal in your RSS feeds. Thank you as soon as once again and maintain up the great operate Awesome post! Thank you very much || thanks for nice content this is really benefit to me.

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix
Click Here
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix
ie8 fix